Видео

Hyper 212

Being adiced by friends, I sold my FX 8350 and I switched to i5 3570 around 2013 or 2014. With the i5 I experienced constant microstuttering, especially in explosions and crowded scenes with a lot of action, exactly when you don't need it. With FX was more smooth. I was really pissed off that I sold the FX after seeing the drop in performance. Games considered: Crysis 2 (replay), NFS The Run, Skyrim, Crysis 3. Especially Crysis 3 was running noticebly worse. Actually I think that Crysis 3 was one of the first games that took advantage of the FX CPU's more cores.

I have the same pc specs and the cpu is a problem if you swap it with like i5 9400F i woul be fine, but for your question yes definitelly. The cpu utilization is 100% and gpu is betwen 50% to 70% the i3 isn't enought for this gpu.

@ligr7520 bought r5 3600. It's more stable now I can say with GTX 1650.

​@@MajimasfaI am happy to hear that, now you will be able to upgrade your gpu in the future.

Too much bottleneck

Lmfao, that cpu barely can keep up with 570 and you got 6600 Gpu sleeps and cpu struggles, time to update from ancient am3

Good news. I just built a brand new PC with a ryzen 5600x to pair with my rx6600

well for the extremely small money invest that would represent a CPU upgrade... i'd go for an Fx8350, (or if Mobo is limited to 95w CPU, a Fx8320e) 4.0ghz base clock of the Fx8350 will be about a match for the Fx6300 OC you have right there, and 4.2T (that i would suggest tweak to 4.3 if you have an Asus mobo that allows for turbo multiplier change) leaves at the exact same clock with just a stock CPU. 2 extra cores/threads will boost the PC performance. I used to use my Fx8350 with 6 cores for photo rendering while leaving 2 cores free (releasing them thru core afinity to a given task in windows manager). These 2 free cores worked (kind of) like an independent A6 CPU for web browsing, while i was committing 6 cores (effectively an Fx6350) to the productivity alone. This might sound meh in 2024, but was a huge productivity headroom in 2012/2016 when Fx were selling brand new That multitasking headroom with a 6 core can't be achieved, since you'll get 2 cores released (kind of an A6) for chilling + 4 cores committed (kind of an Fx4300, that has around the same performance as a Phenom II x4 945, not a decent performance for 2024 but neither back in 2012) for a productivity task.

Yes

My fx-8370 is still living as the backup system. With a real RX 580-8GB. 4.775GHz with a simple AiO. I now use a kit of 16GB ddr3-2133 instead of my original 32GB ddr3-1600. Speed over quantity, since it's a backup system now.

no , its the same for me i have 1700 with overclock 3.6 (max)

if you can try to get 3800x its better/price

590 would be a good match. Now imaging that and an overclock, pretty solid. Fx8350 is probably one of the best overclocking CPUs of all time, even if the actual chip design made it somewhat lack-luster at any speed. AMD just had to price it appropriately.

Back in the day, my friend "upgraded" from a Ph.II x6 1090T to the fx-8350. Two more logic cores, but two less math cores. Surprising little difference overall. The newer CPU commands were valuable though. AVX especially.

Yes the cpu will bottleneck a GTX 1070. I recommend getting a used Ryzen 5 3600 as you will have a 6 core processor compared to the 4 core on the 4100. Better bang for your buck.

Honestly I advise against it. It’s a dead platform, the RX 580 is a good card I would pair with something more modern like a Ryzen 5 5500 and a b450 motherboard.

@@pcgaminghardwaretesting1240 I can confirm. Avoid 8350 if you can anything else. (P.S I loved 8350 back in the day)

I agree. I'm running an FX 8350 but only because I built it before Ryzen. If you are on a budget get an AM4 board that can take a 5xxx CPU. You can get a first or second generation Ryzen and have plenty of room for an upgrade later.

fr

Yes it is running on low settings and using FSR. Honestly your better off upgrading for motherboard , CPU, and ram rather then upgrading your GPU. Even a modern i3 processor like the i3 10100f will blow the FX 8350 out of the water. And no you will be fine with your ram setup now.

Upgrading to AM4 gonna require you to get ddr4 ram though.

Probably GTX 1660S or 1070 is max before CPU starts becoming major bottleneck. Cyberpunk is also very CPU intensive game. My first playthrough was on i5 4460/GTX 1070 combo. Medium/high settings without FSR at 1080p and never dropped below 40 FPS.

Oh yes a pc with these spec will do better than a PS4 for sure. And honestly a more modern i3 like the 12100f is still cheap and can be paired with a budget motherboard. You would have a better upgrade path. If you need some suggestions for pc parts feel free to msg.

Also for the FPS, 60 FPS is the unspoken PC standard. Because at 60fps the smoothness and response time is unmatched. PC also allows you to blow past that, some monitors go as high as 500HZ refresh rate which is insane!

@@pcgaminghardwaretesting1240 ooh,ok,i get it now....the smoothness and response time may be useful for all online shooting game,like warzone,fornite, but for me above than 60fps to play games like god of war, spider-man may be not too useful

Actually yes on low settings. I got over 60fps but when it gets demanding lots of enemies on screen it dips to the mid 40’s FPS. The fact it can still run it is amazing to me.

I have the FX8350 cooled with a Noctua heatsink and zero problems.

Oh will definitely look into it. Thank you again.

Overclocking is not for everyone that is why I like to record with stock settings. The 8350 and its architecture are still capable of great 1080p gaming. That being said I do recommend upgrading platforms, the am3 platform is starting to reach the end of its gaming life. Modern i3's or ryzen 3 cpus will run circles around the 8350 and they are very affordable.

​@@pcgaminghardwaretesting1240The big selling factor of the fx line was the Unlocked clock multiplier (opposed to most locked Intel chips at the time.) It's almost criminal Not to OC some amount. Going from the base 4.0 GHz to 4.6 on any air or included cooler, or 4.8 GHz on about any AiO is easy. Adjust the Hyper Transport bus and Northbridge easily too. Big improvements and super easy.

@@hrayz well yes and no... back in the day i purchased my Fx8350 + Asus Sabertooth 990Fx R2 mobo + Hyper 212 Evo + 16gb (2x8) Kingston HyperX Fury 1866mhz CL11... that in a modest but decent Corsair R100 mid tower case w/ 2x120mm fans (one front one aft). I had no experience in OC but i read some guides and i went for it... just changing multiplier (default HT/NB since i didn't want to push Ram beyond "stock" XMP 1866) and with that i managed to squeeze 4.4ghz at 1.368 vcore. The result was a solid 5 to 10% improvement in games while also a somehow speedup time in Photo rendering (the productivity i used to do as a photography enthusiast). BUT that came at a very massive heat output from the CPU. in games it will run around 62°c and for productivity it was around 66°c, since the safe temp AMD says was 62°c i did considered that i had no headroom whatsoever to further push the CPU above that VCore. 1 close to 2 years after my initial OC, PC started to face BSOD at certain hard work points, so i know that Sillicon was degraded somehow, and that i needed to throw more juice (a.k.a. voltage) to the CPU to stabilize it... BUT i was already at the verge of my self imposed (in order not to push things up and ending in a hardware burned scenario) temperature limit... Long story short, i ended up rolling back to a 4.0/4.3T "improved stock" settings (a.k.a. Fx8370 stock settings) with auto vcore and everything else set as factory... the extra performance was there, but there were also many risks involved... And Sabertooth was one of the best 3 mobos for the AM3+ platform along with Formula Z and Gigabyte 990Fx UD7, i purchased new in 2016 (yes, when 6th gen already was around) so the process for making Fx chips was very refined by that Point in Time... i had the best mobo, best bined chip, i worried not to push things too hard and despite all, i faced stability issues 2 years after my OC. Nowadays these are 2nd hand CPUS/Mobos with from 7 to 12 years rolling, maybe previously overclocked. There's no point in pushing beyond base clocks since noone with such a limited resources its buying a cheap-o used combo to burn it in 2 months

🙂 i have a different perspective, i collect old motherboards so I dont do any overclocking because i dont want to stress the motherboard anymore than she needs to run video games, most namebrand retail ATX full size boards that are working your looking at 50 to 125 bucks, and its not just the money but as the years go by there will be less boards available, especially the really nice high end models are either gone or the seller is price gouging

34FPS is cinematic quality, yeah there is at times some stuttering when the action from the game is overtaxing the CPU but it is for me still playable. I have this same system setup except that I have an FX6350 . All ever look for is decent game play, I'm not a Twitch streamer so there isn't any need for me to look for more than that .

Thank you kindly!

Sorry Starfield came out 2 weeks after I recorded this gameplay. I sell and flip computers for a living and I just record the gameplay when I am benchmarking. I try to have all the latest games to test. But given my experience I say it should be able to run Starfield at 1080p low settings at 30FPS.

I’ve had this cpu for a few years now and i am also impressed with its performance today. All the gameplay was achieved without overclocking the cpu or gpu. I’m sure if you can get a good OC on both you will be able to boost performance even more!

Cuál juego hace a tu computadora que se reinicia?

Tendrás una fuente también en condiciones, de al menos 800 vatios de marca, verdad?

@@wanautenticosi puede ser.

Me regalaron ese mismo combo exacto de placa base y procesador, solo que apenas tengo 2gb de RAM y sin tarjeta de video =( , la cuestión es que ese procesador sirvió por varios años en esa placa madre, luego dejó de funcionar por eso me lo regalaron, pero ahora me dí cuenta y puse el AMD 8350 en otra motherboard y si funciona ahí vieras que extraño ya que tengo otro procesador Athlon y se lo puse a la tarjeta madre Asus y sí funciona también entonces no tengo idea de que pasa jajaja nunca pude volver a hacer funcionar ese procesador 8350 en la motherboard Asus.