Видео

Underrated and under appreciated

Pretty rad

let me cop fr

Terrible narrator. Terrible facts.

Awesome Video. I just love this tank. Just imagine a modern Drone versions with the 50 cal heavy mashinegun.

That looks like an RL cab on a MK body. Also the RL was replaced by the MK not the TK.

Who came here cause of Ian? 😁

AI Garbage yet again full of contradictions and inaccuracies

Only 8200 😂 Germany's whole output of tanks (all types tank destroyers, mobile artillery , recon vechicles etc was only just shy of 50000- 00 in total!

Can someone make a 3d printable replica?

I love these videos about guns when who ever created it knows nothing about guns.

Wrong. LZ 114 was never suposed to bomb America

Seeing action right now in Ukraine 🤘.

From belgium;daar heb ik mee gereden in belgisch leger,lk vond 't de mooiste kamion ooit en als je ermee KON ryden was het n hele eer en belevenis in 1975

This video presents so much false information that it should be deleted! Comments and Corrections: (1) The L-5 was widely used in the European and Asian theaters as well as in the Pacific theater of war. (2) It was nicknamed "Flying Jeep", not "Air Jeep" (3) "This aircraft did not look handsome..." Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and many would disagree. (4) "... and did not appear on the front lines, so not many people knew about it" That is a completely FALSE statement! (5) The U.S. military took note of the Fieseler Storch in 1937 and initiated the development of a similar aircraft more than six months before the Sorch was demonstrated at the Cleveland Air Races. (6) The performance of the Stinson L-1 did NOT lag behind the German Fi-156 Storch. The reason why the L-2, L-3 and L-4 were adopted was low cost. The reason why the L-5 was adopted was better performance and stronger construction than those three types, and it was 1/3 the cost of an L-1. (7) The YO-54 was a stock civilian Stinson Model 10. While six were procured by the U.S. military in 1940 (not 1942), they were deemed unsuitable for Army liaison work during field testing and were thoroughly rejected. They had nothing at all to do with the development of the L-5 which first flew as the Stinson Model 76 in June 1941. THERE WAS NO CIVILIAN VERSION. (8) The L-5 has a conventional (tailwheel) landing gear, not a "tricycle" type that utilizes a nosewheel. (9) The ambulance version with the enlarged fuselage began production in June 1944 as the L-5B. All subsequent models (C, E, and G) were also ambulance versions. (10) The aircraft was powered by a Lycoming O-435, not an O-453. (11) There was no L-5A. It was a proposed variant that was never produced. (12) The maximum speed of the 185 hp L-5 in level flight is 205 kph, not 169, which is the normal cruising speed. The only subsequent model with more horsepower was the L-5G with 190 hp which did not have a faster climb rate or cruise speed. (13) The wingspan is 10.7 meters, not 10 meters. (14) The L-5 was not developed into a reconnaissance aircraft or a glider. Only a small number were equipped with skis and pontoons. (15) The L-5 and its variants were not used by the U.S. Navy until after WWII and it was not used for maritime patrols along the east coast of the United States. It did not participate in anti-submarine work and was not equipped with 100# bombs. The scriptwriter has confused the Stinson L-5 with the Stinson 10A Voyager - a completely different aircraft! The 10As used for coastal patrol did not sink any submarines (16) The L-5 was used extensively in the China-Burma-India theater (CBI) to support Chinese and British Commonwealth ground troops. not the Chinese Air Force, which effectively did not exist because it was destroyed by the Japanese before America entered the war. SUMMARY - EPIC FAIL!

Very informative, however many of the video clips are out of sync with the robot voice. ie. When talking about the RAF Mosquitto Tetsi, you are showing images of he naval 6 pounder mounting.

Buatan Rusia

Антонов был гений.

Great design. Too bad it was never given the chance to prove itself.

What is old is New

CAC would have had more lucky getting a powerplant out of the Axis. The airframe was ready a long time before the war ended. The project was getting screwed around on the engine and that pushed things out until 1946 before it took to the air. Should have sacrificed a few of those Mustangs for the Merlin and Allison engines and got the CA15 into the air sooner.

M28 and M29 were never armored. The two vehicles had different suspensions, but could carry as many as 4 people.

I just got this on Warthunder and it is a shame that so many armoured vehicles of the Eastern Front are overlooked because they seem to have had many interesting designs. For a scouting role, this seems like a good choice though just two crew members means that is a hell of an overworked sod in the turret. Three man would have been better so someone could operate the radio while the commander directs the driver, preferably avoiding a fight.

Poorly researched production with mean factual inacuaseys. along with incorrect images . As far as I'm aware Germany did not produce any ant tank tungsten core ammunition during WW2 as this metal was in very sort supply and was restricted for use in machine tools

Edited by a two year old .

the QF 3.7" How also featured incremented rifling. So more spin, more accuracy, less range and no muzzle brake. The limited range wouldn't apply from mountain tops.

Not Sarac as Sarak but Šarac as SHARATZ

Very nice

Terrible video

As a farmer this is going to be my next tax right off. Need this to check my fences right right 😎

Please explain how an 8.8 cm (NOT "88 mm") KwK43 "had a larger calibre" than the 8.8 cm 'L/56 version equipped on the Tiger tank"? "With the maturity of the Soviet, five pair of road wheels the QF20 under gun eventually weakened a bit"! WTF is that supposed to mean? This is a shocking video. Absolutely appalling. And L7 WAS NOT "developed from the QF20 pounder": it was designed to use the same mountings to facilitate retrofit into existing tanks (i.e. Centurion).

2:13 tricycle landing gear is like the F 15 and F 16 this Aircraft has a Tail Dragger Landing gear. You have to focus on the details if you want trust because all of us know different things. So you must be accurate in all facts. Thank you very much….That is all…. On 😏🖖🏼🇺🇸

Cool

Sorry I wasted 5mins of my life listening to this!! 😢

Cool

Using f-words to cross trenches came from land management. They have been used to prevent river bank erosion for hundreds of years.

For those who know the roblox game Centaura this is the armored car used in Centaura for Antares also the corvus one is a austro hungarian Daimler armored car and cetan one is a Italian lancia 1z armored car with a different turret

Fuck your tax bureau!

FYI, they made less than 10 prototypes, of which 2-3 were non-firing mockups. They were never purchased by the military, never issued to troops, and never used in the War of Independence. They were also never sent anywhere else. All the examples are held by the Croatian MOD.

So this is the origin of the SEAL motorcycle/car combination?

Probably run out of money and other resources etc! Denel need to partner up with someone like BAE.

I should put the AA gun on a truck in stead. Speed instead of terrain mobility is more needed on the modern battlefield.

Comet, Archer, Challenger, M10 and Sherman had the 17 pounder, I don't think Centurion made it to WW2, war ended beforehand. Just to be exact.

Fun fact, the tridon was not on a similar 6x6 chassis as the archer prototype, it was the exact same vehicle, they just ripped the 40mm gun off it and added a FH-77B in the back

Made by Swedish steel for steel men...

Jesus, I wish you would learn to pronounce "anti-aircraft" correctly.....

I can imagine this along side an Archer would work great as an inti-drone protection for the Archer.

Great looking machine, but it's not a tank, could use these in Canada.

really stupid AI voice

Haha Bofors gör Pang Pang!