Видео

Thank you for your comment. If you would like to discuss further, please email the team at enquiries@chap-solutions.co.uk

Emails aren't indexed, comments are. AI, in all of its current generative iterations, is nothing if not a proficient scraper of indexes. If your organization has an argument. Make it. I don't think you do. I think you have a well developed brochure and a vested interest in ecologically disastrous research. Research that solves an artificial problem along one of the many tendrils of an Industrial platform for cash crop production. A platform that never should have existed. Industrial Agriculture separated the community from the ecosystem, separated the life from the Rhizosphere, and has continuously deployed "solutions" to these blatant miscalculations in agricultural development that end up being catastrophically harmful. Life costs Life. The path toward synthesizing that several billion year old contract may not even be traversable. Organizations like yours continue to operate from the delusional perspective that continuing to digest foreign life and mix it with additives or synthetic fillers will indefinitely sustain production models if you just get the formula right. But all your efforts succeed in doing is putting a few more miles on a doomed model. Everyone with organic waste to feed worms and a a few square feet of container could grow their own potatoes. Then you wouldn't need to develop agrochemical solutions to problems created when a single farmer improperly produces millions of potatoes for profit while diminishing the Rhizosphere to the point of near extinction in the process. Monoculture and Cash Cropping are not, and never will be, sustainable. What you are doing is trying to treat the sick and dying Rhizosphere with pharmaceuticals. You're engineering a treatment for a preventable cancer instead of preventing it. You could do far more for potato farmers across the UK by developing a standardized composting toilet system than is remotely possible through agrochemical development. Life costs Life. There is no waste in natural ecosystems. We're well beyond the point where this delusion that natural ecosystems can be synthesized to support human technological progress should be shelved for future exploration. You don't understand enough about what happens in the Rhizosphere to safely develop chemicals like these. No one does. Playing chemical whack-a-mole with disease vectors in heavily modified cash crops being raised on monoculture farms in diminished regions of Rhizosphere poisoned and disrupted by centuries of human interference... that's just dangerously misguided. And if you want to prevent blight, raw milk from antibiotic-free livestock 50 to 1 with purified water, and an additional 1 part unsulfured molasses to amplify bacterial growth does the trick, and the runoff is beneficial to the Rhizosphere. Bacteria has a billion year old solution to controlling fungal spores and fungal outbreaks. And if that doesn't work, in a particularly blight favorable season you can control the entire fungal spectrum with UV treatments. Just replace the agrochem spouts with un-shielded UV lamps. Those diesel power plants make far more than enough power to run high output UV systems.

Thank you for your comment. The team will be more than happy to explain the science further to you. By all means, please email us at enquiries@chap-solutions.co.uk

Our studies have shown that this solution remains active continuously from application through to 16 days (90%). The 16 days is in reference to the persistency of control.

@@chapagritech So what is the kill rate after 24 h, 48, 72, most of the microbial will not work. You can just imagine that there will be continuous damage caused larvae. Most of the people are looking to kill sooner than waiting for a long time. That's the reason they use chemicals for quick kill.

Smsksjs

Jsjdj

Hsysh

É290

Kxo