Видео

The context of the original clip is that its humorous, as its one of a few times he has been seen on camera, leaving whatever event he is speaking at and seemingly just wandering off, like a video game npc would.

Yes and in umbrella academy

I haven't read the manga, but looking at the cover of volume 7, it seems that Leberblume AKA Anemo Nemo has always been coloured with a ton of blue, I don't think her outfit is bad, but it would have been nice to have a little more colour variance in it

I may have been overselling it, but she was clearly naked for a scene and engaged in multiple acts that were supposed to be interoperated in a sexual context (Medical scene and Baby scene). While not as bad as a lot of what happens in the show to other characters, I believe the intent makes it close enough.

I said the loli wasn't lewded. I never said the loli didn't DO the lewding thankyouverymuch.

When the viewer is the one doing the lewding of the loli, then they'll perceive it as the loli being lewded regardless.

@@PäiviYevheniy The viewer is a non-interactive entity.

On the collection bluray sets they have a "behind the sofa" reaction segment for each story, this one is paired with terminus on the s20 set, they go for a pretty penny, but you could also find them 🏴‍☠️ if you know where to look

it's inspired from the Millennium Falcon. that's should give you some clue on what pop culture character Rogue is actually inspired from 😉

@@steelsheen oh is he larping as a psuedo Han Solo?

@@EnyatheGamer37 no not larping.

The gay kiss was horrible jack did it first and it was funny when he did it

@@hawkstringfellow when Jack did it to the Doctor (Chris E.) It felt natural. We weren't told for weeks, or months "we got this gay man on the show." but with Cutie Gatwa, before he was even on screen, we were told "If your white, dont watch it. If your straight, it aint for you." RTD came out, proudly telling the viewers "Im going to make it as gay and offensive to straight people as possible, i want to trigger non LGBT's" and the results are in, the lowest viewing figures of Doctor Who in its history. I'll stick to my Doctor Who Classic's DVD's of Tom Baker, Peter Davidson and Sylvester. Back when the show had heart and soul.

Womp womp

Yes we know move on these comments don't do anything to help

@db5094 I'm gonna give my opinion, whether it helps or not.

@@nicholasconnolly4234 good for you, it doesn't help

@db5094 good for you, replying to me isn't going to change anything either

​@nicholasconnolly4234 well played sir. Well played.

I'm sorry, who are you saying this to? xD

Probably to Rogue. Sometimes I too talkout out loud to a fictional character in a show or a book.

This show is called Doctor Who. It's a British TV program which first aired in 1963 on the BBC. The protagonist is an extraterrestrial called "The Doctor" : a Time Lord (or an unknown species dubbed a "Timeless Child") from Gallifrey / ( or some other unknown dimension of the "Timeless Children").

I looooved this line bc for the Doctor, it's cloaked enough

Why... why the fck would he mention him.

In which episode is he meant to mention him?

Because as far as he knows alex is dead? And the alternate universe Alex 8 traveled with in the time war is missing presumed dead/erased?

How? And he formally apologized in 2008. And it was acceptable and encouraged behaviour on set of BBC since 2006. BBC just brought it up again because of actual allegations they ignored toward Clarke. For a record, Barrowman has not had a single complaint from people that were present even when media was walking around and asking for complaints. The strongest word he has gotten is that "Barrowman is strange".

I could write many paragraphs on my criticism, but since you don't seem to have understood my point from the video is that having unanswered questions can and has been done well, such as in Big O and The Prisoner, but when you build your narrative, and it falls apart when questions are asked and the audience must make numerous justifications just for it to stay afloat, it is bad writing. The connections of the fairy circle, the woman, Mad-Jack as an entity/myth, and Roger do not come together, and you should not say "well its unanswered by design, so it's okay" when the audience has to put so much effort into untangling so much of a 45min program. It would be different if say, the point of the woman is that there is no solid answer, but that isn't communicated in the story either, so all you are left with from a narrative perspective is no justification for why anything happened other than 1. The fairy circle was broken and 2. Roger is bad. The episode doesn't explore the fairy circle any more than 'perhaps it has something to do with a perception filter', the phrase mad jack does nothing to connect Roger and the fairy circle, and roger was a threat before the circle was broken. The woman is given little connection to the circle beyond another mention of a perception filter, and in old-ruby inhabiting the woman's body at the end, not only is the 73 yards rule broken, she appears before the circle is even broken with no answer as to how breaking the fairy circle could have started any of it, where the doctor went or what took him, and why any of it mattered beyond giving ruby a good emotional arc that is wiped by the end of the episode. The episode may be entertaining and interesting, but as a piece of storytelling it falls apart under scrutiny, meaning either the unanswered questions have an answer or many answers that were not sufficiently communicated for us to interoperate, or Russel has thrown his hands up and decided we should make it up so he can move on to the next script, both are elements that I think in your own word, leaves the story not "Finished" Russel also wrote Midnight, where the unanswered questions such as "What is the monster?" and "What was the woman's name" are meaningful. The monster is left up to our imagination, because the story and emotions don't rely upon the monster's visage, its non-appearance making the fear rise as you interoperate it as scary as you want, whereas in this story a large emphasis is put on the woman, literally being a large part of rubys life, And in Midnight, we aren't told the stewardess's name because it adds to the emotions and theme of the episode, 73 yards does not seem to have this quality in it's story, and I hope the longer length allowed in the upcoming novelization, will leave some of the story unanswered, but have meaning behind leaving them so, if you were satisfied by it then I'm very glad, but keeping my eye as critical as possible, this was a major misstep from what could have been my fav episode of the season.

Again, you seem to be conflating plot and story. The story in the episode was about Ruby and her relationship with herself, her missing parents, and her fear of abandonment. The plot is open to interpretation. If you don't like things being left open, that's fine, but you can't call it bad storytelling or lazy writing just because it's not your cup of tea.

If "The story in the episode was about Ruby and her relationship with herself, her missing parents, and her fear of abandonment." Which is an interesting idea, there needs to be a sufficient vessel for that, spending 15min of the episode on a welsh cliff and pub add nothing to that idea, and taking more of the episode to take down a politician with a hard on for nukes may give a good focus to Ruby as a driving force, but does little to explore the deeper elements of her character you describe. If you want to explore Ruby, focusing on all these other elements and leaving them this open not only does a disservice to Ruby's story, but leaves the episode unfocused, as once again, the fairy circle, mad jack and roger do little to relate to each other or Ruby, if the focus was only on the woman then the focus on ruby would work and still be a quite interesting story, with an emotional element that isnt spelled out, but interpretable and interesting, but the episode as it stands is too stretched between ideas and underdeveloped on even how the woman represents ruby's issues. If you ask why the woman is there in the first place, and how she connects to anything else happening in the story apart from Ruby and her issues, such as how she relates to the fairy circle beyond she appears when it is broken, yet somehow appears before it is destroyed by the end, it feels like two different underdeveloped episodes smushed together.

73 yards was alright but did you notice something? Almost no Gatwa. The highest rated episode of the season so far, which is still horrible btw, is the episode where Gatwa is least seen. Tells you everything you need to know.

Rtd watched star trac discovery and became a huge fan of it. Mind you its his only star trek experience to. He said in interviews that he wants to make the show more like discovery

Oh dear.......

Wtf u are talking about??