- Видео 4
- Просмотров 271 896
Alan Foley
Добавлен 4 ноя 2013
B36 Maiden Flight P&DARCS October 13 2018
This nearly 6 mtr wingspan 65 Kg B36 'Peacemaker' was scratch built by Andrew Smallridge and Ivan Chiselett from a design by Kevin Chiselett and Andrew Smallridge. It has taken 5 years to build and underwent it's maiden flight October 13 2018 at P&DARCS club in Melbourne Australia. Test pilot was World Champion and club member David Law. On-going support and assistance by Paul Somerville.
The model is 1/12 scale (230inch wingspan) and has 6 electric motors and four 65mm EDF units.The B-36 manufactured by Convair is the largest mass-produced piston-engined aircraft ever built and was in operation 1949 - 1959.
The model is 1/12 scale (230inch wingspan) and has 6 electric motors and four 65mm EDF units.The B-36 manufactured by Convair is the largest mass-produced piston-engined aircraft ever built and was in operation 1949 - 1959.
Просмотров: 4 146
Видео
Hit and Miss Red Wing Engine
Просмотров 1 тыс.6 лет назад
Built by Rick Talman this is a 1/3 scale of a engine that was originally made in 1912 by the Red wing Motor Company of Minnesota. The kit comes as unmachined castings which have to be machined plus other parts and studs and nuts. It took Rick about 300 hours to complete. This is the first test and only requires a few adjustments before the next test.
B36 Test 2
Просмотров 33 тыс.7 лет назад
This is the second systems test of the B36. Engines, undercarriage and steering were tested under taxiing only.
B36 'Peacemaker' Tests
Просмотров 233 тыс.7 лет назад
This nearly 6 mtr wingspan B36 was scratch built by Andrew Smallridge and Ivan Chiselett and underwent it's first motor and systems tests at the P&DARCS field in Melbourne. The nose gear steering was a bit of an issue making straight taxiing difficult. The scratch built model is 1/12 scale (230inch wingspan) and has 6 electric motors and four 65mm EDF units. It is planned to have it flying for ...
No 1 got it's own life. Fix it before getting airborne.
the 2 jet engines that were added due to the total unreliability of the push configuration of the Pratt and Whitney engines
Very nice model. Too bad its an ev. Oh well
This sport needs a paved runway. You guys spend 1,000s on these gorgeous aircraft so why not have a paved runway.
We’re sorry your number cannot be connected as dialed. Please try again.
2827 was the last B-36 built. In 1959 it was retired and put on display at Greater Southwest Airport in Ft Worth. In the late 70s I was part of the crew that disassembled her to move across town to Carswell AFB, where she remained until the USAF transferred custodianship to the Pima Air Museum, where she is today.
Beautiful. Love those R/C Cold War Aircraft. Keep them flying. I'm retired USAF.
The B-36 was an expensive pork barrel project that was a joke from the start. Eisenhower warned us about The Military Industrial Complex and their greed and lack of moral values and look at what we have today. Best of luck to all of us!
All that and no flight that was a joke
So when are you going to make something big and complicated?
👎
SO GOOD OF THEM TO TAKE THE PLANE FOR A WALK!!!!!!!!!!!
Not very realistic. Electric's are not very realistic but admittedly they do have reliability as long as the batteries don't catch fire, of course!
SIX Turnin' and FOUR Burnin' ! Beautiful craftsmanship !
G'Day, my question is ,what has happened to this amazing aircraft? from Perth WA!
Größenwahnsinn,aber ne supergeile Kiste. Nach der Landung,hat der Pilot " Pipi " im Hoes'chen.Ne.Da bleibe ich bei meiner Taxi oder Charter.
No pressure on Mr Law!😳
wow I love my youtube recommended this is amazing lol 6 churning 4 burning! so cool
They named it Peacemaker because they said the plane gave the target no option
Six turning and four burning, lovely model
Here's a link to see if it B-36 fly ruclips.net/video/TXT_2ePtrB0/видео.html
What a very cool plane!
Cool model, seems pointless to have the outer engines functional.
Not really! It ads to the cool! 😎
Keep em Flying 👍
Wow. What a beautiful beast! Best looking bomber ever built. Does anyone know the specs for the motors and propellers?
Very nice first flight. Congratulations.
What's up with the edit right at touchdown? Aaarrggghhhh!
Amazing plane. Great to see it successfully fly... and safely land. Teamwork!
Any housewife would be happy with one of these things.
BAD ASS !!
Sounds like a damned air raid siren😂👌🎯🔥
Nice. Would have been more impressive if it was gas powered and jets worked... So I could say: 6 turning & 4 burning😎✈️
Great engine,did you machine and build it yourself?
That's scary wearing that glove next to those moving parts....you would destroy those cam gears and shafts if they grab ahold of it. Nice engine, thanks for posting, I'd like to see more of this running. Good day from the US.
Such a magnificent machine. Thanks for building that !
That was to too cool
Looks like the left side engine suit is producing more thrust making crab on the ground?
Pretty much a wasted effort. Electric motors? Really?
Spoiler alert: The plane does not take off in this video.
That is fantastic thank you for your effort and the video fly on
That is bloody unreal
"Six turning and four humming" ? Always my favorite and that's not just because my Uncle was a chief master sergeant in the U.S. Air Force for 31 years and retired in 1972. During his Air Force career, he flew in the B-29, B-36 and B-52 as a tail gunner. 🇺🇲
I grew up about 50 miles north of Carswell AFB (Ft. Worth, TX) & as a wee lad, marveled at these giants flying over on a regular basis. The sound was thunderous & the sight awe-inspiring. One of my favorite planes of all time. Beautiful rendition, mates! Good on ya!
My uncle was a Chief Master Sargent in U.S. Air Force for 31 years and retired in 1972. During his Air Force career, he flew in the B-29, B-36 and B-52 as a tail gunner out of Fort Worth/Carswell AFB.
OH WOW! Mine is also based on 22827! ruclips.net/video/5d6GESCbs80/видео.html
That's pretty cool. The only improvement would be smoke-belching gasoline powered radial engines.
The ones that caught fire all the time.
@@rogersmith7396 It could drop nearly the full weight of two armed and loaded, fully fueled complete B-17s out of its bomb bay. It could fly a mile higher than an ME-109. It was designed to fly from Canada to Berlin and back on a bombing run. (In case the Battle of Britain went badly.) And Dad saw it on the drawing board at Consolidated Aircraft in 1941, before the U.S. entered the war, when it was still a secret project. But yeah, it had some technical issues. 🙂 For example, it originally had huge tires for wheels before they invented the multi-wheel trucks for the landing gear. And the jets were to get it rolling fast enough on the ground to take off in a decent distance and climb in a decent amount of time. They were shut down in flight. And adding them had to wait until jets were, like, invented, during the war.
@@ThatBoomerDude56 SAC Omaha has the original landing gear. The tires are 8 to 10 feet tall. They also have a Goblin, said to fly pretty well. A 36 carried a nuclear reactor, dropped an A bomb on Albequerque, could fly far higher than a MiG 15, could stay up 36 hours. The prototype did'nt have the dog house on top it looked like a B 29. The plane is jammed full of tube type ECM. A crewman could get into the wings to inspect the engines. They had remote operated turrets which were later removed to increase altitude. No arial refueling. 10,000 mile range. Deicers in the propellers.
@@rogersmith7396 That's cool. (Well, except for the Albuquerque incident. I hadn't heard about that one.) Dad said a person could not only get into the wings, but could stand up inside. (He was only 5'8". I'm not sure how high the space was.) And he said that part of its ECM was a chaff dispenser in the back of the plane connected to 3 rolls of aluminum foil each 3' in diameter that made the thing look like a solid wall across the sky on radar. (I found a picture of the chaff dispenser slot once, but can't find it now.) He told me about the B-36N (nuclear) experiment when I was a kid. That sounds to me like a really dumb idea now. But I hadn't realized until recently that the GE engine for it actually proceeded to ground-test before Kennedy killed the project.
@@ThatBoomerDude56 The problem was with a crew safe nuclear reactor there was no weight for bombs. It was called the hole in the head bomber. Never heard how it was supposed to work but I assume steam turbines would turn the props and the reactor would make steam. There is a crewman interview at Castle AFB/museum which settles a lot of the planes controversy. It could fly at 63000 feet and often went over the USSR. They would sleep when over the USSR it was invulnerable. Also he laughs at going into the wings to oil the engines. He says they take hundreds of gallons of oil and their is no way a guy could get that to them.
What batteries were used for this? That thing is a beast for an all-electric plane.
All of them😂
LOL Wow... Even a *model* of the plane is NOISY!!! Beautiful job and quite ambitious... I wouldn't tuck the gear on that thing. Just keep them extended and be happy!
Did you fly it on a 72Mhz radio?
72Mhz was never legal in Australia. We had to use 36Mhz and some still do. Now that just about everyone has jumped across to 2.4Ghz, it means the previously mandated narrow band frequencies are clear and clean.
Interesting I didn’t know that. Thanks for the responses.
@@harrowtiger id just stick with .19 four stroke lol
Wow. Do you mind if I share on RC Groups with a bunch of B-17 fans?
Hey people. No one subscribe nooooo one. Fuck this video