Видео

Pastor Jeff Long, DO y'all have a phone number to give to the Church or address? ❤😊

Nobody understands nor can explain the 3-nity because it is a mystery!!! How in the world do you explain a mystery to someone?? ZERO chance!!

Another great episode Pastor Hand.

pray for me and my husband that he will accept Jesus Christ into his heart

Praying for the peace of Jerusalem and the Salvation of Israel 🇮🇱 All Jews Salvation and Our salvation IN YESHUA NAME AMEN AND AMEN ❤😊

Thank you FATHER GOD for sending HIS Laborer to Teach us all Truth IN THE NAME OF YESHUA IN JESUS NAME AMEN AND AMEN ❤😊

This is such a good deep dive into this psalm. 🙌📖❤️

Well done. Thank you.

We ARE humans dead to God. The ONLY way God will accept for entrance into heaven is the FINISHED work Jesus accomplished for salvation ---Paul's gospel given to him by Jesus himself --- a MYSTERY NOT known before the world began. Romans 16:25

As a Saxophonist, what a beautiful sound of worship! And I'm not sure what has been wrong with the sound mixing but everyone was balanced today! Most of all, Praise God for the blessings He provides through Parkwood! Praise, worship and the proclamation of His Word!! ❤

Praise the LORD for the saxophone and this saxophonist!!!!!

I found your discussion quite interesting, and it wasn't nearly as objectionable as most videos I watch like this, so kudos for that. But never has an atheist uttered the words "I just want to sin." That is a Straw Man of the highest degree. A someone who left Christianity after 60 years, I can honestly say that. And I'm not just the Sunday go to meeting Christian; I was a child evengelist at 9, and didn't stop evangelizing until my early twenties. I met several agnostics and atheist during my ministry and not once did an atheist say those words. But Christians, myself included back in the day, often presented that Straw Man characterization. Like I said, you did a much better job in your discussion than most, so I appreciate that. Take care.

your argument against the futurist theory is that there's no pre trib rapture, got it. could you present any argument for, you know, not a pre trib rapture or is that just irrelevant

The joy of the Lord is my strength is in my Bible- Nehemiah 8:10. I am surprised to hear this preacher say it is not in the Bible.

Thank you for sharing the message. God Bless You.

Great video Pastor Hand.

I am looking forward to hearing you preach on Revelation.

Thank you for sharing the message. God bless 🙏.

youtube.com/@pastorkhalidjavedbiblemessestv?si=nZfeMo_8qR6WwfK8 ❤❤❤ good work 👍❤️🙏 God bless you 🌺 Amen 🙏👍🙏🌷

Great Job Pastor Andrew!

Deano Parker can sure sing!!! True gift from God!!

A Personal Savior wrongly convicted, sentenced to death, 'hung-up', dead for three days, arose & ascended to Heaven where its followers will live forever. Yeah, that story was going around the Mediterranean hundreds of years before the Christians borrowed it. *Google the Mesopotamina God, Inanna*

Is there a number we can call to pay tithes and offerings? 😊❤

FATHER GOD IS AWESOME Preach Pastor Jeff Long. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏❤️😊

Thank FATHER GOD for HIS WORD IN THE NAME OF YESHUA IN JESUS NAME AMEN AND AMEN ❤😊

Thank you pastor.

It’s nice to see a Protestant have the proper view of the crusades.

You need a deeper understanding of Jihad. What you are quoting is similar to the notion of Christians quoting Christ to justify misdeeds. Jihad is about the struggle within, the battle with one’s own shortcomings and sinning nature.

The encyclopedia of wars Out of the 1763 wars recorded in history only 7% or 123 were of a religious nature if you take 66 wars from that which were started by Islam that leaves 57 other wars or 3% of whom Catholics were the perpetrators who are Catholics not Christians. For Christian’s to start a war goes totally against the teachings of Christ. If you look just at the 20th century millions of people have been killed by atheistic regimes such as Mao Zedong, Adolf Hitler, oseph Stalin, Vladmir Lenin and others so atheism, secular and politics have resulted in more wars then religion

I literally watch these as soon as they come out each week 🔥

I think you should do some more research on these definitions. You can be an gnostic-atheist, agnostic atheist, agnostic theist, gnostic theist, all of which could also be skeptics. You had the definition of Atheist right to begin with and then you used a different definition right after. Atheism is the lack of a belief in a God. In other words, there has been nothing to convince me of a god. Believing that there IS NOT A GOD is completely different than a lack of belief in a god. Plz do your research

The phrase gish-gallop comes to mind, Where do you even start with that amount of wrong. The guy is so earnest, and so clearly absolutely believes every word he's saying. Further, he may well be a perfectly resonable person in other areas of his life, we all have our blind spots after all. But in this particular area he has descended into sophistry. He uses similar rhetoric strategies to those I used before developing the ability to say "I don't know", when I don't know something. The liberation from the desire to be right all the time has altered my whole thought process, I'm still a wordy sort, but I'm hungry for the world around me rather than seeing it as a threat with me the victim of oppression. So many times during this sermon, I've thought "WTF?", but there's no respite to explore thoughts before racing on to the next almost completely irrelevant soundbite. As I said before, after watching the How to Patronise Skeptics video, (which I've expanded on here), these sermons are pure brainwashing material, designed to entrench his followers in his brand of theism; to build his own flock from which to fill his belly, and feed his ego. I don't imagine he's aware, I Imagine that he thinks what he's doing is god's work, but I just reel from the arrogance of deciding that god has annointed you his mouthpeice, so you are 'a good person', and your thoughts are divine in nature. Again, tautological thinking rears it's head in top form, it would take a week to dismantle that barrage of nonsense. I'm a little ray of sunshine ain't I?

Yes...yes it is. Incredibly bad.

"The word God is for me nothing but the expression and product of human weaknesses". "The Bible a collection of venerable but still rather primitive legends. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change anything about this" - Albert Einstein.

The explanation of "atheist" is a bit off. * "a": negate * "theist": belief in god * "atheist: "no belief in god" * "anti-theist": "belief in no god" Pastor Hand had a slight of words, going from "Doesn't believe in god" to "They believe there is not a god" [3:00] Moving the negation changes the idea. If the intent is to have useful conversations, and an attempt is made to start by identifying what the other person might believe, it helps to understand the categories correctly.

Just read all of the comments. Not a single Christian. They must be in LGBTQ conversations telling everybody that they're going to hell!

If I wanted to sin, I’d become a Christian. You guys are such good examples.

Science does not disprove the Bible!!! Unless you try to say some stupid shit like the Bible is true. Then yes, science disproves that claim.

I really love this bit "No matter what people tell you, no matter what you read...." that's great. What a wonderful idea that is! Yeah, no matter what - this thing (X) is going to be what you say it is, haahhahaha ahhh good times. Yeah, sure. What a way to just negate ever learning you are wrong! Haahahaha. No.

Let me quote you here. "I'm not a scientist, but God and science are not in conflict." I'm not so sure your underqualification's enable you to properly evaluate such things. You clearly have a laymen's view of science, at best. I suppose, it also depends on how you view the bible. Do you think the earth is six thousand years old and rest upon pillars with a firmament? Do you think that the earth and light, existed before the sun, as stated in genesis? I think a better way to phrase this would have been, a God doesn't necessarily conflict with science. That would of been accurate. But you then went onto say "No matter what people tell you, or what you read, they're actually not in conflict." As we determined above, that depends on how you interpret it, doesn't it? I also think that makes it sound like you're not even open to the idea that you could be mistaken. You're teaching that people shouldn't even bother examining these things openly or honestly. This comes across as you being and teaching people to be extremely closed off to new and or outside information. 4:20 Where did God get the dirt from? I get that it's a joke. But I think the point is moot; when you think God created everything ex nihilo, aka from nothing. "Science does not conflict with a God" Again, it depends on your view of God and interpretation of reality. You certainly can believe things from the bible that clearly and demonstrably conflict with science. I'll give an example of something that happened to me yesterday at a bible study. The person leading the bible study stated that corporal punishment for children in school and at home was a good thing. I asked if they denied decades of research that demonstrate otherwise. Their answer was, yes, because the bible says so. Now, if you don't think that that's a direct admission that these Christians didn't care that the bible directly conflicts with science, I don't know what is. I'm sure, I could come up with dozens of more examples, I'm pretty sure you even hold beliefs that are from the bible, that conflict directly with what we actually observe within science. "Science can't answer X,Y,Z." Sir, do you know what an argument from ignorance is? Are you saying, your God exist in the ever receding pockets of ignorance within science? The academic dismissed the questions as foolish because he understands they're fallacious in nature, something you clearly don't. I like how you think the academic is being arrogant, when you're literally waving your ignorance around like a flag, like it's something to be proud of. You don't understand how to identify fallacious reasoning, and you accuse the academic of being arrogant for dismissing it, hilarious. So, you want people to present a genetic fallacy to non believers? And you think that's supposed to satisfy the non believers question about science conflicting with the bible? It's like the poor reasoning just floods out of you, openly. As to the stupid tea pot analogy. Is it beneficial for us as a social species; if we go around poisoning our mothers? No, the answer is no. And I didn't require any God, to arrive at that conclusion. It's like all reason, rational thought, and empathy, go out the window with you guys if you're God stops existing tomorrow, it's wild.

KOKO keep on keeping on for such a time as this

Assertions abound from materialist, all that exists is matter. Also many explain non-physical or meta-phy questions (mind, will, free choice) by asserting they are illusions. Is that really an answer?

Genesis 1 is Lucifer and the fallen angels. They made man in their image. Man is an idol, a trap to hunt angels. Only one Gospel: The Gospel (GOOD ANGEL) of Reconciliation. Jesus Christ came into THEIR kingdom to reconcile fallen angels unto Himself. We are the fallen angels (ELOHIM) kept in DNA chains of darkness. If you do not confess being a fallen angel in Lucifer's kingdom, then you are an unbeliever. Unbeliever = those that claim to be made in the image of ELOHIM(gods). REPENT FALLEN ANGELS.

There is no god.

Looking forward to hearing from you today at 4:30 PM Central!

I'd recommend any theists here to go ask an actual atheist what atheism is rather than listen to what this man or any other christian says an atheist is. He is not accurate and demonstrates that he does not understand and hasn't listened like he says to do.

55 seconds into the video, alarm bells were going off.... after explaining his definition, he says, "Skepticism isn't always a bad thing." As if the audience and he would assume that being skeptical and needing proof for belief is a bad thing..... wow..... if we weren't skeptical we would have to accept all claims right of the bat. Even other God claims. Atheists and Christians are both skeptical of every single other religion. Is skepticism not the default position? 🤔

Hello. By the definitions you laid out, I am a skeptic, an agnostic, and an atheist. Overall I like your advice and think that you are trying to make a positive impact on the world and I respect that, but I have 2 issues. 1st, I don't believe the story with your friend and am adding it to the list of things Christians say that never happened. The whole "You just don't want to believe because you want to sin" argument has been disingenuously ascribed to me by sore-loser street evangelists too many times. the 2nd is your advice seems to be about listening only to prove the other person wrong, not listening to understand. If you listen to someone without imbibing the notion you might be the one who is wrong.... then you aren't actually listening and are expecting more from the skeptic than you are willing to commit to yourself.

I scanned the whole page. I see: Many replies from atheists. Many trying to be informative. Few snarky. None abusive. No replies from the creator of the video. Despite it being a multiple opportunity to talk with skeptics.. No posts by theists. I find all of that quite interesting/telling.

1. Ask them about skepticism. 2. Realize its a way more sensible approach to assessing reality than your current method. 3. Adopt skepticism and give up any bronze age superstitions you may have been holding on to. 4. Great talk. Let's do it again soon. Bring your pastor next time.