Видео

Definitely it's just a matter of time. Might take a bit longer for condos to get there than detached homes/ townhomes but if not this year likely by next year.

Anything for you

What type of homes would you like to see more of? I'll add that to my to-do list

@ family homes, condos, even unique period homes. Your tours are always excellent, so I’m sure I’ll enjoy whatever you choose.

it is! people relocating from coquitlam and port moody

lots of value in canada

Hi Clayton is a great alternative option! Neighbourhoods are family friendly and similar in design as Willoughby. Price points typically range inbetween Willoughby and Langley city pricing.

no specific reason at all 😂

600-800k text me and I’ll send you a list. 778-814-9682

Hey good question! I’ll look into the specifics. Changes will be official as of December 15

no basement in this one

due to shortage of rentals here, landlords are needed to provide it because our govt doesnt

if theres less rentals, rent goes up for tenants

text me 778-814-9682

Thank you! Really appreciate the feedback 🙏🏼 more coming

You are correct! Honestly we would all be better off if real estate prices dropped by at least 50%. To move into a house in the Lower Mainland means being a slave to your mortgage. That is not thriving. That is simply scraping by. Vancouver has always been a little on the expensive side. But, in the past, at least the middle class had a chance at home ownership without sacrificing everything else.

So then the people with bad credit and no down payment should be homeless? Because a bank isn't going to lend to them. Their credit score and lack of a down payment has already proven that they are a much higher risk to loan any money to. Or who is it that you believe should not only have to carry the cost of the roof over current renters heads but also who should have to be exposed to the risk associated with doing so? And why should these places and people do it if they aren't allowed to benefit from it?

Imagine that, there's a demand to rent a house. Typical rentoid can't see past his 1 apartment window and thinks landlords are forcing people to rent from them. Lmfao.

@@cryptolipht3132you make some good points so let me be clear. I was taking issue with this man’s presentation of people’s anger towards ‘homeowners’ and landlords, and what people are angry about. I’m not saying anything radical about renting. The cost of rent is expensive, we can all agree on that. So is owning a house. The housing market is absolutely screwed, not just for renters, but for people in the market to buy also. But because buying is out of reach for so many due to a higher demand - at least partially caused by people owning multiple properties - renting is their only option. Then the people who have multiple houses, and who therefore are partially responsible for the increase in price, make renting more expensive to match the higher price they themselves created. This doesn’t happen individually, but occurs due to a lot of people following this pattern of behaviour. It’s that pattern that people are angry about. I hope this helps clear up my point of view, cheers.

LOL. You have no idea what you are talking about. If you can afford rent, you can afford a house payment. If a bank will not loan you the money that is your problem, or you need to buy a house that you can afford. Oh, you're not grown up yet, I'm sorry. If I open a coffee shop and sell $4 cups of coffee that you like and you buy a cup every day does that make me bad for selling you coffee? You can make your own coffee for $1.

@@shipdog44 I don't know where you're getting that data, but the premise of your argument is incorrect, the average mortgage payment is higher than the average payment in rent. Not to mention the 10% payment that is going to be standard. My point is simply that people have legitimate reasons to be angry at landlords and the housing market. People should be compassionate about that, surely. The housing market is a difficult thing for most people to interact with in a serious way due to its expense. The membrane of interfacing is littered with predatory real estate agents that don't need to deliver a truly helpful service to the customer, because the demand is so high, people will put up with it if its shit. If someone is single, they have almost no chance of getting a home on the average income. If they're young, it's even harder, as they've had less time to form good credit and achieve a high position in their industry. I feel these are things we can agree are valid reasons for people to get frustrated by, and something that we should look at fixing. As for the coffee metaphor, it only works if your base argument is true, which as I've said, I don't believe to be the case. Please send me a link proving me wrong if I'm mistaken. But working off your own metaphor, I would find it morally questionable if you and the other coffee shops bought up so much of the other coffee that the super markets sold it for even more and it was no longer affordable. But even then, I wouldn't mind as much because I don't need coffee to sleep in. I don't need a cup of joe to raise a family in or keep my possessions so they don't get stolen or a locked door to keep me safe or a bedroom to keep me warm when it begins to snow. I'm living in the real world where people are rightfully anxious about the housing market.