Видео

Thanks for your question! The initial import of references into Covidence must be in RIS, EndNote XML, or PubMed format. You'll find the following Knowledge Base articles helpful: support.covidence.org/help/how-references-move-through-a-review support.covidence.org/help/study-imports - Stephanie

Hi, thanks for your question. You can find help with our quality assessment features at support.covidence.org/help

We are always updating our platform to better serve our users! That being said, most of the content is the same in the older Step 1 video. - Stephanie

Glad you found this training helpful! - Stephanie

Thank you for your question! We have some guidance on our Knowledge Base for this linked below: support.covidence.org/help/faq-is-it-possible-to-use-multiple-extraction-templates-in-one-review-in-extraction-2 support.covidence.org/help/faq-is-it-possible-to-use-multiple-quality-assessment-tools-in-one-review-in-extraction-2

Glad it was helpful!

Thanks for sharing your feedback, we appreciate it! - Laura

Thank you @troyroy01! Under the settings section of your review, you have the option to choose between Extraction 1 and Extraction 2. You can always send us a message to support@covidence.org.- Nancy

Thanks for your question! This does not replace the Cochrane RCT search filter. We'd recommend using this tool in addition to the search filter to identify records that the filter might have missed. - Laura

@@covidenceapp thank you. Makes sense, but interesting if it really removes that many more studies not removed in the search.

Hi @traviskingdon3636 thanks for your question. The PDF in Covidence will not contain the annotations you added to it Mendeley. - Laura

Hi @OsmaraAlvesdosSantos, Thanks for your question. Regarding assigning references, we get this question a lot! Covidence doesn't encourage specific dividing of records in order to minimise bias in voting patterns. You can tell each of your reviewers to track their overall contribution from the Settings >> Team settings page, and to 'aim' for a particular number of votes contributed. You'll still end up dividing the work fairly evenly, but this minimizes the risk that one segment will receive an overall different assessment than another segment. In Covidence you have all of your reviewers working off of the same list. In dual reviewer mode, the reference will be moved forward with any two votes. Once a reference is moved forward, it is moved off of everyone's screening list. Thus, as long as everyone contributes the requisite number of votes, all of your records will be voted on, even without dividing the reference list into segments. Happy reviewing!

Thank you to respond my question@@covidenceapp.

Hello, There are no restrictions on the number of characters in the text field. What you type inside the text field doesn't impact the cells or columns format. You can always play around with the demo review (which can be found at the bottom of your Covidence dashboard) to test how the output will look. Please feel free to reach out with any other questions support@covidence.org. - Nancy