- Видео 71
- Просмотров 15 718
3Rguitars
Добавлен 26 дек 2021
Goldtop Les Paul build.... Part 9
Starting on the fretboards, cutting the crown inlays, lot of info regarding fretboard thickness, measuring and sizes etc. At some point in the video it's raining cats and dogs so gets a bit loud! Again sorry it's a bit long and waffly but there is a lot of info to cover, skip over if you start yawning!
Просмотров: 319
Видео
Gold top Les Paul build...Part 8
Просмотров 28514 дней назад
Doing the very awkward control cavity angled route, underside of the maple and the binding routing.
Goldtop Les Paul build.... part 7
Просмотров 38228 дней назад
Routing the neck pocket and pickup cavities.
Gold top Les Paul build.... Part 6
Просмотров 680Месяц назад
Getting the top carved, take a drink every time I say "Three and a half degrees", it will be a fun evening! AND bonus it's not mirror imaged like the last one!
Goldtop Les Paul build...Part 5
Просмотров 532Месяц назад
Fitting the maple tops. Please be patient with this video, there's a lot of explanation regarding neck angle and top carve. (from 30 min)
Goldtop Les Paul build.... part 4
Просмотров 382Месяц назад
Starting on the neck and making the truss rod
Gold top Les Paul build...Part 3
Просмотров 351Месяц назад
Continuing with the body routing and moving on to the neck.
Les Paul build part 2, early 150s goldtop.
Просмотров 396Месяц назад
Starting on the body and internal routings
Early 1950's Goldtop Les Paul build, Part 1
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.2 месяца назад
It's been a while, here's the first part in the series for an historically accurate early 1950's LP build, also introducing a couple of special LPs!
Sci-fi resin top guitar, final part
Просмотров 1255 месяцев назад
Completed guitar and some sound clips...
Sci-fi resin top guitar build, part 7
Просмотров 1226 месяцев назад
Knobs! Casting the UFO knobs, routing the control cavity and making the control plate.
Sci-fi resin topped guitar build, Part 6:
Просмотров 526 месяцев назад
Polishing the top, routing the control cavity, wire channels and UFO knobs!
Resin topped Sci-fi guitar build Part 5:
Просмотров 1576 месяцев назад
Fitting the bridge and pickups, interesting humbucker mounting arrangement.
Sci-fi resin topped guitar, Part 4
Просмотров 376 месяцев назад
Fitting the neck, making a neck plate and fitting the tailpiece.
Sci-fi resin topped guitar. Part 3.
Просмотров 516 месяцев назад
Initial sanding an polishing of the resin top and making the tailpiece.
1958 Flying V build ...Part 20, completed
Просмотров 39510 месяцев назад
1958 Flying V build ...Part 20, completed
Thanks again! I was thinking I needed a metal template to make sure that the ferrule hole drill wouldn´t go off center. I guess it´s not needed. On telecasters I think this is difficult to get done 100% precise.
I agree, when I do Telecasters I have a simple jig to drill the holes for the ferrules on the back of the body, they're so close that you can notice the smallest "drill wander" also I think that the Korina is much softer than ash or alder ...Thanks for the comment.
Hi ! Question: 58 Flying V use 59 LP shape or the earlier 54 LP? Reference to StewMacs neckshaping templates . If you want to do neckshaping it fast and furious : Use an anglegrinder 125mm with a flapdisc. circular motions .One hand on the grinder. One holding the neck. Circular motions. I use this method on my CBG guitars. (not much risk envolved with cheap materials) Never seen anybody else doing this.
I think the '58 Vs are closer to the '59 profile, I've looked at a good few pictures of the neck heel on a V and considering that the neck mortice is less than a Les Paul at 27-28mm (Les Paul is 10mm more from memory) on the V you can see quite a lot of wood removed on the neck transition, I don't think you'd get that with the thicker '54 profile. From my measurements there's very little difference at the 1st fret between '59 and '54, may be 0.5 mm, the big difference is at the 11th fret where, again from memory, there's up to 3mm difference . I've used an angle grinder to do arch tops and it's very controllable, the "cheese grater" I use in the drill press is pretty quick, anything where you don't have to do it by hand is good! Thanks for the comment.
@@3rguitars890 Hi . I really appreciate you taking time to answer from your deep well of knowledge!
Enjoyed the body /angle part a lot!. Very helpful. Thanks !! I used a router/sliding box angled on top over the body (3,5 degrees) but started the body slope too far from the end ..and messed up .... thankfully on a test body, (alder+birch top.......not korina..
There are many ways to do it, a sliding box sounds good, anything at an angle though upsets the horizontal measurements, when I do my pickup routs with the overhead router I have to move the routing template forward a bit, otherwise the pickup holes end up a couple of mm to far forward, Gibson made things awkward by cutting holes at an angle!
@@3rguitars890 again: Thanks!
Hi! regarding the trussrod cutout. I have used a Dremel with a sanding drum approx 15,3mm onsome other projects. carefully!!
Yes, I've done that and it makes for a nice job, easier than a chisel, I think I need to work on mine a bit, some are untidy.
Who do you buy your wood from?
I purchased a stockpile of it a few years ago from a retiring luthier so I have a good stash of Honduran Mahogany and some Brazilian rosewood although I generally use David Dykes Luthier supplies in the South East UK, however it is getting more and more difficult to get the same wood as used on vintage guitars.
it has been said Gibson get their boards pre fabricated in China!!
It wouldn't surprise me, Epiphones are all made in China I think?
Is that a right handed R9 board ? I have seen Left handed R9's with side dots on both sides of the board ! When you say VINTAGE you mean reproduction don't you??
The R9 board was from a left handed LP, it has dots on both sides, the drawings I did are from a genuine '53 and the R9 board is identical with vintage fret spacing and crown inlay sizes so I use it as a reference, it also matches the Bartlet fretboard jig...Thanks for the comment.
This is fantastic, I am just now building a Les Paul also, I just routed the neck mortis, a short modern 80mm long mortis, and about 32mm wide. Its been a couple of years since my last Les Paul build and I´ve already fu*ked things up a little bit, but it can be fixed, I have not started on the neck yet, i cut the Mahogany a little over-size so I can take of a little bit more once its time to build the neck. My next step is to route for the binding on the body and get all that done. After that I will start roughing out the neck and start the neck build, I will try something new this time, and that is building a box with the angle on one side that match the angle of the top 4.2 Degrees and fasten the neck in that box and use my table router to rough out the wideness of the neck tennon. I also have original Gibson fretboard that I took of from a 1989 Gibson Les Paul Standard, to have as a template, also I got the original body so that´s how knew the dimensions of the neck mortis. I am sure I will mess up more things over the next 1-2 weeks haha.. does your workshop get cold in the winter ? you are in south England right ? Thanks for the video.
I'm not familiar with the more modern Les Paul build, Over the years I've tried many different methods to try and improve accuracy but like you I still make plenty of mistakes, I think the art of guitar building is being able to hide your mistakes! The important thing with the neck joint is the alignment (in all planes) if the joint needs packing that's less of an issue than the neck being wonky!...Good luck and thanks for commenting.
Sorry I forgot, Yes I'm in the South East and it does get too cold at times!
@@3rguitars890 Yeah, it gets cold sometimes in the winter even in the south east, in my area there will soon be 1-2 meters of snow and -30C.. I am not looking forward to it though..
Just putting some splines in me les paul headstock break, Backs killing me nice to relax and watch this cant get enough. Thanks.
Sorry to hear about your LP...Ugh, I've repaired a few of them!
Thanks for a very informative video! Have you ever used African Blackwood for a fretboard? It's in the rosewood family.
No I haven't, just read about it on Wikipedia, sounds like it would be a good option for a fretboard, although would probably be very expensive. There is a very pretty Madagascan wood that is a good alternative for Brazilian rosewood, although it looks like rosewood it isn't so not restricted as far as I know.
Absolutely priceless information. Hurry back.
Thank you very much, shouldn't be too long until the next update.
Great info Thanks! Did you find the tailpiece template (the one by itself) not having the same hole alignment as on the body templates?
Mine were the same alignment but when I purchased the templates I had to ait about 3 months because they were being changed a bit, may be this as the reason BUT BUT BUT if you continue watching (I can't remember which video) I do re make the pickguards and re cut the tailpiece to a slightly different angle as the point of the tailpiece was ending up under the bridge and all the pictures I've seen, the apex of the tailpiece is just short of the bridge although it does vary a fair few mm from guitar to guitar...Thanks for the comment.
Hi This is very good! Thanks!! I´ve had the template kit for almost 3 years now . Next step for me is fitting necks to body.
Fitting the necks is quite difficult on these you REALLY need to make sure that the neck is perfectly centred to the body as the V has such a defined centre line , it stands out a lot if the tailpiece point is off centre ...Good luck
Where do you get your lumber from bro?
I've had this timber for years, I bought a stockpile of it from a luthier who was retiring. Honduran mahogany is going to be very difficult to get these days and Brazilian rosewood virtually impossible . When I do buy timber I usually use David Dyke luthier supplies, Heathfield near Eastbourne.
Great video, yeah back in the days Gibson made most things by hand and/or with a pinrouter, the inside of the electronics cavity was absolutely made by hand, I´ve seen inside a few 50´s Les Pauls too, and it for sure looks to be made by hand. Gibson Les Paul are a quite complex guitar to replicate if you are going to do it exactly the way Gibson did it, no wonder why a Gibson Les Paul Custom did cost around 2-300 quid back in the 50´s.. because it takes quite some effort to build these guitars.. Thanks for the video.
Thanks for commenting, always nice to hear, Indeed LPs are quite labour intensive to build especially when you add in the detailed bits and pieces, crown inlays, pearl logo etc, getting the neck joint lined-up and perfect is a mission in itself, I'd be intrigued to find out if the pickup cavities were done before or after fitting the neck, any idea? No wonder they changed to the SG !...Thanks again
@@3rguitars890 I have no idea back in the day if they glued the neck before routing the pickupcavitys or not, but I know they glue in the neck before routing the pickup cavity today. I always make the angle of the neck mortis about 4.5 degree, the top is always made on a CNC and its 4.5 degree, everything needs to be the same or else the neck will not be seated in the right angle. It's a pain in the a** sometimes to be honest, sometimes I am thinking, why the he** am I doing this.. HAHA.. :D
Loved this - thank you. One of your best videos and your passion shines through. Anyone who has built a guitar will share your excitement when things go well!
Thank you very much, some jobs you just have to go for it! A 3inch router cutter made me panic a bit but easier than I thought.
❤
Stewmac have excellent customer service for their regulars, If you emailed them and tell them which bearing failed, I bet the send you a new one
I do keep meaning to contact them, they are an excellent company, I wish I had a ton of money to throw their way and stock up on some more tools! Thank you for your comment.
@@chrisrichards2272 Yeah stewmax is dangerous. Makes it much more affordable to get tools if you keep the orders under £135 though. LPs are looking good btw, I'm enjoying the series, you take some different approaches to what I've seen before.
Yeah, they certainly have an abundance of tools I'd like to try. trouble is being an old git I tend to be a bit tight with my money, comes with age! I must admit that I enjoy making jigs as much as making the guitars, there's a kinda sense of excitement when something works like you planned it..
It's no wonder gibsons are worth so much more than fenders..
Excuse me - why in particular?
Thanks for the comment, in general I'd say there's more work involved in building an LP than a Strat (say), carved top, fancy inlays, binding, set neck. I'd give Leo Fender 10/10 for re addressing guitar building, I started off my guitar playing with a Strat but these days I'm leaning towards Gibson, no doubt I'll sway back the other way at some point!
Great video mate loving this. A real change from the mainstream.
Thank you very much.
You missed the icecream man, but again nice build with tons of info for the builders out there. Thnx!!!
I was tempted to switch off the camera and pop out and buy one, oh well next time...Damn guitars! Thanks for the comment.
I’m enjoying watching you we are the last and I have no body to pass the trade on to most of RUclips is BS
I'm just trying to document what I do, love recreating vintage instruments.
I Love following your build process on these GoldTops. Well done
Thanks so much, getting those pickup routs done accurately was a worry so nice to get them done and dusted.
Thanks for turning me on to crazy parts. Let me share with you North West Hard woods you might find them useful
Thanks, I'll take a look.
Long and wafflie is good keep it real
Thanks....
Great job my question is what did you use for the rubber?
I either got it from Crazyparts or Eurospruce, I can't remember which, they do it in strips with the same pitch of ridges per inch as the original, it looks good to me and is the correct thickness, you just have to cut it to size .
@@3rguitars890 Thanks so much I’m putting parts together now for a 58 type I’m enjoying your videos on the LP
@@timziegler3765 Great, I love flying Vs and these I've built have exceeded my expectations, other people who have tried them have given such great comments, even those who "don't like Vs" . My best bit of advice would be to start of with quality wood , these only weigh 7lbs and that is the first thing that people comment on. Crazyparts and Eurospruce seem to do the most parts...Be careful with pickguards and tailpiece a lot of repro ones are the wrong size/angle.
🥰🥰🥰
🤣
part five was uploaded in reverse !
I was in too much of a rush to get to the pub! forgot to use the mirror filter!
This is fantastic, quite a lot of work to get at that point that the top is all carved and ready to be routed for mortis and pickup and things like that. I use my CNC as an over-head router, not using it as a CNC when I just using it as an over-head router, it works great, even with routing for binding on a body, just adjusting the Z axis to the correct depth. You have a huge advantage because you have all the data and specs from that 1953 guitar you talked about some videos back, also you made some fantastic job documenting all the guitar on paper.. :D
Thanks very much, I've never used a CNC router, I'd love to try one and can see it as being a huge benefit, especially carving consistent tops.
@@3rguitars890 Yes and even if you dont have any knowledge about CAD software you can pay someone to make a CAD file of a top and then just learn how to set the tool path in the CNC software, I mean even if the CAD file maybe will cost you some quid, you can use it over and over and over again. but most important, you would need a very decent CNC, I have a OpenBuilds Lead 1510 so I would be able to route out a whole guitar from one piece of wood if I want to, the Lead 1010 is the same machine but a working area of about 750x750mm, my machine is 1250x750mm..
@@HearGear The CNC Bartlet top that I used for one of the 'Bursts was superb. If I was planning on making a good few of these then it would be something I'd definitely look at, thanks for the info, I will take a look, this type of tooling used to cost a fortune but now it's getting in to a very tempting budget range!
@@3rguitars890 Yes, it would be a great idea for building several Les Paul type guitars. But I almost never used the CNC for building the whole guitar, I like the idea of using templates and hand-held tools or router table, ive build a couple of guitars with my CNC but it takes some time and it needs my attention during the routing process so its not easy to just walk away and do other things. But for carved tops it's brilliant, or just buying ready to use tops. The CNC machines has gotten very much cheaper now compared to 20-30 years ago for sure, there is quite a lot of different machines that could be good for building guitars and things like that.
There is a problem with the taper of the headstock thickness. Others also think that it is correct to have a difference in the thickness from one end to the other. Tuners are not designed to tighten on unparallel surfaces, obviously. If old guitars are tapered like that, it's because of imperfections in the manufacturing processes of the 50's. As anal as allot of people are about guitars being perfect and tuners being stable, you would think alarm bells would be going off when encountering such things. Just tossing it out there. I make Les Pauls with the headstock faces parallel.
I can see from an engineering point of view that it would be beneficial to have the headstock faces parallel for the reasons you've said although the Beauty of the Burst book has an extensive table listing headstock thicknesses which vary by a up to 2mm between each guitar but all are tapered by between 1mm and 2mm and the '53 I used to make the drawings had a 1mm taper, the variation in thickness does is somewhat haphazard and could well be just a result of sanding the back of the headstock, it's well known that the "stinger" (black painted headstock backs) was to hide a poorly shaped neck/headstock transition so there's a lot of hand work going on in that area.
As far as stingers go, paint can't hide poor shaped surfaces. It can hide putty or fillers that hide the surface imperfections which I assume you're meaning. All I'm pointing out is that you don't have to copy mistakes or flaws that happened back then. I get that the books give all the details, but I know that these imperfections were not intentional. Just like the '58 through '60 burst open book headstock had a lazy ear on one side from worn templates or fixtures. The only reason (in my mind) to copy these things would be to create a "forgery" to con people that it's a multi-thousand dollar original. And no, I'm not saying that you are doing that. Basically, why copy flaws and mistakes? That's all I'm saying.
@@Cannonbawlz I must say that I thought the tapered headstock was a design feature, it is surprising that the headstocks vary in thickness so much as well, thanks for the info, I'll amend future builds. Wonky ears on the headstock would really play havoc with me, I'd have no intention of replicating that feature!
are these left handed gold tops ?
Camera is filming mirrowed. So it is right handed guitar.
Yeah, I forgot to mirror the video..Ugh!
any reason for having the template reversed ?
My Mistake, I forgot to mirror image the video before posting it.
Hi great video did you retrieve that R9 fingerboard from a left handed guitar?? I have notice that Gibson on their lefties have side dots on both sides of the finger board! at l least for a time around 2019 A you aware of the rebates they have in the side of the boards to accept their T section neck binding for ease in production!
I've had it for ages but I believe it was from a left handed guitar hence side dots both sides.
Looking really nice. Great video. I agree - glue ups can be a bit slippery! My tops are usually laminated, so need to be cock-on centre, so I use 2mm cocktail sticks in the neck pocket and pickup area to locate.
Thank you, indeed slippery glue joints can be troublesome, some people put a sprinkling of salt in the joint, apparently it's really good to stop slip but I wouldn't advocate using it, pretty corrosive stuff with a water based glue, don't you think?
@@3rguitars890 I'll stay with my cocktail sticks for now!
Les Paul truss rods are 10-32. That's #10 size and 32 threads per inch. There is no 11-32. There's 11/32nds of an inch but, no size 11-32
Yep, you're dead right, I don't know why I said 11-32...Thank you
Great video.. about making sure not to make a lefty Les Paul when gluing the top on.. I tend to make left handed bone nuts for right handed guitar from time to time, and then f*ck man, lets take a new bone blank and start all over again, now I have a cup of lefty bone nuts.. just in case Hendrix stops by my workshop at some point, then I´ll just give him the cup. You are right, it is confusing to measure and get all the angles right and at the same time getting the math right as well when building Les Paul´s, I make the tops on my CNC or I buy them already CNC carved and ready to glue on the body. I always gives my Les Paul builds a 4 degree neck angle. I have a Gibson Les Paul Standard that I took the neck off of it and the fretboard to get everything exactly like it should be to match what Gibson does, so I am using that as a template so to speak. I am tempted to build an exact replica of one of my Gibson Les Paul Customs, its really good to have the guitar you are making a replica of because it will be in great use even without taking it apart.. thanks for the video. 👍 😃
Thank you, I've fallen in to the left handed/upside down trap a few times, routing out a control cavity on the wrong face of a body...Ugh! More spare chunks of mahogany, I can see left handed nuts being a real problem. Yes, the first top I used was a CNC carved one and it was a real time saver and excellent. Having the original guitar is a BIG help as it gives such an insight in to the method of making the guitar/construction techniques.
@@3rguitars890 It´s quite more expensive to realise that you just routed a lefty guitar body, I mean, real fine wood costs a lot of money. I have not made a lefty body yet, but I would not be surprised if I would make the mistake soon.. :S
@@HearGear I can't believe the price of wood nowadays, especially the traditional woods, I'm quite lucky as I have a bit of a stockpile, the left and right issue becomes rather more confusing with this overhead router jig I've just made, at the moment I'm new to it but I can see the mistakes coming as I get more familiar!
@@3rguitars890 Yes, I totally agree with you, here in Sweden its almost impossible to get some body blanks for less than 80 quid. I lived in Scotland for quite some time some years ago, it was not really any cheaper there. But recently I bought some material from Portugal that is a lot cheaper, so I will continue doing that. The ruters can easy f*ck things up, my simple router table that is similar to yours have f*ucked up some really good Les Paul necks, and I get so angry every time it takes out a big piece of material at the very end of the open book headstock. Another time it sent a really fine fretboard material all the way across my worksop right in the wall because i was not paying enough attention to what i was doing, I thought it just slipped out of my hand... Routers are really dangerous stuff too.. bloody h*ll...
It took a few minutes to realise your vid was back to front. I had an SG in for repair once where the truss rod had been over tightened and had crushed the wood fibres under the washer, making the rod ineffective. Ended up putting an ally channel modern one in.
Yes, I much prefer the insurance of a bi=flex truss rod, makes life a little less stressful!
THIS MAN CAN MAKE A GIBSON GUITAR BETTER THAN GIBSON CAN
So nice to hear...Thank you
THIS GUY is cool 😎 he is better than gibson 😅
Thank you!
Absolutely class watch, learning lots & thoroughly enjoying watching a master at work Chris.. this is a super cool series.. thank you so much mate.. I'm looking forward to the next episode.! 🤟🏻😎 Cheers, Clint x
Thanks Clint, always nice to hear , I'm loving building them!
I love my Japanese file, just about the best tool I've bought in ages. Wanted it for a specific job, it did not disappoint and it has continued to be useful ever since.
Yeah, they're fantastic , I have some really small Japanese files as well and they're lethally sharp and shift wood like no ones business, wonderful!
I really enjoy your videos, I´ve been working on many guitars in my workshop for 25+ years now, mostly Gibson Les Pauls, so far all the Gibson Les Paul trussrod D shaped washers is 14,6x8,9mm and the trussrod access cavity tool is 15,5mm to exactly match all the Gibson Les Paul´s i´ve worked on over the years. All my Gibson Les Paul´s also have a 15,5 mm Trussrod Access Cavity. The tool that stewmac sell is 19mm and that's not right for a Gibson Les Paul, not even the early ones because as you say in the video you measured that 53 and its also 15mm so 15 or 15,5mm would be correct. All my builds needs to be exactly correct to a Gibson Les Paul so I buy the original D washers and I also buy the Gibson Les Paul Trussrod´s. I also make the trussrod slot in the neck just like Gibson does it in the factory so that the slot is deeper in the middle and then comes up a little at the edges. If I dont do my Gibson Les Paul Replicas just the way it should be, I can't sleep very good at nigh.. haha.. anyway, you are a true luthier that can make such awesome guitars with just simple tools in a simple workshop. That's respect right there... Thanks.
Like you it's the detail that floats my boat , I love vintage instruments and trying to recreate them, finding out the information can be the most difficult part, so it's good to cross reference stuff...Many thanks for your kind words.
Another fascinating watch, thank you. If the main stream manufacturers paid as much attention to detail as you do then their products may well be worth the prices being charged for them. Some of the originals dimensions seem accurate and repeatable but others seem to be a bit variable? I wonder if this has some say in whether an instrument turns out to be a "good one" or not? Looking forward to the next episode 😊.
Thank you, yes it's certainly the case that there is variation between guitars, you can kinda tell which processes were done by hand, when you study them you can also see the reason why certain things are done like they are. Once the maple cap is on I'll be revisiting the control cavity, I think that this will be interesting to watchers...Thanks again.
Wow! - amazing. How can I buy copies of your drawings / plans. Like you I much prefer GoldTops and P90's. Best regards from Melbourne, Australia
I haven't really thought about that, I did try a local printers but they didn't have the right machine to copy them. The trouble is that I don't like paper drawings as it is amazing how much they stretch especially if you glue them on to the wood to cut around. Mine drawings are on plastic and have remained true. I'll have a think on it .
Another great watch, ta. You could use a guide collar on the trend router, just make the apertures in the template correspondingly larger and that would save a lot of faffing about. I remember stopping at the roadside a few years ago to watch a couple of spitfires flying over, there's something special about that noise, isn't there? Really great to see this real stuff though, absolutely love it.
That's true, I've never used guide collars, maybe something for the future, although I love my rudimentary pin router, keep watching and you'll see it get quite a bit of use...Thanks again.
Good video, thanks. Worktop cutters are 50mm long but I'm not sure that I've seen any with bearings on the end. They would be reassuringly expensive if they were available, I'm sure.
Yeah, I've had a few with bearings, the trouble is with the straight flutes you can get nasty tear out. Thanks for the comment.
I have thought about the V's neck joint for a long time in anticipation of building a Moderne prototype. You've done outstanding work to get it right. But it is, as you might say "Quite a fiddly bit". Keep up the great work in your 21st century modern guitar building lab/clean room. Looks familiar.
Thank you...Yeah, I know my clean room is anything but...I can't help it!
Yes, I think the Gibson neck joint is elegant to see on the finished guitar with the fretboard laying directly on the body top, the vertical joint lines on the cheeks of the neck and the stepped bottom of the heel, it looks so nice and well worth spending the time to do but as you say and I totally agree, it takes a LOT of time to get it to fit properly, I've never done on that fits "straight out of the box" so to speak. Ah...my clean lab/workshop, I wish I had the mindset where everything has its place, I spend more time looking for stuff than doing the job, I've really tried but a clean workshop is never gonna happen!...Thanks for the comment.
👋👋👋👋
The 59's look very good, what pickups are in them ??
They are a PAF clone but not expensive, they do sound nice though. The buiilds cost a LOT of money and I couldn't justify really expensive pickups, they are vintage pole spacing so the covers could be swapped, the surrounds are CAB plastic and accurate. To be honest I don't play that much and pickups are such a personal choice and easy to change out. Both guitars have been gigged by local musicians and they sound pretty darn good, not too overdriven and quite mellow.