Видео

Can you please share the report

Thanks for the video!

Not sure I see the point of 7050 for the top skins. Top skins are loaded in compression, mostly. It is no better in buckling than 2024.

thanks

I am very sorry, but what you say at time 0:50 is INCORRECT.!. . . . When that wing is at zero degrees geometric Angle of Attack, (AoA) and it is at level flight, it is THEREFORE generating lift; AND the flow__IS__ Asymmetric! There WILL be some up-wash AND Down-wash!! The air Will NOT FLOW AS SHOWN.!. That is Incorrect! .. .. .. There ARE places around a wing where Bernoulli's Principle is followed, but just about all videos and papers that describe how this happens are wrong. .. It is also poor physics to say that the flow is related to the venturi effect. This is a very common misconception that says the air must squeeze through a smaller space above a wing. The fact that the air below has a similar narrowing, near the trailing edge of an upturned AoA, CLEARLY shows that this is OBVIOUSLY FASLE science. The air above the wing does not have a hard wall causing this to happen. The air above is a very soft boundary and there is no venturi effect. .. The air above a wing meets the trailing edge before the lower air because the negative pressure above forms a Pressure Gradient with the positive pressure near the leading edge that together, accelerate the air rearward. If you measure the speed of the air above the wing in reference to the ground (zero wind), that upper air actually REVERSES DIRECTION as the wing goes by and is traveling in the OPPOSITE direction of the wing. It is traveling BACKWARDS - opposite to the direction of flight!. this is the result of the high rearward Acceleration due to the steep pressure gradient mentioned above. . Lift is not very complex when understood correctly. This following blog steps through it for you rxesywwbdscllwpn DOT quora DOT com/ Put the DOTS back in because You Tube does not like links in the comments. .. Regards.

How can I get the datasets?

Can I get entire report please

Can someone else bring up an idea here?

The designer of the Bf 109 should have seen this video

Who uploaded this, Lol?

❤🔥🙏

Intresting keep it up

you dont say something is best in class especially before its even approved hell even atleast built first lol

Great information. Just what I needed to know. Thank you

Great collection of equations and engineering concepts. Especially useful for students. Nice job 👍 I actually downloaded it for future reference, i hope that's ok.

Nice graphical summary

Can I get your entire report for the reference as I am working on the similar project i need the reference for design process of structure.

bruh due to the language i wont be able to see this normally

Please beware of one mistake in the video 0:49 the green color arrows represent "internal forces", instead of pressure. Usually, in engineering, F represents external forces while P represents internal forces.

8:50 I am alarmed that the rib spacing is close up to the halfway point, then sparse further out. It feels like part of the wing is overdesigned, and part is underdesigned. With the power of your software, it should be trivial to distribute the ribs according to the load, instead of some arbitrary parameter.

can you please share the report which contains all the process and calculations?

tailwheel vs trike has nothing to do with nose angle on takeoff and speed to lift off. Compare the following aircraft if you don't believe me; Vans RV-7 Vans RV-7A Both takeoff at the exact same speed if flown correctly. Both can lift off with the exact same nose high attitude. Both can accelerate to a higher speed using a nose low attitude. Both stall at the exact same nose high pitch attitude for a given airspeed. Takeoff speed is a function of the stall speed and nothing else. Also, tailwheel pilots who do STOL flying, like to lift the tail into a nose low attitude on takeoff, even though it has been proven many times that the nose low attitude results in shorter takeoffs.

a tricycle gear airplane absolutely can nose over with hard braking and misapplication of controls, we call it "wheelbarrowing". Just less likely to happen in general is all.

Great job! I really like the detailed and to the point technical tidbits (angles, distances, ..etc.) very useful and clearly explained visually as well. Do you recommend any specific software for landing gear design and testing? Especially for simulating stresses "in-motion". For example, deployment in very high airspeed? Most software can only test them while fixed in one position and doesn't support animation. Thank you very much,

好！有字幕！

科普帖

Nice job!

Well done! What grade did you get for this?

Structure wing for aircraft comercial?

Great work!

Was this your personal project or a thesis project?