- Видео 213
- Просмотров 37 661
Christine Wallace
Добавлен 19 сен 2013
Видео
Oligopoly.Closing Thoughts on the Model
Просмотров 436 месяцев назад
Oligopoly.Closing Thoughts on the Model
Urbanization & Immigration, eary 1900s
Просмотров 449 месяцев назад
Urbanization & Immigration, eary 1900s
Extra Costs Practice Homework Review
Просмотров 159 месяцев назад
Extra Costs Practice Homework Review
End of Reconstruction.If you missed class
Просмотров 3110 месяцев назад
End of Reconstruction.If you missed class
Tariffs.for students who missed class
Просмотров 610 месяцев назад
Tariffs.for students who missed class
Consumer Surplus, producer surplus and DWL
Просмотров 3011 месяцев назад
Consumer Surplus, producer surplus and DWL
Presidential Reconstruction.field trip students
Просмотров 1111 месяцев назад
Presidential Reconstruction.field trip students
Twentieth Century History, arguments of Snyder regarding 9.11
Просмотров 60Год назад
Twentieth Century History, arguments of Snyder regarding 9.11
how you doing?. that is epic trip! :))
Can we say st Thomas personified scholasticism???...Please I need answer ..good work tho 🤗☺
Sylwia
The "Poles needed a port" is actually a bogus "argument", since we can look at the same map and see that Czechoslovakia didn't have a port, and neither did Hungary or Austria. That makes the "needed a port" a pretext, not the real reason. The real reason was to cut Prussia in two parts, and weaken it politically and economically.
The question is not "whether (of not) Versailles was a failure", but WHY it failed. Versailles failed because of a "lack of foresight" and a lack of wisdom. The premise is false. According to age-old observation regarding human nature and warfare, Machiavelli stated that there are only two ways to "deal with" a defeated enemy: 1) *destroy completely,* and make sure he doesn't come back later to take revenge 2) *be fair,* in other words biblical values like "do onto others" determine the rules To be fair is to be wise. Europe lacked wise leaders. *There are no other good options.* History has proven. Only bad options remain. Bad options = the world set up for "eternal war". "Bad options" are choice, not necessity. According to the widespread European leaders' standpoint of "keeping a balance in power" between states in an effort to keep the peace, meant that in logic/reason and human nature, only option 2) remained as a valid way to proceed. In step the "losers" of Versailles. They enforced their 400+ point "peace plan"-division of the continent along random "lines drawn on the map" with a gun on the chest of Central Europe's main power. *What could possibly go wrong?*
Great Video. Easy to comprehend
This video dropped right when COVID hit, I can see why you introduced it the way you did!!
You explain amazingly👏🏻♥️Please, I would like to know more about Buddhist philosophy if you can talk about that.
Thank you! I like this. I have an elective philosophy course in med school. This helped me a lot♥️
There's 3 reasons why scientific phraseologies are good for secular sciences (e.g. chemistry, biology, medicine, mathematics, etc.) but evil for TheoLogical Sciences (i.e. Faith and Morals). 1st, God never talks that way about Faith or Morals. 2nd, TheoLogical Science (i.e. Faith and Morals) is not secular science (e.g. chemistry, biology, medicine, mathematics, etc.). 3rd, pseudotheologians and pseudolawyers have their own gibberish languages to keep it amongst themselves from everyone else so they can't study or practice pseudotheology pseudolaw on their own so they have to go give their "money" to them to get their pseudotheology and pseudolaw done.
There's 2 reasons why pseudoscholastics refuse to denounce heretics as heretics. 1st, they hold the same heresies. 2nd, they want the freedom to think, believe, and teach whatever they want however they want.
There's 3 reasons why pseudoscholastics intentionally "complicate" answers. 1st, complicated "answers" give them more questions. 2nd, complicated "answers" boost their pseudointellectual pride. 3rd, complicated "answers" help them evade Truth and defend or hide lies.
There's 4 reasons why pseudoscholastics use willful ambiguity. 1st, they try to reconcile contrary opinions to each other to make Greek pagan pseudophilosophers sound like Christians. 2nd, they try to use pseudodialectics try to find more questions to try to find more reasons to incessantly "debate" even settled matters. 3rd, they refuse to admit when they're wrong because of their pseudointellectual pride. 4th, they try to hide their schisms, heresies, and apostasies from Christians.
sile timihirtu enamesegnalen Economics unit 3 workout 1-4 sertachuh lekachuhutal ende
tysm
This video got me acting unwise
This video got me acting unwise
The rise of the Ming Dynasty got me acting unwise
true fax
I'm not in this class, but I got recommended this video, and it's really good. Thanks for making education free and available Christine! EDIT: miss Wallace* I'm not American, sorry.
Very soothing voice!! I would have enjoyed you as a teacher god bless!!
Idk my question was to what extent was the Great Depression caused by the stock market crash
Very interesting video! 👌
Ms.Wallace, great video! Just a small question: what is your favorite type of humanism?
I love it! This is a must watch video!!! Stay safe gamers and don’t get da corona?!?! I would also like to point out dat Northern Renaissance is CRINGEE compared to Italy ! Italy 4 life 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹
thank u tal 😻
What does it mean by coming up with different sides of the argument. I’m still really confused.
Counterarguments I assume, kinda late tho lol