Видео

1071 YILINDA MALAZGİRT SAVAŞINDAN SONRA TÜRKLER ANADOLU'U DOLDURDU VE BURAYA AVRUPALILAR TÜRKİYE ADINI VERDİLER. ANADOLU TÜRKTÜR. KESİNLİKLE ABARTILDIĞI KADAR TERLİ HALKLARLA KARIŞIM OLMAMIŞTIR. BUNLAR TÜRKLERE KARŞI YAPILAN ANADOLUNUN TÜRKSÜZLEŞTİRİLMESİ POLİTİKALARIDIR. TÜRKLER ANADOLUYA GELDİĞİNDE ANADOLUDA İNSAN NÜFUSU KALMAMIŞTI. SALGIN HASTALIK VE SAVAŞLAR NEDENİYLE AZALMIŞTI. TÜRKLER KİTLELER ANADOLUYA GELEREK HER KARIŞ TOPRAĞINI TÜRKLEŞTİRDİLER. YER İSİMLERİNİ TÜRKLEŞTİRDİLER. TÜRKİYE TÜRKLERİNDİR. KIÇINIZI DA YIRTSANIZ BU BÖYLE.

yalan tarih anlatıyorsunuz . Sahtekarlık yapıyorsunuz. Türkiyenin Türk soyu %90 'dır. doğu anadolu'da Türkçe konuşmayanlar dajhiş Türktür. Siz Greklere, Rumlara bakın asıl onlar Türk geni ve kanı taşıyorlar. Çünkü çok uzun yıllar Türklerin tebası olarak yaşadılar..

It’s crazy how whenever a non-European sees someone who is slightly darker skin than the average Germanic, they immediately shout “you’re not white!” When in fact, you can be white with tan skin and dark hair like the Sardinians who are 95% pure Europeans 😂

They say the Irish share similar DNA to the Portuguese.

Finally.. one channel that leaves guessing and biasis out of the equation and speaks only about known facts. And if anyone knows their ancient history, it makes complete - perfect sense. To have 3 brances of DNA present. 1) Paleo Balkan roots (Comprised of both Western and Eastern Paleo Balkan roots: Aka, Illyrians & Thracians) 2) Slavic. Which also makes sense since the biggest migration in ancient history of slavic tribes in the 6th century made the region their new home to this day. And lastly 3) Anatolian (When they were under the rule of the Roman empire). But key take away here is that all but Paleo-Balkan DNA is paternal (from the father). So men in Albanian are primarily of Illyrian & Thracian descent.

The irony that Basque have more steppe ancestry compared to Spanish and Portuguese

Anatolian Turks took the most beautiful women of the countries they conquered as wives, DNA comes from the mother, so it is natural for them to have different genetics. Also Anatolian Turks are from the Oghuz tribe and do not have slanted eyes, the number of Turks in Turkey, Azerbaijan, Iran, Crimea, Gagauz, Cyprus etc. is 150 million.. the important thing is that we grow up with Turks and Turkish consciousness, therefore our genetics are not important. Turkey is the country that embraces Turkish consciousness the most in the world.

The Sami people may. According to the dna tests the closest relatives are Belgians. All in all, the white people are originally Caucasians and way before that Africans.

Arabs came to the Berber lands hundreds of years ago. I am an Arab.

Central Blacksea region,Turkish Haplogrup Q Y2052 ,Merzifon district E11 AvrupaAvrupa: %60,86 HindistanHindistan: %23,38 OroqenKuzey Çin Oroqen'i: %6,28 Amerikalı: %2,98 AfrikaAfrika: %2,42 Güneybatı Çin Yi: %1,81 Japonca: %1,18 Doğu Çin: %0,91 Yakut: %0,17 DoğuSeaK12 AvrupaAvrupa: %66,28 Hint: %20,04 AfrikaAfrika: %4,25 Yakutlar: %3,52 Tibetçe: %1,91 Korece: %1,73 Kamboçyalı: %1,09 Moğol-Tunguzca: %0,86 Kızılderili: %0,33

Strong strong Mongolians !

This sounds a lot like the narative hungarians tried to push in order to justify their presence in Transylvania. It has long been proven incorrect.

Bilmeyen varsa öğrensin Türklerin atası İnka Maya Aztek uygarlığı Saygılar Ne Arapız nede Yunan değiliz...... ruclips.net/video/7gMUkgAAtXY/видео.htmlsi=BV9bPGyTUThcCzUo

Biz Arap miyiz Yunan mı anlamadık 😂😂 Bizim bildiğimiz bu ruclips.net/video/pBpN1pS3JZo/видео.htmlsi=_XHYcD77W7wQekBZ

This video is very helpful for me.

Why are no Turks shown on the east Türkiye? This is again a biased video

It really depends what you define as Turkic dna. The Ottoman elites mixed with non Turkic women. So their offsprings became less and less Turkic for each generation. So the Turkic dna became diluted over time. Everybody is mixed to a certain extend. But when comes to Modern Turks, the higest Turki dna is still found In Central Asia. Yet, Turkish people In Anatolia has kind of highjakced the Turkic legacy that moslty belongs to the Turks In Central Asia who has more steppe than Anatolian dna. Ancient Turkic tribes tribes In Central Asia had high steppe dna just like the modern Turks who live there now.

I am a South Marmara Turk. My iron age rates in illustrative DNA are as follows; Anatolian 62.6%, Saka 30.8%, Xiongnu 6.6% I don't understand what it has to do with Levantine.

Estimating the ancestry of the Pardos? Most European Brazilian I have met say they are Portuguese Or Portuguese and Italian ancestry But they say they’re not African ancestry or native. So this has to be about the Pardos mix race ones that have more Europe, ancestry. Many or most Pardos look more European to me. Half the population are fully European. Over 40 percent are Pardos. He must be talking about Pardos.

Turkish people have Central Asian dna and mostly immigrated from Turkenistan to Anatolia which seperated into Yörüks and Türkmens. People try to propogate there is no Turkic in the comment section.

I'm a Finn from a region of Northern Savonia and I've gotten my DNA tests done. All of them including Big-Y. DNA traits lead to Sweden, Norway, Estonia, Ukraine (Scythians) and Hungary.

Thank you for making this video, but we aren’t native to these parts of the Balkans only. There are also quite a lot of us from Moesia and there also used to be a very dense population of Pomaks in Aegean and Central Macedonia. However, due to the Treaty of Lausanne, they were sent to Turkey. Just a small correction, really.

I know looks doesnt count in genetics, but when I see a Romanian they either have a slavic or romani look. I dont know what is typical romanian

Tukic were mongoloid race with paternal haplo group C just like Mongolians. Turks and Mongolians were same people and belongs to mongoloids race

The j2 paternal of ottomans were mostly Iranian farmers related not Anatolians J2, but todays modern Turkey Anatolian J2 is higher than the Iranian farmers J2.

What a waste of time watching this video was . My name is Brian Blaney-Murphy. A bit of Irish in that name. My late father married a Welsh girl. I can tell you straight. If you put this BS up at the pub there would be no Irish. They would have fallen asleep with insular boredom. We all came from the fucking pub .

They are Albanian

South Italians are Mediterranean similar to Albanian

The place called Greece never existed before as we know it today. The people who live in so called Greece today used to be called "Romej" during Byzantine Empire and "Raja" during Ottoman Empire times (except the Arvanitas who used to be called always by their name like "Albani", "Arbanoi", etc.) and the name "Greece" never existed during Byzantine times. During Ottoman times in the Balkans, after the big powers pushed for an uprising in the place that today is called "Greece", an independent country was formed in 1821-1832. The majority of the population there was of Arvanitas (and Chameria) stock, they also were the backbone of the uprising for independence from the Ottoman Empire. The rest of the minority population was of Slav, Turks and Aromanian stock. After the gain of independence the place was so divided, and with a prolonged civil war that a real country could not be formed. Fearing the disintegration of the place after Ottomans left (and possibility of a return of the Ottomans), Prince Otto of Germany was brought in by European powers to clear the mess and do nation - building there. He was proclaimed King of the place by big powers and given plenipotentiary powers. The Price Otto royal family in Germany happen to be an admirer of the ancient civilizations, one of them being the extinct ancient Greek civilization, traces and archeological findings of which are also seen in that region called today "Greece" as well. Being an ancient history romantic and buff, Otto came up with the idea, that the only way to keep the place together and for a chance to build a country there, was to adopt/impose some kind of neutral/foreign ancient language and culture for all people living in that place, that will make possible for the people to stick together under one language and culture imposed on them. So with a special royal decree, he proclaimed a version of the ancient Greek (the easier one to be taught and learned by people there in those times) as an official language of the place, and also came up with the new name for the place, calling it with a special royal decree "Greece". Everything else was banned, and the new "country" formed, was ordered to be rebuild anew in resemblance of the old romantic view of the ancient Greek civilization, starting with the buildings, names of people, places, cities and villages, regions, mountains, fields and all were changed to made-up names loaned by the ancient literature of ancient Greek civilization. This of course was associated with money brought by European powers to rebuild. The more people in that place agreed with the change of their true national and ethnic identity and declare themselves artificially "Greeks/Helenes" and adopt to the new order, the more money was to be pouring in. Naturally, the strongest resistance to this artificial and made-up solution, was made by the Arvanitas (and Chameria), but at no avail. It is legendary, the loss by one vote in the Price Otto's Parliament of that time, of Arvanitas proposal to have the Albanian (Arvanite) language as an official language of the place called 'Greece" today, and to call the new country "Arvanoi" (instead of "Greece"). There is plenty of scientific and factual evidence, archival and historical documents, as well as studies and publications by major authors and authorities in the field about as above. One interesting fact here, is that one of the earlier German/Austrian well known historians and scientists of that time, Fallmerayer, alerted Prince Otto and others to this nonsense, of declaring a whole people and place by a name not belonging to them, and injecting an extinct language, culture and civilization on people who had no idea about it and did not belong to it at all. By the way, Fallmerayer, is a banned figure and historian in what is called Greece today. Germany is still paying for the Otto's mistake, even today. It has gotten stuck with the country so called "Greece". It is now forced to pour free money, even today, out of Germany's pocket (through European Union as well) year after year to keep it alive and going, as this "Greece" cannot stand on its own. It is an artificial creation of Prince Otto's fantasy (a "zombie" country so to speak), and the new generations of the Germans and Europeans are continuing to pay the price for it. Moreover, what Prince Otto did back then, is tantamount to ethnic cleansing. He forced inhabitants of a whole region/place (called "Greece" today) to change by force their culture, language, national and ethnic identity to something else that those people were not, so they could artificially change in order to look modern and civilized (like ancient Greeks in Otto's personal view) and possibly be united. And of course, Arvanites and Chams (as the majority population in the region) suffered mostly from this ethnic cleansing. All this revelation, informs another major point: history taught about what today is called Greece, it appears to be taught wrong. People are wrongly taught in schools that today's Greece and its people are the direct descendants of ancient Greeks. Greece and Greeks of today, in some extend, also think they are superior to others just because they are called "Greeks" and their country "Greece" by decree (not by the virtue of the truth). They also seem to believe for some reason, they are entitled to the German and European money being handed out to them. The school textbooks and historiography should change, telling people the truth as it is. And with this, will come many other changes, in the way we see relations with the country called "Greece" today.

25% Slavic??? What a joke 😂

The notion of Greeks being ethnically homogenous and direct descendants of the Hellenes has been a persistent narrative, often used to foster a sense of unity and historical continuity. However, a closer examination reveals the complexity and diversity within the Greek population, challenging the simplistic portrayal of ethnic homogeneity and direct lineage from the ancient Hellenes. To begin with, Greece has been a crossroads of various civilizations throughout history, including interactions with Albanians, Romans, Byzantines, Ottomans, and others. This rich history of cultural exchanges has inevitably left an imprint on the ethnic composition of the region. Genetic studies indicate a diversity of influences, reflecting the historical interactions and migrations that have shaped the genetic makeup of the Greek people. This diversity challenges the notion of a singular, homogeneous ethnic origin. Moreover, the concept of ethnicity itself is complex and dynamic. It is not solely determined by genetic factors but is also influenced by cultural, linguistic, and historical elements. While the Hellenes were indeed one of the ancient tribes in the region, claiming a direct ethnic lineage from them oversimplifies the intricate processes of cultural assimilation, intermixing, and acculturation that have occurred over centuries. Language, often considered a key marker of ethnic identity, also presents complexities. The modern Greeks language belongs to the Indo-European family but is distinct within this linguistic group. While it has roots in the Hellenic language, linguistic evolution and influences from Latin, Slavic, and other languages have contributed to its unique character. This linguistic complexity challenges the notion of a straightforward, unbroken linguistic continuity between ancient Hellenic and modern Greek. Historical records further complicate the narrative of ethnic homogeneity. The region has witnessed migrations, invasions, and changes in political control, all of which have contributed to the diversity within the Greek population. The medieval period, for example, saw the influx of various groups, including Slavs and Normans, leaving lasting cultural and genetic impacts. In conclusion, the idea of Greeks being ethnically homogenous and direct descendants of the Hellenes is a simplistic narrative that does not fully capture the complexity of Greece's history and the diversity within its population. Genetic, linguistic, and historical evidence points to a more nuanced and multifaceted reality, highlighting the need to approach the question of Greek identity with a recognition of the intricate processes of cultural evolution and interaction that have shaped the region over millennia.

This 'arrival of Gaels' to Ireland in the Iron Age has yet to be substantiated by either genetic change or evidence of conquest.

feck off ai videos

they must have had some viking genes too , wasn't Dublin built by them ??

Drop the racially charged hatred of European people. It is not BCE, but BC, and you are only using BCE to show your hostility to our Christian heritage.

Ireland is the full island

The 'Celts' is a Oxford myth created by Edward Lhuyd a polymath keeper of the Ashmolean Museum, and popularised in a book called The Antiquities of Nations. “There never was a Celtic invasion of Ireland or Britain. The identity of a Celtic Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Brittany dates back, not to the mists of time, but to 1707” (Just after the first Act of Union in fact). There is an Iron Age material culture that is evident in findings from northern Europe between Paris and Prague. It is named after a site in Switzerland called La Tène and is associated with what we call the Celts (there is no evidence that these people ever used the term or even identified themselves as a single ethnic group). And none of the things you would find if these people invaded or migrated to Ireland - their pots, their houses, their burial-sites, their coins, their horse-fittings - exist here. As Barry Raftery, one of the leading authorities on Iron Age Ireland, puts it of the presumed Celtic invasion, “It seems strange that a warrior aristocracy supposedly responsible for imposing so many aspects of its culture on the indigenous population . . . should have had almost no impact on the archaeological record.” In fact, what both archaeology and genetic studies show is continuity - broadly the same people who built Newgrange continuing to inhabit the island, speaking a version of the language of the Atlantic seaboard from which they had originated.

The 'Celts' is a Oxford myth created by Edward Lhuyd a polymath keeper of the Ashmolean Museum, and popularised in a book called The Antiquities of Nations. “There never was a Celtic invasion of Ireland or Britain. The identity of a Celtic Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Brittany dates back, not to the mists of time, but to 1707” (Just after the first Act of Union in fact). There is an Iron Age material culture that is evident in findings from northern Europe between Paris and Prague. It is named after a site in Switzerland called La Tène and is associated with what we call the Celts (there is no evidence that these people ever used the term or even identified themselves as a single ethnic group). And none of the things you would find if these people invaded or migrated to Ireland - their pots, their houses, their burial-sites, their coins, their horse-fittings - exist here. As Barry Raftery, one of the leading authorities on Iron Age Ireland, puts it of the presumed Celtic invasion, “It seems strange that a warrior aristocracy supposedly responsible for imposing so many aspects of its culture on the indigenous population . . . should have had almost no impact on the archaeological record.” In fact, what both archaeology and genetic studies show is continuity - broadly the same people who built Newgrange continuing to inhabit the island, speaking a version of the language of the Atlantic seaboard from which they had originated.

Hi, can you share the sources that you utilized while making this video?

Finns are a mix of Scandinavian, Baltics, Orals and Siberians

The complete history of a dying nation

The Irish and Scots are Gaels. We were mislabled Celts in the 19th century, we stills describe ourselves as Celts and that is okay but really we are Gaels.

How dare they reduce us to a pato-eating race when it's them that are trying to shad their ugly past. the Irish are beautiful and unique and brilliant in iheir own right...

The Irish are not and never were Celts

Im so happy that you have done a video on irish people, now i got a question did the bell beakers from ireland spoke an indo european language that was sepparated from the celtic language?

Finns are Russ.

Payement method with PayPal ?

DNA says it all,Greek and south Italian

They are Without a doubt Cannanites and phonecian s

Southern Italians got high Imperial Roman ancestry. Roman East Mediterranean is like Greeks and Cypriots!