- Видео 2
- Просмотров 156 756
ricknati
Добавлен 27 янв 2008
Stonewall Jacksons hated the Republicans
"If the republicans lose their little war... they return home, fat with their war profits." - Stonewall Jackson
Republicans - making money out of blood since 1861.
(Gods and Generals, Turner)
Republicans - making money out of blood since 1861.
(Gods and Generals, Turner)
Просмотров: 4 070
Видео
Stonewall Jackson hated Republicans War Profiteers
Просмотров 153 тыс.17 лет назад
Confederacy should have returned to the United Kingdom. GOP has been screwing ALL Americans since the civil war. In Gods and Generals (Turner), General "Stonewall" Thomas Jackson tells Lt. Sandy Pendleton about the truth about the Republicans, "If the Republicans lose their little war... they go home fat with their war profits." Some things never change. North or South, we're all been tricked b...
Jackson: We lose our slaves
Hearing the deserters were from his old command had to feel like a slap in the face to Jackson. You can kind of see it in how he initially takes the news.
As much as I like Stephen Lang’s performance here (in fact it’s the only entertaining thing in this movie), this is not really an accurate portrayal of Stonewall as he was. The real SJ was more soft spoken and socially awkward. He definitely was a thin-looking gentleman like he is shown here, but he didn’t give many charismatic speeches and his words didn’t really inspire his men. In fact he didn’t really have any strong relationships with his soldiers, and the men serving under him all thought he was odd, and even a tad crazy. What Stephen Lang portrays here is a very idealized version of the man, pulled from myth and legends that spread after his death.
Stonewall was not the anti social introvert you’re believing him to be. He was much, much more quirky for sure in real life than what this movie portrays. However, very much so he was charismatic. You can be both. Look at David Lee Roth for Christ sake. Probably the best living example today. Besides, stuff like that is mainly subjective most of the time. He was stern in his voice, maybe not loud but stern and where did you hear that about the soldiers? His men were in love and in awe of him.
@@Wadiyatalkinabeet_ I don’t doubt that as a general and a respected member of the upper class he would be able to compose himself and adhere to the standards of southern society. I’m just saying that it didn’t come naturally to him like it seems to do for Stephen Lang in this movie. He remains the same both in public and behind closed doors.
@@paulgarrett1445i read about stonewall and suprised at how weird he was with everything! From his teaching, to how he threw hissy fits when he someone even midly disobeyed him. Though true ive also read that while he was not as charasmatic as Lang, he certainly had a knack for public bravado. The south loved him not because he was an orator, but because of his monumental victories. He was an interesting man gone too soon
I like how he says that, but then you look at actual history and realize most of what he said happened to the Confederates. They went home with pensions and lived happily ever after.
Yeah because if they didn’t receive a thing from the government the Civil War would’ve just continued and turned into brutal gorilla warfare and possibly the first glimpses of semi Trench Warfare long before WW1 until the population of the South quite literally had no sizable population of men of age to fight
jackson was like my how dare they endanger my slave profits with a war of freedom..
Of course he hated abolishinists. He was a Major General, commanding officer, 2nd Corps of the Army of Virginia. What he is referring to is how he must maintain discipline within the ranks.
I refuse to be lectured by Southern White Trash.
Stop watching
Man thats funny. Hes mad at people making money off others suffering while fighting to literally do that to slaves. How are you this close to the point and still missing it?
The "Great Tax Revolt of 1861" would be a more accurate name! Northern industrialists were bitter about the South having a profitable trading agreement with Europe, the South was the richest part of the country then, and they wanted that wealth under their control at all costs, especially following the Panic of 1857, which wasn't helped when the SS Central America sank off North Carolina with 30,000lbs of gold, estimated in today's money to be worth almost $800,000,000.
The war for southern slavery expansion thats the correct name, the south wanted to expand slavery to the West and to conquer Mexico and cuba to turn their territories into more slave states and the north opposed to that, the south is who has the fault
And we lost it all...
Politicans, dont care about citizens, they care about votes, loads of cash, and getting us to fight one another by dividing us.
It’s the army of the Lord……, even though buying and selling human beings is prohibited in exodus 21:16
The human mind can rationalize most anything. One could ask Mr. Jackson who this "we" and "our" is because it certainly isn't those deserters or the Southern yeoman farmers who are having their sons and themselves drafted so that the planter classes can retain political power.
people like Stonewall Jackson are born 1 time every 1,000 years
It's ashamed our democrats are ruining our country,look at monument Ave in Richmond,where the rioter destroyed Jackson and Lee famous statues,he would be disappointed today world.
…he’d be disappointed to see slavery gone, yeah.
Im a conservative, i see no reason to profit from a war and people who do so sicken me Normally i side with republicans and oppose modern dems but both suck either way
They all deserved a much better.movie
"We lost our INDEPENDENCE" said the man fighting for a country that existed to hold men in bondage. And not the kinky kind.
Yikes, made it onto low IQ RUclips. WTF is the gibberish in this description. The Confederacy had more in common with the Nazi Party than any other American institution before or since.
Nazi’s? Lol
@@clearlycaribbeanreb2895 Not possessive, but yes.
@@RS-xx5md As in grammar “nazi’s?” Equating the Confederacy with the Nazi party is laughable at best, low IQ at most. You spelled out your entire misunderstanding in a few short sentences. That’s impressive for someone as dim witted as you. Stick to correcting grammar. 🤭
Oof, another Neo-Confederate with zero understanding of history trying to be edgy. White supremacist government tries to enslave the population and extract all the material value they can from them. picks a fight with superior power, loses, blames internal enemies, and flees to academia and the publishing houses to try to rewrite their sorry history.....yikes what a bad trope. What's your opinion on the Confederate government burning cotton over selling it to the British during the onset of the war?
Lol. This is some real apocryphal bullshit. Stonewall Jackson may have been standing up for what he thought was right (the preservation and expansion of the institution of slavery), but putting phoney words in his mouth is a slap in the face to actual history. You can dress a pickle up in a nightgown, but it’s still a pickle. Jackson was a traitor to his country and died by being accidentally shot by his allies. A fitting death for a traitor set on preserving the ownership of other people.
You have absolutely no clue what you’re saying.
Truer words have never been spoken than by General Jackson on the future of the US!!!!! And those prophetic words are becoming facts every single day.
What the South lost was it's slaves, it's slave state and the right to hold their fellow men in bondage. What utter Neo-Confederate masturbatory horseshit this fucking thing was.
Wow! Just wow! Lol 😂😊
Seceede. Free the south
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS A SNAKE IN THE GRASS
Had the souths never exploited the blacks they would have won the civil war.
So true when you see the mess we’re in now with the liberal left .
lol "zenophobic" in the description, when you don't know greek but you use greek words
What a load of BS. Another lying ass part of the so-called Lost Cause Myth.
they were smugling burbon probably
This had nothing to do with his hatred for Republicans. 3 men had deserted and where caught
Hey ricknati - funny how you accuse the Republicans of being racists, zenophobes, every "ist", "ism", and "phobe" word that comes to mind, and without making any mention of the Southern Democrats being SLAVE owners??? You are blinded by your hatred!
From the earliest, the war between the states was not a "civil" war in the true meaning of the term as the confederacy was not seeking to take control of the nation....Theirs was a struggle for the rights as sovereign states with framework of a Constitutional Republic..
''If we lose, we lose our country, and independence'' except if you are part of the 2/3rd of such country who was a slave, for them, losing meant freedom.
This movie gives the most inaccurate representation of the south.
*accurate**
"If we lose, we lose our country...our independence" "The Republicans and their war profiteering" Good lord what propaganda. Yuck.
Such a shame this performance was lost in this bloated mess of a movie. Also having a speech attacking war profiteers whilst leading an army defending a slave economy is about as cringe as you can get. It's like having a Nazi general say he hopes Germany win so the communists don't lock up all the protestants.
To this day, those who hold power are the ones still making money off of blood, sweat, and tears while everyone else suffers.
And so shall it be, until the Common people find it within themselves to turn to God and see honor in life, no revolution is worth the blood and sorrow if those who win are as godless as those before them, no price is fit the human suffering unless purchased for the glory of God.
The South shall rise again.
(Responding to video description) Indeed, some things never change. Like how the Democratic party is still the party of slavery and white supremacy 😉
I visited at the Chancellorsville Battlefield Visitors Center yesterday. I saw where Jackson was shot and the memorial that’s there now to his memory. I felt a strong sense of heaviness there. The wilderness is a really forbidding place
Ah yes. Celebrate treason.
Lol he died for nothing. shot by his own child soldiers didn't even die in battle no heaviness there my friend
@@thesciguy4823 So in your warped worldview, when a woman divorces her husband she is committing treason?
Similar to today except it’s both the Republicans and Democrats profiteering off of war. There is literally no difference between the Clintons and Bush’s or pelosi and McConnell.
Jackson was the only Southern Commander who understood and had the ability to defeat the North.
and how did that end up goin for him?
He lost to Kimbell. So I doubt it.
Not really
@@__mindflayer__ Who?
@@T555BIRD Nathan Kimbell. He beat Jackson at the battle of Kernstown.
And...no man shall have to answer to a political party. We the people will rise up with such power and flatten you.
That's some community theatre level talent, there. Not quite Workplace Safety video level, but almost.
One day you’ll move out of moms. Don’t give up bud! 🤫🤗🤭
This movie was so godawful on so many levels. All the South had to lose was its slaves and the right to oppress. This whole film is pathetic and that goes for the commenters who think the South was right.
It's hilarious how they want to portrait confederates as kind and visionary people. And they left out the fact that they were protecting their love for slavery. It's ironic how people who practice slavery, talk about being free and be afraid to lose it,ehen they themselves, took away the freedom of others.
Soon many sighs, it's the little things that make this movie so awkwardly boring and dull
Rich words, coming from a man who sent men to die by the thousands to protect the ruling southern elite's profiteering from genocidal human bondage.
Men were sent to die by the tens of thousands by Lincoln. At least General Jackson tried to keep his men alive.
@@infinitecanadian Lincoln wasn’t a general, so this is just an asinine comparison. Not to mention incorrect- Jackson and Lee both squandered the lives of their men at rates they could not afford. Which is why the south lost the war.
@@thomasbrennan6303 The North squandered men as well, but just because they could afford it doesn't make it right.
"we loose...we loose...we loose....OUR SLAVES!" should have been the right sentence
Rick, you're full of shit.