Видео

torilla tavataan

14:15 What is D.C. Schindler's scholia there? It seems interesting, but I can't make it out...

Martinez Jason Lopez Larry Rodriguez Ronald

Thank you both. Excellent conversation.

Excellent conversation. Many thanks everyone 🙏

There are, no doubt, hermits dwelling in the many apartments in Boston and New York

Thank you.Greetings from Greece 🇬🇷 💙

Oh word

Idk whose training the computer but these topics was ahead of the times. What were the chances of seeing this so close up today? Unexpected responsibilities. Suprise! ＼⁠(⁠°⁠o⁠°⁠)⁠／

Beautiful!

You managed to bring together two of the dopest people.

Excellent! Maybe a series with these two guys! Lots of great insights.

Young man, you come across as wanting to ask smart questions and to say clever things. It's making for a conversation that doesn't seem very in the moment. Listen more. Ask him a question and let him go on with his answer!

So awesome.❤

Thank you very much for this! Drs. Schindler and Patitsas are really my two favorites thinkers/writers, it's so nice to see them together! I was also wondering what would @dr.timothypatitsas7889 recommend as a reading order for Jane Jacobs' books?

1:08 - Roy Rappaport, Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity...

1:03 - Eric D. Perl, author of Theophany: The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysios the Areopagite.

Nice looking forward to this

57:00 It is Jeffrey Carson, who at least was one of the main English translator's of Elytis's poetry. Parola magazine has this profound interview with him, "An American in Paros," which tells many fascinating stories. It is searchable online.

25:00 It was actually the 1904 St. Louis Expo/World's Fair. The Michael Lewis I meant was Michael J. Lewis, and one of his books was City of Refuge: Separatists and Utopian Town Planning. "Meet Me in St. Louis" was produced in 1944.

18:00 - Catherine PIckstock's After Writing: On the Liturgical Consummation of Philosophy, made the point that many centuries ago there had been this other way of thinking about work - or at least, the money it generates. She tells us that prior to the 13th century AD, "excess capital" in Christian Western Europe had been typically invested in liturgy / public works. Then, at some point shortly thereafter, excess capital would more likely be invested in generating more excess capital. This is kind of the moment at which things explode, in both positive and pernicious ways. By the way, Jane Jacobs also dates the beginning of capitalism to a specific decade, the 1450s, when several London "counting houses" withdrew from trade with the continent, in order to focus solely on the financing of other companies' trade... Jacobs, too, thinks that capitalism goes awry when the purpose of money becomes primarily to make more money, rather than to finance bona fide economic innovation.

Given the analogy between our work to make a living, and the work of the people in liturgy, we needn't worry about this aspect of a "post-work" society: What will we do when we run out of work? You can't run out of this work! Moreover, in order to avoid madness, you'll just have to go to church a lot more, and start really keeping the liturgical seasons of the Church. AI cannot do this for you, and going to liturgy intelligently and with feeling will give you the grounding to deal with the multiplying simulacra of deep fake life...

Great interview!

Jordan not making it to EO is insane. ☦️ looking forward to this conversation.

I've always enjoyed Jordan's insights going back to some of the first times I've seen him on Rebel Wisdom... But this interview I think I like best of all. His clarity of thought because of a grounding in Christianity has really allowed him to holistically connect some dots in his thinking. Thanks for sharing the conversation...

Great conversation! Really interesting to see how these guys approach issues from very different perspectives but are able to find to so many common touchpoints.

Fantastic conversation! I'm two chapters into The Ethics of Beauty and it's a game changer. Twas a pleasure to meet you and Jordan at the SW Summit. Hope to meet Dr. Patitsas in the near future.

This should be quite good

TLC checking in 🫡

You are not alone (literally) Mr guite, 'there are no gods' poem dh Lawrence has similar to say

Oh word

Love Guite’s work and expression except for being so down on Steiner and Anthroposophy - what’s that about?

Very enjoyable interview. My first introduction to this man, thanks for using this platform to disseminate great ideas and thoughts!

Interesting convo. I love the writing of Dr. Patistas. I found the beginning of this conversation startling. Is it really a Beauty-first approach to claim that the world is billions of years old and that humanity is a product of evolution, which goes against the teachings of the early Church Fathers? I also found it a little startling that there is such an emphasis from Dr. Patistas on utopian visions of what the world “should be” like and a background sense of anger that “we’re not doing enough” to make a better world. I agree that we are not doing enough, we’re not doing enough, I’m not doing enough, to acquire heaven.

Excellent! Thank you both

Surprisingly... I got the opposite impression than debalona... I perceive the interviewer (Golgonooza) is trying to obtain some light on the theme he has in mind... However it appeared to me that the interviewed (Malcolm Guite) seems not to be able to give himself chance to listen and to hear what is it needed from his abundant poetic or espiritual experience to provide clarification on... Again, I wish the interview would have had a rather more balanced relation between both subjects. There is not. Malcolm seems to have this uncontrollable need to utter his own thoughts, annihilating thus the chance to be asked... I am sorry to disagree with debalona, but an interview isn´t a soliloqui. I have not witnessed an example of self restrain in a speaker who overwhelms an audience with his own expressive needs, in spite of the need to listen to the questions an Other, or someone else, needs to ask... Might it be that the priest acted more like a preacher than as a poet who concurs in an act of reflection to collect the truths in the air of communication ?? Be it as it may, the video shows Golgonooza was a nice and patient listener... Good for him !!

Such a frustrating interview, since the interviewer keeps inserting himself in everything and talking about himself. Ask a question, then sit back and listen without mumbling “mmm...”’or similar. We’re here to listen to the person being interviewed, not to you.

Excellant....

Very engaging conversation