Видео

It seams you haven’t receiver prayer answers in your life at all. Have you put hands on other people, and seen them be healed in front of your eyes, for instance? And what you haven’t experienced with God, cannot be real?

Well…I encourage you, to go ahead and heal the sick you meet in life, then. You will see, it won’t be that easy always, to achieve wishes result. An go and figure, how to solve it! I’d say, we know God wants us and the ones we touch, to be healed. Scripture says so. So our task will be, to “crack each nut”, sort of. So…go ahead. Try to heal the sick yourself, in Jesus’ name. I’ve joined this group. Watch them and learn: ruclips.net/video/AIL_n3NmlkY/видео.htmlsi=pc7NRyudoB7-bFYx Where do you live? This is a movement at many places in the world. They might be in your country too.

Kanske det verkar vara ett udda liv jag levt. Men det är så sanningsenligt jag kunnat beskriva hur det gått i livet för mig. Min stora glädje i livet är, att Gud hjälpt mig. Det är sant, att Gud finns…

Jūs tā dzejnieciski izsakāties. Bet man tomēr gruti izsekot Jūsu domām, ko Jūs īsti vēlaties pateikt.

Sadly, I don’t remember. But just search for Graham Cooke at the RUclips. He has lots of good thing, otherwise too.

@@janisvikmanis Thanks. Will do so. Praise the Lord.

I doubt he does. It rather looks like you consider yourself knowing God to such extent, that if there’s anything about God to know, you know it already. One just has to ask you. Everyone else, is wrong.

God loves you soooooooooo much regardless of what you think about Graham. Just keep your eyes on HIM and you will see yourself and everything differently. Magnificent designer that what God is.

It seams you are a person, that seldomly recieve prayer answers from God. Isn't that so? That God rather is more to you, like an intellectual thing?

@@janisvikmanis Hi. No, not at all. This is about Biblical doctrine, how it is important we are careful with how it is rendered. My faith is extremely personal, and intellectual, the faith given to me by God is all encompassing... How can it be anything else? The problem we have is that people often misunderstand criticism. Critique assessing what one teachers its important... we are too always treat it faith, and compare what is said at church with what the Bible says. Of course, there are at times, broad interpretations, and serious discussion, and disagreement. However, and this is the key point... some of what Bethel teache is fine, but unfortunately much of what Bill and his colleagues teach is utterly wrong. It is every Christians duty to challenge those who seek extra biblical revelation, especially when it does not match up with what God has already revealed in the Bible. It's like this... if one wanted to pass an exam in mathematics, and one kept being taught incorrect methods then one would not get the right answer. Bethel teaches a false Jesus, just listen to Bills kenosis teaching, or his "Jesus is perfect theology" teaching. Bill guides behind a mask of false teaching, when one examines it, good theology is revealed to exactly that which Jesus warned against. It is harsh... so you think I and others get a kick out of this? No. I encourage you to please ratch hundreds of hours of his sermons, then go listen to others, John McArthur for example, and start to read again. To move away from hyper charismatic and progressive teaching, to careful reading, and carefully seeking God's understanding. Faith is personal to a degree... but when the church is under threat from false teachers such as Bill, then the real church needs to stand up. Paul did it, all the disciples for it, Jesus did it. The Old Testament is full of false teachers and false prophets. Bill is not an Apostle, as he claims, he is a man who is in serious danger when he finally goes to meet God, as are the many thousands who follow him.

@@janisvikmanis Hello again... how about this... I don't know you, and you don't know me. Comments here may reveal something of who we are... how about, of you would like to... we ask each other a serious question, and the other writers a response. Emphasising our answers with our understanding of Biblical doctrine... this way we can test our responses, and of one of us, it both of us need to adapt, we can? For example, of you're a fan of Bill Johnson, let's look at a handful of his teachings, and test them. Then test our understanding?

I might not have time to invoke in discussions with you. It might be too time consuming. But alright. Some shorter ones perhaps we could do. All too often I’ve met people like you, that are critical towards other Christians, but don’t apply critique against their own arguments. You might be one of them. I don’t know yet. All too often I meet Christians, that want to be right in doctrines, but never pray for sick people. That have no experienced of healing others in Jesus’ name. Just criticizing others, that do. Fault finders, sort of. Are you one of those? I don’t know yet. Tell me, when did you put your hands on someone and healed them that way? In a year, how many? I actually don’t just listen to Bill Johnson. I also listen to : • Graham Cooke • Ray Comfort • Michael Brown (Messianic Jew) • Don Patton • Chuck Missler • David Pawson • Jay Smith (about Islam) • Mark Biltz • Peter Williams (Tyndale House) • One for Israel • To Be Continued (street healings) • biblical archaeology and I “drench my day” in listening to worship songs, if I’ve got nothing better to do. :-) The point I want to make, is that “these signs will follow them believers”…healing the sick, raising up dead, they will know you because of the God kind of love emanating from you. If I’m lacing that, it matters less how “right” I am in doctrine. So, I pick the good things from lots of Christians. King Solomon ended poorly. Nevertheless he is in the Bible with the good that came from him. So, take teaching from the good that came, is what I think the Author of the Bible wants us to do. Isn’t that so?

@@janisvikmanis Johnson is a false teacher of the highest order in charge of a cult at Bethel and God will bring them to their knees he must repent And ask God for forgiveness and step down from ministry

Aw...I don’t think so. Sorry.

I think it's Drawing closer to God...

Here is the full service. It is titled ‘A Year of Promise’. ruclips.net/video/t8EaPgs6Bj4/видео.html

Thanx

Nekad neesmu dzīvojis kādā angļu runājošā valstī. Kā 16 gadnieks Cincinnati Amērikā, 3 nedēļas. Man radās tuvs draugs no Londonas pilsētas daļas Puney, kad pārcēlos atpakaļ uz Vesterosu (Västerås). Viņš un es strādājām ar manas (zviedru) pilsētas bezpajumtniekiem. Man ir viens ieprecēts rads no Manchester. Klausos britu mācītāju Graham Cooke bieži, kas arī no Manchester. Atdarinu raksturīgos angļu dialektus - austrāliešu ļoti spilgts un pielīp man. Kad jokojos ar zviedriem, pielietoju Norrlandes dialektu. Kad atkal viņi grib ar to norlandieti runāt, nevar atrast. Jo tādu nav! Hā, hā...

Please don't be fooled by this rubbish

So great fun to hear! Especially about leavintg the critical spirit and pointing of fingers! :-)

Ja. Han var en unik personlighet. När han tog emot Nobelpriset i litteratur av vår nuvarande kung, var det honom kungen talade längst med av alla, minns jag som tonåring. Det går att hitta Solzjenitsyns verk på antikvariat. Titta där. Då blir det inte så dyrt. Han skrev upp stödord på små papper han grävde ned i små patroner, i sin trädgård. Sedan tog han upp dom och lyckades rekonstruera otaliga namn och platser i Sibirien, där förintelsen av människor förekom. En väldans bragd.

as wacky a donkey speaking ? numbers 22;21-29

@@patrickshore5859 that doesn't even come close lol 😂😂😂

Jag tror inte på konspirationsteorier. Inte heller att SD just "sålt" sig till några sionister. Jag var inbjuden till den ortodoxa synagogan i Stockholm. Det var flagnad färg på väggarna och de hade tydligen inte så mycket kapital, att köpa sig SD:s (eller Liberalernas eller andra partier i Sverige) röster med. Fåniga konspirationer. Alltså inte den synagoga som finns nere i city, mellan Nybroviken och Kungsträdgården. Den är mer liberal av sig, som jag märkt. Varför hata judar för? Ett så begåvat folk som de är. De gör inte allt rätt. Men det gör inte Sverige heller. Här talar jag på åminnelsedagen för Förintelsen 2015 : ruclips.net/video/mZhxXoG85B0/видео.html

Det tror jag också. Lär hamna någonstans mellan 22-28%. Vad nu det spelar för roll? SD kan aldrig rädda Sverige ändå. Stödjer hellre ett parti på 1% som vill något än ett stort parti utan lösningar och visioner mer än att slicka sioniststjärt. Lycka till alla sekterister, en dag vaknar ni upp med braxorna nere och inser att ni blivit lurade.

+Ēvalds Bērziņš Vecais veids domāt. Neatjaunotais prāts. Ka cilvēks neattopjas savu jauno identitāti. Bet, bez personīgi kapitulāciju Jēzus priekšā, nekā te nebūs. Bez to, nesanāk kristīgā dzīvi, bet ir tikai labo darbu vai pareizo uzskatu mocība.

Vai kapitulācija Jēzus priekšā ir vienreizējs akts, vai dvēseles stāvoklis?

Principā jā. Vienreizējs akts. Bet, "ja galva dumja, ķermenis cietīs." tādā nozīmē, ka cilvēks VAR sacelties pret Dieva gribu. Un atkārtoti cilvēkam jākapitulē. Bet priekš kam tā? Tad jau cilvēks nav sapratis ar Dievu staigāt. Bet iešāvušās dumjas domas galvā. Mēs visi daram savas kļūdas. Šāda kļūda nav izņēmums. Par visām Dievs ir ar mieru mums piedot un ļaut atkal ieiet Dieva gribā.

Jūs runājat pats sev pretī. Ja kapitulācija Jēzus priekšā būtu vienreizējs akts, tad to nevajadzētu atkārtot. Tā kā šī kapitulācija nedara cilvēku pilnīgu un neatrisina visas iespējamās problēmas, mums jārunā par cilvēka dvēseles stāvokli - labprāt pakļāvies Jēzum, tomēr joprojām ir pieejams arī kārdināšanām. Cilvēks uzreiz nekļūst pilnīgs saprast staigāt ar Dievu. Bet ja viņš paliek pazemīgs Dieva un cilvēku priekšā un atzīst un nožēlo savus grēkus, viņam tiek piedots, un viņš tiek atjaunots. Turpmāk viņam vēl nāk talkā pieredze (viņa paša un Baznīcas) cīņā par savu staigāšanu ar Dievu. Un tā dienu no dienas, kamēr mūsu laiks būs galā.

+Ēvalds Bērziņš Kapitulāciaj Jēzu priekšā ir vienreizējs akts. Viens otrs cilvēks dumjā veidā saceļas pret Dievu tomēr, arī pēc tam, kad piedzimis no jauna. Man tas nav noticis. Jo man liekas tas ir stulbi. Jūsu spriešanas veids rāda, ka Jūs nelasiet Jaunderības vēstules, kur tas aprakstīts. Jūs tā te nespriestu, ja Jūs būtu iepazinies ar Jaunderības tekstiem. Posmu Apustuļa darbi līdz grāmatai, pirms Atklāsmes grāmatu. Ķerieties klāt. Ar mani runāt, tas neko nedos Jums. Rakstos ir izskaidrots jau. Lasiet tur.

Jag tycker det skulle vara intressant att få höra SD:s åsikter i frågan. På bästa sändningstid i TV, tack. SVT är ju bara fega. Vad är man rädd för? Man slåss ju inte.

I så fall bör hon censureras, tycker jag. Rapportera så neutralt som möjligt, så folk själva kan bilda sig uppfattning. Man skall inte mästra folk. Då röstar folk in just det massmedia spottar extra mycket på. Så blev det med Junilistan till EU-parlamentet. De förbjöds vara med i svensk TV innan valet. Folk blev ju förbannad och röstade in dem. Och det partiet var upp-som-en-sol-ned-som-en-pannkaka. En flopp.Det borde ju svensken fått se INNAN valet. Så kastade folk bort sina röster. Upp till debatt om sakfrågorna som upprör. Inte sopa under mattan. Då slåss folk på gatan istället.

Ja, hur det nu är med SD, så tycker jag det är komiskt hur andra politiska partier inte törs tala om ens integrationen, som misslyckats i många delar. För då nuddar man SD:s hjärtefråga. Man är ju rädd för att halka in i debatt med dem. Löjligt. Har de fel, så är det ju enkelt att i debatt visa det. Upp till debatt, alla fegisar. I TV på bästa sändningstid, tack. Jag vill se, även om jag själv inte röstat på SD. :-)

Brendan Jobe I found it just interesting. Besides, the first Catholic Bibles that were copied BEFORE 450 AD, has this last part of Mark. It seams perhaps better to speak about evidence, more possible for non-Mathematicians to track. Sorry I didn't reply earlier. I just forgot. I make my conversation, mainly over e-mail.

+Brendan Jobe There's also plenty in those verses to indicate it is not original. Anyone who calls ANYONE but God their "father", I immediately question as that is a direction violation of a command from God! If you can't get something that simple right, how can I trust anything else you state? Also, I don't base my opinion on the NIV on one section like this, there are plenty of reasons to not trust the KJV and many other versions. They're all flawed in someway, but I won't waste my time attacking them.

Mark 16:9-20 is THE signature text in the bible....period ...it IS authentic.....i will argue that one with the top scholar...try me

@@janisvikmanis Mark 16:9-20 is THE signature text in the bible....period ...it IS authentic.....i will argue that one with the top scholar...try me

@@NeilRoy Mark 16:9-20 is THE signature text in the bible....period ...it IS authentic.....i will argue that one with the top scholar...try me