Видео

Just using a controller. As for the motion sickness, you just get used to it after some time with a headset. :) I also played a lot of VTOL VR flying the chopper, so spinning out of control isn't unusual for me. lol

Not sure I follow..?

@foxUnit01 Like when the bot gets too far away it comes back, it would be cool if we could change that

Honestly no idea - my guess is the cars themselves are a bit jittery due to network sync (see other car at 2:45), and the "smooth cam" option used for recording made it (ironically) worse trying to interpolate between jittery positions in motion. You used to see similar behavior with menus in-game if you opened them at high speeds, but this was improved and no longer an issue - so I'd wager this recording might also look much better if made today.

The world name is Space Colony "Island-4" by S_ASAGIRI - you should be able to search by name in-game. Have fun! (Alternatively if you click the world link above, you can directly join the world via the VRChat site)

Yes

Ha... I do miss working on that. Maybe :)

It's possible! We're gonna need AGI (or at least good enough to achieve full automation) though. Not enough _human_ labor to build one of these, much less mass-produce them. Also it'd be a really dangerous construction job. AGI timelines look short enough so far

Only for it to be invaded by space n4z1s in zakus

I hope we can all live to reach LEV (Longevity Escape Velocity)

We didn't go too far up in this visit, but you really can go all the way around the station in a loop. In fact, if you use an avatar 10km tall (it's possible! Or "playspace move" up 10km), you can talk to people upside-down on the other side of the ring.

No plans at the moment - sorry!

Gravity weakens as you move towards the axis in the center, but I wouldn't know what to expect, if you were flying straight "up.." Would you travel faster, as you rose up..?! Could a digital model be made to even express that..?!

@@user-tp9gy8kt2q No, the speed would be the same as one started with. There is no gravity "field" in this situation. If you were in a ground vehicle secured to a rail and traveled in the opposite direction of the station spin at the same rotational speed then all sense of gravity will be gone and you will float up with a slight jump.

Keeper, This "same rotational speed" would have to be almost 500 miles per hour.. I seriously doubt anyone would simply "float up," if they leapt from your very fast moving train.. No (science fiction) artificial gravity field is involved here, simply rising through whatever atmospheric soup that would be contained within the cylinder. Remember that this air will be moving (part of it anyways) relative to the "ground speed" of the cylinder's inside surface. Will all of this churn into an unbearable hurricane (within this large airspace), or will it flatten out into a homeostasis - much as the internal atmosphere of a vehicle moving at high speed? Would we need to build baffles to create dead airspace? How much effect would be caused by changes in temperature, and pressure..? With an air mass of this size, I would expect SOME atmospheric effect. All of this will be figured out before anything this size gets built, but it is fun to imagine all of the peculiar effects that could be experienced within an enormous cylinder habitat like this.

@@user-tp9gy8kt2q The only force involved in a rotating o'neil space cylinder to provide gravity is the centripedal force. Only something with immense amount of mass can produce a gravity field and there is no technology we know of that can do that in our current science.

Keeper, I don't know where you got the idea that I ever implied anything besides the spin gravity that is integral to the design. I was trying to move the conversation AWAY from your mention of a science fiction gravity field. I am more interested in the movement of air within the habitat, and how temperature, and pressure will work with/against the spin direction. As you mentioned with your high-speed rail reference - zero gravity might be achieved WITHIN the vehicle (train), as long as you were traveling opposite the direction of spin. Because it will be happening at more than 450 miles per hour. You would have to negate the 1 spin per 2 minutes, for the full 1.0 gravity. The concept of air currents (moving inside the habitat) that rise and fall because of temperature and pressure differentials, are very interesting. How might we direct them otherwise? Would baffles (created by superstructures) be needed to move wind where we would want it to go? Until larger scale tests are done, I figure much of this will remain a fascinating mystery.

Look at the scale of it, you would need to have pretty precise equipment to even detect the curve on the scale of a building. Also the slight curve is also a thing om earth. For even a large building, building flat wouldn't be noticeable.

​@@Cyberwar101 Architects do have to consider the curvature of the Earth when designing very wide buildings. There is about a 6 inch drop for every 1,000 feet of length. For example, the Amazon Warehouse near my place (east Mesa, AZ) is more than 2,000 long.

You can add more bots via the console: * On PC, the ~ key * On Android, the black >_ button in the pause menu Once open, type in "addbot tails" (or any other character) and hit enter. Good luck!

It’s probably because of ‘How the theme [Nebulous] started’ and the Vocals in the Soundtracks

Hehe, cute

To some extent, yes - bots will seek out currently spawned air bubbles, though they won't wait around the bubble-spawners themselves. They'll also only do this if they have less air than the player.

@@foxUnit01 That's actually really interesting! I wonder how far this goes-if a bot will avoid fighting Buggles if it has more air than the player, or if it will take an Elemental or Bubble Shield to sustain its own oxygen (provided the leader already has a shield). Sorry for the paragraph lol, I just think feigned sentience is one of the most fascinating things out there, and this is a near-perfect case of that.

Try adding a bot number (shown in `listbots`) to the end of the command - that will use it on a particular bot instead. For example, `overrideaiability 2 1 5` will make bot 5 act like Tails, regardless of which character its using.

@@foxUnit01 thanks

​@@foxUnit01 how do I make the bots walk on their own?

Technically any mod character, but the AI may or may not intelligently use its abilities.

@Fox thx, and how can I for example change the input AI ability. For example surge only homing attack with spin and she only use double jump with jump Button.

Hey fox question is there gonna be a multibots mod that follows waypoints?

Proper waypointing / gametype support is something I'd love to do, but currently don't have any plans for. Sorry!

​@@foxUnit01 For example, Super Mario Bros mod when you use Foxbot, Mario and Luigi aren't jumping, crounching, spining and attack with power UPS or hammer. So there's a option to make Foxbot with custom buttons/fire normal buttons support?

Currently, I'd say the mod is "complete" - I'd like to return to it some day, to explore more modular behaviors and gametype support, but haven't worked on it since early 2022 (for the game's 2.10 release) and no further work is planned at the moment. Sorry!

I am genuinely amazed at how far AI-generated text has come in the past few years.

lol

@@foxUnit01 its serious its the best addon of the all world :)

@@andrezinhojogosoficial1690 Glad you like it! I had fun writing it. :)

@@foxUnit01 oh... Ok thanks :)

This footage was from a multiplayer session with both human players and bots; anyone not directly following is just another player.

@@foxUnit01 oh ok

@@foxUnit01 please make bots pathfinder if they lose the player.

This particular post might help: mb.srb2.org/threads/foxbot-exai-based-multiplayer-coop-bots.30044/page-2#post-529430 You basically just want to alt+tab and run another instance of the game as a bot. Let me know if you're still stuck after!

lol sure, hit me up - steamcommunity.com/id/foxBoxInc