Видео

Congratulations on your golden text video "Psalm 19:10 God's Word Is More Precious Than Gold" inspirational thanks for sharing. Amen. 💛

1Co 14;34-38 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. 35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. 36 What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only? 37 If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. 38 But if any man doesn't recognize this, he is not recognized.

You cannot divorce because of adultery, only for fornication and fornication is when you are not marry yet but engaged to be marry. In the eyes of God engagement is like marry, you are committed and just can't put away your spouse for any reason, only for fornication once marry it's for life. Your teaching is wrong This is the teaching of pastor Gino Jennings from First church of our lord jesus christ

*Remarriage after Divorce while 1st Spouse Lives = Adultery* Romans 7:2-3; Luke 16:18 Mark 10:6-12 Adulterers Do Not Inherit the Kingdom of God: 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Unless they Confess and Forsake their Sin: Proverbs 28:13; Luke 13:3

What are the main difference between the Geneva Bible and the KJV?

There is no reason God gave for a person to divorce. A Greek word was added by Erasmus which caused all this confusion about Matthew 19:9. Divorce does not break the marriage vows. Dr McFall said divorce papers is nothing but toilet papers in God’s eyes.

"Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees " The leaven of the LAW, through the oral laws, making the word of God to be of no effect, concerns the Jews, "Beware of the leaven of Herod" The leaven of the FAITH, by Faith only, Concerns the Gentiles , through Protestantism & Protestantization from where came Christian Zionism, complimenting each other, both to Egypt Give unto God what is to God --- FAITH, without which it is not possible to please God, but surely not a Leavened/Corrupted Faith , For that matter a leavened/corrupted LAW, For the Commanments of God came out of his love, "In the two Commandments hang the law & prophets" Where unto man the law is to convict sin & Love to live in it, for with God it is Love come as Commandments, God Changes not So , neither the Faith nor the Law is to be leavened , Leaven breed leaven,

It doesn’t say the innocent party can remarry, l…. That is till a way to go to hell. No where it says the innocent party can remarry!

There are any moving to the Majority Text over the critical text. The are problems with modern reasoned eclecticism in that you create new variants that do not exist in any earlier greek manuscripts. Critical Text proponents have often stated older and better without giving any compelling reason why other than if it's older it must be better.

The exception in Matthew is not if a spouse commits adultery. It is fornication. Premarital. The custom of the Jewish culture. King James gives the true translation because in Greek it is pornia which is fornication. Death of a spouse is the only biblical ground for remarriage. Peace.

@ChapelHillchurchofChrist A wife cannot divorce her husband for any reason or circumstance. A wife can only separate from her husband, while he is alive. 1 Corinthians 7: 10-11 KJV Bible

Greeting Pastor, I came across your Message regarding Marriage and divorce...I've been studying on this subject for quite some time now my question is my spouse committed adultery on me am I allow to remarry? Luke 16 :18 whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery I understand that when adultery is committed you are allowed to get a divorce... how ever I'm not seeing in the scripture where it says you are allowed to remarry after adultery has been committed.. just wanted to know are you able to point me to the exact scripture that says you are allowed to remarry after adultery has been committed? Like you mentioned in your message there was only two places in the Bible where remarriage is allowed and that's for the widower and a widow? The scripture also supports in 1cor7:10-11 if you are divorced you are to remain single or be reconciled with your spouse... I just have not came across the scripture that supports you are allowed to remarry once adultery has been committed in the marriage? If possible are you able to share the scripture that supports that question? I've been searching for quite some time and that is a big question for many.. I know you put this message up 4 years ago... please if possible if you come across my comment regarding your message, can you please help me find a supporting scripture for that question? Thanks again and I've truly been encouraged by the word of God.... God bless you man of god..🌈🌝🙏

Original sin is not false doctrine dude

Stephen does call upon Jesus in Acts 7:59 in the NASB95. Not sure which edition you were looking at. And as far as always using the same english word for a particular greek word-- there is something called semantic range, where many words have various definitions. The context determines what definition is to be used.

Amen my brother, God said it and that settled it. Not everyone can bite on the hard rock, but we will have to if we desire to make it heaven for those believe there is such a place.

I consider the 1901ASV to be the very best English translation to use. Far less futurist bias in it than the others.

Matthew 24 and Acts 15:28 both tie into this first abomination of desolation spoken of in Daniel. We are the 3rd temple. It matters what is placed on the alter within. Trust no man. Only God. Shalom

John 4:18 Jesus said the woman had 5 husband's and the one she is with is not her husband. So Jesus said she had 5 husbands not 5 men's she had been with. God forgives for every sin but blasphemy. Adultery is it not a sin and he gives grace and mercy. Just asking

Show me in the Bible where Jesus said go out and make Christians oh you can't can you so if it ain't from Jesus Christ then who's it from oh Satan oh okay but you call yourself a Christian I remember Jesus said call us to be disciples interesting

The bible says that the marriage is for life...the exception allows divorce if there is adultery....what scripture says the innocent party can remarry?

RSV is probably my favorite English translation Christian Bible. The vocabulary and grammar are modern, yet it's still reads very beautifully.

The divorce and remarriage for adultery doctrine is based solely on the supposed guilt of the wife in Matthew 5:32 and 19:9. However, the wife, in the above scriptures, is clearly not guilty of fornication because the Jews (that Jesus was speaking to) were still living under the law, and if fornication was discovered, there was a moral obligation to report the offender according to Deuteronomy 22:13-24. The wife, who would have been found guilty of fornication, was subsequently stoned to death, according to the law, which had still governed the Jews up until Christ's death on the cross. The same for a woman caught in adultery, according to Leviticus 20:10. How could a wife, guilty of fornication, or adultery, under the law of Moses, be given a writing of divorcement and be caused to commit adultery with whosoever marries her, that is divorced? Jesus is clear, in these examples, that the wife is not guilty of fornication, but is still caused to commit adultery if she marries another man now that she is divorced. This is the only way that Matthew 5:31-32, and Matthew 19:9 keep harmony with Romans 7:2-3, and 1 Corinthians 7:39. Unlike the synoptic gospels of Mark and Luke, which were written to evangelize the Gentiles, Matthew was written to the Jews, and has of 24 characteristics that identify it as intended for the house of Israel. The ancient Jews called the betrothed (engaged) "husband" and "wife" according to Deuteronomy 22:23-24, Matthew 1:18-25, and Luke 2:5-7. Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage) was never for fornication or adultery. Allowing those guilty of fornication and adultery to remain living and become a prospect for remarriage was against the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22:13-24 and Leviticus 20:10, which commanded that those who were found guilty of fornication and adultery be put away from Israel, and stoned to death. The law of Moses was not given to the world, only to the Jews. From the exodus, to Christ's death on the cross, the law of Moses governed the Jewish people. Christ's death on the cross caused the Jews to become dead to the law of Moses, so they could be joined to Christ under a New Covenant. This is what Jesus's fulfillment of the law of Moses, including Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage), means. Paul gave several warnings to Christian believers against keeping the ordinances of law of Moses as justification, over following Christ and his commands under the New Covenant with Christ. Keeping the ordinances of the law is no longer possible, for Israel, and that is why Christ prophesied that the temple would be destroyed. These scriptures make it clear that if you choose the law over Christ, that you must keep the whole law: Romans 7:4, Galatians 3:1-9, Galatians 3:10-29, Galatians 4:1-7, Galatians 4:21-31, and Galatians 5:1-15. Being unequally yoked to unbelievers is not a cause for divorce, once two become one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, according to 1 Corinthians 7:12-14. Many one-flesh covenant marriages between unbelievers are recognized by God in the scriptures, most notably the marriage covenants between Herodias and King Herod's brother Philip, Potiphar and his wife, Ahab and Jezebel, and Ruth to her deceased husband Mahlon by Boaz when he took her to be his wife. Some are teaching that 1 Corinthians 7:15 implies that those who are abandoned, by an unbelieving spouse, are "no longer bound" in a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The reason this is in conflict is due to the way some translations word it, which gives it an entirely different meaning, and context. 1 Corinthians 7:15, says, "But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace." As you can see, the actual scripture says "not enslaved" which means that the husband or wife is not enslaved to sin with the unbelieving spouse, and is free to worship Christ in peace. Subsequent translations have changed the words to imply that they nullify the marriage covenant, which is not at all the case. The issue that this creates is with 1 Corinthians 7:10-11, which says, "10To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife." As you can see, those who claim 1 Corinthians 7:15 shows the Apostle Paul giving those who are abandoned permission to remarry, do not understand the command that Christ gives is to an abandoned husband, in 1 Corinthians 7:11, and that he "must not divorce" his wife, and his wife is commanded to "remain unmarried or else be reconciled" to her husband. The theory that 1 Corinthians 7:15 nullifies two as being one-flesh, due to one's unbelief, puts the Apostle Paul directly at odds with Christ, and himself, by implying that Paul has issued an opposing command to verses 10-14 in verse 15. Some also teach that 1 Corinthians 7:27-28 is referring to both divorced men and virgin women, and not exclusively to men and women (virgins) who have never been married. This has been falsely taught for some time in churches as referring to anyone who is not currently in a marriage, which, for them, also includes those who are divorced. This is a very false assumption, and puts these verses in a different context, that is at odds with both the teachings of Christ and the apostle Paul. We see Paul refer to virgins, which signifies the unmarried who have never before been wed, which is the proper context here. We see Paul saying clearly that it is good for virgins, which is also speaking to never before wed men here, "that it is good for a man so to be." He goes on to say, "Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife." Who is he referring to here? Men who, like himself, have never married. The word "bound", in these verses, is a clear reference to betrothal (engagement) and not to a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The ancient Jews were considered bound as husband and wife during the betrothal (espousal/engagement) before becoming one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, through consummation. This is affirmed by the context of the term "bound" seen in Numbers 30:14-16. The Jewish couples in ancient Israel, who were betrothed (engaged) were also bound together until death, either by execution for fornication, or by other causes. Then Paul says, "But and if thou marry, thou has not sinned", which is who? The men who had never married in the congregation at Corinth. So he begins with verses 25-26 speaking exclusively to men that have never married. Paul then says, "and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned", which is speaking directly in regard to virgin women who have never been married, within the congregation, not divorced women. Notice that verse 34 says, "There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband." Paul speaks plainly when he says "there is a difference between a wife and a virgin." Paul goes on to say, "But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry." This is speaking of a virgin who has become of age to bear children when it says, "let them marry." This is a clear command, to a single man, who has taken a virgin to be his wife. Paul then says, "Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well." This is referring again to the single man who decides it is better not to marry, but to stay betrothed (engaged), under the present distress, by saying that he "hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin." Paul then says, "So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better", which again means single men, in the congregation, who have betrothed a wife, do well if they marry, and those who choose not to marry their virgin brides do better, under the current climate. For more proper context of the word "bound", let's look further down in this chapter to verse 39, which says, "39The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord" (1 Corinthians 7:39). For so long, these scriptures, between verses 25-38, have been twisted and used to enable divorce and remarriage, by wayward churches and teachers, and have caused many to stumble and to be trapped in unscriptural unions. The use of the woman at the well, in regard to marriage, falsely implies that Christ was endorsing remarriage after a divorce. This teaching is in defiance of Matthew 22:23-28, which shows a woman who had been widowed seven times, and entered into each subsequent marriage without any scriptural conflicts with God's law of marriage (one-flesh covenant) seen in Genesis 2:23-24. Mark 10:1-12 and Matthew 19:1-12 both record Christ's teaching that day beyond the Jordan. There is no mention of the words "fornication", "writing of divorcement", or "divorced" in Mark's Gospel because Mark was not written to the Jews (as Matthew's Gospel was), but to evangelize the Romans, and likewise Luke to evangelize the Greeks, who had no knowledge of the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22 or Deuteronomy 24. All of these facts draw a clear understanding that remarriage after a divorce, under the New Covenant with Christ, is a scripturally false and baseless teaching. Please use wisdom when living in any situation against what the scriptures command.

Im having a hard time finding the next lesson online. Anyone know what its called or could you paste the link for it? Thanks!

Listening in 2021. Thank you for the reminders and encouragement.

A GOOD UNDERSTANDING of Daniel 9 :24-27 will show that there is NO 7 YEAR TRIBULATION .....

POSTMILLENNIALISM is such a old worn out LIE !

Thank you for sharing this and for your thorough scholarship. Humbly, I challenge your broad assertion that all non-canonical early writings are difficult to read. Agreed that the Shepherd of Hermas is a challenge, but the Didache (c. 75), First Clement (c. 95), or the Apocalypse of Peter (c. 130) are all quite readable. Second, the process was not nearly as fast as was implied. Read Eusebius' History of the Church, Book III, Ch. 25, which was written c. 313. He lists 5 disputed books plus the Apocalypse of John, which he says some reject and others accept. Clearly there wasn't universal acceptance yet. Thank you again for sharing. I know RUclips comments can be a cesspool. I pray my words are read in the same humility with which they were written. God bless

The RSV is my favorite translation. It’s very concise in its wording (even more than the ESV) and is very beautiful, flowing, and elegant. Best sounding translation in my opinion. Makes for good memorization. Also, the NRSV came out in 1989, not 1991.

What is this guy referring to when he says "the false doctrine of original sin"? Is he denying original sin?

Thank you Isaac .

Really enjoyed this sermon on Marriage. It is so sad and heartbreaking to see the amount of marriages that fall apart in the world today. The ways of the world today play such a big part of why so many marriages are falling apart and ending. People put so much effort to live or fit in with people in the world today that do not have no morals, respect, love for the people/things in the world today. The most important thing they do not have is the belief of GOD and the love for GOD and if they never have that in their marriage then it’s a good chance that marriage is not going to last. If people put the effort they use to fit in the sinful ways of the world into their marriage then it’s a much higher chance of it lasting until death do we part. Wonderful sermon as always, GOD Bless You 🙏🙏.

I agree with the RSV - very scholarly while maintaining the integrity of the King James, and does so without so many of the "thee" and "thou" statements.

I am having a long difficult night at work Issac. It is good to hear this Sir

Wonderful service and a beautiful great sermon from Isaac as always❤️❤️. Thank you for the opportunity you provide by live-streaming the service for those who do not get to attend the service because of health or other situations😁😁❤️❤️. Thank you again for this opportunity💜💜.

praying for all

I'm finding this video in Aug 2020 & just want to commend this teacher for taking the time to go through the evolutionary process of the Holy Bible in English

Wonderful lesson ..

Thank you Chapel Hill COC for live streaming you service so that those of us that can’t attend can enjoy the word of God.

Good morning and welcome to our streamed worship service! We are so glad to have you with us!

Great post! I believe you'd enjoy my content too. Keep up the great work! 💕💛

Thanks to my brothers at chapel Hill church of Christ for streaming another wonderful lesson.

Thanks to Isaac and Michael Desjardin for putting it together and making it possible. From our end as different as it seemed, I feel it went very well and God was glorified in our efforts

Thankful for the servants that served this morning. It was great to worship with everyone this morning. Glory to our God!

The Sheep-Goat Judgment. Thank you so much. This is a good explanation of the sheep-goat judgment. But it still does not home in on the essential basis for the judgment. Yes, it is definitely not the judgment at the end of the age or the end of life. It is not the judgment of souls for heaven. It is not a judgment based upon the atoning blood of Yeshua/Jesus. That judgment is featured elsewhere and showcased in the parable of the wheat and the tares in Matthew 13. So the sheep-goat judgment is not a judgment based upon whether or not person is saved or whether or not that person is redeemed under the atoning blood of Christ. Nor is it a judgment of eternal destiny in heaven or a judgment just based merely upon good works for the sake of good works. Here is what the commentators have missed, not understanding blood covenant. In limiting their discussion to “grace vs. works” from Ephesians 2:8-9 they are not understanding the wider matter of divine grace and favor based upon blood covenant. The redeemed, the saved, the born-again, those who know Messiah one-on-one are in first order blood covenant. But there is a second-order blood covenant. This would be a blood covenant judgment of a person who does not know Messiah. Messiah’s favor shown here is based upon the testimony and the “good word” of another person, a saved person,a brother of Christ, someone who DOES know Messiah. Second order blood covenant favor is based upon this second order blood covenant lovingkindness that the person in question showed to the friend of Messiah. This is blood covenant judgment mediated by a third party. Here is what is really going on in this sheep-goat judgment. The sheep, (just like the goats), did not know Messiah personally. They were not saved or born-again. If they had, then they would have been taken up and glorified into new spiritual bodies at he end of the age. They would have been snatched up in the harpazo, in the Harvest, in the Resurrection-Rapture of 1Thes. 4:15-16. BUT, the sheep are still in their mortal bodies. As they stand before Messiah after his return at the Second. Oning, they are given favor. They are given a passport for entry into the Millennium of Messiah. Along with this the entry into the Kingdom of Messiah is God’s plan for their ultimate eternal salvation. So what is the basis for the divine favor granted to the sheep and denied to the goats? The answer lies in the words of the returning Christ to these mortals who have survived the Tribulation. He says, “Inasmuch as you (showed blood covenant lovingkindness) to these my brethren, you did it to me”. This is second-order blood covenant, Messianic favor given to an unsaved person and mediated through a third party. The third party is a brother or sister of Christ. This would be someone who DOES know Messiah. See EndTimePilgrim.org/sheepgoat.htm Also, Ezekiel 20:38

Um the doctrine of "original sin" is not only completely orthodox but was fully defended by Augustine against the heresy of Pelagious. We ALL fell in Adam when he sinned. The Bible is clear that the natural man is a fallen and totally depraved creature.

At 17:32 at bottom of picture it says" Dec 25 165 B.C. the temple was cleansed and its services were restored. Do you have a source that says it was dec 25?

Would loved to have seen number 4.

"Thee" and "thou" are singular, whereas "you" can be both plural and singular. Old Quakers used to use "thee" when talking directly to one person. It's not just a question of tradition. One deacon once told me he used it because there is only one God

Amen

Eh these are alright translations. NKJV is the best modern-one.