Видео

You’re all over thinking it. Time simply does not exist.

Supposed internal contradictions.

He was the worst philosopher. No new ideas. The dialetic is hegels, alienation was also hegels. His economics was dead wrong basing it completely off of the labor theory of value, which had been utterly debunked. He sucked. Didn't know anything about human nature. The proletariat don't sacrifice it all for revolution, they go on strike and back to work with marginal gains over time. Marx didn't understand much at all and no new original thought that ended up being anywhere near the truth.

It´s not true that his sister falsified his teachings. His teachings already had been proto-nationalsocialistic. He wrote about smelly Polish Jews, blond aryan conqueror races and the extermination of millions of "malformed" - in his lifetime, in scriptures that are undoubtedly by him. He also glorified war and wrote that women are there for pregnancy and in order to give there man recovery from war.

ruclips.net/video/sGG6leJtzHc/видео.htmlsi=YY2dfu42PWJ1pyxI

Time is an illusion.

Camus proved his point dying in an alcohol fed vehicle.....life is meaningless.....however Mother Teresa died having strived to help those dying....proving life has meaning.....which is quite an admission from a man who tortured nuns so much i was banned from every Catholic school in the state.....

Thank You for this!!

The greatest loser whose idiobables are considered something..

Everyone sees what you appear to be, few experience what you really are." - Niccolò Machiavelli. Excellent video! You captured the complexity of Machiavelli's ideas perfectly.

Time can be explained as a process of energy exchange formed by photon electron interactions. We have photon ∆E=hf electron couplings continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons as an uncertainty ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future comes into existence. All it takes for this to be logical is for the spontaneous absorption and emission of light waves to precedes absolutely everything that happens in our three-dimensional world.

Western style capitalism? - post-war Keynesianism.

Albert Camus was a cool dude. Very few men in history can figure things out like that.

guess he was wrong.

The mispronunciation of Wagner is the downside of synthetic voices.

Wouw you need more attention if you keep going

As a camuiest, I would say I'm impressed you went through well precised details about the absurdity philosopher. Best of luck with this remarkable channel 🤝🏼🙏🏼

humans are pattern recognizing machines! I don't need "faith" that the working class will eventually recognize the right patterns! I have EVIDENCE! :D

Nice.

jewww

Wouldn't it be funny if I, who smoke weed all day and unmotivated made the same amount of money as.... someone who is mad driven like Andrew Tate through universal basic incomes? Communism is a fantasy bull shit

The images are p good and so is the video essay. Thanks. ❤ This is good for anyone getting introduced to the domain of radical political philosophy.

Hi! I enjoy listening your videos while sleeping. One comment though, feels like there is something that could be adjusted with your mic. The voice is not clear but blurry, sounds like an AI talking. Best regards

In my opinion, time is the creative activity of God.

Please cut the incessant music.

A philosophy of history is incomplete without a consideration of the philosophy of time.

Eternal Return is great idea -- To be become Free spirit in Modern time ...we must know the secret of our time

Once again the not only is the background Music totally unnecessary...it is way too loud...

Great video

Very nice channel!

i’m very much surprised that this video is not as popular as it thought. great job in explaining such topics!

Hey unmask Aldous Huxley

Try Infinity Squared. T.E.N. The Eternal Now 010 dimensions

That was really well done, thank you.

How can you comprehend any fundamental concept, when a fundamental concept is itself the means by which you comprehend ?

Things definitely change, just not so fast that we can’t understand the thing and its changing.

Thanks for this overview. The reliability of God is what caused Abraham to leap, not merely blindly, but faithfully at God's seemingly absurd command to sacrifice his son. No less, Christ and the new testament writers provide absurd and paradoxical opportunities to leap toward the life, not death, found only in God. Then we find that we tread upon ice that is thick, not thin.

The statement 'a man steps in the same river twice' is only meaningful if there is a man and a river. But a man by definition is something that lives beyond a single moment, and a river by definition is something that flows constantly. So, once you take-away the passing of time, you take-away the meaningfulness of the statement. It is not false, it is just meaningless. In order for it to be true or false, it would have to first be meaningful. If there is a man, and if there is a river, then it becomes a real possibility that he might or might not step into the same river twice. He might step into the river once, and step into it again, thus making the statement true; or, he might only step into the river once, withdraw his foot, and never step into it again, in which case the statement would be false. But to say a man cannot step into the same river twice because neither one endures is nonsense, for stepping itself is something that requires time, as does the existence of the man and the river. Take-away the passing of time, and you take-away the context in which the statement is meaningful. This kind of word-play belongs in Wonderland with the White Rabbit and the Mad Hatter, and it is mere sophistry to take Heraclitus literally. Of course, it can be maintained that Heraclitus is just using a metaphor here. Now, strangely, his point seems to be akin to that of Parmenides and Zeno -- who are supposed to be his polar opposites. Time, motion and change are not real for Parmenides and Zeno because Being simply exists and it is the only thing that exists, thus there is nothing else for it to become, or to change into, (and, as they would have it), time itself must be illusion, for time is simply a kind of change, but change is, (as we have seen in their theory) impossible. Now, Heraclitus, in contrast, is supposed to believe that change is the only reality, and Being (or permanence) is only an illusion. But, as the first paragraph above demonstrates, without endurance (meaning existence over a period of time), there is nothing in existence in the first place that can possibly change. In other words, Heraclitus' notion of 'pure change' is absurd ! No less absurd is Parmenides and Zeno's idea of 'absolute permanence'. 'Permanence' itself is only meaningful in the context of the passing of time. So, both positions turn-out to be a denial of time, motion, real change, and real permanence, and even real existence in any form whatsoever. Which is to say, they are both utter nonsense !

Wonderfull video, thank you for such a nice work. Good luck in your life dear editor of this video and viewers also

Thanks. For me all that is a kind of new material being not undergone such studies having complexities in UNDERSTANDING as well. To a simpler note that was the era when someone started thinking beyond a routine conditioned MIND to begin something new or original and later became relativistic textures becoming debatable and still growing further. Plato is well known name and the beautiful pictures plates around and PLATO has some nomenclatured similarities of simpler nature perhaps and thanks.

I think about gravity a lot.

This is probably the best non-biased and straight forward overview of Nietzsche's life I've ever seen. Thank you!

Remarkable presentation. Best of luck for your channel.

"There is nothing permanent except change" -Heraclitus

Here before this channel blows up

Thank you for putting this together for the world. I really enjoy Nietzsche

Bro your so underrated 😢

Good and informative

Time is the awareness, feeling and measure of motion, of things that are before and after. Thanks Aristotle!

Thanks for the vid! Do u narrate these or is this AI?