Sképseis
Sképseis
  • Видео 36
  • Просмотров 456 879
Sképseis - Universe; the Illusion of Knowledge
sképseis - Universe the Illusion of Knowledge
Просмотров: 204

Видео

Richard Feynman Magnet
Просмотров 11 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman Magnet
Richard Feynman Fire
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman Electricity
Richard Feynman Electricity
Просмотров 2,7 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman Electricity
Richard Feynman rubber bands
Просмотров 77110 лет назад
Richard Feynman rubber bands
Richard Feynman Mirror
Просмотров 95210 лет назад
Richard Feynman Mirror
Richard Feynman Numbers part 1
Просмотров 60510 лет назад
Richard Feynman Numbers part 1
Richard Feynman thinking part 2
Просмотров 52610 лет назад
Richard Feynman thinking part 2
Richard Feynman Numers Part 2
Просмотров 48910 лет назад
Richard Feynman Numers Part 2
Richard Feynman thinking part 1
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman thinking part 1
Richard Feynman speaks about the Atoms
Просмотров 3,1 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman speaks about the Atoms
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 7
Просмотров 2,9 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman - law of gravitation
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 6
Просмотров 53010 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 5
Просмотров 1 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 4
Просмотров 50110 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 3
Просмотров 33810 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 3
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 2
Просмотров 36010 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 2
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 1
Просмотров 51910 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 1
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 7 of 7
Просмотров 17610 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 7 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 6 of 7
Просмотров 12210 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 6 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 5 of 7
Просмотров 13910 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 5 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 1 of 7
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.10 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 1 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 3 of 7
Просмотров 24510 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 3 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 2 of 7
Просмотров 42910 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 2 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 4 of 7
Просмотров 14810 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 4 of 7
Feynman Magnets and Why questions
Просмотров 13 тыс.11 лет назад
Feynman Magnets and Why questions
Richard Feynman Physics Lecture 01 - Photons, Corpuscles of Light
Просмотров 114 тыс.11 лет назад
Richard Feynman Physics Lecture 01 - Photons, Corpuscles of Light
Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics - Richard Feynman
Просмотров 41 тыс.11 лет назад
Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics - Richard Feynman
The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman
Просмотров 159 тыс.11 лет назад
The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman
07 - vertical suturing.flv
Просмотров 99013 лет назад
07 - vertical suturing.flv

Комментарии

  • @ThePatente
    @ThePatente Месяц назад

    Damn he's totally right.

  • @pratiksaha7699
    @pratiksaha7699 3 месяца назад

    Why is the audience so silly? Are they high or what?😂

  • @user-qw4zg2py9p
    @user-qw4zg2py9p 4 месяца назад

    MATH 数理科学

  • @glashoppah
    @glashoppah 8 месяцев назад

    If you find Feynman fascinating, I recommend “Genius” by Gleick. It’s an excellent biography, and it’s incredibly informative and interesting.

  • @glashoppah
    @glashoppah 8 месяцев назад

    What a gift that these lectures were captured and are available. I’d love to see them cleaned up from an audio standpoint.

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 11 месяцев назад

    Indirectly, his lectures built on Wheeler's One Electron Theory that leads by the logical elimination of relative-timing to the freeze-framing of Euler's infinitesimal Entanglement, to Susskind's Black Hole Singularity equivalent objective and thus to shell-horizon orthogonality in holographic reasoning, but present day Students are required to critique all such previous theories and not accept any without detailed Sciencing.

  • @janklaas6885
    @janklaas6885 Год назад

    📍52:30

  • @janklaas6885
    @janklaas6885 Год назад

    📍59:36 2📍41:18

  • @scottbergeson8726
    @scottbergeson8726 Год назад

    Great video. And not monetized - hurray!

  • @jiujiu
    @jiujiu Год назад

    The guess in question is the Big Bang Theory and the experiment was the JWST images of fully formed galaxies too close in the timeline to the Big Bang to be possible. It's wrong.

  • @bircancakir
    @bircancakir Год назад

    what a fundamental knowledge, thx Fr upl

  • @audiogrouch1
    @audiogrouch1 Год назад

    what year was this? And when was the junk science lecture?

    • @EasyEight3674
      @EasyEight3674 7 месяцев назад

      Richard Feynman lecture from probably the early 1960s, considered one of the greatest Physicists of all time, developed the theory of Quantum electrodynamics. His awards in Physics include - Albert Einstein Award (1954), E. O. Lawrence Award (1962), Nobel Prize in Physics (1965), Foreign Member of the Royal Society (1965), Oersted Medal (1972), National Medal of Science (1979)

  • @pieterduplessis6632
    @pieterduplessis6632 Год назад

    Thanks for sharing

  • @KipIngram
    @KipIngram Год назад

    Is this written up in a paper or book anywhere?

    • @ibraheemkhurram6185
      @ibraheemkhurram6185 Год назад

      Yes there’s a book called “Elementary Particles and the laws of Physics” which has his lecture

  • @Biju-1729
    @Biju-1729 2 года назад

    "If it disagrees with the experiments it's wrong " a simple statement but is the core of science ❤️

  • @sudheerdivekar5949
    @sudheerdivekar5949 2 года назад

    Really Thought Provoking!!

  • @Achrononmaster
    @Achrononmaster 2 года назад

    It helps to follow along reading this: www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9D72E7C9045A9C0797DD952678F03C75/9781107590076c1_p1-60_CBO.pdf/the-reason-for-antiparticles.pdf

  • @richardlemos3798
    @richardlemos3798 2 года назад

    Amei

  • @aaronbarlow4376
    @aaronbarlow4376 2 года назад

    Government climate change scientists sorely need this lesson drilled into them.

  • @martingoldthorpe5413
    @martingoldthorpe5413 2 года назад

    Has anyone sent this to "Professor" (Lockdown) Ferguson, who's actually got a degree in Physics?

  • @revalexander4419
    @revalexander4419 2 года назад

    I didn't understand any of it. Wonderful❤️

  • @angele810
    @angele810 3 года назад

    Happy birthday, very fine man

  • @brianwade8649
    @brianwade8649 3 года назад

    Pro ba bi li..... oh screw it!

  • @realitynowassigned
    @realitynowassigned 3 года назад

    I really thought this dude was dead before video lectures were a thing

    • @lucilla888
      @lucilla888 Год назад

      i thought he was dead like 20-10 years ago idk why

  • @BeoFistTie01
    @BeoFistTie01 3 года назад

    Feynman

  • @noahbelsito744
    @noahbelsito744 3 года назад

    Basically I understand this as it's better to be ignorant than knowledgeable. If you don't ask why something happens first and just accept it for what it is then you nor anybody else will ever know how anything works and will just accept things for the way they are. Example being instead of asking why it is common practice to beat wifes in your culture you will just accept it for what it is.

  •  3 года назад

    Actually the blurriness on the overhead screen was caused by the students momentum in this course.

  • @mjParetoQuant
    @mjParetoQuant 3 года назад

    If you want to see the maths: www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9D72E7C9045A9C0797DD952678F03C75/9781107590076c1_p1-60_CBO.pdf/reason_for_antiparticles.pdf

  • @yiluoli6890
    @yiluoli6890 3 года назад

    idk why ppl talks shit about feynman for this video. You have to see things in context. He could surely go into details of quantum field theory and explain everything from ground up but is that the purpose of this interview and did he have enough time? when he says its too complex to explain in terms of things that interviewer is more familiar with, he is very humble to admit that he doesnt understand the fundamentals enough to explain in daily terms, which is perfectly normal. the question about magnets is NOT simple. it is very deep and profound if you dig deeper and ask more "why" as Feynman explained in the beginning of the video.

  • @trejohnson7677
    @trejohnson7677 4 года назад

    I gotta get my degree so i can bother people on a podium w/ my ideas

  • @bruxyb
    @bruxyb 4 года назад

    we need to be doing with this with Covid-19...

    • @Sockpuppet2012
      @Sockpuppet2012 3 года назад

      The propaganda would fall apart like a house of cards.

    • @benjamindover5676
      @benjamindover5676 3 года назад

      Thanks to the scientific method, we came out the other side of this hell hole called covid 19.

    • @aaronbarlow4376
      @aaronbarlow4376 2 года назад

      @@benjamindover5676 Firstly, we're still in the hole. Secondly the scientific method has only been applied by scientists like Sr Malone and Dr McCullogh pointing out the data that shows how flawed the approach to Covid by govts is and how dangerous the vaccines are.

  • @giovanniguy2421
    @giovanniguy2421 4 года назад

    wow there are so many geniuses in these comments its amazing

    • @DeeEllEff
      @DeeEllEff 7 месяцев назад

      Or to put it another way, as Lucille Feynman did, there are so many geniuses here in the comments, “God help us”!

  • @ssengup123
    @ssengup123 4 года назад

    WHY didn’t we hear back from the interviewer anymore? Because he was passed out. Jokes apart, in the world of BS, Feynman gives us happiness.

  • @KipIngram
    @KipIngram 4 года назад

    It sure would be nice if we could READ THE PROJECTOR IMAGE. :-( :-( :-(

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 4 года назад

    Bro do make list in more organised way love you for being with plinthrophist we need more organised manner lectures Its just great work you are doing brother ..... Understand

  • @DoubleHarmony22
    @DoubleHarmony22 5 лет назад

    Ken brought me here. Wtf was this explanation. Just say you don’t know. This was my college professors. To protect his ridiculous ego he tries to make the interviewer feel stupid.

  • @DoubleHarmony22
    @DoubleHarmony22 5 лет назад

    Ken brought me here. Wtf was this explanation. Just say you don’t know. This was my college professors. To protect his ridiculous ego he tries to make the interviewer feel stupid.

  • @Mhammerable
    @Mhammerable 5 лет назад

    Man this would be so much better if we could see the diagrams

    • @keithdow8327
      @keithdow8327 2 года назад

      There is a book version of this talk.

  • @holdfast7182
    @holdfast7182 5 лет назад

    I always post this on the global warming pages

    • @snuffeldjuret
      @snuffeldjuret 4 года назад

      I assume you understand the difference between a controlled experiment and an uncontrolled experiment?

    • @richardverney6702
      @richardverney6702 4 года назад

      @@snuffeldjuret In climate science, one has to compare prediction to observation, and for the past 40 years, the numerous predictions have not been borne out by observation. Indeed, the IPCC do not predict things, but rather they project things, because they know that the many predictions have been shown to be wrong time and again.

    • @lindocalrissian0926
      @lindocalrissian0926 3 года назад

      @@richardverney6702 this is patently, absurdly false. One would only need to look through google scholar over the past 100 years to find papers upon papers upon papers of evidence for climate change, but I suppose that's hard work...

    • @throwaway692
      @throwaway692 3 года назад

      @@lindocalrissian0926 So why did the temperature go steadily down for the next 40 years after the 2nd WW while we were putting millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere? So much so that the climate prediction (in the 70's) was the coming ice age? And if CO2 is the so called control knob of climate why does no one ever offer a simple 1 way ANOVA that clearly rejects the Null Hypothesis? Sure that would go a long way to settling the matter.

    • @throwaway692
      @throwaway692 3 года назад

      @@snuffeldjuret I assume you understand the difference between if/then and if and only if?

  • @cyberdelicxp9125
    @cyberdelicxp9125 6 лет назад

    Fuckin magnets?...your question is malformed

  • @Moronvideos1940
    @Moronvideos1940 6 лет назад

    Some brains can fall into the category of elementary particles ......

  • @kotodama8959
    @kotodama8959 6 лет назад

    I like how this video is in the category under "Comedy" :D yep, this guy would have made a great politician.

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 6 лет назад

    This is an invitation to see a theory on the nature of time! In this theory we have an emergent uncertain future continuously coming into existence relative to the spontaneous absorption and emission of photon energy. Within such a process the wave particle duality of light and matter in the form of electrons is forming a blank canvas that we can interact with forming the possible into the actual! The future is unfolding with each photon electron coupling or dipole moment relative to the atoms of the periodic table and the wavelength of the electromagnetic spectrum. As part of a universal process of energy exchange that forms the ever changing world of our everyday life the ‘past’ has gone forever. At the smallest scale of this process the ‘past’ is represented by anti-matter annihilation with the symmetry between matter and anti-matter representing the symmetry between the future and the past as the future unfolds photon by photon. In such a theory the mathematics of quantum mechanics represents the physics of ‘time’ with the classical physics of Newton representing processes over a period of time, as in Newton’s differential equations. In my videos I explain how this process is relative to temperature and the phase changes of matter.

  • @hubris7389
    @hubris7389 6 лет назад

    Incoherent and fraudulent. A long sequence of contorted sentences that do not connect to each other. Not a single semantic frame is established. So this garbage is what passes for 'high science'. How embarrassing! 'One man's virtual particle is another man's virtual anti-particle.' X.Y.C.T. etcetera ad infinitum. Alphabeticus absurdum. For those who suspect there may be something fraudulent about the whole Einstein-relativity story....plenty of supporting evidence here.

    • @johnmorrell3187
      @johnmorrell3187 3 года назад

      Username checks out

    • @mjParetoQuant
      @mjParetoQuant 3 года назад

      It's your ignorance of the supporting facts that makes you see it as incoherent. Why you claim it as fraudulent I leave to your introspection.

    • @jamesnicol3831
      @jamesnicol3831 3 года назад

      up your hub

  • @kkchandrakar7411
    @kkchandrakar7411 6 лет назад

    How the turning of hands of "clock "determine the amplitude?can someone please explain.

    • @threaljo_
      @threaljo_ 3 года назад

      Have you found the answer to this question? Pls share🥺

  • @Gizmo1869
    @Gizmo1869 6 лет назад

    He’s refusing to admit he doesn’t know because he’s operating from the ego mind, and the secrets of magnetism reveal many other liberating secrets of existence that was understood in Ancient Egypt or more accurately Kemet. Richard Feynman was a Royal Society shill assisting in the expansion of their new world order scientism agenda. Wake up! You’re being manipulated by men that smile and laugh as they do it.

    • @snoopymccloud1875
      @snoopymccloud1875 6 лет назад

      Please show me your source for your absolutely insanely stupid conviction that ancient Egypt had better knowledge of magnetism.

    • @pietzsche
      @pietzsche 6 лет назад

      'He's refusing to admit he doesn't know' in a fucking video where he's explaining why that's not a question that can be answered.

    • @WZW1982
      @WZW1982 6 лет назад

      He literally answers the question at 5:00 minutes.

    • @liolp808
      @liolp808 5 лет назад

      Can I have what you're having please?

  • @caileanparis9998
    @caileanparis9998 6 лет назад

    Ken brought me here.

    • @codetech5598
      @codetech5598 6 лет назад

      Imagine how Feynman would squirm if it was Ken asking the questions instead of that British guy.

    • @martinesimmonds7379
      @martinesimmonds7379 5 лет назад

      Ken brought me here too. Ken's, explaination of his squirming in the chair. It's so funny. "It depends what you mean by" so Bill Clinton. Like depends what "is, is" Your Impeached!!!

  • @glutinousmaximus
    @glutinousmaximus 6 лет назад

    The 'light cone' idea came from (Sir) Roger Penrose - also a brilliant physicist, and worth looking at his stuff.

  • @SSJHF
    @SSJHF 6 лет назад

    I you want to see the notes, just search the videos title and download the pdf. It seems people have put together a book on the lecture and all the mathematical syntax used as well.

    • @moc5541
      @moc5541 6 лет назад

      I found only a pdf from a questionable site that is flagged as such by uBlock Origin, one of my browser's plugins. You can buy a legitimate used paperback copy of the book for around $5, with shipping.

    • @VaibhavSingh-dq9kr
      @VaibhavSingh-dq9kr 4 года назад

      The book is called "elementary particles and laws of physics". Check on internet archive. Its available for free.

  • @fdjorup
    @fdjorup 6 лет назад

    Utterly