Видео

@@LedaiCepelinai an old ass ps4 😂

@@bobtwistastrange. I used to play NBA 17 on Xbox 360 and the graphics were perfect, now I recently bought 2k17 on Xbox One because of sentiment, the graphics are terrible. p.S. this game graphics are better than the last few recent 2ks

@ you’re not the first to mention this, I’ve honestly been away from gaming for a while, but I’m not surprised they’re cutting corners. It seems like most of the companies that push certain titles that come out every year know people are going to buy it regardless and make no efforts to improve or even maintain the level of quality

😂 I just believe the Bible

So first you say the color of his skin matches the background, then you say if he was black his face would match the background. Am I confused or is your analysis?

​​​@@bobtwista Yes, because etching does not show colour but contrast between light and dark parts of an image. Etchings are achieved by carving into a piece of wood or metal plate! And then dipped into black Ink and stamped onto fabric, paper ect....this was very common in times when the print press didn't exist. You etch the areas that you don't want to be covered in ink, the light part of the contrast, the deep rivets don't catch the Ink. This artist deliberately etched into his face to show it was lighter than the background, the areas that show light such as the windows and clothes tell me that his skin was darker than the wall but as light as the light from the window meaning he was fair skinned. Lots of Drawings were either hand painted which showed colour and contrast or for the masses etched which only showed contrast between light and dark NOT colour. I studied art history, art and did my fair share of etching to recognise a etching.

I really appreciate that. I struggle with my temper sometimes so it means a lot to get some encouragement. Thank you 🙏🏾

Because storytellers tend to use things that already exist in their stories, just taking artistic license with it and making something new. Who knows 😆

What? Ok so to start people had way less complex lives then. They would do a task for an extreme amount of time. Such as go on a voyage that could take a years to get there and years just to get back. After frequent trips to the African coast they had a pretty good idea of how to get there. They have traded with them pretty frequently seeing how Africa is basically the equivalent distance of South America to Americans, it’s a straight shot that can hug the edge of the continent in order to not get lost at sea without provisions. Now after awhile the traditional slaves as in people conquered after losing a battle were taken and sold to the trading Englishmen for goods. Let’s say they had 100 slaves on ships. And let’s say 10 ships a month. That’s 1000 slaves per month transported let’s say half of them die. So 500 now the 2 and a half kid average of western modern life is far off from the amount of kids people had. Kids were likely to die of many things and people had many less options for entertainment. So they had sex more often and in turn had more kids. So let’s say 4 kids each and consider half the slaves woman. That’s 1000 kids that then go on and have a higher chance of life seeing as they aren’t on slave ships. So you don’t have to carry million s of slaves, once you have a decent amount they’ll have kids that will grow up to be slaves. I do agree Africans and African Americans have different cultures that make them have almost entirely different histories but that’s normal. Looking past skin Africans are just another group of people that live on another continent just like any other group. Also the Holocaust was definitely not exaggerated. We have a good amount of evidence of it. Also what do people have to gain from it? So significant amount of the world disliked Jewish people, so why would they try to make them look better? Americans already supported the war once it got going, the camps weren’t found until the end of the war anyway. Please just do your research

@@skidzzthewiz9226 all wrong

@@useyourbrain.5256 darn you denounced my comment without saying how it’s wrong lol, Even though it’s pretty well substantiated.

@@skidzzthewiz9226 according to you .

@@useyourbrain.5256 according to most people. You still have supplied no counterpoint so apparently according to you too

Thats what your parents said about your life

@@bobtwista Maybe. Doesn't make this shit true tho. The dark ages are called the dark ages because the rulers of Europe were Dark 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Thats whack yo! King James 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Here are the videos ruclips.net/video/8M7yBjtx_Ic/видео.html ruclips.net/video/j1FsD9Y7NfY/видео.html ruclips.net/video/Zeuk_qZXVXE/видео.html

yeah those few athletes wld be able to compete today.... The vast majority cld not, which means the vast majority of mjs competition wld be considered trash today lol. I mustve really got under your skin by disagreeing lol

@@bobtwista watch the videos and prove me wrong.

@@paxrodriguez5992 i watched them, and if you watched more than highlights you would know you're wrong

@@paxrodriguez5992 yeah actually why dont u do the research ive done while we're at it. Ill watch these highlights again... And u can watch all available games (edit: in their entirety) from the 60s til this season. Then we'll be on even footing and we can discuss this after that. Deal?

Thanks bro i appreciate that. I pray the Most High blesses u in all that u do

Please go to Christianity God will come soon come to this website www.livingwaters.com/

God Bless!

Jesus is the Savior! He is the way, the truth, and the life!🧡 Jesus’ love has overcome this world!!

The so called 'dark ages' was the time period following the collapse of the Roman Empire in the 3rd century... and it only concerned those lands under Roman Rule... i.e Europe, the middle east and north africa.... it was the time period in which Christianity spread all over europe and became the dominant religion there .... it was also the time when Islam arose in the east and began its world wide attempts at invasion, and forced conversion.... the so called dark ages was a time of uncertainty, doubt, and change... it ended circa the 11th century ....

Suuuuure LMAO.

Coming from you, this is a compliment. And i mean that with such sincere incredulity 😆

@@bobtwista You have the education level of a six year old lol!!! How about providing ONE SINGLE SOLITARY piece of archaeological, anthropological, genealogical, historical original, primary, genetic/DNA evidence to back up your hilarious make it up s you go along claims???? GO ON... I DARE you ... put up or show the watching world what an idiot you actually are....

@@eenor71 soooooo the paintings depicting him as dark skinned, the buildings of stone from the time period that have large busts of dark skinned ppl, the coat of arms of so many european nations, none of those are anthropologic, or historical evidences? Damn that public school education failed me again 😆

@@bobtwista There is not one single solitary painting of King James that shows him other than he was... a white european caucasoid lol.... HERE are ALL the paintings of King James over here in the UK... original, ancient provernance documented over the centuries.... King James VI of Scotland and I of England (1566 - 1625) - RUclips ruclips.net/video/Wb8ALTTNn14/видео.html

@@bobtwista As for heraldry, stop making a fool of yourself lol.... try looking up EXACTLY what the symbols used in heraldry mean... colours, materials, quarterings puns, play on words and names, mythical beasts and achievements, all created by the Royal College of Arms for the individual they were awarded to... even the holders position in his family is placed on his arms (older son, 2nd son, 3rd son etc)... this in turn is passed on to HIS legitimate sons and to their sons in time ... and down through the centuries up to the present day where their heirs still retain those same arms... NO ONE is permitted to bear 'arms' but the individual person they were created for and HIS male progeny....

Elvis just stole his act from black musicians of his time, but ok, incredulity noted lol

@@bobtwista Elvis might of copied some entertainers, but that talent and looks was all his.

@@tweedconstruction exactly, and using his looks and his talent to imulate those superior creative minds is fine, as long as you know thats what he was doing 😆 im sorry i cldnt resist.

If thinking that makes you able to sleep at night, thats great. Just doesnt make it true

@@bobtwista King James VI and I, white European Protestant Christian slave owner.... male line haplogroup R1b-L21....

That nonsense theory was concocted in the 18th century as they knew the identify of this man. Why exactly would a homosexual include Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 in the Bible?

Well i cld be wrong but i believe i read that henry stuart was king james' father. But there are plenty of books that seem to show that Europe was ruled but Hebrews, and even more historical texts that seem to prove that the Hebrews were a dark skinned ppl often confused with tribes we now know as african. It depends on what sources you think are most credible, i suppose. And for me personally, with my belief in the bible as a historical text; a text that also claims the hebrews were a dark skinned tribe often confused with the tribe of ham, i think its more likely that the ppl claiming to be jews today stole the Hebrews history, position, and land through slavery, and they white washed all they could as far back as they could to be able to lay claim to being jews. They can tell you what Babylonians were eating for lunch 5000 years ago, but there are no records of what was happening during the "dark" ages. Seems a tad suspicious to me personally

@@bobtwista James father was the blonde blue eyed English born Roman Catholic Henry Lord Darnley...he and his brother Charles Earl of Lennox were the sons in turn of Matthew Earl of Lennox and the Tudor princess Lady Margaret Douglas...nearly the entire current aristocracy of the UK and Ireland is descended from this lineage....male line haplogroup R1b-L21 (Celtic branch)...so too are our current royal family....Queen Elizabeth II is the living breathing flesh and blood 11th great granddaughter of King James... R1b-L21 along with its Germanic/Anglo Saxon and Romano/Italic branches is the major, dominant male line haplogroup of ALL Europeans past and present... meaning one and all are the same genetic race with ONE common ancestry that is thousands upon thousands of years old...

@@eenor71 where are those sources you're so keen on? When did the royal family do a genetic test and who was responsible for administering the test?

@@eenor71 from what ive read there is just as much evidence that king james was part of the actual hebrew race. Not a (roman) askenazi jewish convert like i think the royal family is.

@@bobtwista Here we go again lol.... a ghetto educated african american desperate to be part of our glorious incomparable european inheritance and distance himself from his own embarrassing sub saharan tribal african one ....genetics and its attendant genealogy are major subjects over here in the UK... nearly everyone has or has access to a family tree that stretches back over countless centuries.... myself included... add to that inheritance (fiscal or property), land deeds, court documents, birth, marriage and death records, wills, parliamentary acts, death duty records, mediaeval pipe rolls, inheritance laws, and titles and property law documentation, and you have everything you need to show who you are, what you are and which ancestors you are indebted to for that wonderful inheritance... now thanks to the great strides made in genetics and DNA studies we have further proof of our inheritances that simply reinforce our already impressive genealogical family trees... King James has MILLIONS of living descendants alive today.... ALL his descendants are known, their descent provable beyond doubt, passed on from generation to generation up until the present day... DNA taken from his LIVING, BREATHING MALE LINE DESCENDANTS (The Duke of Buccleugh, the Duke of St Albans, the Duke of Grafton and the Duke of Richmond) are all R1b-L21 male line Y DNA, passed on from father to son unbroken for thousands upon thousands of years.... R1b is the MAJOR male line Y DNA haplogroup of europeans past AND present ....

305 Thief Well if someone were close to The Most High God, you would know his name isn't Jesus, and you would know better than to think you know where another human is in their relationship with Him.

But the problem is you don't have a relationship with Yeshua aka God/Jesus Christ you have a relationship with the Devil!!!!! You need to get out of there!!!!! I will always pray for you bro!!! God Bless you!!!

Brad Ley it's pride in understanding history, it's not about trying to say black ppl are superior human beings, which is what I thought your comment was implying. But maybe I'm misinterpreting your reply

305 Thief really? Alessandro de medici? the Medici and habsburg intermarried. there is no doubt that medeci was a man of color(mom black,but not a slave and his dad was a pope). there is no way you or i can dispute this. today,their blood runs through the italian royal families,but also most of europe. the jews/hebrews that left africa or wherever the hell they came from,but doesn't matter they were still black people,they left and went to europe and married royalty there. the hebrews were a caste of "ruler-priest,"not common folks. king james was a hebrew, you will see on coins paying teibute to him the word hibernia. hibeenia is a hebrew name. hibernia is now called ireland.

@@bobtwista With a reply like that denying the divinity of Christ had YOU lived in England/Scotland during King James reign he would have had you burned at the stake as a heretic within minutes....

Michael Miller I try to keep up with it but I'm always freaking working, have a blessed day brother

Michael Miller ruclips.net/video/APXK9xP35hk/видео.html but I believe I got this video off of the wearechange channel. So he might still have his longer version too

Naruto is Shit I respect your opinion, and if I were you I would probably think exactly as you do, however I'm not sure I can agree with every point here. Cuz I've looked at strength lifting, as well as body builders and there are plenty of black people represented. If I had said ALL black people are physically superior that would've been the stereotyping that you're talking about, and maybe I did say that n if so I was wrong. But one more point about the power lifters and bodybuilders, they're size n strength are not functional for the most part and this makes it inferior to more functional but less flashy strength. But I welcome the discussion and I appreciate your argument good sir or madam (sorry I don't take the time to differentiate) n have a great day

RIP America 1776-1913 dude you have so much misinformation and biases in your comment here first of all Black people are in fact inherently physically superior to everyone worldwide we learn to crawl and walk at faster rates have incredible nervous and immune systems when compared to other racial groups. And to say that every black man in a fight sucker punches or jumps someone to win, you probably watch way too many fight comps and street fights on worldstar Black people are adept in fighting it’s proven in the sports the greatest champions in Boxing MMA and damn near everything else are what. Black men 1 on 1 black people are just that good we all have that inherent potential and capacity that’s not commonly shared amongst others. people that do contend with us on an even basis tend to be people who have traces of African DNA in them like the Samoans and Pacific Islander peoples. No hate just facts you on the other hand sound bitter.

kd1love kd1love they were high af that day we was mad

Jessica McKinnon Yooo, that's crazy af

Bronx NeNa sure does

Steven Quinn lol we were sooo pissed!!!!