Видео

US already got these in the 70s, Remember How China got their hands on the SR73 Black raven drones, these are literally unmaned High altitude hypersonic surveillance drones with the speed of mach 3 - 5 But due to technology issues That once it goes too Fast and get heats up That the Drone looses the radio signal which remotely controlled it, So these drones crashed in China and in good condition which indicates That these drones crashed due to running out of fuel. So China spend multiple Decades researching the technology until they can build similar drones like That and now surpasses US. Chinese Wu14 surveillance Drone flys at mach 8 - 10.

Once it’s a man aircraft, then tell me something about it

Bla Bla Bla airplanes and tech that are over 60 years old. They get the col stuff why we get the chud!

You forgot about the X-15 from the 1960s. And it was reusable. Do better. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_X-15

Uhm... no. The first hypersonic aircraft is the X-15.

👍👌

This makes me mad. They're spending our tax money on these projects, and we already have advanced planes that people see. You know the ones they call UFOS. Especially the triangle ones. I remember seeing a docu with an ex high Boeing employee talking about the advanced ships we have that are Star Trek type vehicles. In the Black Projects. But they keep the illusion that we don't have anything that advanced and keep people thinking " aliens" from distant planets are visiting.

The Clown Works 🤡

maverick! here comes a new toy for you

We can't even develop a hypersonic missile. What makes you think we'll be able to make a hypersonic aircraft?

All the money in the world for crap like this yet no money to take care of veterans

Have you forgotten the true first hypersonic plane, the Space Shuttle?

Talk is cheap; I'll believe it when I see it.

This is an American project. Why is it being told by someone from England? I couldn’t stand listening to that British accent more than about 1 minute. I doubt that British people would be very happy listening to an American describe the latest British jet.

If current NASA government agencies/management have anything to do with it, the results will be like Starliner. DEI will cause pilots and astronauts to DIE. Sad to say this but let recent history be a lesson.

I lost interest after the first commercial. This is junk to keep us unaware of what is really happening.

made by Boeing... goes up in one piece, comes back down to earth in a dozen pieces

More BS

All this, and they never even battle🙄 How many raptors have ever had a dogfight?

"Boeings rock solid reputation (pre B-737 Max)?!?! Their rep was in the tank long before the Max issues ...

Awesome Video🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂

Always the never never land of aerial combat, & they never get used. Air displays & daft fly pasts for the infantile public.

To do what ?

Goal is Mach 5. NASA has developed an an aircraft form, to minimize the sonic boom. This is needed for supersonic flight over land. It is still a far way to Mach 25; orbital velocity. From a normal runway, to orbit and visiting a space station, and back to landing on a runway, would greatly normalize access to space. Deep space must be accessed from space stations; leaving rockets only for heavy cargo lift to LEO. 🚀🏴‍☠️🎸

It made by Boeing. The world a realy afraid

At this point this type of technology is unnecessary in my opinion. For military use this would boil down to being used as a missile or for missile deployment and there's really no need for that given our far-reach around the globe with the countless types of missiles we already have. And then secondly, it could be used for high altitude reconnaissance, something which we already have well covered now with satellites. Both of these are also reasons why the SR-71 no longer flies. Sure, companies like this, along with Darpa are working on these projects, but I see them as "fluff tech" to keep justifying the huge budgets of taxpayer money used each year which in turn employ thousands of people in the big aerospace companies. Isn't this what Eisenhower warned us about with the military industrial complex??? I think it's something like .40 cent of every tax dollar now. And aside from making a much larger space station and moon base, what else do they have to do? Nothing really except for bragging rights of "who can go faster". Yes, we've learned a lot along the way, but I just don't see these things having any tangible consistent use that's going to justify their costs. And I'd fair to guess I could count on two hands the amount of executives that need to be in London or Hong Kong each week in under 3 hours. We have this modern thing now call the internet and Zoom meetings. And Zoom is FREE. As it turns out, electrons already won the speed race.

All this and much more has already been accomplished long ago. This current public disclosing is just another way to keep the funds flowing and new engineers trained 😆

It's been this many years and we still haven't found materials for aircraft that will withstand the temparature at hypersonic speeds. We have seen what has been done to some of the x planes at those speeds looked like after and they were lucky to have survived . They looked like Swiss cheese some of them. Herre is to hoping they are spending as much on the materials science part on the outside and control surfaces as the rest of the future hypersonic planes.

Very limited use case will only interest China and North Korea, but Both will buy only one each and reverse engineer them.

things are getting too fast, there is no time to ferret things out, no time for strategy or communication. its a dangerous game.

I am so sick of "MK-anything". It's now and has always been Mark 1, Mark 2, etc.

Malzeme mantigida verdim hayatimizdan bir imge fikir.

Cozdum boom motor,bir mantik kurdum,basarili oldu ise on denemeler,gerisi gelecektir.

Merak etme usa bizim cocuklarda basladi booom jet arge tasarima coktan yakinda guya animasyonlari donmeye baslar.avn.dtcf.18244

Great

Interesting, but repetetive. Could have been 3 minutes.

Hmm essentially a startup with little money and lots of PR. However the real issue is that supersonic winged air craft will be eclipsed by reusable rocket technology but admittedly for commercial civilian use it’s a long way off. The SpaceX Starliner Project has a number of potential uses and one that the US military is interested in is using Starliner in rapid deployment of troops in minutes to any part of the globe. For example if Starliner ‘only’ rises to low earth orbit and then decends and lands it could take 100-200 troops from a launch site in the US to a landing site in Europe or SE Asia in under 15-30 minutes.

So in ten years they've made a single seat plane that is slower and lower than an off-the-shelf G5?

Sr-71 had a turbo ramjet. I heard it would accelerate until it started to melt. Limited by temperature.

I'd be interested to hear how they solved the high speed air cooling. Did they buy out the SABRE company tech from the UK.

No more than a fast reusable missile. Put a pilot in it and then call it a plane.

It took almost 70 years to match the genius of Kelly Johnson. In an interview, a Skunk Works guy said, the Blackbird reached mach 4, but they didn‘t want somebody to know

A-12 Oxcart was faster than sr-71.

You suck ,the front page I think you know 😐😬

What and when did the Russians do in this direction? This topic is at least 40 years old. In the USSR, work on a hypersonic aircraft began at the Tupolev Design Bureau in the mid-1970s, based on the serial passenger aircraft Tu-144. Research and design was carried out on an aircraft capable of reaching speeds of up to Mach 6 (TU-260) and a flight range of up to 12,000 km, as well as a hypersonic intercontinental aircraft TU-360. Its flight range was to reach 16,000 km. A project was even prepared for a passenger hypersonic aircraft Tu-244, designed to fly at an altitude of 28-32 km at a speed of Mach 4.5-5. As a result of preliminary studies under the MVKS program, a power plant was selected based on proven and tested solutions. Existing air-breathing jet engines (ABE) that used atmospheric air had temperature limitations, they were used on aircraft whose speed did not exceed Mach 3, and rocket engines had to carry a large supply of fuel on board and were not suitable for long-term flights in the atmosphere. Therefore, an important decision was made - in order for the aircraft to be able to fly at supersonic speeds and at all altitudes, its engines should have features of both aviation and space technology. In February 1986, scientific research began in the United States to create the X-30 spaceplane with an air-breathing power plant, capable of entering orbit in a single-stage version. The National Aerospace Plane (NASP) project was distinguished by an abundance of new technologies, the key one of which was a dual-mode hypersonic ramjet engine, allowing flight at speeds of Mach 25. As a result, the working variant was a combination of an economical solid-fuel jet engine operating in the speed range of M = 0-2.5, a second engine - a ramjet engine accelerating the aircraft to M = 20 and a liquid-propellant rocket engine for entering orbit (acceleration to the first cosmic velocity of 7.9 km / s) and ensuring orbital maneuvers. Due to the complexity of solving the complex of scientific, technical and technological problems, the program was divided into two stages: the creation of an experimental hypersonic aircraft with a flight speed of up to M = 5-6, and the development of a prototype orbital vehicle ensuring the conduct of a flight experiment in the entire range of flights, up to space entry. In addition, at the second stage of work it was planned to create versions of the Tu-2000B space bomber, which was designed as a two-seater aircraft with a flight range of 10,000 km and a takeoff weight of 350 tons. Six engines powered by liquid hydrogen were to provide a speed of M = 6-8 at an altitude of 30-35 km. The first time the model of the Tu-2000 aircraft was shown at the exhibition "Mosaeroshow-92". Before the work was stopped in 1992, the following were manufactured for the Tu-2000: a wing box made of nickel alloy, fuselage elements, cryogenic fuel tanks and composite fuel lines. The collapse of the USSR in 1992 stopped work on this project. Project "Ayaks" - hypersonics in a new way Work on the creation of a hypersonic aircraft was also carried out in the design bureau "Neva" (St. Petersburg), on the basis of which the State Research Enterprise of Hypersonic Speeds was formed. The bureau approached the creation of a hypersonic aircraft in a fundamentally new way. The concept of the hypersonic aircraft "Ayaks" was put forward in the late 80s by Vladimir Lvovich Freishtadt. Its essence is that the hypersonic aircraft does not have thermal protection. The heat flow that occurs during hypersonic flight is admitted into the GLV to increase its energy resource. Thus, the GLV "Ayaks" was an open aerothermodynamic system that converted part of the kinetic energy of the hypersonic air flow into chemical and electrical energy, simultaneously solving the issue of airframe cooling. For this purpose, the main components of the chemical heat recovery reactor with a catalyst were designed, placed under the airframe skin. The aircraft skin in the most heat-stressed places had a two-layer shell. Between the layers of the shell, a catalyst made of heat-resistant material ("nickel sponge") was placed, which was an active cooling subsystem with chemical heat recovery reactors. According to calculations, in all hypersonic flight modes, the temperature of the airframe elements of the hypersonic aircraft did not exceed 800-850°C. The hypersonic aircraft includes a ramjet engine with supersonic combustion integrated with the airframe and the main (cruiser) engine - a magneto-plasma-chemical engine (MPCE). The MPCE was designed to control the air flow using a magneto-gas-dynamic accelerator (MHD accelerator) and to generate electricity using an MHD generator. The generator had a capacity of up to 100 MW, which was quite enough to power a laser capable of hitting various targets in near-earth orbits. It was assumed that the cruising MPCE would be able to change the flight speed in a wide range of flight Mach numbers. Due to the braking of the hypersonic flow by a magnetic field, optimal conditions were created in the supersonic combustion chamber. During tests at the Central Aviation State Institute of the USSR, it was found that the hydrocarbon fuel created within the framework of the Ayaks concept burns several times faster than hydrogen. The MHD accelerator could "accelerate" the combustion products, increasing the maximum flight speed to M=25, which guaranteed entry into near-earth orbit. The civilian version of the hypersonic aircraft was designed for a flight speed of 6,000-12,000 km/h, a flight range of up to 19,000 km and the transportation of 100 passengers. There is no information about the military developments of the Ayaks project. According to some information, Russia is working in this direction. As always, quietly, without applause, in the silence of design bureaus.

China must have already stole the tecnology.

YES USA!😍😍😍😍😍😍

All fake and lies. Nothing is true. A real Bullshit-video

AI video trash

just bring back the Concord with different upgraded engines