Видео

can you tell me how to use Wound Healing process Modeling using partial Differential equation

Taking copious notes.

❤❤❤

My great honor to be taught by Professor Evans.

As a statistics student, I find talks like these especially enjoyable..so thanks!

👍

I sent you an email Martin Goodson.. My name is Martin Onassis Goodson.. I sent you an email about 4years ago.. I got interested in technology by looking at your RUclips videos..

Unless one has read (and re-read) very carefullly both of Mayo's most recent books (and I have) it is not possible to authentically appreciate her genius, breadth of knowledge, and careful clarity of thought. She is a very lucid thinker and writer. This interview on RUclips is a surprising disappointment for me but not because of anything that she is saying. The sharp disappointments I have are with the host. I do not know his credentials but from the rambling structure and content of his overly long questions, I perceive that he is in way over his head. He is visibly ill at ease. It is highly distracting for me that he repeatedly says, "like" and uses it as a verbal crutch. I actually lost count of the number of "likes" I heard. As well, he spews the odious filler "you know" over and over in his remarks -- this sort of verbiage choice makes him sound exactly like the teenaged kids seen hanging around with their well-used skateboards near shopping malls all over 'Murika.

Very insightful!

pHARMa scamdemia poisoned 2/3rds of the planet

I enjoy this podcast! That’s a well knowledgeable young man ❤

Keith passed away in late November. He was a mentor and friend to me; until the pandemic intervened we would have lunch together every few months and discuss statistics, machine learning, philosophy, and so forth. This video is basically my last chance to spend some time with him and gain the benefit of his wisdom.

Next time add the link to your code

Thanks alot for sharing this,,,share more videos

Deborah, there is nothing problematic about Popper’s demarcation. I consistently ask people what it’s problems are and you realise they are just straightforward misunderstandings. Your elaboration is no exception. Popper took all what you say it account. He said that the rule for ‘face saving’ adjustments should be that the auxiliary hypothesis that adjust them should be independently testable. It does not follow from Popper’s demarcation that if something is falsified then it is science. His demarcation is a necessary property not a sufficient one. It only claim that if something is not falsifiable then it is not scientific. How can you be a philosopher of science with and award and make this elementary year 1 undergraduate mistake? It is not Popper’s fault that there isn’t a demarcation of science that will make it anymore warranted than any other investigation. Why is it that only Popper had put a demarcation forward that doesn’t succumb to this obviously erroneous way of delineating science. Yet his method, though not justified is effective. What else do you want: the unicorn of warranted assertsbility…😢 this is not the dark ages, where people’s assertions have to be vetted by some self-appointed clergy. Why are scientists trying to usurp that role and why are philosophers trying to help them? All you need is a republic of science where each participant is open to criticism, and just open to criticism but actively seeking it. Continue to promote a philosophy of science that thinks that we have to find some way do justify our claims and also that justifying makes them what - less suceptical to being wrong? - then you will constantly stifle the only idea that solves any of these problems in science - the idea that theories should be constantly and ceaselessly critically investigated and no amount of evidence justified them, and you will constantly be a participant in encouraging the very thing you want to disappear: the attempt to pretend that your theories are exalted by evidence. Your view leaves a back door to that kind of misuse. Self-sabotaging. Any theory of science that says there is some way to make scientific theories compelling will always have methods that can be abused to make theories some more compelling than they are. Theories can never be justified not one bit. Pretending that they can is the whole problem.

Hi, thanks for the video!

great podcast

I enjoyed this episode can you invite other statistical consultants in your future vids?

thank you for the video .... can you give us some references about change point detection with a statistical approach

I really agree with what you said at the 18-20 minute mark. There is a big issue I am facing as someone trained in stats in regards to domain knowledge. In stats, DS, CS we learn all these tools but ultimately don't learn enough domain knowledge. And the way things are headed domain-specific modeling is becoming the "next big thing" (eg DAGs, incorporating inductive biases, priors, neural architectures, etc). Without the science aspect I fear statisticians are going to be left behind. The math/stats/programming for an applied setting is the easier part in my opinion and you now even see so many domain experts in chemE, BME, bioinfo, chem, physics etc picking up DS/ML skills. They may not be as rigorous as a statistician but the domain expertise is more important than "is my estimate perfectly unbiased and is my inference type 1 error calibrated" for modern modeling

Thnk u for this series and greetings from peru, as a undegrad in math and statistics u touch topics that matter for applied math and the role of data in society

C.S. Peirce is pronounced “Purse”

👍

👍

thank u for keeping this series !

Soon there will be an Environmental Information Technology standard . Much like Health information technology and traditional IT

Loving the unexpected dry nerdy humor. Great show. Very interesting angles.

Ceviri yaparak bu faydali bilgileri dinledim lutfen alt yaziyla videolarin devamini bekliyorum

Bu faydalı bilgiler için teşekkürler

verdiğiniz bilgiler için teşekkür ederiz videoların devamını bekleriz

bu günde bilgi kumbaramıza birkaç kuruş attık sayenizde teşşekkürler<3

çok güzel ve bilgilendirici bir video olmuş gerçekten emeğinize sağlık

Evren hakkında daha neler öğreneceğiz sayenizde

Altyazı eklenirse sizin için etkileşim bakımından daha iyi olur👌

Emeğinize sağlık çok güzel anlatımlı bir video olmuş 😊👏

Evren gizemlerle dolu bunlardan bazılarınızı açıklamanız çok güzel

Altyazı eklenirse daha büyük kitleler faydalanabilir diye düşünüyorum

Bence fizik sevenler buraya harika bir video olmus

Bilgilendirici

Başarılarınızın devamını diliyorum güzel bir anlatım 👍

gercekten mukemmel bır konusma olmus emegınıze saglık

Faydalı heralde ugraslas icin teşekkürler İngilizce bilmkek gerek

Gercekten mukemmel bır konusma olmus

Gercekten mukemmel bır konusma olmus emegınıze saglık

I think it is a helpful video

Evren gizemlerle dolu bunlardan bazılarınızı açıklamanız çok güzel

Temel fizik ve biyolojiyi model çıkarımına entegre ederek anlatmışsınız çok güzel bir çalışma olmuş. 👏👏👏

Emeğinize sağlık çok güzel ve kaliteli bir video olmuş💯🙏🏻

Harika olmuş devamını bekleriz

Büyük patlamaya ilgim arttı