Видео

one more comment. ... these ideas are presented a very clear and calm way and your brief clarifications or examples bring out thier application or usage in the world in a helpful way. I worked with these ideas ( in family therapy) in the late 1980s trying to help families to get 'unstuck' and encouraging them to experiment with different ways of relating.....as is so often the case theory sounds better than the practical application appears ....and your ending remarks about human fallibility remaiin the main thing that most of the humans I know continue to struggle with.

Thank you again. I think what I find help full about hearing many of these complicated ideas discussed in relation to the law is coming around to looking at them in relation to the 'real world' where some of some of the coolest or most beautiful ideas look reveal differences in their practical applications

As a person who often listens to podcasts like this while carving or sawing in my workshop I can say from direct lived experience that this talk is much more exciting than chewing on sawdust. Just having words like right,duties, privilege, immunity, disability and their relationships in the same talk is pretty exciting for me

Hi again. You responded to my last comment ( which was a nice surprise) and mentioned that comments help you guage directions for future podcasts. I'd mentioned liking your angle on Plato and CS Lewis.... I'd like broaden that a bit. ... I found your discussion about the idea of meritocracy as something worth considering in more depth and not throwing the baby out with the bath water and relating these ideas to moral agency as well as self- evident human values very enlightening. I'm guessing your talks are aimed a particular group of people but for many people trying to get their head around things in the world they can be really helpful. I'd never heard the term 'practical reasoning' before but when the internet saw me suggesting that 'truth can't be found by science and reason alone, it sent me to your podcast.

I'm not sure how these videos found there may to my media, but I find them very interesting, useful and enlightening and will continue to listen to them whenever I get the chance. I've never really thought about Plato's ideas, or CS Lewis's ideas from these angles

Thank you so much for the video. It was quite useful during my defence.

Tbh this is very confusing theory, I needed to watch many videos of this😂😂u were so good!! I'm a Law student of 2nd yr and tommorow is my final exam! Ur so amazing in explaining and very pretty sendin much love from india❤❤!

Hi Dr Lee, I just viewed this talk on RUclips "BILL C-63 - Everything You Need to Know | Bruce Pardy & Konstantin Kisin | EP 442" and was wondering if the quote at the beginning had relevance to your lecture on Positivism. The quote "instead of the Rule of Law we have Rule by Law" seems to be directed towards a sources style managerialism that is divorced from the underlying Natural Law. I might be way off base here but nether the less would be interesting to hear your take on the discussion.

Thanks again Dr Lee for your content. There has recently been established a free speech union in Australia called , wait for it…….“Free Speech Union of Australia”. I would encourage anyone who values liberty around expression, association, and enquiry to consider checking it out. Dr Lee please feel free to delete this comment if you would prefer if I do not make mention of the Free Speech Union. Thanks again for your content it is like a breath of fresh air to hear highly educated people dispassionately present both sides of the coin. Looking forward to your future content.

Hi, I really enjoyed your video and look forward to viewing your other content.

Thank you for the explanation.

It's sooooo important ... the basis of a universal ethics. Oh please can we turn it into a TicToc meme?

You address interesting topics, but please improve the audio. It has nothing to do with pronunciation or accent, but with whatever mic or device you use.

Thanks for the video. It was immensely helpful.

Hi, you made me understand the theory so well❤, thank you. I'll really appreciate if you can make videos on the Philosophy of logic🙏

Depite being introduced to Hohfeld's theory years ago, the understanding of it always eluded me. Thanks for the simple but deep explanation of it✨️

Thank you for the breakdown, ma'am. Before now, I couldn't consider the concepts of rights beyond being too abstract to relate to. Now, I am glad I found this channel. You should do more videos on Jurisprudence. 💐 Thanks again!

I think your definition of the word "deconstruction" is really a definition of the word "analysis" applied to communications. That is what "deconstruction" is taken to mean in normal speech. But it is not what the word means in the work of Derrida. The Oxford dictionary definition is pretty good: "Deconstruction is a method of critical analysis of philosophical and literary language which emphasizes the internal workings of language and conceptual systems, the relational quality of meaning, and the assumptions implicit in forms of expression." The Wikipedia definition of "analysis" is good too, and you can see the difference: "Analysis is the process of breaking a complex topic or substance into smaller parts in order to gain a better understanding of it. "