Видео

Merneptah stele say israel Is laid waste. It's seed is not.

Go Archangel Michael 🏃‍♀️🏃‍♀️🏃‍♀️

Yooooooo thats my real name

Sin is fun for a season, but the end there of is death

Wheeling a dealing is the name of the game when you are in power. The high priests seem like they are the shady ones. To the people they look pious and respectable and with a calling from God, but in reality they are just buying the franchise. Bible readers give so much respect to these ancient jewish figures and despise a king just because am ancient jewish commentator say so. Form your own opinion.

t

I’m late but I have to disagree, Mark doesn’t have a neutral portrayal of the Jewish leaders at all, just like in Mathew and Luke they are portrayed as Hypocrites, self righteous and heart hardened, this is seen especially when Jesus heals on the sabbath: Then Jesus asked them, “Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill?” But they remained silent. 5 He looked around at them in anger and, deeply distressed at their stubborn hearts, said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his hand was completely restored. 6 Then the Pharisees went out and began to plot with the Herodians how they might kill Jesus. Mark 3:6 This doesn’t seem like a neutral portrayal at all. Jesus also acuses them of hypocrisy and even quotes Isiah while doing so: So the Pharisees and teachers of the law asked Jesus, “Why don’t your disciples live according to the tradition of the elders instead of eating their food with defiled hands?” 6 He replied, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written: “‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. 7 They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules Mark 7:5-7 Jesus warns his diciplee about the yeast of the Pharisees: The disciples had forgotten to bring bread, except for one loaf they had with them in the boat. 15 “Be careful,” Jesus warned them. “Watch out for the yeast of the Pharisees and that of Herod.” I could go on but that’s enough proof to dismiss your claim that Mark has a neutral portrayal of the Jewish leaders, they’re the ones that arranged Jesus arrest, spit on him and mocked him during his trial and when Pilate gives them the choice between a prisoner and Jesus they choose the prisoner. Even during the crucifixion Mak has the Jewish leaders mocking Jesus, to say that’s neutral portrayal is a bit weird. You should also see the parable of the vineyard on Mark, which seems to make a similar point to the parable of the great banket: “A man planted a vineyard, put a fence around it, dug out a pit for a winepress, and built a watchtower. Then he leased it to tenant farmers and went away. 2 At harvest time he sent a slave to the farmers to collect some of the fruit of the vineyard from the farmers. 3 But they took him, beat him, and sent him away empty-handed. 4 Again he sent another slave to them, and they[a] hit him on the head and treated him shamefully.[b] 5 Then he sent another, and they killed that one. He also sent many others; they beat some and they killed some. 6 “He still had one to send, a beloved son. Finally he sent him to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’ 7 “But those tenant farmers said among themselves, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him, and the inheritance will be ours!’ 8 So they seized him, killed him, and threw him out of the vineyard. 9 “Therefore, what will the owner[c] of the vineyard do? He will come and destroy the farmers and give the vineyard to others. I could make more points but I’m kinda tired of writing

I have seen other sites saying 44 Kings🤔

Rene reyes

15:20 We read that the 'certain imposter' was destroyed. So the Egyptian was actually killed?

I asked the Lord, who is the angelic being in Danielle 10 who Michael had to rescue? Thank you.

You would have to ignore other scripture for this to be true. Remember John the baptist was prophecied to prepare the way for Yahweh. Isaiah 40:3. Then Matthew 3:3 John is preparing the way for Jesus. Matthew definitely believes Jesus is God, not Michael.

"What's the Abominable of Desolation?" It's when God, was creating this Earth. And that, will be done again...When Jesus' 2nd creating the last 7th, of of our 1,000 yrs! No Nothing, but "dirt and rock". And, NO water or seas either, etc, nothing atoll. That is when Jesus has (every human), separating the Born Again's; from the Non Born Again's. Then He, will cast ALL "non" Born Again's; into a "Burning Lake of Fire." to (Hell). But the Born Again's, will be sent to a New Earth, and a New Heaven, a New Jerusalem and a New Holy Temple (And that is Jesus). Where we Born Again's; will be with Jesus in a "ONE" Spiritual being, Forever! AMEN!

really enjoyed this! thanks

But who was his father and mother? He, Omri, has no ancestry!

[ The economic dilemma of the Antichrist & relative immortality ] (Six hundred three SCORE and six) 666 [Important] The bible only uses the score counting method with 7 different kinds of categories, everything in existence can be classified into one, or more, of these 7 categories. Score categories 1.)Man. 2.Time. 3.)Money. 4.)Plants. 5.)Animals. 6.)Locations. 7.)Length/Measurement. [note] these seven categories of SCORE counting are the first seven categories associated with Gods creation and also mans creation in Genesis…… and that category order in Genesis goes… 1.) Time. ( Gen. 1:1 in the beginning..) 2.) Location. ( Gen. 1:2 God hovering over the deep..) 3.) measurements. ( Gen.1:6 God divided the land the sea’s the heavens etc..) 4.) plants. ( Gen.1:11 earth produced seed after his kind…) 5.) animals. ( Gen.1:sea and earth produce animals after theyre kind) 6.) man (Gen.1:26 let us go down and make man in our image) 7.) money/greed (Gen.3:6 she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also to her husband) i.e mans creation. ………………………….. The Mark Of The Beast. The mark of the beast is conveyed in the bible with the score counting system… “Six hundred three score and six” ~its the number of a MAN~ category 1.(MAN) [note] All of the categories that are mentioned above are exactly what the beast/Anti-Christ in Revelation comes to have complete control over. The Mark of the beast is an >exchange<…. I.e The ability to buy trade and sale in exchange for taking the mark and pledging allegiance to The Beast. Category 3.(MONEY) … If you are found anywhere the beast has immediate control and you also oppose the beast, your as good as dead. Category 6(LOCATION) … Plants & animals can pretty much be lumped together with money property or recourses, so… category 3.(MONEY) … Length and measurements Now this I believe is linked to another category and thats the TIME category… (2.TIME) How do i think the Antichrist will come to have control over TIME…?? When God kicked adam and eve out of the garden there was one ☝️ tree that was “left behind” ON EARTH… The Tree of Life. ( I believe the tree of life only gave you partial immortality, or in other words, they had to keep eating from it to have an eternal effect…) …🤔what if the devil is in possession of this trees fruit….? If so, then the Antichrist could potentially offer to us humans relative immortality as something that is apart of the offer of taking the mark of the beast… extra life!! Six hundred three score and six years of it. …or 666 years of extra life added onto whatever life span you already have. Why would there be this extra part of the deal of taking the mark that includes EXTRA LIFE??? 🤔 Iv always found it problematic trying to imagine how the Antichrist would exactly go about implementing such an economic system and with such impunity.. Its seemse to me that this system of the beast is so tyrannical that if implemented right now at this very Moment in time, i would imagine even every single Atheist non believer rejecting such a system out right on the pure basis of it simply not being a FREE SYSTEM….. ( Every blue haired liberal would be out in the streets rioting over the fact of being forced to bare a mark on they’re right hand or forehead just so they can buy and sell things…!! ) and how could THAT be in the devils plans?? Why would he actively do something that would lose a non believers “already gained” allegiance to him by virtue of theyre non belief in God!! this makes no sense. Unless there was some kind of catalyst involved ….. like immortality or at the very least, relative immortality…🤷🏻‍♂️ 🤔if “The Pot” was sweetened! With lets say…. Extra life! Category 2. (TIME) That might be something everyone and they’re dog would jump too!! This, to me, seems like a way more plausible implementation of a tyranny that comes to be willfully accepted then just the bare bones aspect of the Mark of the beast that is conveyed in revelation……….there, its just tyranny!! and thats it…… 🤷🏻‍♂️ A pure tyranny posses massive problems especially if its lead by the Antichrist because of the Antichrist’s Goal ( gaining Gods status) …. How could you do that by means of tyranny!?!? Maybe its not going to be a tyranny at all… Supporting thoughts Isn’t it not true that the devil not only wants to do away with God, but he himself, wants to be God?? or at the very least, have us humans believe these things about him, for himself?? If this is the case then its not to far off to imagine that the devil at least wants us to believe that he is ALSO a LIFE giver ( like God is) Now.. Lets say for the sake of argument that im right about the “relative immortality/666 years” part….! If we now have a population that has taken something that grants them extra life, i can imagine that this “new population” probably wont have to consume recourses like they once had to in order to stay alive…🤷🏻‍♂️ i mean theyre going to live to 666 years regardless at that point, so i see things like food and recourses becoming a PURE commodity…( this could explain why the bible reports that recourses will be EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE during this time) I.e… ~and i heard a voice amongst the four angels say “a measure of wheat for a days wages and a measure of barely for a days wages”… But now since food and recourses are things of pure pleasure in the eyes of this “new population”…. Now! The ones who didn’t take The Mark (The believers) and did not therefore gain extra life, will have to keep consuming the recourses at the usual rate. To this new population, it will look like the ones who didn’t take the mark are sucking up all the pleasurable recourses……and at this point they’ll be calling for the death of those who threaten they’re new “way of life”…..

My name is onias

My name is onias

🔥 ILLUMINA, DOMINE, VULTUM TUUM SUPER NOS 🔥SHINE, LORD, THE LIGHT OF THY COUNTENANCE U[ON US

🔥MOST PRECIOUS BLOOD 🩸 OF JESUS CHRIST, SAVE US AND THE WHOLE WORLD 🌎

Matthew was Jewish. Mark wasn't. So the Jew was hard on the Jews? Go figure.

Interesting. Copied material is actually is more realistic in the way that people release their own accounts of events. It doesn't become a problem unless the first guy lied, and the 2nd one and after are just blindly copying his work instead of attempting to be an actual witness.

Re: Atalus- Pergamon helping Antiochus 4 to ascend to his kingship- note ( Rev. 2.13 as The Seat of Satan is in Pergamon!) Now see it Repeat in- ( Rev. 13.1-7 As Beast rises the status ‘of Beast-here’ switch’s from The Empire to The Man ( See Dan.7.8- Little Horn is- 666 and Not Antiochus 4!) And as ( Rev.13.2 states - The Dragon- Satan give his power to ( Now) The Beast ( Dan.7.8) who now is The Man- 666!

Today our Politicians do not- can Not ‘openly’ kill each other- this is instead done by seemingly Third ( very unbalanced individuals .ie Trump ‘shooter!’j None the less it is The Prophesies that Lock it Altogether . Ie Rev. 13.3-5) Again it is ( Mat.24.6- ‘signs’ that are paralleling What is!)

As of Oct. 6 2024 as we head into US Presidential Elections ( Dan. To Rev. ‘Seems’ to fit together nicely as the Mat.24.6- ‘signs’ are proving!) Again- a little more Time will tell?

Matthew was there tho, agreed?

Cool video, but it doesn’t all check out. As I stated in another comment, your interpretation that the guards are Jewish does not check out. The way you interpret “you have a guard” to mean that Pilate is insinuating the Jews have their own guard to use only comes from a select few English translations. The Greek is better translated “take ye a guard”…The Greek verb may be either imperative or indicative. The former gives the better meaning. The “watch,” or “guard,” was a body of Roman soldiers “koustódia” who could not be set to such a task without Pilate’s permission. If the priests had had such a “guard” at their disposal before, there would have been no need for them to apply to Pilate.

Wait the Jews were Evil tho *AND* responsible for Jesus' Death.

Interesting case. About halfway through the video and I noticed a couple things when checking your work. 1. The Greek word used for “guard/watch” in Matt. 27:65 is “κουστωδίαν” (koustōdian) and is of Latin origin, which would indicate Roman soldiers, and the word is only used three times (Matt. 27:65-66 and 28:11). 2. In Matt. 28:12 these guards are specifically identified as “soldiers” which is used 26 times in Greek to exclusively refer to Roman guards.

Josephus wrote Luke . The whole tale is a concocted Roman religious propaganda intended to declare the Flavian dynasty as the new Messiahs. Upon the fall of the dynasty after Domitiuos roman Caesars turned back on the project and tried to suppress it. It nevertheless continued in secret and branched into several sects and versions prosecuted by some emperors and tolerated by others as long as Rome's supremacy is acknowledged . 250 years later we had the roman version of the religion and the eastern version in stark conflict, Hence, the Roman empire sought to force its original version ( a deified Messiah with Rome as supreme representative). It fought a fierce religious / doctrine war in the east Mediterranean and crushed / purged all other versions and other religions. By 330s , it was able to force its concoction of the tale and contemporary Christianity was borne.

Huge fan of your videos, but I feel like there is some cherry picking going on in this series, and I am not confident in our ability to discern Matthew's motives in making the changes he does. For instance, you say that Matthew's addition of Peter walking on the water is meant to elevate Peter as a leader of the church-but the very passage you quote shows that Peter FAILS to walk on the water, and Jesus thus berates him as "one of little faith." If Matthew was simply adding this story for the reason you posit, why wouldn't he have Peter walk confidently on the water and receive praise for having GREAT faith? I suspect that if the situation were reversed-if Mark had included the story and Matthew had omitted it-you would argue that Matthew disliked the story of Peter failing to walk on water, which is why he left it out. But if the opposite scenario can be used to support your theory just as easily, then perhaps the evidence isn't so clearly pointing in one direction after all. Similarly, you say that Matthew adds James and John's mother to the narrative to make the apostles appear less foolish-but Matthew says the brothers are kneeling before Jesus as their mother is speaking. Clearly, they are also making the request, the mother is simply their spokesperson. If anything, this seems like an even more pathetic display! They didn't even have the courage to ask Jesus themselves? If Matthew's agenda is what you assume, it seems to me that James and John would not be present at all-or would even contradict/rebuke their mother for asking such a thing of their master. I am not saying that there is nothing to your hypothesis, and I readily accept that the Gospels contradict each other (so I am not coming at this from the POV that everything must be harmonized), but I think the evidence seriously undetermines your specific conclusions. One last example. In your previous video, you argued that Matthew's view of the Jewish leaders is more negative than that of Mark-which I think is broadly true-but Matthew includes something, which Mark does not, that actually upholds the authority of the Jewish leaders. “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses' seat, *so do and observe whatever they tell you,* but not the works they do" (Matthew 23:2-3). Here, though Jesus is continuing his trend of criticizing the moral character of the Jewish leaders, he is also affirming their authority-something Mark says nothing about. I think these passages are just as important to discuss as the others you mentioned in your video, as they give a more complete picture and suggest (to me at least) that more may be going on than that "Matthew is more anti-Jewish leaders than Mark." All of this being said, I continue to be a very happy Patron and remain excited to see your next video!

Thank You

I continue to enjoy your videos

Great video as always

Thank you for your detailed analysis.

Thank You Sir, Yes You Are 100% Right. I Am Agree With You Sir.

The covenant said if I don’t do my part may this happen to me. If this is what God was saying to Abraham and that it actually happened to God, doesn’t that mean that He would have broken that covenant?

The worship of the golden calves at Dan and Bethel put a curse on the Northern kingdom

I wouldn't reach to far there I believe it is Gabriel to but also the hand was probably same Daniel was shook up Gabriel is kind and caring I believe it was him to or Michael is as well if it was the antichrist that wouldn't make sense as the visions are explained not by the devil or Satan who wouldn't tell the truth to anyone 😅

4:11 This is why I don't like Red and Green🔴🟢, but keh good luck (These aren't just stories people, written in the book of TRUTH as fables and parables) #HiddenMessages

4:11 This is why I don't like Red and Green🔴🟢, but keh goodluck

There's a reason why God (YHWH) gave the Israelites commandments and Rules before they even got the land. (The Question is why He gave us Jesus Christ After) every country has a Constitution and A Bill of Rights. In a Democracy It all depends on a country if it wants to be united on A lie and what is wrong or on TRUTH and What is right. At the end of the day it's all about Commonunity = Common Unity. The people Decide what kind of Guardian Angel they want over their territory Examples of a person’s basic human rights include the right to privacy, dignity, equality, access to healthcare, freedom of speech, fair labour practices, and so on. As for me: I choose TRUTH Always regardless of others (choices or actions).

There's a reason why God (Jehovah) gave the Israelites commandments and Rules before they even got the land. (The Question is why He gave us Jesus Christ After) every country has a Constitution and A Bill of Rights. In a Democracy It all depends on a country if it wants to be united on A lie and what is wrong or on TRUTH and What is right. At the end of the day it's all about Commonunity = Common Unity. The people Decide what kind of Guardian Angel they want over their territory Examples of a person’s basic human rights include the right to privacy, dignity, equality, access to healthcare, freedom of speech, fair labour practices, and so on. As for me: I chose TRUTH Always regardless of others.

There's a reason why God (Jehovah) gave the Israelites commandments and Rules before they even got the land every country has a Constitution and A Bill of Rights. In a Democracy It all depends on a country if it wants to be united on A lie and what is wrong or on TRUTH and What is right. At the end of the day its all about Commonunity = Common Unity. The people Decide what kind of Gaurdian Angel they want ovwer their territory Examples of a person’s basic human rights include, the right to privacy, dignity, equality, access to healthcare, freedom of speech, fair labour practices, and so on.

Very interesting. Luke used Codex Sinaiticus and Mattew used Codex Alexandrinus.

Love you From Pakistan

The im’s come from Mizraim: Casluhim, Caphtorim, emim, zamzumim, Philistim, nephilim Anakim. Also the gods come from Egypt. The peleset came from Egypt and were trying to go back. Before the Giants were wiped out a king named Chedolaomer had them in subjugation but they rebelled and so Chedorlaomer waged war on them. The ites may come from Canaan the Cannanite. Here’s a list of things that happened in 1200 bc: 1313 Moses exodus leaves Egypt Heracles born 1286 bc in Greece 1273 Moses dies Heracles sacks Troy 1246 1245 Joshua dies Herakles dies 1236 Judges rule beginning with Othniel 1228 1214 Seven against Thebes 1207 bc October 30 at 4:28 pm, solar eclipse. Joshua prayed to protect the Gibeonites. “Sun stand still”. 1204 The Epigoni 1199-1189 Trojan War 1184 return of the Herakladae or the Dorian Invasion

and Cyrene, and Libya and the Cycladic Islands they also inhabited Italy, Sicily Sardinia, Malta, and Ionia

Gesus loves you!

By being ground as "thin as dust" they're essentially 'killing' it, because dust is what we become when we die.