Видео

Beautiful. If I were to attend a performance of this I know that my heart would ache for a long time... Anyways can't wait to hear more of this suite.

Me suena un poco a Bach

Excellent score mate!

sounds wonderful

Glad to see you out here still composing. Keep up the great work!

Very scholarly played, like a well-prepared student, very pretty.

this is a famous piece beautifully performed 🤗

Episode 144 of Intermezzo with Arik. There were around 480 episodes which aired from 2003 - 2019, so I guess this was around 2007

Including going fast, improvising is excellent. what a wonderful performance definitely best

Barenboim is the best pianist ever

Robert Levin true genius of fortepiano. His Mozart is stunningly beautiful!

Your understanding of harmony and intervals is very good. Also no mistakes. So hats off🎉🎉.

Genius piano soloist. An artist of high calibre!

Second movement is full of pathos, and folks have galls to call him facile.

I'm most curious about what Mozart does in 1:23-1:24 sounds like a break in rhythm.

Mozart's prophetic lyrical style. No one developed his legacy.

I love Mozart. Some of his childhood works like Thamos King of egypt, piano sonata no 2 show that he already developed a mature style. The harmonies and chromaticisms in Kv 138 looks 200 years into the future. These are the teenage works. That time he just wrote what he felt.

Once you get Mozart's emotion aside from the sensuous intellectual edge, it becomes all the more glorious.

Sorry, this is not even close to Richter's interpretation. Barenboim is missing the "big picture." In fact, I find this performance boring--really dull--partly because of the slow tempo but also the lack of sparkle.

neither theory is right

I'm rather puzzled by this sonata. I haven't over the years followed Mozart's music closely, as he is not one of my very favourite composers - but this sonata seems new to me, appears to be a new addition to the canon of Mozart sonatas. When I was a boy, I had a Schirmer edition of 19 sonatas by Mozart which I naturally took to be the canon of Mozart sonatas, similar to the two volumes I had of the Beethoven 32 sonatas, and it never occurred to me that the situation with Mozart's sonatas might turn out not to be so fixed as it was with Beethoven's sonatas. For a start, I later learned that there was more than one ordering of Mozart's sonatas, and the ordering in my edition (which sonata was no. 1, which no. 2, and so on) appeared to be less standard. Next, I learned that the sonata no. 19 in my volume was not by Mozart at all, but probably by August Eberhard Müller. (I should have been suspicious of the sonata. It was the only one which had four movements, and its last movement modulates to distant keys - long enough to change key signatures a few times - in a way that Mozart seemingly never does in any of the other sonatas.) And I think another sonata disappeared from what I believed to be the canon, although I don't quite remember why - I think it was along the lines that it was discovered to have simply been cobbled together by someone from various other works Mozart had written, not for piano, and arranged into a piano sonata. Now I come upon this Sonata no. 17, and it is not familiar to me, and I am wondering where it has come from. And since the number of sonatas is still 18 (after the sonata by Müller was dropped), surely that must mean that another sonata has also been dropped from the canon. Which one? As I mentioned, it seemed when I was much younger that there were (at least) two different orderings of the sonatas. Is this still the case, or is there just one ordering of the sonatas that is accepted today? If anyone familiar with the history of Mozart's piano sonatas could please explain this to me, I would be glad. But overall, it seems to be much less clear what Mozart did and didn't write than it is for Beethoven, with whom I can think of only one or two small examples of works possibly by him, but it's not certain.

The piece was played so well by Robert Levin, why the hell does it get 400 views only?

Sublime

1- 00:08 2 - I - 5:37; II - 7:01 3 - 9:31

You're in good hands with this guy

Cool.

Is it an error in the original recording or something that makes the 3rd movement sound like the first note is cut off a little?

Genius.

Now THAT is genius!

Possibly the worst performance I have ever heard

9:53 loved this fughetta. I will play this!

Quite interesting, I like the orchestration here.

Really well done! I thought the orchestration was super interesting and I liked how you employed each of the instruments. I though this was a very well put together work.

Wow! It's insane how much more views this video got than any of previous ones!

Whose great painting is that, perhaps a Turner orWinslow

Marvelous mastery! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🎹

Get a proper piano. With a digital piano you will develop wrong touch by practicing this technical piece. More harm than good.

¡Muchas gracias, Maestro Barenboim!

Yeah, and Chopin had a broken metronome, Czerny had a broken metronome, Liszt had a broken metronome, Brahms had a broken metronome, Schumann had a broken metronome, Schubert had a broken metronome, Moscheles had a broken metronome, etc. Doesn't there come a point where waggling out the broken metronome excuse just becomes ridiculous?

Wenn das Klavier nicht so unglaublich scheppern würde wäre es eine tolle Aufnahme. Schade.

Really great work!

nice work :)

Listening to this I have felt it... the touch of a great composer

we eatin' good tonight!

0:00 1. Allegro 6:37 2. Andante 13:12 3. Allegro

I tought this is a joke, then I realised its a channel I follow, good job man!

Whose interpretation of this piece do you like best?

W