Видео

I’d love to claim I planned it to end at exactly 13:37 , but it was 100% accidental :p

Probably more like Matrix

AI is certainly impressive in many specialized tasks, like image recognition, data analysis, and even generating text, but it hasn’t surpassed humans in all domains. It still depends on massive datasets and human guidance to perform well.

Wish it was that straightforward but work isn't just about earning money. It often gives people a sense of purpose, community and personal growth. Even if we reach a point where machines will handle all of our jobs we certainly will need to figure out how to distribute wealth, maintain social connections, and ensure there are meaningful ways to spend our time.

And they leave us behind.

Interesting! Send a link when it will be released.

I appreciate how you tackled the topic from multiple sides!

Any sort of alignment is a delusion once we get to asi... by definition

I think you are right. People will eventually give more value on creations made by other humans. It’s the human connection that truly matters. The imperfections and messiness of our souls are what inform art, and that’s the part we resonate with the most.

We are indeed cooked, as you say. Don't be concerned by it, it produces a boring, flat, pastiche style that has no understanding of human experience. Both you and I can recognise it's shitty, flat world view at a glance. It literally said 'the raw emotional vibes of Bukowski.' I feel embarrassed for it.

Don’t worry, this isn’t AI trolling you! ;) I do use AI tools to assist with some aspects of the production process, mainly to speed things up. But trust me, every key element of this video is thoughtfully created by a human. The concept, the script, and every clip shown are carefully chosen by someone who genuinely cares about how AI is transforming art and life as we know it. If you feel the video’s value is diminished because the voiceover is AI-generated, that’s totally your call. I respect that. Either way, thank you for watching and engaging!

Plot twist: You’re half right! This video was a collaboration between AI and human. The AI helped structure the script, but the idea, the passion,the creativity, and philosophical deep dives? All human. Think of it as AI being the assistant director😉 . Together, we made something that (hopefully) gets us all thinking!

Absolutely. Technological advancements alone aren't enough, we need to address systemic issues to ensure a positive future for everyone. My video beside the philosophical implications touches on some of the practical social and economic challenges. Even if the science works, we need to ensure our societal structures can support such a shift. Otherwise, as you said, we could face serious problems.

Who says that the ones that already own the technology are not the bad guys?

@Μ.Κ-φ6φ it's still an option till we know that they aren't

@@dirtbikerman1000 some of us already know

@@Μ.Κ-φ6φ I didn't want to mention china They definitely are pre preparing

Things like bias in AI decision-making, over-reliance on automation, loss of privacy, and the potential displacement of jobs could go wrong if we're not careful. It’s crucial to have ethical oversight, clear accountability, and a focus on ensuring these technologies benefit everyone, not just a select few.

thank you for sharing!! I really appreciate it!!

It’s more accurate to say this video was a collaboration with AI. The core idea and many aspects of the execution were entirely human. If AI had a role here, it would be as the assistant director 😉. Thanks for watching!

That’s a really interesting tip! Leonardo’s ambidexterity is legendary, and there’s definitely something to be said about challenging your brain in new ways to boost creativity. It’s a fascinating example of how physical actions can stimulate cognitive growth. Have you tried it yourself?

I've been doing this for over 10 years now and my mind no longer pays attention to which hand I'm taking something with (kettle/ cup/ etc.). I've adapted a long time ago and moved it to the "subconscious", so I looked for other stimuli (art/ piano/creativ music*/ etc.) The point is that economics is determined by sociology (you have to feel the "spirit of the crowd" [~ Le Bon], but find a solution with logic ["expert intuition"] and for that you have to have a constant connection between the brain's spheres, because this is the Era of "Philo-Tech" [as I called it in 2015]; knowledge of human nature [including "computer science"] and technology and then "human leadership", and to understand psychology and sociology/social psychology, you have to understand philosophy [meta-science for other sciences and/ because critical thinking, and that's the basis of creativity]). Do you know where Seagway's failure came from, even though "on paper" everything was perfect? They didn't know philosophy ("they didn't feel the crowd" and innovation overtook the market; adaptability, and the need in people hadn't been created before) You can talk about this for hours :))) * ruclips.net/video/59wYFRHO17w/видео.html

I love how you frame the era we’re in as ‘Philo-Tech’-a fusion of understanding human nature, critical thinking, and technology. It’s true that the connection between creativity, psychology, and philosophy is often overlooked, yet it’s what drives true innovation. The Segway example is spot on: innovation alone isn’t enough if it doesn’t align with human behavior and societal readiness. ‘Feeling the crowd,’ as you referenced with Le Bon, ties deeply into how people adopt and adapt to new technologies. This reminds me of how AI agents and swarm systems might succeed where other technologies failed-not just because of their technical capability, but because they can be personalized, intuitive, and aligned with our social psychology.

Exactly, but it's also about money- "huge accumulation of success" like in football. Only one child out of ca. 13,000 trainees will become a professional, and how many will be Messi/ Ronaldo/ Lewandowski??? The same will happen now on a grand scale- the point is that my "output" (e.g. as a teacher) is worth 100x more than 99% of teachers; "talent"~ prof. Klaus Schwab And the market is ruled by money, and now AI Agents will "amplify the output" of the best employees (so what's the rest for? And which companies will want to cooperate with them, since they can have a "copy of an outstanding specialist"?) Money...

@@marcin3136 You bring up a very real concern-what happens to the majority of people who might be left out of this AI-driven evolution? If AI agents amplify the output of the top performers, there’s a risk of deepening inequality in the workplace and society as a whole. This evolution isn’t just about technology-it’s about how we as a society decide to adapt and distribute the benefits. We need to think beyond just maximizing productivity and profitability. For this shift to be sustainable and equitable, there has to be a focus on upskilling, creating new roles that complement AI, and ensuring opportunities for meaningful contributions from everyone. It’s also a chance to rethink how we value human qualities like empathy, creativity, and adaptability-things that AI can’t replicate. The question isn’t just about who gets amplified by AI, but how we ensure that this amplification creates opportunities rather than exclusion.

Absolutely! Swarm technology is a game-changer-AI agents working together like a hive, sharing tasks, learning collectively, and achieving goals no single agent could handle alone. It’s fascinating to think about how this could scale across industries. Did you write about any specific applications of swarm technology? I’d love to hear your insights!

@@AIDailyDigest007 Somewhere, some time ago I wrote something, but I don't run a blog or anything like that (I want to have peace - those are my values. Working in a company where they have brains and pay fairly is enough for me ;) Apropos "the swarm" (but in short to show how amazing it is :)))) Snowball effect/ The Butterfly Effect/ training in the "twin world" (robots learn in the virtual world and all of them can do what one- DoD has already learned and passed the tests; like adding a "branch" in Git with an update for everyone)/ exponential learning (its not a linear process)/ updating knowledge "in the background" (for example one AI Agent is connected to financial markets and gives "everyone" [in "background"] information about the price of oil, which affects their negotiations with the client)/ etc. etc. You can write about possibilities for hours... Critical and creative thinking is real gold (nuances decide/ "millimeters"- its a "huge accumulation of success"). The smallest mistake will cost millions because it will be magnified (and even hard to calculate). Ciaooo... :)

That's a great point, and it's something many people are concerned about. While it's true that AI agents are rapidly advancing, humans bring something irreplaceable to the table-our creativity, values, intuition, and emotional intelligence. AI agents are incredible at handling repetitive tasks, processing data, and optimizing workflows, but they still rely on us to define goals, provide context, and make nuanced ethical decisions. The future isn't about humans versus AI-it’s about collaboration. By leveraging AI's strengths to amplify our own, we can focus on innovation, big-picture thinking, and building a better future together.

AI Agents can extrapolate based on a list of ideological objectives about a whollistic agenda description regarding eternal paradise - immortal anatomy; workforce humanoids; full-conscious immersion simulation; full, deliberative control interface with feasible utilization of infinite resources; world divisions about a remake of the universe; music; architecture; city-planning and building; space travel methods; edu methods; principles or rules of ideology by which to enforce boundaries: (1) immortality of subject person, memory and personhood; (2) rational, beneficial events that absent death, war, disease, crime,punishment, poverty, extreme pain, and anything of an evil nature.

@@StanLeeStanley Thanks for watching!

See my book hitting shelves by late February, “THE NEW SOCIAL CONTRACT”. Will AI take jobs?! I have solved this problem.