One reason that battles like Minsk and operation Bragation is partly because as Americans we concentrate on our national experience and have a tendency to minimize the efforts of Britsh and Canadians as well as the Soviets which if mentioned are usually called allied troops.Another reason that the the Soviet Union and Eastrn front got much less attention than it deserved, is that until the end of the Cold War in 1990 very little written material was available. A lot of good books and video footage has been made available.
It was a stupid plan, the Germans could have taken Moscow and large amounts of the northern front and still would have taken Kiev with smaller attacks.
Why would 100s of thousands White guys put their lives on the through multiple gruelling battles in the harshest of conditions to own someone? Why so many Blacks do the same? Yeah, l don't believe that either.
If I remember correctly, first the Khmer Rouge invaded Vietnam. Kampuchea at that time first declared war on Vietnam and attacked the Vietnam border post. The Vietnamese response was effective and very brutal. The occupation of Cambodia was carried out quickly and efficiently. Many Cambodians welcomed the Vietnamese as liberators. Do not forget that at that time the USA and the UK openly supported the infamous Khmer Rouge in the fight against the Vietnamese. You pretended to be silly and said that you didn't know about the crimes of the Khmer Rouge. Neither is their sale of Opium to your intelligence agencies. It later turned out that it was the opposite of your "official" story. Just like in the Balkans in 1990/91. You really know how to lie and screw things up.
@@ussenterprisecv6805 Yep Russia acts like the big one when it's just soldiers that make them look powerful even their economy is terrible and this why Russia isn't really a superpower anymore China has kind of took that spot
Soviet competence won ww2. Without their sacrifice and weakening germany in manpower and firepower usa couldnt even land on europe and take the easy kill.
@@sauceempty418 no, soviet numbers helped win ww2. It definitely wasn't their competence. If they were competent they wouldn't have been pushed so far back in the first place. And even with their massive landmass and all of their natural resources they required supplies from Britain and America and they couldn't even escort those supplies themselves, something the British basically had to do completely alone. So you can say Soviet competence won ww2 but you would be extremely wrong to do so. Sure every now and then they had some surprisingly good moments showcasing some levels of competence but they were only allowed those moments by the competence of the British and later Americans who allowed them to keep fighting by being a major distraction. Had Britain not been there the Soviets would have lost, on the other hand the British wouldn't have lost if the Soviets were gone because they actually know how to fight a war. Though technically none of this matters as I didn't say the Soviets were incompetent in my original comment, I said the current battle of Kursk is showcasing Russian incompetence.
@@rheinm1209 Ukraine has literally invaded the Kursk region and has secured around 1000 square kilometres of territory from what I have seen so yes it is in fact close to Kursk
Italy never switched side in WWI but to know that people should study history and what was the Article 7 of the Defensive pact. Cause who actually betrayed the Pact was the AH violating the article 7. Italy joined the allies side as Neutral. Return to school, goat.
November 11, 1918! If France, Great Britain, and the United States had not hammered Germany in the peace talks, Nazi Germany would never have happened. Say what you want, Germany entered the First World War because a Serbian dissident killed the Austrian King and Queen. Russia put the Serbian up to the assassination. The German people didn't deserve what happened to them!
One reason that battles like Minsk and operation Bragation is partly because as Americans we concentrate on our national experience and have a tendency to minimize the efforts of Britsh and Canadians as well as the Soviets which if mentioned are usually called allied troops.Another reason that the the Soviet Union and Eastrn front got much less attention than it deserved, is that until the end of the Cold War in 1990 very little written material was available. A lot of good books and video footage has been made available.
Absolutely no idea why you used a modern map of the world instead of one from WW2.
Mixing in modern footage? Wtf....
Russia takes all comers
Over six hundred thousand troops found themselves encircled and after a fierce battle six hundred thousand were imprisoned?
It was a stupid plan, the Germans could have taken Moscow and large amounts of the northern front and still would have taken Kiev with smaller attacks.
There was more about the banks than slavery.
No panzer IV’s were harmed ( or shown ) in this video
The north won the war. The sourh won the propagands war.
U show every tank except the panzer 4
More people are subject to slavery today than at any other time in human history!
Since when was actually owning other people an idea. It was an actual fact.
Mental sickness is a disease known to man for being cruel to each other base of the skin color and race.
Why would 100s of thousands White guys put their lives on the through multiple gruelling battles in the harshest of conditions to own someone? Why so many Blacks do the same? Yeah, l don't believe that either.
If I remember correctly, first the Khmer Rouge invaded Vietnam. Kampuchea at that time first declared war on Vietnam and attacked the Vietnam border post. The Vietnamese response was effective and very brutal. The occupation of Cambodia was carried out quickly and efficiently. Many Cambodians welcomed the Vietnamese as liberators. Do not forget that at that time the USA and the UK openly supported the infamous Khmer Rouge in the fight against the Vietnamese. You pretended to be silly and said that you didn't know about the crimes of the Khmer Rouge. Neither is their sale of Opium to your intelligence agencies. It later turned out that it was the opposite of your "official" story. Just like in the Balkans in 1990/91. You really know how to lie and screw things up.
Pol Pot has entered the chat. To whom do you refer when you comment "you?"
china losses in this war. what a shame to china
But but but it is being fought right now yet again
Which one ?
@@justinbors4695 The one in the second world war I'm going to post the Ukrainian one tomorrow
Even now in 2024 the battle of kursk still continues. Showcasing Russian incompetence
@@ussenterprisecv6805 Yep Russia acts like the big one when it's just soldiers that make them look powerful even their economy is terrible and this why Russia isn't really a superpower anymore China has kind of took that spot
Soviet competence won ww2. Without their sacrifice and weakening germany in manpower and firepower usa couldnt even land on europe and take the easy kill.
It's not even close to Kursk
@@sauceempty418 no, soviet numbers helped win ww2. It definitely wasn't their competence. If they were competent they wouldn't have been pushed so far back in the first place. And even with their massive landmass and all of their natural resources they required supplies from Britain and America and they couldn't even escort those supplies themselves, something the British basically had to do completely alone. So you can say Soviet competence won ww2 but you would be extremely wrong to do so. Sure every now and then they had some surprisingly good moments showcasing some levels of competence but they were only allowed those moments by the competence of the British and later Americans who allowed them to keep fighting by being a major distraction. Had Britain not been there the Soviets would have lost, on the other hand the British wouldn't have lost if the Soviets were gone because they actually know how to fight a war. Though technically none of this matters as I didn't say the Soviets were incompetent in my original comment, I said the current battle of Kursk is showcasing Russian incompetence.
@@rheinm1209 Ukraine has literally invaded the Kursk region and has secured around 1000 square kilometres of territory from what I have seen so yes it is in fact close to Kursk
Terrible video omg lol
There was probably one person who fell asleep in Denmark and woke up in the German Reich.
Never talk about history,geo with murica.
The Tiger 1 was very powerful when it was first introduced, but it didn't take long for the allies to respond with guns that could take it out easily
KV2 join the chat
Delete your channel and learn tank names first.
Todays generation of people is braindamaged
AI generated channels lmfao
Learn what a Panzer 4 is. Where is it.
I thought that AI were smart.
Fucking ai
Yeah it was so nearly invincible every late war tank could brush it aside with ease
Where's the panzer 4 then
Not a single panzer 4 was in this fucking video, some of these arent even ww2 tanks ffs
Can you at least show the tiger 1, instead of the sherman and some other tank?
None of the tanks shown were a panzer iv go get cultured
It is the panzer 6 not the panzer 4
@@nielshunskjr1082 I realised it's the wrong picture I added it's was from a video I'm working on and used that one by accident
Idiot is max speed was 45 km for hour for a tank that was really fast
L channel. Just put a bunch of random tank images after having a Wikipedia article copy and pasted into a text to speech
AAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAha
waste of time
You did not show a panzer 4
Indeed - everything except a IV!
It was also designed to be used against stationary warships as it could bounce over anti torpedo nets.
A slightly different version called Highball
Shame that raf scrampton home of the dam busters is now home to thousands of illegal immigrants what a way to show respect to our military
Italy never switched side in WWI but to know that people should study history and what was the Article 7 of the Defensive pact. Cause who actually betrayed the Pact was the AH violating the article 7. Italy joined the allies side as Neutral. Return to school, goat.
Ottoman empire come back
They always switched sides haha...
Done it in WW2 too lol
If you are going to talk about Montgomery, at least show some of the UK forces.
Have you not got any pictures of British forces?. Very disappointed.
27 BC - 1453 AD
What about Desmond doss WW2 or ww1 and it was America vs Japan and Okinawa
November 11, 1918! If France, Great Britain, and the United States had not hammered Germany in the peace talks, Nazi Germany would never have happened. Say what you want, Germany entered the First World War because a Serbian dissident killed the Austrian King and Queen. Russia put the Serbian up to the assassination. The German people didn't deserve what happened to them!
LOL didn’t both wars start because of a single shot. Like WW2 started because of WW1