![Sképseis](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- Видео 36
- Просмотров 456 879
Sképseis
Добавлен 31 мар 2011
Here You Can find new thoughts
Sképseis - Universe; the Illusion of Knowledge
sképseis - Universe the Illusion of Knowledge
Просмотров: 204
Видео
Richard Feynman speaks about the Atoms
Просмотров 3,1 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman speaks about the Atoms
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 7
Просмотров 2,9 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman - law of gravitation
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 6
Просмотров 53010 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 5
Просмотров 1 тыс.10 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 4
Просмотров 50110 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 3
Просмотров 33810 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 3
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 2
Просмотров 36010 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 2
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 1
Просмотров 51910 лет назад
Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation Part 1
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 7 of 7
Просмотров 17610 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 7 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 6 of 7
Просмотров 12210 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 6 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 5 of 7
Просмотров 13910 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 5 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 1 of 7
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.10 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 1 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 3 of 7
Просмотров 24510 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 3 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 2 of 7
Просмотров 42910 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 2 of 7
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 4 of 7
Просмотров 14810 лет назад
Feynman - The reason for antiparticles Part 4 of 7
Richard Feynman Physics Lecture 01 - Photons, Corpuscles of Light
Просмотров 114 тыс.11 лет назад
Richard Feynman Physics Lecture 01 - Photons, Corpuscles of Light
Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics - Richard Feynman
Просмотров 41 тыс.11 лет назад
Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics - Richard Feynman
The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman
Просмотров 159 тыс.11 лет назад
The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman
Damn he's totally right.
Why is the audience so silly? Are they high or what?😂
MATH 数理科学
If you find Feynman fascinating, I recommend “Genius” by Gleick. It’s an excellent biography, and it’s incredibly informative and interesting.
What a gift that these lectures were captured and are available. I’d love to see them cleaned up from an audio standpoint.
Indirectly, his lectures built on Wheeler's One Electron Theory that leads by the logical elimination of relative-timing to the freeze-framing of Euler's infinitesimal Entanglement, to Susskind's Black Hole Singularity equivalent objective and thus to shell-horizon orthogonality in holographic reasoning, but present day Students are required to critique all such previous theories and not accept any without detailed Sciencing.
📍52:30
📍59:36 2📍41:18
Great video. And not monetized - hurray!
The guess in question is the Big Bang Theory and the experiment was the JWST images of fully formed galaxies too close in the timeline to the Big Bang to be possible. It's wrong.
what a fundamental knowledge, thx Fr upl
what year was this? And when was the junk science lecture?
Richard Feynman lecture from probably the early 1960s, considered one of the greatest Physicists of all time, developed the theory of Quantum electrodynamics. His awards in Physics include - Albert Einstein Award (1954), E. O. Lawrence Award (1962), Nobel Prize in Physics (1965), Foreign Member of the Royal Society (1965), Oersted Medal (1972), National Medal of Science (1979)
Thanks for sharing
Is this written up in a paper or book anywhere?
Yes there’s a book called “Elementary Particles and the laws of Physics” which has his lecture
"If it disagrees with the experiments it's wrong " a simple statement but is the core of science ❤️
Really Thought Provoking!!
It helps to follow along reading this: www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9D72E7C9045A9C0797DD952678F03C75/9781107590076c1_p1-60_CBO.pdf/the-reason-for-antiparticles.pdf
Amei
Government climate change scientists sorely need this lesson drilled into them.
Has anyone sent this to "Professor" (Lockdown) Ferguson, who's actually got a degree in Physics?
Degrees are irrelevant or did you not pay attention to what Feynman said.
Who?
I didn't understand any of it. Wonderful❤️
Happy birthday, very fine man
Pro ba bi li..... oh screw it!
I really thought this dude was dead before video lectures were a thing
i thought he was dead like 20-10 years ago idk why
Feynman
Basically I understand this as it's better to be ignorant than knowledgeable. If you don't ask why something happens first and just accept it for what it is then you nor anybody else will ever know how anything works and will just accept things for the way they are. Example being instead of asking why it is common practice to beat wifes in your culture you will just accept it for what it is.
Actually the blurriness on the overhead screen was caused by the students momentum in this course.
:-) Nice one.
If you want to see the maths: www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9D72E7C9045A9C0797DD952678F03C75/9781107590076c1_p1-60_CBO.pdf/reason_for_antiparticles.pdf
idk why ppl talks shit about feynman for this video. You have to see things in context. He could surely go into details of quantum field theory and explain everything from ground up but is that the purpose of this interview and did he have enough time? when he says its too complex to explain in terms of things that interviewer is more familiar with, he is very humble to admit that he doesnt understand the fundamentals enough to explain in daily terms, which is perfectly normal. the question about magnets is NOT simple. it is very deep and profound if you dig deeper and ask more "why" as Feynman explained in the beginning of the video.
I gotta get my degree so i can bother people on a podium w/ my ideas
we need to be doing with this with Covid-19...
The propaganda would fall apart like a house of cards.
Thanks to the scientific method, we came out the other side of this hell hole called covid 19.
@@benjamindover5676 Firstly, we're still in the hole. Secondly the scientific method has only been applied by scientists like Sr Malone and Dr McCullogh pointing out the data that shows how flawed the approach to Covid by govts is and how dangerous the vaccines are.
wow there are so many geniuses in these comments its amazing
Or to put it another way, as Lucille Feynman did, there are so many geniuses here in the comments, “God help us”!
WHY didn’t we hear back from the interviewer anymore? Because he was passed out. Jokes apart, in the world of BS, Feynman gives us happiness.
It sure would be nice if we could READ THE PROJECTOR IMAGE. :-( :-( :-(
Bro do make list in more organised way love you for being with plinthrophist we need more organised manner lectures Its just great work you are doing brother ..... Understand
Ken brought me here. Wtf was this explanation. Just say you don’t know. This was my college professors. To protect his ridiculous ego he tries to make the interviewer feel stupid.
Ken brought me here. Wtf was this explanation. Just say you don’t know. This was my college professors. To protect his ridiculous ego he tries to make the interviewer feel stupid.
Man this would be so much better if we could see the diagrams
There is a book version of this talk.
I always post this on the global warming pages
I assume you understand the difference between a controlled experiment and an uncontrolled experiment?
@@snuffeldjuret In climate science, one has to compare prediction to observation, and for the past 40 years, the numerous predictions have not been borne out by observation. Indeed, the IPCC do not predict things, but rather they project things, because they know that the many predictions have been shown to be wrong time and again.
@@richardverney6702 this is patently, absurdly false. One would only need to look through google scholar over the past 100 years to find papers upon papers upon papers of evidence for climate change, but I suppose that's hard work...
@@lindocalrissian0926 So why did the temperature go steadily down for the next 40 years after the 2nd WW while we were putting millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere? So much so that the climate prediction (in the 70's) was the coming ice age? And if CO2 is the so called control knob of climate why does no one ever offer a simple 1 way ANOVA that clearly rejects the Null Hypothesis? Sure that would go a long way to settling the matter.
@@snuffeldjuret I assume you understand the difference between if/then and if and only if?
Fuckin magnets?...your question is malformed
Some brains can fall into the category of elementary particles ......
I like how this video is in the category under "Comedy" :D yep, this guy would have made a great politician.
This is an invitation to see a theory on the nature of time! In this theory we have an emergent uncertain future continuously coming into existence relative to the spontaneous absorption and emission of photon energy. Within such a process the wave particle duality of light and matter in the form of electrons is forming a blank canvas that we can interact with forming the possible into the actual! The future is unfolding with each photon electron coupling or dipole moment relative to the atoms of the periodic table and the wavelength of the electromagnetic spectrum. As part of a universal process of energy exchange that forms the ever changing world of our everyday life the ‘past’ has gone forever. At the smallest scale of this process the ‘past’ is represented by anti-matter annihilation with the symmetry between matter and anti-matter representing the symmetry between the future and the past as the future unfolds photon by photon. In such a theory the mathematics of quantum mechanics represents the physics of ‘time’ with the classical physics of Newton representing processes over a period of time, as in Newton’s differential equations. In my videos I explain how this process is relative to temperature and the phase changes of matter.
Incoherent and fraudulent. A long sequence of contorted sentences that do not connect to each other. Not a single semantic frame is established. So this garbage is what passes for 'high science'. How embarrassing! 'One man's virtual particle is another man's virtual anti-particle.' X.Y.C.T. etcetera ad infinitum. Alphabeticus absurdum. For those who suspect there may be something fraudulent about the whole Einstein-relativity story....plenty of supporting evidence here.
Username checks out
It's your ignorance of the supporting facts that makes you see it as incoherent. Why you claim it as fraudulent I leave to your introspection.
up your hub
How the turning of hands of "clock "determine the amplitude?can someone please explain.
Have you found the answer to this question? Pls share🥺
He’s refusing to admit he doesn’t know because he’s operating from the ego mind, and the secrets of magnetism reveal many other liberating secrets of existence that was understood in Ancient Egypt or more accurately Kemet. Richard Feynman was a Royal Society shill assisting in the expansion of their new world order scientism agenda. Wake up! You’re being manipulated by men that smile and laugh as they do it.
Please show me your source for your absolutely insanely stupid conviction that ancient Egypt had better knowledge of magnetism.
'He's refusing to admit he doesn't know' in a fucking video where he's explaining why that's not a question that can be answered.
He literally answers the question at 5:00 minutes.
Can I have what you're having please?
Ken brought me here.
Imagine how Feynman would squirm if it was Ken asking the questions instead of that British guy.
Ken brought me here too. Ken's, explaination of his squirming in the chair. It's so funny. "It depends what you mean by" so Bill Clinton. Like depends what "is, is" Your Impeached!!!
The 'light cone' idea came from (Sir) Roger Penrose - also a brilliant physicist, and worth looking at his stuff.
I you want to see the notes, just search the videos title and download the pdf. It seems people have put together a book on the lecture and all the mathematical syntax used as well.
I found only a pdf from a questionable site that is flagged as such by uBlock Origin, one of my browser's plugins. You can buy a legitimate used paperback copy of the book for around $5, with shipping.
The book is called "elementary particles and laws of physics". Check on internet archive. Its available for free.
Utterly