Видео

This video sucks

Play it at 1.5 speed and works great. I appreciate your insight and hope you post more on your thoughts.

Transcript: “The motto of the Ulster Freedom Fighters: ‘Feriēns tegō’; ‘Striking, I defend.’ ‘tegō’ literally means: ‘I cover’, and it is from this verb that we get: ‘tēctum’, which means ‘roof’. In the Roman Catholic Mass, we have: ‘Domine, nōn sum dignus ut intrēs sub tēctum meum...’ ‘Oh Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest enter underneath my roof...’ so a ‘roof’ is: ‘a covering of a house’ so, literally: ‘Feriēns tegō’ would mean something like: ‘punching, I cover’ but, idiomatically it means: ‘striking, I defend’ . The Ulster Freedom Fighters are the military wing of the Ulster Defence Association, but really the Ulster Defence Association is the military wing of the Ulster Defence Association. However, in order to keep the Ulster Defence Association legal, they perpetrated their terrorism under the name Ulster Freedom Fighters. There were some extremely charismatic leaders, though, in the Ulster Defence Associatio. I am a secular Catholic from Southern Ireland, and I obviously have no regard for a terrorist group that goes about murdering innocent Catholics, however, that said, there were some extremely charismatic leaders within the Ulster Defence Association: Andy Tyrie, John McMichael and Ray Smallwoods: all of these men were extremely charismatic: there was just something about these three men that drew you in, even if you disagree with them, and another thing that is interesting about the Ulster Defence Association is that they flirted with the idea of an Independent Ulster. On the night that Ray Smallwoods was murdered by the IRA, he actually had an Independent-Ulster flag flying outside his window. The Independent-Ulster flag is the Cross of Saint Patrick; the saltire of Saint Patrick; the red saltire on a white background mixed with Saint Andrew’s saltire, so on it we have a red cross on a blue; we have a red saltire on a blue background with the Red Hand of Ulster and the hexagram representing the Six Counties, and that is the flag of an Independent Ulster, and John McMichael’s son, Gary McMichael: he too wants an Independent Ulster. I find that the Independent-Ulster movement: the movement within Protestantism and Loyalism to make Northern Ireland an independent realm... I find that this is a fascinating position and so mottoes are a great way to build vocabulary, in Latin, and I remember about twenty years ago, I used to travel down quite a bit to East Belfast, for... with my uncle, and in Loyalist areas, you would see a lot of paramilitary paraphernalia: flags and graffiti with Loyalist symbols and mottoes and things like that, and so: ‘Feriēns tegō’, and this of course, here, is referencing the Red Hand of Ulster, clenched as a fist... so... it’s the Red Hand of Ulster clenched as a fist; clenched as a fist punching... that supposedly defends the Protestant and Loyalist community.”

Transcript: CIARÁN AODH MAC ARDGHAIL:“‘in mediās rēs’ or: ‘[jumping] into the middle of things’: a compositional style as regards narrating fiction. I am having a little browse through ‘Latin Prose Composition’ by Thomas Kirchever Arnold and Bradley and by Dr G. G. Bradley, as edited and revised by Sir James Mountford. Here we see the Latin phrase ‘in mediās rēs’, and this is a Latin accusative plural phrase that means: ‘into the middle matters’ when ‘in’ is employed with the accusative rather than with the ablative then motion towards something is usually denoted... so ‘in mediās rēs’ means ‘into the middle matters’ and this is a style of narration. Instead of beginning at the beginning and ending at the end why not jump into the middle matters? Then one can employ alinear storytelling so as to fill in what happened in the beginning. Perhaps a creative writer might do this by employing things like dreams or flashbacks... and so our English phrase: ‘in medias res’ or... this is usually translated as: ‘in the middle of things’, however I would translate it as: ‘[jumping] into the middle matters’... the middle matters that the creative work is about... and so this is a style of composition and it comes from the Latin accusative plural phrase: ‘in mediās rēs’, which means: ‘[jumping] into the middle matters’.”

אני לא ידעתי מה אמר עם הסירטון הזה, באמת - אבל מיכאל הייזר הוא היה אחד המורים הכי טוב בעת הזאת (על עברית). ואתה - אחי באמת, אתה לא ידע הרבה על עברית ואתה לא ידע על התנ"ך מהייזר. על כן, אין חכמה בסירטון הזה. אבל ברוך אתה ליהוה.

Brother I really don't know why you sing every word, but that's not at all the pronunciation - neither ancient greek, nor byzantine greek, nor koine greek, nor modern greek, nor erasmian greek.

You don't pronounce τουτο that way brother. Ου is always pronounced as "oo" like in english "cool" or "stool". This is the case since ancient greek from Plato etc. and is still the case in the 21st century - it was always like that and was in no century ever pronounced as "oü" like you did in this video. The same goes obviously for your wrong pronunciations of βους and ουτος. The pronunciation of υ as in το υδωρ is obviously not the same as the υ in the sequence ου like in τους (or the given examples τουτο, ουτος, βους).

Brother your pronunciation is off. It's not "mahz"

The zayin isn't part of מה and therefore it is "mah zeh" and not "mahz zah". Besides that, זה has a səgol and not a qames, therefore it's "zeh" not "zah".

Keep it up man. I'm trying to get this Greek down as well. Thanks for sharing.

I am a huge fan of John Bunyan (1628-1698) and his Pilgrim’s Progress. I was left wanting more after Installment 2, known as ‘Christiana’. A part 3 did emerge, and for a time, people thought that it was from John Bunyan himself. However, scholarship now deem this to be pseudepigraphical work. That people thought that part 3 was from John Bunyan for a long time is why I name the author ‘PseudoBunyan’. This video comprises the Title Page. The text of Pilgrim’s Progress 3 that I am utilising: en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Third_Part_of_the_Pilgrim%27s_Progress ____ #bunyan #calvinism #fantasy #pilgrimsprogress

Uhhh

Same guy ⚡️⚡️⚡️

To be fair to the British Government, though, they would have rejected the term: ‘Ulsterisation’ and would have preferred instead: ‘normalisation’. However, in my view, the pretended goal: making Northern Ireland a ‘normal’ part of the United Kingdom was never really in view by the British Government. Take the Downing Street Declaration: the British Government would never say about a “normal” part of mainland Britain that it had no ‘selfish strategic or economic interest’ in it. However, such a statement was in line with Ulsterisation, and with a British desire to ultimately disengage with Northern Ireland. In my view, the actual aim of the British Government was to make Northern Ireland a “normal” overseas self-governing Crown Dependency... which is what the Isle of Man currently is. Arguably, they succeeded in this beyond their wildest imaginings. The Northern Irish question, by and large, is confined to Northern Ireland.

That's a very good point about James White. White argues for consistency all the time and he himself is inconsistent. I used to be a Presuppositionalist as well but then one day I decided to test my presuppositions with data and evidence... and to my shock ended up an atheist.

Thanks for sharing 🙏🏿

James White is, I believe based on his behaviour, willing to be a presuppositionalist, an evidentialist, or anything else, just so long as the money keeps coming in. Not all of the modern apologists are truly conmen, in it for money, power, and control, but many of them most clearly are.

Im so exciting! can you post the link?

Good to know

I stopped the video and did my own Latin translation. It was exactly the same as yours.

Okay, if this is meant to be a joke you are pretty funny

It's written in the law, a number of conditions that if a man is guilty of that his punishment is childlessness. God certainly ends slavery. It is even how he chooses to identify himself. And he even had one of the Prophets going around telling everyone to stop using slaves. And the overall jist of the book is concerning God's Kingship. And everyone knows the King's Line was by Male descendant. None the less, the Lord has many female appreciation readings happen in the Jewish community on a regular basis for balance. And it is regarded the women of valor. And the courage of Queen Esther. But regardless of the doings of mankind. The point of this creation is the realization of the billions and trillions times more ability our God has. While he instead gently and lovingly sits you on a chair. For we can calculate the exact amount of nuclear energy that is direct below your feet. Why can't we just appreciate that he constitutes himself so calmly. Yet you know what happens when I do something for someone and they don't appreciate it? I stop doing that thing. So how much greater is He!! That in my weakness I would of given up on you already. Yet look around!! All calm and collected. Even for the ungrateful. Yes indeed. He is a very good God. You're just lucky he is so very good.

God won’t be mocked. The God of Israel is The Almighty. Repent, and believe the Gospel or suffer eternal hellfire.

There isn't anything inherently immoral in slavery. There could be slaves living a happy life and being treated very well.😊

Please spell my name correctly. 😊 Bird

zot beten

Love it

Cool😂

In my recent video on Total Depravity I document how the issue of infant damnation is based in Augustinian anthropology. It's not present in Judaism, Eastern Orthodoxy or Anabaptist groups. Inherited guilt & sinfulness is anti-Biblical. In my series on Original Sin and Total Depravity I also explore the issue further. James White has stated publicly he believes in elect and unelect infants.

It should be ‘mich’ and not ‘mir’: ‘Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.’

The Latin phrase under discussion is: ‘Num cāsū factus est mundus?’ which means: ‘Was the world made by chance?’ or, better still: ‘The world was hardly made by chance, now, was it?’ In the above Latin sentence, the interrogative particle: ‘num’ tells us that we expect the negative answer: ‘No, of course the world was not made by chance!’ If one were to pronounce Latin with the Received Pronunciation-RP is not rhotic-then this is to mispronounce most r’s and most-if not all-of the vowels. Long ‘o’ in both Hiberno-English and Latin is pronounced: /oː/ whereas in RP it is /ɛoː/. short ‘a’ in both Hiberno-English and Latin is pronounced /ɑ/ whereas in RP, it is pronounced: /æ/. If one be really posh, like the characters in the crown, short ‘a’ can even be pronounced as: ‘ɛ’. Often the characters in The Crown speak of being ‘heppy’. The RP is dying in England. Not even princes William and Harry use it. However, thankfully, ‘The Crown’ has preserved 6 series of exquisite RP. To pronounce Latin in an Irish accent is, in my view, to pronounce all the r’s and vowels of Latin perfectly. The Irish accent-or ‘Hiberno-English’-is a rhotic pronunciation of the English language which means that r’s are always pronounced. ‘rhō’, in Greek signifies our English letter ‘r’ hence the linguistic term: ‘rhotic’. There are other similarities to the Irish (and Scottish) like the Romans giving each other unflattering nicknames. ‘Brūtus’, for instance means: ‘dull’, ‘stupid’, ‘brutal’ and ‘Cicerō’ means ‘warts-on-his-nose’. ___ #latin #education #translation #classics #history #linguistics #ireland #thecrownnetflix

Too slow, and disjointed.

Thank you, sir!!

Don't get any where nere a candle. All theses strawmen go up quick.

There is no reason for any Christian to follow an evil 16th century French lawyer.

To the OP. Did God create Lucifer, Adam and Eve knowing they would fall into sin and condemnation?

II Timothy 1:8-9 NKJV 'Therefore do not be ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me His prisoner, but share with me in the sufferings for the gospel according to the power of God, who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was given to us in Christ Jesus before time began,'

Moses didnt enter the promise land because although moses was going to heaven after his death that doesnt mean he doesnt have to answer for his sin. Jesus redeems anyone who seeks redemption but we all have to answer and live with our sin. If you murder someone and then become born again you still have to serve a life sentence in jail.

In the bible it says Gods will is that everyone be saved. Why would God hand select some by to not be saved? That goes against his will. We areall predestined to be saved but many of us reject that free gift. Dont reject that gift. Accept jesus :)

If Calvinists want to be truly consistent with their logic then they would have to admit that they don't know if they're saved. Under their worldview, God creates confused and unsaved people who identify as Christians but end up in Hell; they are actually not part of the elect. So how do they know they are not one of those people? They can have hope at best but not assurance.

I wrote my last comment before I finished watching. Now that I have finished, I must say I am very confused. How could you prop up The Bible Mini-series, Jesus Christ Superstar and even The Passion and yet criticize The Chosen for: 1. Supposed imaginary characters 2. Adding back story 3. Supporting traditional beliefs 4. Turning the Bible into a soap opera 5. Making money from producing the show? Are not the other shows mentioned just as egregious- or even worse? The Passion was the biggest grossing R-rated movie of its time. It took its characters and story very seriously and played it literal. It added scenes such as the one where Jesus made a Roman-style table while talking to His mother. Theee was also a demon baby. But worse yet, it incorporated the stations of the cross- even Veronica’s cloth that took in the image of Jesus’ face. Pure tension that took any logical person out of the moment. The Bible mini-series was even worse. No doubt it was taken seriously. The producers saw it as their calling and an offering to God. I didn’t watch the New Testament, but the OT had a literal Genesis and Flood. I’m good with that. But I was very much against the cringe-worthy additions like the ninja-angels who went to Sodom. It was just embarrassing on every level. The birth of Jesus had the three kings appear at the manger- when we know they were magi and they didn’t make it to Jesus until he was a young child. The producers made enough that they kept on making similar projects- including the re-release of the Jesus story as a movie - which made extra money from recycled film. And don’t get me started by how imaginary Jesus Christ Suoeratar is. Mary Magdalene love story? Judas the innocent? Jesus as a weeping clown crucified on a fence with no resurrection? Of course, they never made money on that production. Unless you count the many years the was presented all over the world. Oh- and the filmed version as well. I don’t understand most of your criticisms. It may just be that this one makes an honest effort to place this story in the middle of actual history. It seeks to honor Jesus and point viewers back to the Bible. Many people have a problem with that.

If you enjoyed those other films about Jesus, I do think you should give The Chosen another chance. If you are only going to watch one episode to make an opinion of season one. I would suggest episode six. It has two Biblical miracles you would be familiar with, yet it doesn’t spoil anything for the rest of the season. The Chosen is more like Biblical fiction or historical fiction. The viewer gets to see what it might have been like to walk with Jesus and how the people around Him changed as a result. The show does start slow - on purpose. You are supposed to be learning about the disciples and what it was like in the first century before Jesus comes and interrupts it all. You really don’t even get a major Bible event until episode four. But from there on, those scenes become regular. I think the biggest thing The Chosen does is return Jesus to his first century Jewish roots. You see things in life of history and culture- which brings a whole other level of meaning to the viewer. I never pictured Jesus saying the traditional Jewish prayers or celebrating the Festival of Booths. What was Samaria like? And what is the Sanhedrin all about? This all comes together to weave a beautiful picture of how things might have been. Just don’t expect 100% Bible- this show is meant to honor the Gospel stories, show a plausible version of how it could have played out, and point the viewer back to the Bible.

Sounds like a biological attack against Baal Peor where he is used as a catalyst for this type of voodoo orgy otherwise why would it happen in the first instance if things were managed properly, so the Universe was under mass entropy as soon as it morphed yet to complete the first phase of its cycle and Gods creation is part of a virus as a whole being the true abomination actually because dryland appeared representing the false image of the abomination of desolation of the Empire of Old which is a machine being unnatural!

This is an ox that I drew with pencils, some time ago. In this short we shall learn how to say: ‘What is this?’ ‘This is an ox.’ in Ancient Greek. «Τῐ́ ἐστῐ τοῦτο;» «Τῐ́ ἐστῐ τοῦτο?» ‘Tĭ́ estĭ toûto?’ «Οὗτός ἐστῐ βοῦς.» ‘Hoûtós estĭ boûs.’ ‘This is an ox.’ ____ #greek #greece #translation #classics #linguistics #languages

‘What is this? This is ivy.’ In Ancient Greek: In Ancient Greek: «Τῐ́ ἐστῐ τοῦτο;» «Τῐ́ ἐστῐ τοῦτο?» Transliterated: ‘Tĭ́ estĭ toûto?’ Translated into English: ‘What is this?’ In Ancient Greek: «Οὗτός ἐστῐ κῐσσός.» Transliterated: ‘Hoûtós estĭ kĭssós.’ Translated into English: ‘This is ivy.’ Alternatively, in the Attic Dialect: «Οὗτός ἐστῐ κῐττός.» Transliterated: ‘Hoûtós estĭ kĭttós.’ Translated into English: ‘This is ivy.’ Further Note: In Bacchae (407 BCE) by Euripides (c. 480 BCE-c. 406 BCE), in line 105, we have: «ὦ Σεμέλᾱς τροφοὶ Θῆβαι, στεφᾰνοῦσθε κῐσσῷ·» Bacchae (407 BCE), 105. or, when transliterated: ‘ō̂ Semélās trop͡hoì T͡Hē̂bai, step͡hănoûst͡he kĭssō̂(ĭ);’ Bacchae (407 BCE), 105 (transliterated). or, when translated into Biblical English: ‘Oh Thebes! Oh Semele’s wet-nurse! Crown thou thyself with ivy!’ Bacchae (407 BCE), 105, (my translation into Biblical English). ‘Oh Thebes! Oh Semele’s wet-nurse!’ Crown yourself with ivy!’ Bacchae (407 BCE), 105, (my translation into Modern English). ____ #greek #drama #history #ancientHistory #classics #drawing