Niels Bohr International Academy
Niels Bohr International Academy
  • Видео 4
  • Просмотров 28 619
NBIA Simons 2016
Starting July 2016, the NBIA will run a sequence of six thematic programs funded by a generous grant from the Simons Foundation.
The topics of these programs will be centered around the research areas relevant for six prestigious Simons Visiting Professorships, one for each semester for the period 2016-19.
The first Simons Visiting Professor is Vladislav Mukhanov, Head of the Theoretical Astroparticle Physics and Cosmology group at the University of Munich.
This video gives a short introduction til the NBIA Simons program.
Просмотров: 191

Видео

Nima Arkani-Hamed
Просмотров 5 тыс.8 лет назад
With an intro by professor and Director of the Niels Bohr International Academy Poul Henrik Damgaard, professor Nima Arkani-Hamed holds his lecture at the Simon Program at the Niels Bohr Institute in 2016. For a two-week period of 15-26th of August, 2016 the NBIA and the Discovery Center will host a workshop supported in part by a Simons 'Targeted Grants to Institutes' program. The idea is to p...
Lecture on turbulence by professor Alexander Polyakov
Просмотров 22 тыс.8 лет назад
With an intro by professor and Director of the Niels Bohr International Academy Poul Henrik Damgaard, professor Alexander Polyakov holds his lecture at the Simon Program at the Niels Bohr Institute in 2016. For a two-week period of 15-26th of August, 2016 the NBIA and the Discovery Center will host a workshop supported in part by a Simons 'Targeted Grants to Institutes' program. The idea is to ...
SUSY Bet settled in Copenhagen in 2016
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.8 лет назад
In the presence of Stephen Hawking a bet from 2000 was settled at a conference in Copenhagen held by the Niels Bohr Institute Academy on the 22nd of August in 2016. The bet was: Do you think that in ten years from now, that is by noon C.E.T. June 21st, 2010, at least one supersymmetric partner of any of the known particles will be experimentally discovered? Due to delays in Cern it was agreed t...

Комментарии

  • @cantcommute
    @cantcommute 6 месяцев назад

    are people joking about his accent this makes perfect sense..?

  • @scienceonsaturdaysMPEI
    @scienceonsaturdaysMPEI Год назад

    Waste of time... Mumbling and bleating... He does not have general idea of his lecture...

  • @manfredkrafczyk5755
    @manfredkrafczyk5755 2 года назад

    Unfortunately incoherent…

  • @unverozkol
    @unverozkol 5 лет назад

    How is it that a continuum theory such as fluid flow can be analogous to particle physics? Even in a statistical sense!

    • @pandiatonizm
      @pandiatonizm 5 лет назад

      Easy, because every flow is made out of particles who make the flow

    • @ET-oq9mg
      @ET-oq9mg 3 года назад

      @@pandiatonizm , Your comment is partly right, but when you go to molecular level in fluid dynamics then fluid dynamics' rules are not applicable anymore. it is quantum theory, atomic and sub-atomic physics

    • @annaclarafenyo8185
      @annaclarafenyo8185 Год назад

      The reason is that particle physics is described by quantum fields, which have an action function which describes how to 'average' the fields. The fluid is statistical, and you have a probability distribution over velocities which is analogous to the action function over the quantum fields. The analogy isn't perfect, because the statistics of fluids isn't known, and isn't likely to be described by a local action, i.e. the probability distribution for the velocity in a tiny region in turbulence isn't determined by the velocity at neighboring points only, but by the velocity in a much larger region. The analogy is strong enough to produce mathematical relations between the correlation averages of fluids which resemble the correlation functions from quantum field theory that describes particles. The other answers on this comment thread are both glib and wrong. This has nothing to do with the particles that make up the flow.

    • @unverozkol
      @unverozkol Год назад

      @@annaclarafenyo8185 appreciate your elaborate answer.

    • @suki0venkat
      @suki0venkat 10 месяцев назад

      There is this Boltzman's atomic equation (opposed by religious Mach and explained beautifully by Einstein in his work on brownian motion) and there is this mystical Liuoville equation that Lord Kelvin believed in. Atomic theory of individualism won (exemplified by that quitessential individualist Richard Feynman). Polyakov is mumbling and bungling between the two, trying to walk on two legs. What else one can do? Even Feynman's lecture on Fluid Mechanics was immature. He called Euler flows dry water! Polyakov isn't that stupid, but he speaks English in Russian and QED.

  • @smileforever68
    @smileforever68 6 лет назад

    Omg. Is everyone serious about his accent? 90% of folks in the tech world speak with a heavy accent! Take a look at yours! Keep looking at the formulas on his board

    • @22ttiimmeess
      @22ttiimmeess 4 года назад

      People: (complaining about accent) Me: (watches in 2x speed)

  • @rostamr4096
    @rostamr4096 6 лет назад

    Man, this is so over my head..but we are all proud of Nima.

  • @pianotalent
    @pianotalent 6 лет назад

    The professor of Princeton could have worked on improving his English...and making his talk in a more confident voice...not using....ummm, ahhh, ehhhh, errrrrhhh...NO EXCUSE! NO MATTER HOW FAMOUS HE IS. THERE ARE CERTAIN LITERACY STANDARDS.

    • @annaclarafenyo8185
      @annaclarafenyo8185 Год назад

      You'd be better off listening to every word he says and trying your best to understand it. This is one of the greatest giants of science who are still alive today.

    • @pianotalent
      @pianotalent Год назад

      @@annaclarafenyo8185 yes better off.... there are no giants. No idols...better off.

  • @makavelilcf
    @makavelilcf 6 лет назад

    it is impossible to listen to

  • @nullnull484
    @nullnull484 6 лет назад

    It is a pity that the audience did not behave as in a Russian seminar-when the speaker is not allowed to say unclear or vague things, but must make it clear. P has a million ideas, but this talk is hard to follow.

  • @CastelDawn
    @CastelDawn 7 лет назад

    incomprehensible, between his accent and the way this man is talking it's just a pain to watch.

    • @pandiatonizm
      @pandiatonizm 5 лет назад

      don't blame on the lecturer, blame it on the proper lack of schooling before you attend or listen to a lecture, I didn't have a problem to follow his lecture

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 7 лет назад

    If the situation is viewed as a QM phenomena, beginning at the temporal origin of all information integration, then superposition of eternity produces a mathematical matrix of "crystalline" quantum fields/geometries, apparently relatively static and interpretating, with "uncertain" proportionate fields exchanging virtual information. Without a pre-coexisting format of description and only piecemeal definitions, like when suggesting a pure-math speculative picture, ...it's a real temporally substantiated image projection from/focused on modulating spin/reflection. The property of prime numbers as conductors of information states, that are congruent probabilities in superposition-now, is therefore the matrix of fluidity and turbulence according to the numerical cascade of sequences due to occurrence/probability in discussion. From this format, the work done by Proffessor Tao on primes may be applicable to the Quantum Dot and Superconductors experimental work of the kind Professor Sergy Frolov demonstrates. Because, the elemental mathematics that involve Euler's formula in fluid probabalistic relationships shows a commonality between the stricly defined jump-orbital of electron proton field connection and vector spaces, laminar flow/ turbulence, latent heat of fusion etc, flow/conduction/ resistance, and everything else between superconductivity and chaos. Because the fundamental distinction between the "jump" conduction and "tunneling", according to the occurrence of scaled primes in harmonic sequences, in a linear, radial, divergent-convergent First-Second Law of Thermodynamics format, and geometry, ..and the modulated, rotational/spin turbulence, is probably much more complicated than that Navier-Stokes formulation, which is well above my knowledge anyway, (but extremely interesting to analyze). (amateur's comment, observation, suggestion (?))

  • @A-Go-5
    @A-Go-5 8 лет назад

    A great example of how infinitely annoying some audience members can be.

  • @walterbishop3668
    @walterbishop3668 8 лет назад

    The female Scientist is super hot and super smart .

  • @abbasvahedipour8034
    @abbasvahedipour8034 8 лет назад

    Great talk, I enjoyed it.

  • @shahinarya
    @shahinarya 8 лет назад

    TO NIMA: It's always perfect to be 25 :)

  • @shahinarya
    @shahinarya 8 лет назад

    One month since the post of this video and only 115 views is a sad statement of the public's interest in science!

  • @dong.7519
    @dong.7519 8 лет назад

    mr hamed is cool. lets do lunch.. 😎

  • @dong.7519
    @dong.7519 8 лет назад

    can you guys help me with a problem. ?