Видео

-50 to +50

Spot on, this is probably what Meyer was doing to get the most out his WFC for the same power cost, especially if you can get the cell electrodes as close together as possible without galvanic contact.

@@JenkoRun True. I believe there was a lot more to that guy's HHO car and he was "accidentally" removed, conveniently along with his research and plans etc in a house fire. Not sure if Meyer was his name, but i remember seeing a guy that ultimately refused to give up when he was mocked and accused of fraud trying to present his invention; he decided to just build it himself staring his own company as an electrical engineer. He went out west to sell some land to fund the first 10 vehicles and ironically died in a house fire along with his garage and pretty much his research as well. Not the first time this has happened around breakthrough technologies either. People think its about making things better, environment etc....total bs. Its about making profit and thats all, no business wants a product coming along that lasts ten times longer because there's no money in selling tires that go 350-400k miles before wearing out (actually documented organic chemist discovered rubber polymer capable of this, company promised to make the product, bought his patient, then sat on it and its still a locked down tech to this day) I worked at Oak Ridge in Tennessee USA, largest research facility in the US where the first atomic bomb was developed back in WWII doing R&D as a chemical engineer minoring in polymers and biochemistry. I had security clearance to everything but the military stuff; lets just say I saw things you would swear was science fiction and not real. Our tech to the public truly is 25-30 years behind what is really out there at least....its just kept buried because it holds no profit or power over the masses as consumers. I personally developed with my team a Li_ion type battery to completion....its capacity was minimally better than current tech, current output was somewhat improved but not by any serious amounts (except for the nano tech layered ones, they had massive current capabilities but also heating issues). However, I used a biomolecular process to generate the electrode mixtures with nitrated cellulose and other things....making manufacturing not only environmentally friendly removing the harsh solvents needed, but also lowering cost estimated 35ish percent (in 2014). The kicker though was lifespan. Currently around 1500 to maybe 2000 charge-discharge cycles and the battery is toast, time to buy replacements. Mine, however, after 6500 full cycles still retained at least 90% of their original capacity! Now...being ten years ago now; tell me please, where is this technology??? Ive never even heard of it anywhere in public eye. Sadly money and greed run things, not the attempt for better things.

@@ckimsey77 If you really have been involved in that kind of research that's very impressive, I've had my head buried in highly alternative physics and research for the last few years and the kind of stuff I've come up with as well is, as you said, the stuff of science fiction. I'd wager those at the top have tech that's actually 130 years ahead of the public in the field theory department. My interests range all over the place from so called "free energy" (which is really COP > 1, delayed entropy, there are a surprising number of ways for this) to field propulsion craft and various medical devices, and some extremely wacky geometry research, among other things, I'll occasionally browse around the net on a topic I'm interested in to see if anyone has has been thinking along similar lines and your comment caught my eye concerning the Hydrogen production tech. I saw the exact same thing from one of Aaron Murakami's videos from nearly a decade back, turns out the missing key for Meyer's water fuel technology is Nitrogen of all things, he used it via an air intake to slow the combustion rate of the Hydrogen gas giving it a more conventional burn rate, the resulting ammonia could be fed back into the mixing chamber to increase efficiency. Another area is purely reactive circuits, preferably the single wire type system that Tesla developed, I don't really like conventional closed circuits since conduction current gives you heat losses in the wires, switch to a resonant single wire system and you get rid of the problem all together, not to mention the reactive power is far less dangerous than active phase, even the Plasma becomes non-destructive. It's kind of frustrating looking at the modern public tech and actually *seeing* where the problems are with it and knowing how it could be vastly improved. I saw your post from a year ago concerning your health, have you looked into the lakhovsky multiple wave oscillator at all? Specifically the data from Borderlands and the Vril website (most other sites tend to be full of useless promotion n such) I've got a copy of the borderlands research data on that thing and it's pretty impressive.

"You'll probably explode or something. Maybe." got me.

Try not peeing in it

www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/SChapter15.pdf

KOH + HNO3 --> KNO3 + H2O