Видео

WHAT is HISTORIC and ACCURATE>>> ✍️ WRITTEN down 👇 in EVIDENCE 🧾🧾🧾🧾🧾 in the SCRIPTURES 🔎🔍 IS ADAM 🧬 FIRST 🥇 POSITION (LUKE 3:38 ) ----- FALLEN ANGELIC NEPHILIM GARDENER SON (GENESIS 2:15 ) OF GOD 🧬 (LUKE 3:38) ----- CURSED >>> MULTIPLYING ❌❌❌✖️✖️❌❌ THE EARTH 🌎 THROUGH NEPHILIM INCEST AND INTERBREEDING ( GENESIS 3:16) ------ ADAM 🧬 FIRST 🥇 POSITION FALLEN ANGELIC NEPHILIM GARDENER (GENESIS 2:15) SON of GOD 🧬 TEACHING THE WORLD 🌎 THE FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE OF ROOT CUTTING ✂️ (GENESIS 3:17-19) --- CURSED>> EVE - BEING the mother of ALL LIVING NEPHILIM 👑 SEED 🧬 MEN OF RENOWN 👑 FAMOUS IN THE CONGREGATION ( NUMBERS 16:2) ----- NOT a legend NOT A MYTH!!!!! ----- CONVINCING proof 🧾. Such as is sufficient to establish the proposition in question, beyond hesitation, ambiguity, or reasonable doubt, in an unprejudiced mind. --- BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY --- ---- Findings of fact shall not 🚫 be set aside unless clearly erroneous. Fed R. Civil P. 52(a). --- A general finding by court is a general statement that the facts are in favor of a party or entitle him to judgment. It is a complete determination of all matters, and is a finding of every special thing necessary to be found to sustain the general finding. ---- NOW ASK YOURSELVES ⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️ HOW did you miss that ❓⁉️❓⁉️⁉️ ---- WHERE ARE YOU RYAN PITTERSON ⁉️⁉️❓⁉️ RENNER MINISTRY ⁉️❓❓❓⁉️ Get SPIRITUAL and MENTALLY PREPARED!!!!!! BISHOP HOLSONBACK ⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️ GARY WAYNE ⁉️⁉️❓⁉️❓ TIMOTHY ALBERINO ⁉️⁉️ YOU FAKE 🤥 PROPHET OF MITT ROMNEY'S ⁉️❓⁉️⁉️⁉️ YOU CULTED CATHOLIC CULT POPE ⁉️❓❓⁉️❓⁉️ ----- TENACIOUS 💢🔥😡🔥💢 THORN LEON AWAITS you grasshopper 🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗 TURDS 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩 ----- MY LAMP 🪔 is TRIMMING>>>> ----- ILLUMINATED YET 🕯️ ⁉️❓❓⁉️❓⁉️ SCREENSHOT CENSORSHIP BACKUP LEGAL NOTEBOOK 📒 TIME ⏳ 11:23 AM MAY 4, 2024 -- DEAR PRUDENCE!!! *FIGHTING 💪 WORDS DOCTRINE*

All the Books of the New Testament, as they are commonly received, we do receive, and account them Canonical. 39 Articles of Religion

Grateful for Rob’s input, the others just spout more Zionist propaganda!!!

Psalm 2 you heathen that erroneously claim Christ

There is no individual interpretations to the WORD of GOD AMEN

God stands with israel forever ♾️ your so biblically literate in old days which were you Sadducees or roman!👁️😇⚡🔥🙏😘😎👑👋🛑✅✌️

Yshwhew your aii algoriths retype stuff where has Yshwhw not Yshwhe.. By now your ignorant teachers of biblical truth..that pat you on the back ..the Lord sends you correcttion thru the ones you love as israel lost many loved ones your sin will not gounpunished! Forgiven you are not a TRUE believer the Lord see you ie HEBREWS 4 ..11-12..and psalm 2 read it that your branch isnt cut from the tree 🌲💜 of life heart doin ok lately God witnesses hello witnesses against you Gospel outreach nortwest can help you with your erronious interpretation of Gods word repent!

Yshwhe who that dude?

Dude israel is gods your mouth is of the synagog of satan spoke of in revelation IAm David and your mouth and interpritations ate in error God is not retorical that U continue in life is Gods Grace which you arent teaching truth your mArxist rhetoric and false interpritations isnt healthy for the children so God will Himself silence your error

What a joke lol

zionists are taught revisionist history. Isreal was founded in 1948 via "the Nakba". Please learn about the Nakba and then tell me why an indigenous people have no rights in their own land and are trapped in an open air prison.

Don't say bullshit about god! As an atheist, I condemn Israel genocide Zionist is a racist

13:20- I like Steve’s question. It’s my opinion that many linguistic concepts are dubious. For instance, cosmos (John 3:16) in the NT. I don’t subscribe to “world” being a legitimate connotation. I’ll go so far as to say it should never be translated as such.

9:37 -so no extant Hebrew texts earlier than the masoretic?

F1rst!!!🎉🎉🎉

🤚 40:32 What makes you think that we can go 1500yrs further back? 48:00-I don’t know what this means.

First 👍 and comment, and I shared it on my Community post.

See what Christians scholars say video link at the bottom and below ruclips.net/video/z8rT0esXPuA/видео.html The bible has no preservation The 3 Oldest Manuscripts Containing the Corrupted Greek New Testament (2 Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus from the 4th century and 1 Codex Alexandrinus from the 5th century) ALL HUNDREDS of years after the disappearance of Jesus (PBUH), and ALL in Greek, Jesus did NOT speak Greek, Jesus (PBUH) spoke the language of Aramaic 1 church fathers changed the words and are not reliable such as Jhon 17:3 And church father Augustine 2 Only evidence we have is Jesus (PBUH) did NOT speak Greek, Jesus (PBUH) spoke the language of Aramaic. No creditable bible scholar or historian makes the claim of speaking Greek 3 also no evidence THAT THE COMPLETE BIBLE writen say you claim 40-70 years As no Christian scholar can back this up no evidence You The earliest manuscript of a New Testament text is a business-card-sized fragment from the Gospel of John, Rylands Library Papyrus P52, which may be as early as the first half of the 2nd century. is a small fragment of papyrus with portions of the Gospel of John (18:36-19:7) on both sides in Greek. It has been dated paleographically to the second century A.D.4 This text is part of the Oxyrhynchus papyri, a group of manuscripts discovered in the ancient garbage dump near Oxyrhynchus, Egypt. Papayrus P104 (P. Oxy. 4404) is a second-century papyrus fragment that contains Matt. 21:34-37 on the front, and traces of verses 43 and 45 on the back.5 This manuscript is 6.35 cm by 9.5cm in size. Scholars date the writing of Matthew’s gospel to the late 50’s or early 60’s in the first century. This is due in part to a comment by the church father Irenaeus that “Matthew also issued a written Gospel among the Hebrews in their own dialect, while Peter and Paul were preaching at Rome, and laying the foundations of the Church.” John’s gospel is dated to the late first century, after the composition of the other gospels. Again, Irenaeus, writing near the end of the second century states, “ Afterward, John, the disciple of the Lord, who also had leaned upon His breast, did himself publish a Gospel during his residence at Ephesus in Asia.”7 Early church history records that John lived the final years of his life in Ephesus, dying as an old man sometime near the end of the first century. This means that these two manuscripts date to within 100-150 years of the original autographs. For comparison, Pliny the Elder wrote his encyclopedia, Natural History, in the first century and the earliest manuscript we have is from the 5th century - a gap of about 400 years. first reasonably complete copy of the Gospel of John is from around 200 C.E. That is still a long time after John was written (well over a century). But it is still pretty old-older than most manuscripts for most other authors from the ancient world, by a wide margin. first complete manuscripts of the New Testament start appearing about 150 years after that, in the mid-fourth century C.E. (three hundred years or so after the originals). And so with the New Testament we are in the good situation of having some manuscripts-even if highly fragmentary-from within a century or two of the books’ originally having been written. Having a few scraps from within a hundred years of when the New Testament was written does not give us what we’d really like to have: complete manuscripts from near the time the authors published their books. If our first reasonably complete copies of the New Testament do not appear until two or three centuries after the books were first put in circulation, that’s two or three hundred years of scribes copying and recopying, making mistakes, multiplying mistakes, changing the text in ways big and small before we have complete copies. We can’t compare these, our oldest surviving copies, with yet older ones to see where their mistakes are. There aren’t any older ones. And the problems get worse. In later times, when we have an abundance of manuscripts, the copyists of the New Testament were trained scribes-usually monks in monasteries who copied manuscripts as a sacred duty. These monks of the Middle Ages did their level best-most, but not all, of the time-to copy their texts accurately. They sometimes got tired and inattentive and made mistakes; and they sometimes changed the text because they thought it was supposed to be changed. Still, for the most part they did a good job. But that was only much later in Christian history. In the earliest centuries, the vast majority of copyists of the New Testament books were not trained scribes. We know this because we can examine their copies and evaluate the quality of their handwriting, and we can assess how accurately they did their work. The striking and disappointing fact is that our earliest manuscripts of the New Testament have far more mistakes and differences in them than our later ones. The earlier we go in the history of copying these texts, the less skilled and attentive the scribes appear to have been. Also the authors of mark ,Luke Mathew , Jhon Are not known as it even says according to them not from them In Luke it clearly says it seemed good to me Basically I wrote what I liked and chose and ignore what I did not like Why you believe bible is reliable historical source ( Q asked by brother hamza from hamza den RUclips channel) If you it’s word of god again why you believe that what the scriptures if you say Faith and believe are synonymous That you are accepting proposition To be true meaning you have reasons for it to be true therefore what’s supporting your faith is it blind faith or you have no reason to believe it The bible is a biography of Jesus a recording of what Jesus said where he went what he did and where he remained silent this what New Testament is the problem you have is that the people saying what Jesus said and where he went and what he said Their are not eye witness To sat what he said what he did where he went the people recording this are not eye witness !!! If you have one source and you can verify that source and everything is pure but if you have multiple sources you could verify each one and problem you have is that you cant even identify the identity of that source You don’t known who wrote mark Mathew and Luke John don’t known who wrote first Peter and 2nd Peter dont known and the most books attributed to Paul you dont known who wrote book of Hebrews you don’t have the identity of these authors so you can’t test if they where liars crazy or mistaken as you don’t know who they where We Can cooperate our the (QURAN) the source you can’t Also see what Christians scholars say ruclips.net/video/z8rT0esXPuA/видео.html