Видео

Maybe. I know I'd get a lot more views as a talking head and I'll probably have no choice to ever get the channel off the ground. I think for some reason I got it in my head it would me condescending to say this stuff myself and it would be easier for people to hear from AI. I was mid-psychosis at the time, but the idea stuck around that I should just rely on the content of what I say and not make it about me. But reality's nothing if not fluid so I expect to change my mind.

That is an excellent theory, but ever since Tesla used the Ether to explain things, people have been conflating it with physicalist interpretations, and it was easier for Tesla to leave it hanging as something outside of us that only he seemed to be able to understand, rather than explain it as a representation of something internal we all have access to. Though he made that clear in his more esoteric writing. So Wheeler says all sorts of things that are correct but then goes off into the ether, as they say. But if everything is toroids, that are self sustaining, and appear through time as waves like I say, energy doesn't need a medium! So what really is the ether? The ether is not a substance or an undetectable medium, but the logical framework that provides the universal models for understanding how objects can organize and interact. I like to call this the Logos-the underlying structure of relational dynamics - because it avoids the connotations of the 'ether.' The other things people use to refer to the Logos are Sacred Geometry and Vibrations. Everyone is blown away by how the patterns manifest in their specific ares of interest; so they don't see the patterns are reflected everywhere. Until you realize that, you can't start lining them up. Let me show you how Wheeler's concepts line up: Triad 1: Inverse Proportion (Magnetism and Dielectricity) as Logos Objects: Magnetic Field Strength (A), Dielectric Displacement (B), Distance (C) In this triad, the logos is the inverse proportionality between magnetic field strength and dielectric displacement modulated by distance. The ether, interpreted as Logos here, is the self-reinforcing pattern that emerges from this reciprocal relationship. The magnetic and dielectric fields aren’t separate things that exist in isolation; their interdependence is the very pattern that defines their existence. The inverse-square law becomes part of this abstract etheric pattern, the organizing principle that describes how these forces behave across space. The logos of this triad is the balance and feedback loop between magnetic and dielectric fields, both adjusting in a reciprocal manner as distance changes. The “ether” is not a mysterious substance here but a way of describing how these forces maintain their proportional relationships dynamically. Triad 2: Gyromagnetic Ratio as Logos Objects: Magnetic Moment (A), Angular Momentum (B), Charge-to-Mass Ratio (C) The gyromagnetic ratio connects the magnetic moment and angular momentum of a particle, mediated by the charge-to-mass ratio. The ether (as Logos) is the pattern of interaction that aligns these measurable phenomena in a way that reinforces their relationship. The logos here expresses how a particle’s rotation (angular momentum) and its intrinsic magnetic properties are not separate-they are interwoven in a dynamic relationship governed by this ratio. The ether becomes the law of proportionality that organizes these objects. The gyromagnetic ratio is a fundamental interaction pattern-a Logos that dictates how these quantities behave in relation to one another. The “ether” doesn’t need to be a physical medium, but rather the interaction framework that causes this ratio to manifest in predictable ways. Triad 3: Field Propagation (Inverse-Square Law) as Logos Objects: Magnetic Field Intensity (A), Dielectric Field Strength (B), Distance (C) The inverse-square law governing the relationship between field strength and distance is another example of a logos at work. Here, the ether represents the principle of interaction that ensures that as distance increases, field strength decreases predictably. This triad showcases the pattern that structures how fields propagate across space. The "ether" in this sense is just the relationship itself, the inherent order that governs the measurable changes in field intensity. Instead of thinking of a medium that fields propagate through, the ether is the relational pattern described by the inverse-square law-a geometric law of proportionality that explains how forces decay over space. Triad 4: Permittivity and Permeability (Speed of Light) as Logos Objects: Permittivity of Free Space (A), Permeability of Free Space (B), Speed of Light (C) The equation here reflects a fundamental interaction between permittivity and permeability, where the speed of light is determined by these two constants. In Wheeler’s framework, this could have been interpreted as an expression of the ether, but in our Logos-based view, it's really a pattern of interaction between these constants. The speed of light emerges as a product of relationships between permittivity and permeability. These aren’t just constants-they’re part of the relational fabric that organizes electromagnetic propagation. The logos here is the self-consistent pattern that ties together the constants of space to produce light speed. The ether, as an organizing principle, ensures that these constants are in harmonious balance, determining light’s velocity. Thus, the ether isn’t a medium but the formulaic relationship between these physical constants. Triad 5: Wavelength, Frequency, and Light as Logos Objects: Frequency (A), Wavelength (B), Speed of Light (C) In the classic wave equation c=fλ, the speed of light is the product of frequency and wavelength. The ether, in the sense of Logos, is the relationship that ties frequency and wavelength together to produce light’s behavior. The logos here is the harmonic structure that governs electromagnetic wave propagation. Frequency and wavelength are interconnected aspects of this pattern, with the speed of light being an emergent property of their relationship. Light itself can be understood as a manifestation of this logos-an orderly interaction between frequency and wavelength. The ether isn’t something light travels through; it’s the structural relationship that dictates how light’s frequency and wavelength behave in unison. Triad 6: Polarization, Permittivity, and Magnetic Field Intensity as Logos Objects: Polarization (A), Permittivity (B), Magnetic Field Intensity (C) In Wheeler’s framework, polarization depends on both the permittivity of the medium and the magnetic field intensity. The logos of this triad lies in the interactive relationship between these three measurable elements. The logos is the set of rules that governs how polarization emerges in a material, influenced by the magnetic field and permittivity. The ether, in this sense, is the pattern of interaction rather than a material object. Polarization becomes a structural outcome of this interaction, and the ether as Logos describes the way in which magnetic intensity and permittivity combine to produce observable polarization effects. No medium is necessary to explain it-just the patterns that are already present in these interrelations. So the ether, understood this way, isn’t a hidden substance but a pattern of proportionality, a description of how objects and forces naturally organize themselves into triads of interaction. This approach dissolves the ambiguity around the "ether" as a physical medium and allows us to focus on the patterns that emerge through interactions in nature, each described through measurable quantities and their logical interdependencies.

RIGHT ON