Видео

I have seen a few of your videos now. I am already convinced IVC script is classical Sanskrit, because i am convinced from all the evidence: classical loan words of Sanskrit in in Old Sumerian; the fact that Hittite and Mittani Sanskrit are Prakrit, the settlement data showing the Buddhist Mahajanprada period and the rise of Magadh is in 2000BCE and carbon dating of Asoka's shrine gives us the date of 1300BCE. Finally the puranic chronology. I should be excited that you have finally proven IVC is Sanskrit, classical Sanskrit at that. But why am i so frustrated and straining to understand you. I hate to say this but you are pretty inarticulate, you slur your speech, sometimes you seem incoherent and you sometimes use a lot of heavy theoretical and technical language that a layman who does not know about cryptology, machine learning and programming will struggle. I honestly think if you have really undeciphered it, you hire a fluent English speaking spokesperson to communicate your ideas better. Please focus mainly on the actual topic of the fact you have undeciphered the script. Show us each sign and translate it for us. Then show us exactly which sign corresponds to which Sanskrit letter. Don't dilute your discussions talking about information theory, computer coding, genetics and archaeology. Present your research by making it as simple as you can for a layman and stay on topic.

What agreat explanation

Have you tried to fit Prakrit instead of Sanskrit?

Yajnadevam needs to acknowledge the empirical work of Suzanne Marie Radalia Sullivan who initially proposed that the link between Indus script and Brahmi and translated the seals in Sanskrit. How much does Suzannes and Yajnadevams translations differ is a question for Yajnadevam? Excellent work Yajnadevam!

Jay Shree Krishna.

This work deserves a whole book.

Hi YD, I think the RTL order needs another look. No other language had this way of writing at that time. Also, it is not natural.

Remarkable work by Yajnadevam ji. One day we shall be able to rid all distortions by the western historians and tell write our true history.

This is very interesting.

I am extremely happy that your great efforts are linking us to our pre vedic and late vedic period to Era of Buddha and Mahavir..which is denied by Sanatan haters

ruclips.net/video/m_FaaD5OL3U/видео.html

ruclips.net/video/m_FaaD5OL3U/видео.html

Abhyshek is brilliant. Thank you for bringing him on the program. I ordered Abhyshek's book on Amazon. I came to know about many more facts from the conversation - 360 day average, the Oriya calendar system of 128 years and the one day offset and about the hidden architecture of the "Vidisha" tower in Delhi!

Mr. Oak digresses a lot. Wish he would answer the questions raised on his work directly and save his breath too.

Abhishek, You should present to ASI and other stakeholders. This is so huge..it should be recreated at a smaller scale nearby so it can seen, understood and admired by visitors to this monument.

Michel Danino has explained very lucidly in his book The Lost River ..on trail of the Saraswati, the connect between Rig Veda and Saraswati or Indus civilization. Yajnadevam's work is a vital addition to our understanding of this period of Indian history.

do you the language of palusisthan.(in pakisthan .)it is a dravitan language . praqui ..please understand the truth behind it .

The basic issue for the supporting secondary evidence it can be matched for almost any year. Ascertaining the year of the event ab initio based on astronomy reference is a step of utmost importance.

@yajnadevam after reading through Steven's paper, I honestly think his theory and methodology is more robust than yours. Hope you'd also try out a more subjective, non-mathematical methods a try as well.

Problem with dating of Mahabharata war by Vedveer Arya, Nilesh Oak, MM Pandit and many others who used western astronomy simulators is incorrect choice if the tool. First is ascertaining the year. Hindu astronomy is sidereal whereas these simulators exhibit tropical sky charts. Both are incompatible unless precessional correction is applied. No one applied this correction. Similarly verification of sidereal observations stated in Hindu scriptures using tropical star charts is blunder. All such years are research frauds. After having published and sold priced books these people keep on cheating gullible. They are afraid of monetary backlash.

Momentous piece of work

Twitter autists solved the SSS 🙌

It actually sounds like some form of early prakrit ( considering "vaidika" as prakriti)

Connecting Indus Valley Civilization with Vedas is pure nonsense and done with hidden agenda by the Right Wing Fundamentalists of Northern India.

Try to publish a research paper incubated with a big university like iit delhi, I could provide prof red for the same

Around 1hr 8mins in the Brahmi-IVC alphabet list.... For the 38 Brahmi symbols you have mapped 32 IVC symbols with some repetition. What about the rest 300 or 400 or 700 IVC symbols? Brahmi च symbol (looks like a w) is close to IVC symbol for ल in your list श and ष have different IVC symbols, but ष and ह have the same IVC symbols which is strange ट, ठ, ड, ढ, ण is supposed to have been imported into Sanskrit from Dravidian (or Munda) much later than IVC times.

He is beating this story for the past two years. No other scholars are buying into this.

Hello Yajnadevam Sir! I am writing this huge comment only for you. I think you have done some really amazing work and achieved what many people believed to be nearly impossible! I myself cannot do much with this or help you a lot with your precious service to us all, but I hope it can be of help to you. Have a look- I actually used to believe what was taught to us at school that some 'ARYAN PEOPLE' came to India in 1500 BC, but lately I have been feeling like things do not add up. Dasharanya War : - It is the oldest recorded war in India. It does not mean Battle of Tens of Kings. It means - 'Battle of Tens of Kings'. Like dosens of kings. More than 25 different tribes are mentioned who took part in the conflict. Only 5 of these are the prominent so called 'Vedic' tribes. Vedic and non-vedic tribes seem to be co-operating with each other and living together. - Also, the name of the Bharata's king 'Sudas' has 'das' in it, suggesting that the clear cut two races of people called 'Aryans' and 'Dasyus' may not be accurate. Coz here is an apparently 'Aryan' King, with a name of the people he is apparently conquering. - Also, the conflict could have been over water as Saraswati was drying up. Saraswati was very important to these people. Prominence of Indra in the Rig veda might have been due to him being the Monsoon God and these people becoming desperate for water as Saraswati dried up. Before that, Agni might have been more prominent. Indra, Asura and Surya : It is portrayed as if Iranians worshiped Asuras while Indians worshiped Devtas like Indra. That does not seem to be completely true. - Indra being considered the villain and Asuras being worshiped is not some exclusive feature of the Iranians. It is very prominently present in India too. - Indra seems to be most prominent among the Bharta tribe in the Haryana region and surroundings. Other people even in India seem to be against Indra. So, not just Iran, even central UP and other areas were also against Indra. This is the reason Indra is not worshipped today. As Bharata tribe faded, so did the worship of Indra. - In fact, Vishwamitra is also portrayed as being enemy of Indra and Indra is believed to have done evil things to disrupt his tapasya. - Indra's prominence might have risen among the Bharata tribe due to Saraswati drying up and the people being desperate for water. - Surya himself was an Asura god and he was very prominent in India and always remained. While Indra is not prominent anymore and has negative conotations. Surya remains much more prominent to this day. So, Asuras like Surya being prominent and preffered and Devta's like Indra being rediculed, is not a characteristic of Iranians, same thing happened in India, just not as clear cut as both kinds of people wrote our texts. IRAN AND MITTANI Western narattive seems to be that Mittani, Iranians and Indians separated from a common people somewhere outside of these places. I dont think the facts line up as well. Look at these things. Mittani : It is very likely that they migrated from India probably around the time Saraswati was drying up and conflicts arose. 1. Mittani are established in the middle east in 1500 BC. 2. Mittani Language is actually quite close to Sanskrit. The words they use seem to be closest to the comparative words used in India. The word they used for one is 'eka/aika'. It is also only used in India alone as far as we know. Not even in Iran. In Iranian texts 'Aiva' is used. 3. They quite clearly worshipped vedic gods. Indra, Mitra and Varuna are mentined in there texts. If you know of any other civilization in the whole world that worships a monsoon GOD named Indra, please inform me. Until then, it seems India has to be the most probable place of origin. Not even the Iranians worship Indra. Iranians and Avesta : 1. It uses a language very close to sanskrit, in structure, grammer, and vocabulary. 2. But, some scholars have suggested that the language actually more closely resembles later vedic sanskrit and not the older more archaic sanskrit. 3. This is how linguistic dating works and may work for relative dating of texts but may be very unreliable for absolute dating. 4. When compared to vedic literature, Avestan ancient literature is extremely limited(Like 17 long Hymns). Vedas have thousands of hymns, dozens and dozens of named authors and families. Verifiable places, rivers, tribes and kingdoms, many of which can be traced and identified to this day. 5. For the creation, preservation and study of the vedas, vedangas were created later on. Chanda Vedanga studies the various meters of the vedic hymns. Meters used by Avesta are mentined in Chanda Vedanga. 6. Considering this, Rig vedic tradition seems much more developed, robust, exhausive, expansive. Avesta on the other hand seems like a Spin-off that later developed into a full-fledged religion. 7. The study and translation of the Avesta is extremely dependent on the Vedas and not the other way around. 8. On top of that, Avesta mentions an 'original homeland' and calls it 'Aryanam Vajeh'. Avesta also mentions Saraswati river. 9. Vedas do not suggest a homeland outside of India nor any migration. Instead, Indian texts seem to call North India the land of Aryans. Vedas do not mention any geographical feature that has been identified outside India with any level of confidence. The rivers mentioned in Rig veda are in order from west to east. They are present in the same order and identified. 10. Saraswati has also been mentioned in the Rig Veda very prominently and its location is also mentioned as between between Yamuna and Satluj. Archeological evidence also suggests that this was probably one of the most important rivers for the Indus Valey people. 11. Saraswati did dry up. It is a fact. People living around it did migrate. They even moved thousands of kilometers into South India through the forests. WHY WOULD THEY NOT MOVE TO IRAN WHICH WAS MUCH CLOSER? In fact, just next door to western Indus valley Settlements. Considering all this, I do feel that a westward migration from India is very likely. Now, if Vedic people came from outside, NO settlements in central Asia following the Vedic culture have been clearly identified. A lot of empty speculations. In fact, central Asian settlements were very small, mostly like a few hundred people. They were no match contemporary Indian settlements. Also NOTE: The apparent so called 'Aryan gene', it's highest concentration is found in North India and not any place outside India. SO, DO LOOK INTO THESE THINGS AS WELL. ALL THE BEST!

Great work! Mainstream archeologists wont be happy. What does the inscription of seal M420 (Pashupati seal) translate to?

Interesting that you mention that the dealings were used to mint coins. But then question would be why no such coins have ever been found across so many sites.

Strongly disagree with Steve Bontas findings. The statements like "Conclusions: Found names like Ravi, Ratisena, Varman, Sarmna, Pati, Pathni, Deva, Sri , Bhupati, Bhapala, Dhanapala, .. proving the language underlying the Indus Script is an early form of Sanskrit!" is ludicrous. Some of these refined names did not even exist in that form even 1000 years ago... Part of a hidden agenda which is financed and supported by some sources in India to prove everything came form Sanskrit. Sanskrit is an old language - one of the main root of INdo -European Family - which can exist and stand on its own without resorting to gimmicks like this. This kind of stupid theoris as put forward here can also malign and pollute the discussion in this area.

Wonderful work. Appreciate your effort and hard work. Can you help me to translate Dholavira signorad.

Amazing information- Jai Hind ❤

Steppe pastoralists migrated to india after 700bc according to genetics.

This QnA has answered all of my so so many questions. Thanks a lot for this amazing achievement! ❤

A white guy deciphering another peoples' script. Imagine that, lol. Covert as sheeeeeeeeet. (No Vedic God references, .......how conveeeeeeenient.) If this guy is the Mormon Steven Bonta, he threatened my life once -- total deep state tool.)

Upendra is Vamana Avatar the younger brother of Indra and one of 12 sons of Aditi

,,,we are not fools, you have the rudimentary brain. Assure you,, you will be exposed soon. The money alloted to do research on sanscrit, the ? Is how much ; this real lier. Kindly quickly quit. U have no self respect as well no respect for the truth.

Pala are still use in Buddhist specially in Mahayana. Specially Dammapala a mean protector.

Jijith Ravi recently appreciated your work. Though I had seen your previous video and knew about it. How does your work reconcile with S. Talageri's monumental work.

Seems like whole India was fed up with Dravidian fakery. Everyone is feeling great that we have shared history.

Consider Gupta & Yukteshwar Hindu timeline ( Academia)

Every 2000 years the AUTUMN EQUINOX changes the constellation ; now it is in Virgo,from 500 AD to 2500 AD ( 2000 years) it will stay in Virgo. Autumn equinox was in Saggitarius before Virgo; Yukteswar Giri ( Holy book ) Hindu timeline and Dr Gupta model suggest RIGVEDA 6000 BCE Ramayan EVENT 5000 BCE Mature Harappan cum Descending Dwapar Yuga 3100 BCE to 900 BCE. MAHABHARTA EVENT 900 BCE in last Sandhi period of Descending Dwapar Yuga.

With DNA analysis it was correctly shown how people migrated ftom different parts to indian sub continent. Indus valley people itslef didnt orginate in that region. They also came from Anatolia. Vedic people came from iran. But their languages might have mixed, even people mix. But north indian and south indian have different ancestry

Jai Shri Krishana.

Why are you guys puvlishinytgr research paper if you have truly deciphered, let the news spread out to the world

Wow, anything Mr. Yajna Devam puts out, I am watching lately. What a learning experience. Thank you so much for bringing these amazing facts in front of all of us.🙏

Sir, How old is this script. Can this finding establish that IVC was the predecessor of Sanskrit script probably the Prakrit one and Rig Veda was written in later Sanskrit script or verses recited

The UNICORN is TRADITIONAL VYAL OR YALLI

its based on urdu