Видео

@@rajatdas223 it should be working. Have you tried setting the profile of Wukong in the adrenaline software, then launching the game?...also make sure you have chosen bordeless , and set search mode to High/ Quality

@@krosh8982 5700x. What problems are you getting?..I will try to help

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks my cpu is also 5700x, i'm getting 110 fps at low settings in fights and it feels so much unsmooth, unlike my 2070

@@krosh8982 if you are playing on low settings, then you are getting bottlenecked. The 2070 won't be bottlenecked by the 5700x, so FPS won't fluctuate as much. Maybe, try using higher settings or resolution and try vsync to see if you get a consistent/smoother experience.

@@damnman2862 thank you. I have the same model, 7800xt gigabyte oc model. I have a regular case, Cyberpower Blaze Mid Tower Case. I temps depends on what fan settings I choose to use. For a heavy oc setting I would set the fans to maximum power. But my temps are usually between 50-55.

@@sevans1596 the higher your monitor refresh rate the better experience you will have. I have a 165hz monitor, so I couldn't notice screen tearing or that much jitter when panning the camera. I think this specific game, afmf2 performs pretty well. I did not notice much latency with afmf2 by itself, so much so that I could also use fsr3 in combination. The latency with both is still not bad, especially on a controller.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks I see would you say I should stay on the normal drivers because on release of ff16 there will be fsr 3.1 in game

@@sevans1596 yh I think you should stay on the recent updated drivers, because It is a lot of hassle to use ddu/AMD clean up. Also, the game will have fsr3.1 FG officially implemented. But personally I am enjoying afmf2 preview driver because there are games without official fsr3 fg officially implemented, so afmf2 is a good alternative imo.

@@BioClone what model card do you have?..and CPU?

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks The powercolor 7800 and a Rizen 9 7950X3d... However I managed to make it performs better... apparently seems like audio problems lead to lost many frames in the process?¿? lol

@@BioClone 🤣 very strange. But now it is working 👍

5700x. What is your CPU?...and are you using the exact same settings?...

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks r7 7700 is mine. I think yes i use same settings. I will try tonight again.

@@massterwushu9699 7800xt gigabyte model, 5700x CPU, 4TB storage, 850w PSU, 1440p 32 inch curved monitor 165 hz, also 4k 50 inch display, 43 inch 4k display, 27 inch 1440p 100hz display. I have a lot of displays 😂.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarksThanks! we actually have the exact same build. Monitor and all!! 😂😂 im trying to decide between the 7800xt or the 7900GRE at the moment.

@@massterwushu9699 7900gre. Get a good model like nitro+ or Asus tuf oc model. Then manually overclock it, you will have it trading blows with a 4070ti super, and RT performance is not bad, only path tracing is difficult. But I would take 16gb vram, similar 4070 ti super performance for $500-$550. A bargain imo.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks Thanks!! That’s my train of thought too. It’ll be my first AMD card so we’ll see how that goes

​@@RX7800XTBenchmarksyou could have also listed your gaming chair, mice or any drinks you use.

@@Chimera_0990tfr I would say it is around the 7900gre nitro+ , which is 3% slower than the 4070ti at 1440p (tech power up). But then you could oc the 7900gre nitro to trade blows with the 4070 ti super. In raster + FG, I'm beating the 4070 ti, even with FG enabled on the 4070ti. My normal oc settings are : 2802 min, 5000 max, 15% power, 2614 memory, 975 MV. Some games I have to adjust the voltage. 7800XT gigabyte oc model.

​@@RX7800XTBenchmarkswhat country are you from?

@@Chimera_0990tfr UK

@@Chimera_0990tfr Shockingly, the latency is not bad at all. I'm not sure what to compare it to, but it didn't feel like 2 different frame generation was being used. I could easily play with both until I completely finished the game with a mouse and keyboard. On a controller the ratio is built differently, and I was struggling to notice a significant difference between having just one FG enabled as apposed to two.

A regular 4070?...I can't recommend 12gb cards. But if I had to choose a 12gb card it would be 4070 super or a 4070 ti on a good deal. The regular 4070 is not better than the 7800xt. Regular RT both are similar, but the 4070 does better with Path tracing. Dlss is good, better than FSR. It depends on your personal needs. I have my 7800xt tuned to my liking and really the regular 4070 doesn't stand a chance apart from Path tracing. But, it's still a good choice when using dlss and frame generation. You'll be happy gaming whatever you choose.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks 4070 super 100 dollar more so i can only get 7900 gre or regular 4070 ti is even more expensive dlss3 can beat 7900 gre ? Or you recommend 7900 still

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks İ think i cant see 20 fps diffrence and probably maximum i will use 3-4 year or 2-3 year

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks Super cost 100 dollar more for 15 percent better i think dont worth dlss 3 framegen beats 7900gre as i see

@@adonizss overall, I think you will be satisfied. If you can't play at 1440p with Path tracing, then you could also use 1080p or 1200p. It also depends on how much the 4070 cost. If it is $100 difference, then I would get the regular 4070 over the 4070 super. Ray tracing is very similar, only non RT, the super is a little faster. The 7900 gre is just the better buy over the 4070 in my opinion. You can overclock it to challenge the 4070 TI super in regular rasterization, you can also play at 4k and use frame generation if you want, without worrying about vram issues. 3-4 years is quite a long time, but you have dlss which is a good upscaler.

No problem. What would you recommend?...I wanted to put the frame time graph up, but I don't know how to do it. I was also thinking about showing CPU power ect. I'm more familiar with the AMD overlay tbh.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks you can put frametime meter clocks for both cpu and gpu power draw Vram clocks

and if you have OCed your GPU then try to add the settings you have used in the description or at the beginning of the video

@@drizzith0 these are video games. Nothing is real. The characters are not real, the trees are not real. When you use upscalers at 1080p, 1440p or 4k, then you are not playing at those Real resolutions. When you watch cartoons/anime, those are not real, when you watch movies, those are not real. This is all a form of entertainment. Frame generation is a subjective and optional feature. If you don't want to use it, then the option not to use it is available. It definitely doesn't feel horrible to me, less than 10ms is added to the latency, which is 100% playable. This is not a competitive game.

Touch some grass dude

@@adonizss in just Wukong? Or other RT games...I have a few games uploaded already like cyberpunk, Alan wake 2, the Witcher 3 but not with afmf2 and FSR3 combo...I'll try to do some.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks can u do with wukong and different games i watched all of your videos but resolution is not native 1440p so i dont know 100 percent if experience will be same or worst

@@adonizss just tried the settings in Wukong. 😭 It wasn't playable my friend, took much visual flaws in movement. The other games are fine. No real issue imo. But Wukong is biased in favour of Nvidia cards. Even Nvidia cards are struggling with RT.

@@dhruv8124 🤣 I think the next generation of GPUs will be better suited to handle UE5. Everything now is geared to using upscaling and Frame generation. This game runs okay for the most part, considering AMD hasn't released an official game ready driver, lumen RT is baked into the game, Nvidia sponsored and crappy UE5 optimization. I'm actually quite happy with the overall experience on my 7800xt. I've chosen to play at 4k High with FG and I'm getting consistent 100fps, I can't really argue with that. I

@@dhruv8124 I would wait until AMD releases game ready drivers, and try to get Wukong on a sale. But if you want to buy now, I would use CDkeys site, it's a little less.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks alright, gonna wait for the driver then

@@johnspencer8982 I feel like they could have added more enemies in between the bosses. There wasn't many enemies in this scene tbh and they die after couple hits , the FPS would have stayed roughly the same because it is a dense vegetational area. Game is solid though imo.

@@argelisgonzalez5009 use my timestamps and you will see flickering on the character when moving the camera when using Lossless. There is no flickering on AFMF2. But, For the most part there is not a lot of difference. Dependant on the game and the scene, visual flaws can go either way. Afmf2 latency is far better, and it is more convenient than lossless. If you are an AMD user I don't see a reason to spend $7 for something similar that you get for free. Imo, AFMF2 is better overall, better latency and I can use it in full screen, use HDR, can use a performance overlay. Both are good alternatives if there is no official FG in games.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks thanks a lot Bro but I had a issue with afmf 2 and i dont know if you can help with this, recently install this version, and i tested It in two games The Finals and Battlefield 2042, in the Finals works good but isn't the same case that in battlefield 2042 in the software says that is active but it doesn't work and its become unplayed, do you know what is happening?

​@@argelisgonzalez5009 That is strange. I don't have battlefield anymore, but I am currently re-downloading it to see if I get the same issue. Using the AMD overlay, can you see if your FPS is doubled? ...and does the frame generation part on the overlay say "NA" or is there a number value?...if it says NA then AFMF is not enabled. Also, you might have to add the game file to adrenaline manually. Sometimes AFMF will say active but in fact it is active in something else and not actually in-game. It's weird, but it has happened to me in other games, but once I added the game file manually to adrenaline then it was okay. I'm waiting for it to download, then I will have a better idea of what is the issue.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks i gonna check out all these things.

​@@argelisgonzalez5009 I have been testing AFMF 2 in battlefield. It works perfectly for me, I didn't see any issues. What GPU do you have?...

@@raul1642 gigabyte model

@@PenX79 you can't get banned over frame generation. Anti lag + had issues before , but that has been sorted. Frame generation is also officially in warzone, so frame generation is fine to use in competitive games.

@@andersonperes4184 you can achieve 60 or above using 1440p quality mode/balance mode with high/very high settings. If you don't like upscalers, then your best bet is to use Native 1440p high preset or custom resolution of 1200p native high or very high preset. Personally, I don't mind using FG because I'm using a controller and the input lag is non existent imo. I will try to put out a video with NO Frame generation, and you can see what is best for you.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks Thank you very much! I'll give it a go.

How is the visual quality. Is it bad​@@RX7800XTBenchmarks

​@@qweasd-xf5pv we all have different tolerance levels. In my opinion the visual quality is not bad at all. The main flaws are actually coming from the upscaler. The only issue I see is there is ghosting when moving the camera quickly around the character, but I don't play games in that way, so it's not a main issue for me. I would suggest using TSR instead of FSR though.

​@@qweasd-xf5pv I would also suggest playing the video in 0.25x speed, this will allow you to bypass RUclips compression a bit more, and you will be able to see any "flaws" more easier. In 0.25x speed I still couldn't see any crazy visual flaws that would affect me significantly.

@@RDVGAMER888 if Ray Tracing/path tracing is important to you, then I would try to get a 4070 super if it is similar price. But I don't like to recommend 12 GB cards. There is more longevity with AMD cards imo. I have a good model 7800xt and overclocked, so I love the performance I'm getting.

@@RDVGAMER888 5700x...but I'm looking to upgrade soon.

@@RDVGAMER888 it depends, the 4070 is better at path tracing. Normal Ray tracing they are about the same. Dlss upscaling is better than FSR, but you can use xess instead of fsr on the 7800xt. AMD Frame generation produces more FPS on AMD hardware, which destroys the 4070. 7800xt is a better overclocker also. You can get a comparable performance to a 4070 ti with a overclock for under £500. More vram, which helps if you want to experience 4k more smoothly. Personally, I don't care about Dlss, because I can use FG on top of native instead of dropping my resolution. Latency is not a issue because I use a controller. 7800xt also has driver level Frame generation, which the new version is greatly improved and will get better , because right now it is in preview/ beta. Personally, I would get a good model 7800xt, not a reference model. I don't recommend 12gb cards, but if you do want better path tracing and upscaling is important to you, then I think a 4070 Super would be better buy than a regular 4070. 4070 super has similar raster performance to the 7800xt, but better RT, but less vram.

@@YourAverageGuyLight no problem 👍...I also tested afmf2 which is another decent alternative if you wish.

@@thunder-gaming 5700x

@@halsaufschneider1446 🤣.. I just like this aspect ratio, just a personal choice, looks good on a 55 inch screen. I'm getting over 100 FPS AVG at 16:9 2560x1440p, so it really doesn't matter. Cdpr has been getting bullied by Nvidia, so AMD had to come up with a viable alternative to official fsr3 fg implementation. Afmf2 works well enough.

@@tuna-m6b There was a few stutters, but mainly after a cut scene. This game is just like that with and without FG. Afmf2 works great though, only a little ghosting on the cross hair when moving the camera quickly. Not really a issue for me personally. 👍

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks When I activate AFMF 2 in the driver, the driver shows me AFMF 2 as inactive and sometimes its active

@@tuna-m6b strange, I have not had that issue. Are you playing in full screen?... sometimes you have to manually add the game in adrenaline

@@tuna-m6b strange, I have not had that issue. Are you playing in full screen?... sometimes you have to manually add the game in adrenaline

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks Yes fullscreen. I dont know.. strange.

I have a 55 inch 4k display, so I set the aspect ratio to Full. It looks good on a big screen. If you are on a smaller screen/monitor just set the aspect ratio to "Full", and that will fill your display and remove the black bars at the sides. Everything is a little bigger than 2056x1440p, which I like . Also extra FPS 😁

@@Geeemwo overclocked and UV. Check my oc/UV video. Gigabyte model not a reference model.

@@carlz4209 search mode high, performance mode quality. Anti lag enabled.

@@mickaelsflow6774 okay...I'll try to put a video out...thank you

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks awesome! My assumption is that by losing "only" 5-10% perf, we might see a much bigger decrease in power consumption, above 30%. But overall, very curious what the card can do at different power level.

I'm playing on a 4k 55 inch display. If you are watching on a small device like a mobile phone or a small screen, RUclips will render it to match your screen size. 2048x1538 ratio is not meant for small screens

@@bias69 how's your 3070, 8gb?...about the same price as my 7800xt, let's do some performance comparisons? 🤣

@@manuelschmidt7852 😁 it's fine for me. I wear headphones whilst gaming, so I can't really hear anything too distracting. Also, my GPU temps are cool so that's more important for me personally.

@@RX7800XTBenchmarks alright :) same also wearing a headset. I was just wondering how much resources this game takes :))

@@sparsh.j.sharma fsr3 mod from lukefz. You have to be a patreon of his to download the mod. But, I believe there's a free version on nexus mods site. You can try the free version, but I don't think it is as good. Download it, and I'll help you set it up.