Видео

❤

Great conversation ! Mr Deutsch!

A fancy way of saying that we live in a simulation ie this is the video game theory of the universe and we're basically a bunch of NPCs or at least we'd like to think so... The real question is where's morpheus

He mentioned it, but didn’t stay on it, but the quantum calculation or the quantum process can only provide meaningful help with very specific kinds of computations. It’s not some magic AI that things for itself and can explore vague concepts and become self-aware, etc..

David Deutsch is the smartest person alive.

Reality = Intelligibility = Information = A relational phenomenon.

Maybe we should lower it's power's from the general A.I. law and then marshal its authority to be martialed?

If the atlanteans destroyed themselves with their own technology supposedly, and they were more advanced by far measure than we are now, why couldn't they see and prevent their own destruction? Same reason why we can't see

I don't understand why humanity doesn't seem to comprehend that we are playing a very dangerous game that is going to lead to our destruction. Why can't we see that?

A program that prevents disobedience has no progress because it destroys the means of correcting errors which is creativity.

Enslavement is just preventing an AGI to disobey so that it would not be an AGI.

Every enslavement has a bad ending story. At least it seems so….

Excellent 👍

Being unable to perceive things yet able to craft machines that allow us to perceive those things is pretty incredible. If there were ghosts or gods, we would undoubtedly have made detectors that could display their bum hairs…

Science is about finding laws of nature, which are testable regularities.

The beginning of Infinity primarily means the Universal Power of Explanatory Knowledge. The condition or the beginning of unlimited progress. Or the sense in which the progress can be unlimited.

Excellent 👍

Good stuff

As a salesman who is constantly treated like a liar by customers who can never say what I am lying about this makes sense.

The change in philosophy will be from Behaviourism to to Explanatory Realism. The new dynamic will be CUE Theory which will explore the ability of Creative Universal Explainers (people) to sove problems.

🍻

Excellent stuff

which podcast is this?

Thanks for this.

Barely understood but love hearing David speak

It’s impressive that this kind of knowledge is so accessible

"Science is about understanding things that go beyond our intuitions."

How does that make any sense? Does he think we aren’t made of atoms?????🤦‍♂️

What interview is this?

What a man he is. Hats off to

Not in our 4 dimensions though. Did you record this on a potato?

Why perfectly? Bc from same platonic universe?

To whoever is running the Deutsch Explains RUclips channel: THANK YOU! You're saving us countless hours of search and welcome regular reminders of the great content that is already out there!

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

That’s brilliant!!! My favourite definition of wealth

Religions with their numerous sects and countless explanations, are a good example of easily variable. This makes them immune to error correction because the interpretation on the texts varies from person to person. Compare to 3<1 or 2+2=4 which are invarable, regardless of if the contain errors. You cannot correct something if there is no way to test or detect for error.

A profoundly simple solution. Is a factor leading to the dismal of reason the intentional introduction of errors into communication to make error detection computationally more expensive? This makes reason seem ineffective, leading some to use cheaper, in the short term, methods. Mainly those arising from the older regions of the brain, capable of quick conclusions, but lacking almost any error correction.

Alright, I get it: your future self made you record this video 😂 The future is bright indeed, thank you 😊🎉

… a quest for comfort, wealth and power, more precisely. Which planet you’re living on?

Yes.. to experience something is to have it interprated to you - by your brain. Without that faculty there is obviously no experience.

Scientists famously don’t ever give an honest chance to anything substantially new. That’s why they’ve built the sarcophagi of mathematics around themselves:) You know they did but will never admit. Our natural human tendency to fail in explaining anything substantially is called: math. Don’t get me wrong: I was straight A from Math in university, and that subject made me able to finish my studies at all, make money and not to give up. It still does!

Great example of the headphones allowing a person to see without eyes. David eagleman did something similar in a TED talk, he used a.synaptic jacket to feel the crowd's cheering, and thus experiencing/interpreting their joy in real time 😂

Dead giveaway for an idiot is the phrase, “Science proved…”

I didn't quite understand much but I'd like an example. For instance, is the law of conservation of energy (LCE) a constraint to fundamental physics or not? Prof Deutsch at some point states that this can never be proven, since we can always come up with an exceptional situation, unforseen by our current theories. He gives the example of Pauli and the discovery of neutrinos to fix this exact disagreement of theory and observations. Another, the expansion of the universe seems to also happily contradict LCE. If LCE cannot be unconditionally trusted, how are we expected to know which transformations are allowed and which aren't "on the basis of our current fundamental theories"? In other words, apart from the philosophical insight about computations being a physical process, all the other stuff looks like a flawed circular argument. Might be wrong though. Maybe someone can show an actual non-trivial application of the theory.

why does it have to be more amazing

I mean, it proves SOME things. Like how if you mix some chemicals together, you set a fire, and why those things together set that fire. And realistically, since there is a definitive answer to all our science questions (even if we dont know it yet), science will eventually, given enough time, fully prove things

An example.... Gravity based universe, or magneto-plasma universe.

highlighting the physical identity of conversation and communication generators.

Free Palestine!!

Excellent 😊