Видео

I agree Touch OSC is good and versatile but I wouldn't recommend it as the entry point into MIDI for many reasons. Firstly you need a touch device which is already more expensive (and more fragile!) than an entry-level MIDI controller. Another issue is the fact that the possibilities are endless regarding the amount of controls and configuration, this results in "too many options freeze" for beginners. Starting with limited options is a good thing in this case. While very useful, I find the lack of physical controls on touch-screens a problem. It's easy to keep your finger on a slider while looking elsewhere but not so easy to do the same on a touch screen. Also, physical controllers give you eye-free haptic feedback which again, it's extremely useful in a performance setting. Having said that, if you already have a tablet go for it!

Thanks, it's great to know people find it helpful!

That's a functionality of the MIDI Fighter Twister: djtechtools.com/2016/07/28/midi-fighter-twister-5-hidden-features-you-should-know/

I've never seen the things that you are talking about believe it or not. My plugin is clearly inspired by the Rotoreliefs of Marcel Duchamp as I explain in the video. If there are any similarities with what you mention, then they were also inspired by Rotoreliefs which where made in the 1920's. Are you suggesting that I give away all of my work for free? I give away my knowledge and experience for free yet apparently that's not good enough! Interesting.

@@mowglitv It's okay, dear jungle dweller, just don't get too upset, that's just how it is and I'm allowed to have my own point of view and opinion, right?

@@bennoH.-cr9gu That's fine and I respect your right to have a point of view, yet I'm curious as to how you rationalise giving everything away for free while living in a world that demands me to pay for everything and It's quite intriguing how you go around various platforms publicly accusing me of plagiarism with no basis whatsoever!

Thanks. Much appreciated.

Thanks for the kind comments but I'm afraid I'm only reviewing the effect, I didn't create it.

I suggest using what you already have if you can. Having said that I have no experience of the Push.

Ok thanks for the reply. I need to find a way to map it. Do most controllers come with a mapping template? Maybe a template someone has configured and made available online?

I'm afraid that I don't have a Push so I can't help.

mowglitv.gumroad.com/l/audiofluid

You can render a clip: resolume.com/support/en/clip-renderer

Or save the preset: resolume.com/support/en/effects

@@mowglitv Thanks. I was hoping to not have to render the clip. I have the demo version and it puts the watermark on all renders. Have to wait until black friday to buy it.

No, just Resolume 7.20+

Hi, yes long time indeed!

@@mowglitv BTW I agree that the APC40 is over rated, I've started using the Intech modular controllers and so far so good... :)

In the same way as any other keyboard shortcut... Shortcuts/Edit Keyboard/Assign your key

I'm far from giving away all of it ;)

You can use the record function in resolume.

Or obs

I completely agree with your point about a pdf manual. Unfortunately, it appears to be the norm in this day and age. I also like a nice printed manual for hardware devices and that's only too rare nowadays.

I'm afraid that's not possible currently.

Hard to say. Which version of Resolume are you using? That could be an issue. If not, contact Resolume support directly from Resolume.

Kuwahara was released for 7.15

True but that only works for layer transport, what about cues, beatloopr, dashboard... I clearly picked the worst example: jog wheels but the idea still applies.

I do a very similar thing with the Twister where the opacity controls also select the layer.

There's no simple way of achieving what you want, other than to re-think how you structure your composition. If you want the same effect applied to a bunch of clips you could use effects clips and/or groups etc...way instead of placing the effect individually on every clip. It won't be exactly what you want but your composition will be way more efficient.

@@mowglitv okay, i think i got it.. yyes.. i use to place effects on diffrent individual clips.. and play them once i need.. thxxx for the answare🖤

Absolutely!

Well noted!

Thanks for your comments but I'm afraid that I'm not giving this stuff away. I didn't create it, I'm just reviewing it and publicising it! Having said that, I also sell plugins and I don't see anything wrong with that. I create a lot of free content but I also have to make a living. I don't understand how Juicebar wants to benefit from your work, your work should be benefitting from Juicebar and if it isn't, then don't buy anything from it.

@@mowglitv Yes, that's all understandable and people have to live on something. Bat Art should never be primarily about money, but you probably see it the same way and I have now too closed my project with free Arena/Avenue plugins (78 pieces) for various reasons and am currently working on a new one, to create a series where I will then charge a new fee, like 50.-US$ or € for a package of around 80 to 160 plugins plus I will add the old series of 78 as an free extra. I don't want to have to make a alloverliving from art - that's probably what very few artists who ended up with resounding success (often after their lives) deliberately intended, but rather felt internally compelled to do their thing. I'm thinking of people I've grown fond of, like Vinzent VanGogh and the like. But I see things differently with JuiceBar. ResolumeB.V. earn enough money from hear main & great software itself, which also has 1000 + 1 errors in it, & should concentrate on this and promote the users completely free of charge with a platform like JuceBar and not earn so much from the sales off. I am not alone with such an attitude, consider the very recent judgment against the AppleStore in the EU!! But yes, the life of an artist is a very bitter and often breadless one, but I still describe myself as a light and video artist from time to time. With only the best wishes and greetings bennoH.🐹

I'm intrigued, clunky how? It has an outstanding build quality. Unintuitive? It has great feedback through the customisable LED rings and a very straight forward interface, what you see is what you get. Would you care to expand?

@@mowglitv sure. Let’s start with the fact there’s no one off switch. The software it comes with leaves very little customizability options to where you have to buy css for another $80 to simplify the twisters ease of use (and even then it’s far off). To customize it you have to go in and out and in and out over and over again closing and reopening your daw. This is extremely inefficient and wasteful You have to continually remap, and the guidance available on the dj tech tools sight is very sparse. It isn’t user friendly. The sequence mode is very attractive yet almost no info exists on the set up It’s a $80 product with bells and whistles.

@@Blueblackngold I do agree that having to go in and out of your editing software is a drawback. But I have no idea what this css buying that you mention is. I've found the editor app to be extremely comprehensive and the light feedback can be fully controlled with MIDI feedback from your application. You mention a DAW and this video is about Resolume. Out of all the MIDI controllers that I have (and I have a few!) most don't have an on/off switch.

@@mowglitv control surface studio. Scripts to organize your twister without having to keep remapping. What’s the point of banks without them

Thanks. Your question is a bit vague. What do you mean by AUM? Resolume can be used in conjunction with anything but what exactly are you trying to achieve?

@@mowglitv AUM is kind of like AUV3 or audio bus. We use it with a korg synth in combination with the dj software. What I'm thinking is that I could route the audio to Reolume and create on fly videos to beatmatch with the Dj (live) basically.

@@HVYCHKNRADIO yes, that's possible. You should get a MIDI clock into Resolume from whatever you're using to make the music. Having said that, Ableton Link is way more stable than MIDI clock.

@@mowglitv Looking forward to checking it out. Thanks for the videos and response!

Thanks!