Видео

מדהים, תודה על הדברים

תודה על התוכן המחזק הרב שמכניס אותנו לפרופורציות.

❤Thank you for sharing!

Multi line comments

Mazal Tov to all the new graduates, and in particular to Lisa. Super proud of you for sure, but more importantly, expecting great things from you and your classmates. Get going Lisa!!

וסת הרמ"א + עיון וחפיפה, דאורייתא ודרבנן

ברכת הטבילה

חפיפה

חציצה

דם חימוד

תעשה סרטון על האם פסח הוא חג חקלאי

תעשה סרטון על האם אדם וחווה המציאו את חנוכה

תעשה סרטון על האם אדם וחווה היו תאומים סיאמיים בן ובת

תעשה סרטון על 4 המלכויות מספר דניאל (שהם בבל , פרס, יוון ורומא)

תעשה סרטון על מעשה מרכבה

Harav. Maybe you had the "Scottish common sense philosophers" in mind(?)

Promo-SM

Surprised no one has commented yet. Deeply appreciate Rabbi Yitz G! As someone who did not grow up in the Orthodox world (and now endeavors to be a Ben Torah and Shomer Mitzvot) I value independence of thought and personal experience. His perspective is so crucial!

She teaches extremely clearly and it's a pleasure to listen to her Hebrew. Really interesting.

Maravilha Baruch HaShem

This is a great discussion. Wide ranging thru ancient and modern thought in a number of traditions. Really liked it.

Ok, so since they didn't write a description, I'll just mention that this is distinguished scholar of Judaic Studies Prof. Michael Fishbane of the University of Chicago.

I have the impression there was some talking at cross-purposes, at times, between Dr. Malamet and the panelists, especially around the issue of "language games" and "mythic belief," which Dr. M. linked with Tamar Ross. Nothing any of the panelists said was an endorsement of the view that one should or could be pious in conduct but a skeptical philosopher in belief; all their ideas, I think, were much more holistic than that, and committed to a truth which would make religious life genuinely divine. (By the way, if I'm not mistaken, Franz Rosenzweig wrote beautifully about the "disease" that Dr. M. mentioned--the disease of viewing religious belief merely "as if it were true"--in his book, "On Understanding the Sick and the Healthy.") And from the side of the panelists, the main thing I feel was neglected (until the very end when Rabbi Bigman spoke of the normative role of ethics) was the necessary place of reason in the religious life, even if one is committed to a more postmodern, subjective, personalist view of religion. There are definite limits, I would argue, to what subjective experiences can determine to be true. Yes, there are differing truths, what some call multiple covenants, but there is also idolatry and evil. Reason, therefore, still needs to be a more objective, counterbalancing force in order to avoid the pitfalls of complete relativism. The righteous shall live by their faith--as supplemented, disciplined, and corrected by rational thought.

Fantastic

Such a sweet, intelligent man.

Very nice talk. Where would I look up this lesson in Mei h'Shiloach?