Видео

WRONG !!!!! The matter was about the South paying more in tariffs than the north (notice my prejudice in the spelling). As far as slavery goes, that might have been one factor, somewhere down near the bottom of the proverbial totem pole, but it was not the chief issue. The north was playing the "card" both ways.....while they were bellyaching about slavery, THEY were running sweat shops that utilized child labor. So how the hell were they any better up north ? I say NOT. The South had every right to secede, and once they declared such, we became a whole 'nuther country down here, only to be militarily invaded by the tyrant Lincoln, whose only interest was in "preserving the Union". The Confederate Handbook by Curtis Patranella explains it better than I can.

My upper jaw is too small. More so on the left side. I was bottle fed as a baby. Apparently it was the fashion in the 70s, according to my mother. No one has ever made the connection to me before.

Your south I'm north. Under my administration my government takes your land. You were paying 30% tax. Well now you have to pay 80% What are you going to do, fight for your right not to pay taxes to me, or pay the tax? Under my government. Keep in mind if you don't pay me. You're a racist. Although I have not freed my slaves yet. I plan to after the 13th amendment Ulysses s grant this means you too. Like rn. We hear the govement is here for us. They're our protector doing all they can to keep us safe. You know bascially Gods position. But otta save us from trumps grasp to harm us. Back then slavey was viewed as a right. They were probably taugh slave trade becasue just like the kids today are taught to hate our country and base everything off of their feedings,race ect. Government control is the problem. And always has been. During the events of the civil war. Both north and south started to view slavery as immoral. the north made more money off of slavery than the south. I have another question If slavery was the main issue. Than why did free yes i said FREE African Americans and native Americans willingly yes i said WILLINGLY join the confederacy? I know why native americans fought. I have some in my family. The union was killing their food. Women and children. And destroying their homes. And sacred land. But that narrative isnt what the government wants people to know. Yes some southern slave owners. Were shit. Inclduing the black slave owners. But don't forget the north had slaves to. In fact alot more than the south had. How do you think they funded the war? Yo we tryna end slavery. Pitch in a few dollars. Its a worhty cause. I can take a moral issue(slavery) During the final months of the war, and use it to my advantage. First i offered the south to keep their slaves. Just pay taxes to me. Join under my government. That didnt work. Cuz why? We don't wanna pay the bloody tax. It wasn't about keeping slaves. Even tho it was viewed as a state right. How could i uswe this to my advantage? Ill free every black man. But you gotta go on the front lines(expendable) War is nearing a end. Im getting that 80% tax. As lincoln im labeled a hero. Freeer of the black race. But truth is he was a tyrrant. Im not sorry for what JWB done to him. Not sorry at all. Anybody can read about the civil war. But nobody digs deep enough to realize they been lied to. By the same system that won't teach actual history. Like how the black race came from africa, sold by other africans. Slavery exists to this day. And all races have either taken part or have been a victim of slavery. No one is exempt. Or special. Literally people complain about the system. But support it. It baffles my mind.

as our ancesstors may have had plantations and hired people soon it was about getting european help and some made some choices to become types of pirates stealing people greed evil .. and bad practices .. but being threatened and forced .. was the reason the north and south differed as now though we all agree with helping .. one third or more of the ones we are helping are tgreatening and forcing a society of greed and danger they are convincing some its better to take take over scare all others by force burning down good peoples homes businesses driving us out ... its civil war .. again .. we arent into cartel therefore we will be shot or killed or ruined ..we dont allow crime intemidation there fore we are suffering america is amore tgan freedom its about hearing every voice all people can achieve whatever their dreams are .. descent people

You made a really long video and missed a simple idea. The states rights argument simply refers to a new states right to decide for itself to be a free state or not. Nothing more. The idea that the South simply heard Lincoln won the election and then states began to secede is supposed to be a serious description of reality?

The northern states WEREN'T trying to abolish slavery. Not only were they not particularly concerned about slavery, some of the northern states actually profited off of Southern slavery. The abolitionists like Frederick Douglas were the exception to this rule. President Lincoln even promised that the Southern states could KEEP their slaves. But the southerners were fearful that the abolitionists would start a slave insurrection, such as happened under John Brown. This is one of the reasons the South seceded.

its lot deeper than this

I’m from Tennessee, one of the confederate states that didn’t submit declarations/excuses for their secession. Tennessee actually went as far as to say that they didn’t want to comment on their secession. However, if you read the previous speeches of Confederate State of Tennessee governor Isham G. Harris, it’s very clear that Tennessee’s secession was fueled by the threat of the abolition of slavery and the state’s refusal to comply with Lincoln’s call for troops to fight their fellow southern states after the fall of Fort Sumter.

Succession started under Buchanan 1860 Ft Sumter 1861 Emancipation Proclaimation 1863 Revisionist history = timeless

Dont forget how hard it is to have a good posture with a huge belly hanging... in other words, does obesity make the problem even worse?

"I believe slavery is an abomination but i could never turn my sword against my home state of Virginia" General Robert.E.Lee

I can only assume that the rest of the text talks about more pressig issues since you cherry pick.

Was it about slavery? You bet it was The Constitution of the Confederate States of America Article IV, Section 3, Clause 3: "The Confederate States may acquire new territory; and Congress shall have power to legislate and provide governments for the inhabitants of all territory belonging to the Confederate States, lying without the limits of the several States; and may permit them, at such times, and in such manner as it may by law provide, to form States to be admitted into the Confederacy. In all such territory the institution of negro slavery, as it now exists in the Confederate States, shall be recognized and protected by Congress and by the Territorial government; and the inhabitants of the several Confederate States and Territories shall have the right to take to such Territory any slaves lawfully held by them in any of the States or Territories of the Confederate States." This provision ensured the perpetuation of slavery as long and as far as the Confederate States could extend its political reach, and more then a few Confederates had their eyes fixed on Cuba and Central and South America as objects of future conquest. So, tell me again how the Civil War wasn't about slavery.

Dude, it was a war of secession, not a civil war. A civil war is between factions that want to control the same entity. The war in 1776 was no more a civil war than 1861. Both are wars of secession. Stop repeating the Unionists (winning) dictum.

This just says to me that states rights weren’t being upheld. I think slavery is wrong, don’t get me wrong. Also, I believe more and more modern technology would have made slavery obsolete. These states had their own laws and systems. Albeit racist but the north was no different. The 3/5th compromise, minstrel shows, and exploitation of African Americans in cities are obvious examples. The civil war was fought over states rights, the rights of those states to practice slavery. The North went to war with the south over succession, not slavery. Look at the time gap between the emancipation proclamation and the start of the civil war. I do not support slavery at all and it is evil. However just saying “south is bad and racist” is stupid because the north was just as racist.

Congress enacted a resolution declaring that the Civil War was being fought to preserve the Union, not to abolish the South's “peculiar institution” of slavery. 1861 July Funny how the emancipation proclamation was signed later on Jan 1863 , they were winning the war & decided to ear mark this act ? I don’t know how it started , only how it ended , states have NO right to leave the federal government & into there own sovereignty , only to bend knee to powerful almighty god I quess ?

Holocaust denial and distortion is a crime in many European countries and Canada, so should denying that slavery was the primary cause for the American Civil War. Public displays of the Confederate flag should be illegal as well, just like the Nazi flag and symbolisms are banned in many nations.

Ugh. This guy just looks like a weiner

Lol idiot

BS!!! Look up Lincoln’s purpose 13th amendment! Proof positive that it wasn’t about slavery. Or it would still be legal.

So why did the Union army include a few slave states?

Slavery was The greatest material interest of the world! According to Mississippi documents of secession

You are a bad historian. You are taking history out of context. Of course the south was pro-slavery but the question is what did pro-slavery and anti-slavery mean in 1861? A pro-slavery position was that the south had equal rights in regards to the western territory. Anti- slavery meant no free or black slaves allowed in the territory. By confusing what these words or positions meant in 1861, you are injecting presentism and counterfeit moral virtue on the north. Southerners lived, ate, and often times went to church with black men and women. The north wanted no blacks in the territories because they wanted the territories for free white labor. The reason for secession and the reason for the war are not the same. Equal access to the territories was essential to being in a union. The south did not care for central banking, high tariffs, subsidies to corporations. There was no authorization for these programs in the constitution. The reason for the war must be explained by looking at the northern position. The north could not let the south go because a south with a free trade policy would have devastated northern industry. Cheaper goods from Europe would have been purchased by the south. It would have wiped out northern industry. Northern politicians discussed this in Congress and in state assembly's. Loads of primary evidence back this up. Most southerners did not own slaves. Additionally the north was heavily involved in financing slaves and was responsible along with Britain for the carry trade. Africans came to America on British and Yankee ships. The south had no part in the carry trade. Virginia, North Carolina, Arkansas and Tennessee stayed in the union. When Lincoln said he would use force against the states to collect a tariff those state seceded from the union.

I hope you’ve been well. I enjoy your content and noticed you haven’t posted recently.

Thanks

10:31

Glad that you mentioned the ordinance.

The answered there would be no it was not about freeing the slaves they worked out if they freed the slaves then they get more money

20:28

this is revolutionary

The Soviets had no ability to attack the island nation of Japan. Their navy (what little there was) sucked and they had no strategic Air Force. They were a one trick pony land power. Even then they still received enormous logistical support from Great Britain and the US. The emperor was smart enough to see the writing on the wall and did not want to continue to see his people slaughtered by the tens of thousands until there were no cities left and then invaded. By the time that happened the Japanese army would be fighting with not much more than spears and swords while the allies continued to rearrange the ruble from the air and, due to civilians and soldiers refusal to surrender, killing millions. By the second atomic bomb they figured out that a single bomb leveling every city vs hundreds of bombers and thousands of bombs leveling their cities would mean that they could not bleed the allies white and negotiate better terms. They were a dead man walking and had no more leverage. Nothing.

He took his braces off to talk to mike mew lol

The reason breastfeeding is important for jaw growth is the acquisition of proper tongue posture which will not be developed from bottle feeding, as the cheeks are used instead of the tongue. Without proper tongue posture, the maxilla does not have the support to develop forward, leading to a recession of both upper and lower jaws. Mandibles are often always the same size among individuals (see Mike Mew lectures for more on this) and it’s mainly the positioning of the mandible that causes problems.

This video is fascinating and deserves more views

The truth is that US/UK faced less than 1/3 of the German army & Japanese emperor decided to surrender to Americans because of advancing Russians. Bottom line is Russians caused US to gain a foot hole in Europe & also the surrender of Japan. Not the Atom bomb. What they have told us was a lie to cover up war crimes by Truman.

It should be noted that the Texas declaration tried to be very specific since a large part of the population was against leaving in the first place. This also resulted in conscription in the area being either unenforced, or being forced to such a degree that it resulted in the massacre of civilians like that of many German speaking Texans

64 year old daughter!??? He looks 64. Damn good for him

Is there any practitioner you know of to deal with a growing lower jaw that is becoming too large for the top jaw, leading to an underbite? (this is enquiry for my relative, who is still 17 so I think can grow until 21 ) So far drs have said nothing you cando just wait till it grows out and then do surgery? And been told risks of surgery is high chance of paralysis on face ... does not sound good

By far Ithkuil. Mr. Pakman's brother

Very clear & good explanation, without that cheeky sound and deep voice narator who vaguely explain the title only 1 minute in 15 minutes video. Jeez.

Random bookmark 10:20

Excellent video. It's not just allergies that causes deformation of the jaw, but also child abuse, and too authoritarian an upbringing, which then causes low self-esteem and slouching as a result. I've noticed this in myself and others, that the worse your relationship with your parents or school, the more likely you are to have a underdeveloped lower jaw and the more likely you are to slouch.

But of course, no historical context was given. The South's grievance regarding the North's attitude about slavery was centered on the fact that the North objected to allowing any more slaves into western lands south of the Missouri Compromise line. And why was the North adamant about this? Because of the provision in the Constitution that allowed 3/5 of slaves in any state to be counted towards Congressional representation. The 3/5 clause gave the Jeffersonian southern states more power in Congress and the Electoral College than they otherwise would have had. This hampered northern desires to dominate both politically and economically. Jefferson would not have won the election of 1800 had there been no 3/5 provision. Think about that. This was the whole foundation of the north's efforts to resist the "expansion of slavery" They did not give two hoots about the welfare of the slaves. It was the slaves' presence in any new Jeffersonin states carved out of western lands that concerned the north. For example, if 300 thousand whites and 200 thousand slaves formed 3 new southern states, then 3/5 of those slaves would count towards Congressional representation (120 thousand in total). This could have a significant impact on the balance of power. The north was slowly beginning to dominate in Congress due to immigration. It was just a matter of time before they could cast aside any restraint on their economic aims imposed upon them by southern representatives. The Republican Party was not so much against slavery as it was against the SLAVES! Thus, the mention of slavery by 4 of the 13 seceding states in their declarations of causes was in THIS context.

Does it matter the reason for secession? A state in voluntary union doesn't have a right to end that union? How many people do you want to kill to wage a war of conquest against them?

You are a lying POS. It was the Tariff's raised to 47% for export of goods such as Cotton. Learn the dam truth.

Wow. That wasn't the only reason it went to war when only 1% owned slaves. It was about having their own economy which consisted of agriculture goods, trade rights and slavery to a point. You forget that 4 million slaves lived in the north lol

Actually your wrong. There was an economic war going on between the north and the south. Northern ports in New your and Baltimore were losing revenue to ports in the south such as in New Orleans, Savannah, and Charleston. Your Hollywood version of history is pathetic. Please read "An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States" by Charles Beard for further detail.

Fuck the emperor that nerd.

Milk powder and bottles are a huge factor too. The composition of breastmilk is not reproducible and the baby doesn't make his jaw work the same way with a bottle. The problem starts here and continues with bad diet.

Atomic bomb show that any resistance is useless in face of atomic bomb.