Видео

In space you can only notice movement, by observing them, reletive to another point. If you consider any object to be fixed, the whole system works as well. Its just a different point of view and relative, thus the geocentric model could also be true, we cant proof, chause we need a fixed point in space, which needs to be yet to discover if it even exists.

Giving me a 15 second ad for 30 seconds 😂 👎

Geocentrism is harder to explain with this spinning model? In the example of geocentrism I see how everything's spinning beautifully around the sun, following it's sort of magnetic orbit. Looks more alive than the Heliocentric.

This is total BS the heliocentric model does not gave perfect circles it relies on non circular. The geocentric model is geometric, ie the orbits are perfect circles. This video is a lie, showing rhe geocentric as the heliocentric and god knows what as the geocentric. Incredibly dishonest.

i just saw the geocentric pattern are defective. look at how perfect heliocentric pattern

" I don't want to live in a universe that isn't beautiful "

Can you do the animation using the Tychonic model?

obrigado, estava procurando imagens assim :D esses vídeos por algum motivo são difíceis de achar

excellent!

Chi .: Chikyuu no Undou Ni Suite Fucking Peak Anime

Uranus and Neptune wouldn’t have been included as they were discovered after heliocentric model had been accepted. Also they can’t even be seen with the naked eye.

Anime got me here

May i know which one is the heliocentric and geocentric

Orb Anime brought me here. 🙌

doesnt disprove flat earth tho. just disproves geocentric. however, it is still done incorrectly. sun and moon would be inside the earth

Sorry but you're wrong. Its a simple inaccuracy that almost all models do. The Tychonian Planetary model states that the earth is center, the sun revolves around the earth, but all other planets revolve around the sun. I would love to see an accurate model of this theory and not the one before us. Source: UCAR edu website

Oh my goodness, the geocentric model is so beautiful! Definitely the way God would have designed it 🙏👍😃

After watching fighter pilot drinking water, i believe geocentrism.

ruclips.net/user/shortsQQ1gv1ma5SM?si=l6014warpBsKsN7k

Globe geocentrism is false Flat geocentrism is correct

How about make earth a flat motionless enclosed dome with a sun moon and stars revolving around its center?

Space is fake

Wow. Thats amazing to an idiot whom cant disprove the Theory of gravity with nothing but a single piece of toilet paper But amazing to an idiot surely.

In 2100, lunacenstrism would exist thanks to the futuristic robots from 2079.

Nice animation, I will use it in class, thank you!!!

Geocentric is weird af

seems like the flower of life being drawn

인생을 살다보니까, 문득 생각이 났는데. 천동설이라고 해서 꼭 틀렸다고 할수있을까? 알고보니까 사실 태양조차도 은하의 중심을 함께 돌고있던거 뿐이고. 상대성이론에 따라 시간조차도 상대적인건데. 즉 완벽한 기준점이란게 없는데. 그냥 우주의 중심을 나를 기준으로 놓고 생각한다는 관점을 가질수도 있자나

The heliocentric model is relatively less realistic in this model, as all of the orbits are elliptical and not a perfect circle.

Excuse me sir may I use your video for my content materia? l. I will include your channel link.

The geocentric model is wrong because it is based on the heliocentric model which came later.

Shoe size IQ fantasy vs Reality according to it happening observably.

This is a false representation! The Heliocentric models orbits are nothing near perfect either, for example the earth's orbit is so called "elliptical" and have the earth 3% closer to the sun in January when the earth is the coldest and further from the sun in July when the earth is the hottest... this just dosent make any since. Also, the orbits of the stars don't form perfect circles with heliocentric model either, however on the Geo, the stars actually form perfect circles around the earth depending on your location... I truly beleive the Heliocentric model is flawed... it's still a theory to this day and NASA is the only reason people still believe in it.. but it still has many flaws, for example, water cannot curve and always remain level yet they want us to think we live on a giant pear shaped sphere when in reality curvature has never been seen or proven and the rotation of the earth also cannot be tested... the Geocentric theory actually holds up closer to reality than most of you think because we were taught heliocentricm as "fact" growing up but it's just not holding up to reality. Don't be blind and also question everything. There's a reason for thousands of years all our intelligent ancestors going back as far has history can "knew" the earth to be motionless and a flat plane... fun fact, the word "planet" comes from the word "plane".. go figure. The only footage we get of this theory is CGI images all proven to be composites and all created by NASA. ALL IMAGES of earth from space are "cgi" this is a fact and you can easily prove this by googling it and comparing the size of the continents... if this theory was true... why don't we have any real images of it? Instead what we see when sending Ballons 25 miles high is flat horizon. One thing for sure, the earth is very special and unlike anything we see in the sky and I believe we are the center. I refuse to beleive in one mans theory named Copernicus from 400 years ago who created this theory based of the fazes of Venus. His observations had nothing to do with the orbit of the earth at all. It's crazy when you actually think about it.

Go Dr Sungenis.

Both models are correct 👍🏻

*The Earth isn't moving.*

The virgin heliocentric solar system vs. the chad geocentric system.

I prefer the neo-Tychonic model. Not only does it require stars and galaxies orbiting at insane speeds, pulled by forces of mind melting magnitude, it’s a geocentric model that’s more heliocentric than the heliocentric model.

in physical reality, there are no infinite endless sinosoidal waves, so there are not dirac's enldess peaks... we are always dealing with a spectrum of finite peaks with some non-zero bandwidth of various frequencies... exponentially decaying vibration of excited electron produces a such typical spectrum through Fourier transform

There are various versions of the geocentric model that do not require the above planetary motions. The modified tycho brahe model has the planets orbit the sun and the sun orbit the earth. The interferometer results and George Airies telescope experiment are consistent with a stationary Earth.

Permission to use this video for our short vlog In STS.❤

and yet despite all of this it's *still* equal in validity and works better. Until they find dark matter that is

On the heliocentric model, orbits of planets are supposed to be elliptical, not circles. I wonder what other lies are included in this animation.

(I am not a geocentrist) But fun fact: the reason culture was uneasy to switch to heliocentricity was not because 'they thought they were the center of the universe' (I mean, literally they did, but not in a prideful way) in fact, quite the opposite. They believed anything higher than the moon to be divine/eternal, and thus placing the earth as 'just another planet' basically defiled that divinity.

So all the planets rotate within a toroidal field. Makes sense.

Usted tiene una cuenta de Twitter?

Wow. I have never seen anything in reality function like the one on the left. It’s like a 1980s computer logo or something. How rigid.

There'is not ball idiota, unless the ones on your chest you bad girl -

Geocentrism still makes sense if you consider the planets are following the torus field. It's actually kinda beautiful

Anybody here feel yourselves spinning on a 1045 moh globe shifting axis every year?? No?? Yeah, thought so. It really is that simple.