Видео

Congratulations to all the awards winners. Go job WPPD.

Congratulations to the police officers who received those awards.

Congratulations to all

Thank you!

Thank you for making this available.

People move here for the mountains and now your just mowing them mountains down making it look like the cities people.moved away from.

Thanks for posting!

Thank you for posting.

Funny How Gene didn't say that he is a Charis student but said he is a local tax payer. Those students need to understand that just because you go to that school dose not make you a better person. They don't care about the community unless it is about them. Landlords do not put tax into the rents. The lies being pushed! They still can not bring up any facts on what and how they have helped the Woodland Park community! NOTHING! to this day!

I’m just hoping that charis comprehends how much further this will divide our community. Yes OUR community. Which existed long before THEY came. I understand the law is the law whether or not we like those laws or not in this circumstance. But to be ‘Christians’ and do this to their ‘neighbors’ (and that man with such arrogance in his sense of ‘righteousness’) is a disgusting example of what I believe my Christian friends would want represented. Hold on Woodland Park, because I now fully believe Charis is here to completely ruin your community in order to make it ‘theirs’

Shame on Charis Ministries

Placing blame on the city council for Charis's reputation is pure horse 💩. Their actions, Andrew's actions and words, and this lawyer are the ones ruining Charis's reputation! This is one more drop of crap in the bucket from Charis. They constantly cause trouble.

Well said, mayor

No video?

Thanks for posting.

Disappointment with the ill-informed statements by candidates concerning three topics. A) (1:45:36) Transparency/Allegation of Council getting together outside of public to determine sixth Council member. B) (1:46:33) Someone that sued the DDA being appointed to the DDA Board, which does not making sense. C) (1:13:14 and several other points in broadcast) Vendor Fee categorization. A) I'm a sitting Council Member not running for election or re-election. I can categorically state that no predetermination of a council nomination was ever agreed to outside the public domain. I was asked by the Mayor approximately two weeks prior to the public vote whether I would support appointing the candidate that had received the second highest voter count to the Council in the most recent Special Election. I said yes. I had no further discussions with any other council member. The statement that Mr Zuluaga made claiming that he had not been consulted is not true. I stood approximately 10' away from him when the Mayor approached him at the conclusion of the Council meeting prior to the appointment and floated the same question and idea to him as she had to me. I was not part of their discussion, only within hearing distance of the interaction. I do not recall the verbatim response but he conveyed in words and deportment that he could support that idea. I have no other knowledge about other council members' actions or discussions, nor any knowledge of how they would vote. The selection had not been predetermined, only the desire to use the method of the second place candidate since the first place candidate was already appointed. B) If it didn't make sense that the Plaintiff (who WON the lawsuit) should be appointed to the Board (Defendant) that wronged him, the candidate should take the time to read the Judge's Ruling. The Judge found entirely in favor of the Plaintiff and ruled entirely against all counter claims by the Defendant. A better question for the candidate would be, "why wouldn't you be removing the Board Members that spent over $600,000 taxpayers dollars in legal fees, damages and court costs to the Plaintiff to stop a development and WERE IN BREACH OF CONTRACT? The Plaintiff (a citizen and taxpayer) doesn't forfeit a right to volunteer to a Board that was not operating in the best interests of the Citizens and in fact, has more of a right to be on the Board than the members that lost the lawsuit. C) Vendor Fee was brought up many times. Four candidates continue to state that the Fee, which is actually a credit or subsidy, to cover work performed by Businesses, don't understand that the State and County provide 4% of the sales taxes collected to cover businesses work (and to help offset credit card costs). The City, since 1996 has continually voted down the Vendor Fee topic because the past and current Council understands it is a unfair subsidy to businesses, paid by the citizens. It is paying businesses twice for work performed once.

k7u0w vyn.fyi

I reside at Jeff Baldwins RV park. I've paid them over $14,000. The manager Carl thanked me by charging me over double for the last month. They think they have the right to keep my $550 deposit simply because they think they can. These are businesses owners not philanthropists. Their bottom line is the bottom line.

The tree

I watch the zoom meetings. At this meeting the request to allow a variance for RV parking at the Shining Mt. Golf Course was discussed. I hope this problem can be resolved in favor of Shining Mountain so this good business is supported and also our wonderful law enforcement. Hopefully, this much needed parking for travelers will be permitted.

Dalton is nuisance 🤦

I fucking love this city

33:35 Thank you, Noel, for taking control and reigning it back in. I was just thinking the same thing.

2:52:20 No, they are not going to realize that the other road has a million stop signs. A lot of the traffic using these side streets are tourist that are trying to avoid the hellish traffic jam that occurs in Woodland Park. This was poor planning on both the county and city. Have you actually tried to go through the "three stoplights" in Woodland Park on a weekend? It took 16 minutes to get from one end of town to the other this past weekend.

Farmington missouri...note carol rohlfs wamts to know ...well just why Does the cat mess the front room area floor.. After leo is read and popeye rape book is read and well #178973 still has the intrigators name !#:$@;&%...?.... And well we own the CAT..the boys...etc...and well have tried to get Sheriffs office under fire as with well #178973 usa!...and is well after spot checks ...ww1 ready to go?.... And cat near table and Pat sayjack and # ole wanna white#...speak...well # 178973?.... Well ..1st off you uave a very bad head ache...number 2 you probably ! Torutured the cat that pees in the floor where i was spanked so hard ..and my little brother too until...well number 3 the cia knows the cat is really hurt! Like leo #178973 and probably tried to help! Regestered guns ... But you loke rape and disicipling little raped boys!

Without david morehouse i fear we t h e people would have LOST more lives...without sheriff and colorado police people could have went missing...come up dead...more losses...without a FBI COMMANDER ROLL in my #178973 mind there would have been major losses than i witnessed on June 28th 2012 as a REMOTE VIEWER who doesnt have to leave the body but can now trust fbi commander roll more!

Thanks police and please!

Ww3 on!

Remote viewing louos herman rohlfs and a southeast missouri german sleeper cell possably operating in MISSOURI!....talking during the next clouds works well....lightening science already ....built.....

In backing up remote viewers ie joe...david morehouse...mel riley...levy....people...officers...usa i kept a very safe distance from waldo canyon on june 28th 2012 ...ie 14 west bijou a place to help...diagonally facing northwest to canyon area to left of FALCON STADIUM which i did NOT see while governing the hold of cold..cold temptures while i witnessed to cool temptures on june 28th 2012 near waldo canyon!!!!

Thanks sheriff of our simple life of usa!

Jesus i can see why you told peter james and john ....be careful...the minds van be read...jesus knew that the reflections of the mind could hurt the area...on the mountain ...during jesus tranfiguration just before a cloud comes to settle in bible accounts by mattew...speaking of the art of ie CIA fort meade troops who can fly out side the body as most do fly in thier sleep...parts of the body can be in more than one place...miles away..jesus...maybe john....possably moses could piggie back one or more souls and change more than the weather...turning very hot dangerous weather to mericful weather to regain your homes...jobs...land...the life before the 14,500 acres!!!

1:45:30 Butt-hurt alert from guy named Paul. Completely out of line and should be removed from council.

Well, they said it couldn't be done. Noel Sawyer reaches a new low. (1:26:00) He uses "council report" to make a campaign speech for himself and his impudent advocacy of Mayor Levy's campaign. But an campaign speech is not enough. He makes it an attack speech. His allegations against Councilman Carr are personal opinions based on faulty premises. But by setting up an ambush AT A COUNCIL MEETING, he prevented Councilman Carr from rebutting his ridiculous and misleading accusations. Take a shot and hide under the table. But we've seen disregard for ethics from Mr Sawyer before, haven't we? Who remembers when council faced a decision to revisit the selection of the Aquatic Center? Sawyer and Levy wanted to kill that proposal to revisit the decision in spite of the bitter divisiveness in the community. Sawyer and Levy were paid employees of the school system and longtime advocates for the school system's interest. They were facing a decision where the school system was a Very interested party. A clearer case of "appearance of conflict of interest" is hard to find. They both had clear appearance of conflict of interest. To get what they wanted they disregarded the conflict of interest ethics and insisted on NOT recusing themselves. The other council members agreed this was a conflict and stated that both should recuse themselves. So what to do? Well, they paid the city attorney an undisclosed amount to build a case that refusing to recuse themselves would not be ILLEGAL. “Not illegal” was good enough for them. As a result these two people decided by themselves for our entire community that the community will should be ignored, that conflict of interest is a legal matter and not an ethical matter. The rest is history. We now have a pool within the school system and a bitterly divided community. And the same two people are running for reelection. The point? After this AND other ethical dalliances, Sawyer, chooses to excoriate Councilman Carr. Excoriate For what? For not laying down and keeping quiet while the four liberals on Council insist on getting their way. Sawyer is demanding that once THEY decide, everyone else is required to shut up. Required to stop representing the people. Required to not challenge irresponsible choices by the liberal four. Council is not supposed to be genteel country club of the elite. Or in our case, a club of the liberal-four. It is supposed to be an institution of debate and individuals fighting for the interests of the people. Mr Carr was performing his duty. Sawyer, Harvey, and Levy were again violating ethics by conspiring to disparage Mr Carr at a public council meeting. (you can expect that the City officials will remove this Post asap. You can find it however at FACEBOOK.COM/BETTERWOODLANDPARK Replies welcome !

Thank you Tanner!

I've noticed that since the topics at these meeting have become more "uncomfortable", someone has turned the microphone volume down to the point that the audio cannot be heard without turning my sound to the absolute max, then straining to hear. Is that a coincidence?

I remember reading in the Pikes Peak Courier a couple of months ago (VOLUME 55 | ISSUE 36 | September 07, 2016) that despite the recent political and legal clashes, both the DDA board and city of Woodland Park representatives appear on the same page regarding the DDA’s "intention" to repay the city for a previous $1 million loan it incurred "FROM" Woodland Park for a previous project in 2007 that went bust. Seems like to me, if the DDA WOULD HAVE paid their debt in a timely manner, the City of Woodland Park would not have to find ways to "CUT" their budget now. What's the holdup on the repayment of the Loan??? ~ Concerned WP Resident...

Good meeting! And Good info.! Thanks! The evacuation map on inciweb is hard to read, and the legend is illegible even when enlarged; it looks like the entire city is evacuated...Since there is no information about how long 24 will remain closed, I guess we can expect it to remain closed until the fire is near completely contained. Probably closer to the July 16th goal of containment, if all goes well... I would not count on the road opening in time for 4th of July. It's a nice thought though.