Видео

Great video 🎉

Reading plutarch's lives rn ❤

How is HBO rome? I think the lesbian and incest scenes were unneeded but i love seeing the historical characters. I also have come to like titus pullo

great video!

great vid!

acting lacks, few good actors but the rest lack experience or maybe they just suck at acting. They either over act to certain situations. many times I wanted to skip the dialog. the fighting scenes are are okay not great but I seen worse. all the actors are too clean. their all clean cut n came out of a shower. it doesn't have that raw feel of being or looking realistic. even the slaves I the show look so clean even their clothes all look so new regardless of social class etc I'm trying to enjoy it just n give it a chance but it needs a lot of work for season 2 I'm hoping it's way better. if not, it won't make season 3

I feel like a junkie who needed his fix, but was humiliated by the dealer. Please just give me my Rome show, man

Where part two

Wish Caesar was my dad

Love how my comments are blocked for no reason on every subject on every channel.... Its election season

It's interesting. If Jesus was God in human form (but actually God's son, but that's technically God?), he walked the earth almost the same time as Caesar.. We know so little about God's time on earth, a handful of stories of him mixing his spit with dirt and rubbing it on people's eyes, or a vague telling of how he inexplicably managed to get enough bread and fish to feed a bunch of people, like people just kept reaching into the basket and each time they grabbed a loaf another one appeared? Or.... And then telling a few parables, then being crucified. But we know so much about Julius Caesars life. And even about other less famous roman senators from the time. It's just that you'd really think if God, who created everything - matter, the laws in which matter behaves, time, everything - decided to live as a human, eat, poop, pee, stub his toe, you'd really think we would have heard more about this person than we have. How is it we know more, much more, about other random historical figures who nobody claims was god, yet people found it worth keeping records of.

LONG ESSAY COMMENT: TL;DR - CAESAR IS A JERK You said you didn't mind dissenting voices in the comments, so I'm here. I'd like to focus in mostly on the whole Celtic genocide thing, as that is what I consider myself particularly knowledgeable on and is the most deplorable of Julius Caesar's actions. I'd like to start off by saying that when comparing past people to modern cultural understanding, there is room for some unfair judgement. However, across culture itself there is a deep reverence for life which may be forsaken due to cultural or political conflict resulting in mass violence against a targeted demographic and this is always bad. You'd be hard-pressed finding a German today who supports the Holocaust, the same way you'd find it hard to find a Japanese person who supported Nanking, and the same way even when Caesar was still alive we see senators calling for the trial of Julius Caesar while he was in Gaul due to war crimes thousands of years before the modern definition of a war crime. If even in the day of Julius Caesar, his actions were seen as reprehensible by some of the greatest minds in Rome, then it makes no sense to argue that the Gallic War is taken out of context or is unfairly portrayed by modern academia. There was a political, cultural and strategic reason for Julius Caesar's genocide and enslavement of Gallic people which I shall discuss, and these reasons led to perhaps the greatest mass slaughter between the Indo-European migrations and the Mongol conquests of Eurasia, that is, completely unreasonable by both ancient and modern moral principles. 1. Political: This is the main reason for the subjugation of Gaul. Gallic tribes had raided the Romans for centuries, as raids were part of Celtic and Germanic culture for thousands of years at this point. Roman culture saw this as barbaric and had a great cause for initial war, and Julius Caesar leapt on this opportunity to expand his political influence. The Gauls went to war with the Romans expecting it to be war akin to what they were used to, but were completely caught by surprise when the Romans didn't leave once they had surrendered. Vercingetorix would not have surrendered, at least in my opinion, if he knew Caesar's true intentions of subjugation and integration into the Roman Republic. We have seen countless times how the cursus honorum (the political ladder of ancient Rome) appears more like a highway to military leaders who lead successful military campaigns. By eradicating the Gallic threat which had been an existential threat for hundreds of years, Julius Caesar gained mass popularity in Rome which he later used to install himself as dictator imperpetuo (dictator for life). 2. Cultural: The Celts had been an existential threat to Rome for hundreds of years as mentioned above. This deeply ingrained fear of the Celts stems from the sack of Rome by Brennus in the fourth century BC, where a Celtic horde led by this chieftain had managed to defeat and sack Rome, as was part of the Gallic culture, as brutish and "barbaric" as it was. This fear of the massive, uncharted forests of central and northern Europe gave Caesar a lot of backing for his war, which the Romans saw as unfinished business. Roman society was deeply intolerant and saw itself as superior to others, and by slaughtering and neutralizing the Gauls in what we might now call a genocide Caesar gained even more popularity by essentially proving the Roman cultural superiority over the Celts. 3. Strategic: By inflicting mass murder on the Gauls, the morale of the Celts diminished, making what looked like a Roman equivalent of Vietnam turn into a total Roman victory. Vercingetorix and Ariovistus had both attempted to cut Caesar's supply chains to starve his army and had used skirmishing tactics, but the Gauls had little reason to continue fighting to protect themselves when each time Caesar would inflict reprisal in the form of mass slavery and execution, like his 'failure' to stop the annihilation of Avaricum by his own troops after a lengthy siege, or how he poisoned the water supply of Uxellodunum, which had resisted Caesar even after most of the Gauls had surrendered. In truth, none of this is necessary. The Celtic populations of France are long gone, and their genetic heritage is mixed in with much Germanic and Latin blood in the modern Frenchman's DNA. It's not like these Celts simply got up and moved, and it is obvious that violence caused the downfall of Celtic ancestry in France. Caesar wrote in his biography that he had killed one third of all Gauls and enslaved another third. While these are probably exaggerated to fit his political narrative to gain more dignitas/clout in Rome, it shows how his hunger for political gain led to his intent of mass slaughter in what could be called a genocide by modern standards. Only a genocidal mindset could brag about something so inhumane. I'd also like to end this by finding it unfair and academically unhonest to say that Caesar's only slaughter of the Celts occurred when the Celts had betrayed him. At the beginning of the wars there were many Celtic allies fighting for Rome, but these tribes turned against Caesar once they saw the utter ruin he had wrought even on peaceful tribes of Gaul. And who could in their right minds blame them for betraying Rome at that point? In all, Caesar had the intent and means of mass slaughter and bragged openly about it, and even if these events are heavily exaggerated, they are the reasons why Caesar should probably not be celebrated, aside from all the dictator overthrowing stuff. But I don't want to waste my time writing another essay!

5:47 So you don't think that killing 30,000 people in what is basically a concentration camp to make room for other people to live in their place is not a genocide. wow

Yet another whiny rant with a right wing slant.

That drain the swamp and genocide remarks let on about who you support. The studies are always correct. The right prefers authoritarianism

He was a MAN OF HIS TIME, but people really need to learn about t him rather then to emulate him,

Good memes. Nowadays i vote down every video without memes.

Why is there a guy banging a black woman in a tree on the left of Minecraft Rome?

Woa.... I thought I was the only one who thought Dan Carlins Celtic Holocaust was of dubious quality.

Based.

So Julius Caesar was just the Donald Trump of Rome

4th one is his name. Its not Jewlius Seizer, its Jiulius Kaisr

Just watched ep 2 hbo rome

They complain so much sbout caesar but nobody talks about the genocide of the greeks in anatolia by the turks

All hail Divus Julius!

What dp you think of the caligula movie? I can email you my personal cut without the X rating

Ridley scott making banger after banger. I want to watch this a morbillion times

How is it woke?

No need to see it, the whole unnecessary and derivative film was shown in the far-too-long, over-blown (and REALLY desperate) trailer.

Put a chick in it and make her gay!

I absolutely hate this time period we're in. I only hope it goes down as the lowest point for human history possible.

Listening to you massacre Roman history I can't help but realize three things. 1st you're American. 2nd you're rewriting history worse than any movie. 3rd you have no concept of actual history. Rome was never unified. Never not once in it's entire history going back to Romulus and Remus who were brothers until Romulus killed Remus to take Rome for himself. Never was Rome united not before Caesar and not after Caesar... and as for the joke of "Law and order"... well that's best expressed through Roman governing principle of "Divide et Impera." Roman Patrician Common law which rules to this day is best described as "unequal justice. You could only exile a Caesar but you can crucify everyone else. This natural injustice system still is creating injustice and tyranny to this day... But before you think I hate Rome.. I don't... I just don't pretend that it was anything other than what it was.

Love it. The fact that more movies like this will piss you off to your cold pathetic heart (wow, thats lyrically Roman rap for you) is so satisfying. Post more crap, homie.

lol @ racists caring about details when raceswapping happens in fantasy movies. 🤡🤡🤡🤡

…and the first Gladiator was a model example for historical accuracy 🤡

About Lucius in Numidia, would it make more sense if he was sent off to Caledonia instead, and was captured there?

In Gladiator III, the Gladiator will certainly be a woman.

No creativity or imagination. Nothing to offer, nothing to want. Movies have run out. They're done.

Pocket Sand!

Good video!

Funny considering that Prostitution was considered sacred by the Romans. Even seen as a form of worship or divine marriage. Nuns that actually had fun instead of repressing themselves under habbits.

Brilliant

False: Roman cities were actually painted with rainbow flags representing the different types of barbarians you could own.

Crazy how those People ain't gon do nothing about real life pdf filia and grooming but gon talk about anime that has nothing to do with real life😂😂 but hey psst ... they see dead peoples😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Wtf is that Thumbnail, shame on u

Thank you

I am very interested in Julius Caesar and the late republic, thank you very much

Thank you

What a well spoken leader

LETS goooo