Видео

This shock can also be given my seeing what is happening as intensely as possible and consciously & deliberately deciding not to change it, or even to magnify it...

My goal was to make the concept of identification and non-identification more understandable. Thank you for your feedback!

@@Healthedsamurai Well, I have to say, you did an excellent job of it. And others I have shared the video with also agree. I look forward to watching more of your productions. God speed, my friend. 💫❤

If I recall, although a name was mentioned, no criticism nor praise was ascribed to that person. That figure has many passionate followers, and the intent was to thereby indirectly characterize the particular supporter mentioned in the video as having a lot of intensity and energy that was about to be brought to bear in an impending unwanted conversation. Regrets if you were offended.

hey m8 as u must know, all protein is composed of the the combination of the same aminoacids. same aminoacids. different protein. same aminoacids. thousands of different combinations that make up proteins so different that their function in the human body changes drastically, not to mention that different food have different protein. if u have studied biochemistry u must know that, right? the problem is not in aminoacids. somehow i think you havent watched the whole vid. of course protein is essential, it just happens that different protein has different effects in our body, what a thing. imagine if all protein was the same. we either would be all enzymes, or all hormones, or we wouldnt even exist because we would be all made up entirely of collagen and we'd be as good as a fucking tree. if you have really studied a career of that nature, you should have learned to think differently. rn u come off to me as a highschooler whos just learned that in chem class lol

+Izuru Kamukura Agree, plant and animal proteins are different. But, us humans are carnivors as well, right? For hundreds of thousands of year our digestive system has evolutionized in this way. Why should all the sudden now it's going into the wrong direction? We should look at things like meat processing, the diet of the animal, etc. Thats why "animal bad, plant good'' is a total myth. Too many questions about his studies and only few answers. P.S.: writing with small ''u'' is disrespect.

+Ross Hor yeah i dont think as humans as "herbivorous" either, if an animal can, and does eat meat (as well as plant foods) it should b considered omnivorous (just like pandas, even tho they cant digest plants too well). but you cant base your defense, just in case youre defending animal products, on "we've been doing this since the beginning of time and survived as a species" because the health problems animal products consumption may cause come usually after reproductive age. if you die of a heart attack but you already had two kids, for example, the species is going to continue existing. whether we can or not digest & even metabolize something means that we can "eat" it, but that doesnt mean it is necessarily good and viceversa; for example, the fiber from plant foods is "good" for us, but we can not digest it. the thing with studies is that (if they are well executed & the funding sources are clear of interests) they /prove/ things. if multiple well executed and revised studies show that animal protein is carcinogenic, one should start worrying about the food they put in their belly. not to mention the amount of saturated fat, trans fat and cholesterol animal products have, but the health handicaps that derive from these are more obvious. the thing is, there is probably an amount of animal products one can consume without risking their health too much (for example, max 10% of kcals daily in case of animal protein as this video shows). i think its necessary to determine exactly the risks consuming an amount of animal products creates, and informing the general public, who doesnt even truly know how badly their diet is affecting their health. by the way, i didnt mean to offent you at all. i use "u" on the internet bc its faster, no bad intentions at all, sorry.

+Izuru Kamukura NP. 40% diseases come from bad diet, I do agree. I'm focused on the study and not the diet. The message is that this study has a lot of controversions and no solid base.

+Ross Hor even so, multiple studies by different researches have been made, all of them coming to the same conclusion. i wouldnt base my opinion on a single study alone, the benefits of a plant based diet have been documented in studies from the first decades of the previous century

Are you not aware of the lifestyle diseases in our country? There is no mystery as to why we are sick and dying. You are in denial, sir. We need to change how we eat. We trusted the wrong people.

+Nancy KanodeIf his work is of such great importance, why don't he got Nobel prize by now? I've met scientists like him. All what they are interested in is money and fame

+Ross Hor Obama got a Nobel prize for Peace. That whole Nobel Prize thing is worthless

An Obama hater? This is precisely why other countries think we are nuts. Why not reward great thinkers and those who contribute to humanity? Have you read The China Study? Don't judge unless you are sure.

+Samantha Reynolds Yes, unfortunetly it is :(

+Biswajit Rajaguru there you go, now we can cure cancer with yoga. Brilliant!

Deserves a second listen. to download free @ tinyurl . com \ q82rfet . remove spaces.

+Biswajit Rajaguru yoga is optional but food is not.

His book is a sham. Look up Denise Minger and her critique of the book. You will find how Campbell seems to have forgotten previous papers he has published that have actually been peer reviewed that claim the opposite of some of his own claims in the book. What a farce!

Glenn Carr It is quite clear to all that about the only community interested in the kind of thing Minger is attempting to demonstrate would be the pro-beef Weston Price Foundation and the meat industry. She cancels post on her bolg that explain how to make accurate analisis of metadata. By the way Colin Campbell knows this job very well! She is for raw meat diet! As a vet I can assure you we are not designed for eating animal food and I will not get into the detail because it would take many pages. We have taste buds that do not contemplate aminoacids...our stomach ph is tremendously lacking if compared with true carnivors. Our intestines are long and need time for digestion (12 mt average). A carnivor's intestine is hardly twice the size of the animal and after few hours they expel all the toxic debris of their meals. We need fiber. Carnivors don't. Now how do you figure it out? Be careful before criticizing. You never know who is in front of you and I have lots of animal research behind and what I am telling you is not an opinion. It's facts. Go on eating your meat but don't blame who is on the right side of truth. Ciao...

Glenn Carr If I were you and believed in transparent dialectic confrontation I'd go here and read Colin Campbell's answer to Denise Minger. A question. But how can a 23 year old non scientist think she can possibly shatter the knowledge of men like Campbell just criticizing some data badly misinterpreted? It took me 40 years of hard study and I just feel nobody in front of researchers like Campbell, McDougall, Fuhrman, Esselstyn, Gerson, Budwig, ect... If I were Minger I'd just step aside and start thinking it differently than just satisfying her personal ego and lifestyle choices others than what important studies have demonstrated to be better choices for health... Think! www.vegsource.com/news/2010/07/china-study-author-colin-campbell-slaps-down-critic-denise-minger.html

Lorenzo Catalano I will take the time to look at Campbell's response later when I finish work. In the meantime, can you explain why you have claimed intestine length to be proof of our supposed requirement to eat a plant only diet in light of the fact that our intestine lengths are very different to natures true herbivores? Did you actually look at Minger's side of the story too (the clip I previously linked to with the time location)? If so, can you explain why Campbell claimed not to know of any issues about wheat when a previous paper HE WROTE clearly demonstrates he was perfectly aware of such issues?!! The wishy washy argument that we can discredit the likes of Minger because she is young is a typical response I hear yet as I have previously stated, Minger is actually out there giving advice to vegans on how to remain healthy on a vegan diet rather than trying to convert individuals en masse! Have you looked at her critique or even John Masterjohns? He also 'slapped down' Masterjohn for being young and inexperienced. Later he 'slapped down' the more mature Dr Mercola for following John Masterjohn's critique (supporting it) as he couldn't argue it was due to inexperience! Campbell's anomalies throw serious doubt on his publication and the wheat issue is by far not the only obvious example of where Campbell has contradicted himself. I don't see anybody telling me that Campbell found animal protein to be cancer causing for any other reason than his research into rats (biologically different to humans) when administered aflatoxin at levels that would be impossible through diet alone. Where is this evidence my astute friend? If this research should be considered proof of the cancer causing properties of meat then kindly explain to me why? I'm no great doctor but I do have a decent level of scientific knowledge and enough resource to decide that the arguments Campbell makes while contradicting himself in other research papers of his own writing are at best worthy of questioning and more likely the result of a desire for his beliefs to be right. There is simply no decent science backing Campbell's notions. The book is not peer reviewed and many scientists have poured scorn over it's badly drawn conclusions in many many areas. Trust it if you will, it is your right but if you want me to buy into it then do answer the very fair questions I have raised and do take a look at Minger's critique with an open mind. I suspect to date you haven't. When I return home later I will check out the link you have provided too. I would be a hypocrite not to as an open mind should ALWAYS be adopted.

Glenn Carr The wheat issue seen by Minger is misleading. Populations with poor diets in terms of fresh fruits and vegetables, having only some flour and meat in order to sustain life during cold periods are obviously suffering disease. It's about a lack of nutrients and it is well demonstarted that the cause of their heart disease is excess meat in the diet and not wheat that alone can give other ailments. It's just the fact these populations have very poor diets and we need good diets to live. No living creature could thrive without the right nutrients. Plants die when the soil is depleted. We die if we don't eat right. Simple hey? Eskimos have bad disease for a very poor nutrient diet even if many say they don't have chronic degenerative disease. False! The equation is simple. If we don't get a healthy and correctly oriented nutrient diet we get sick or die. Try if you don't believe it...Getting back to the intestines...We are NOT meant to eat animal food as I explained. If we do and in small quantities we might not get badly ill but we will not thrive with good health. And I know this from clinical experience! Our intestine is proportional to our height. Herbivors have long intestines but we are just behind them...we are very similar to monogastical herbivors (horses, giraffes, zebras) and are strictly related to primates, gorillas especially. Gorillas only eat fruits and vegetables, mostly fruit, figs mostly. They know hundreds of types of vegetables and they cure themselves changing diet when needed. They know how to eat at a cellular level of need. We don't! We lost the lesson and that is very bad. Gorillas have duplicated genes for starches in their DNA and have taste buds in their tongue for starch. We have 6 duplicated genes for starch (quite a backup hey?) and our tastebuds for starch far exceed the gorillas... We have no tastebuds for aminoacids in our mouth and digestion MUST start in the mouth. Cats or any carnivor has practically only aminoacid tastebuds in their mouth and their pH in the stomach is really very acidic. Ours is relatively acidic. We digest starches easily. We do not digest animal protein if not with very high expense in the process and the necrotic debris that carnivors excrete very quickly takes up to 3 days for us to get out of the body damaging our microbiome and getting bad inflamation throughout the intestine. Ever heard of leaky gut and what happens to the body after it happens...celiac disease, autoimmune disease, lupus, reumathoid arthritis, chronic arthritis? It's all due to animal protein intake because we are absolutely starch eaters. Our DNA is 99% equal to that of gorillas! Our protein comes from vegetables...greens have the highest protein in nature. Where do elephants get their protein? From grass! A human baby needs 2,6 % of protein and it takes it from mothers milk that has 2,6% protein. A potato that is not so proteic has 2,4% of protein and it is enough for our needs plus it has all the good calories, minerals we need. Meat is dead food for us...some protein, no fiber, no vitamins, no minerals, too many omega 6 (remember the leaky gut? Inflamation?) too little omega 3 ... and so on... doesn't all this evidence convince you. Everybody has the right to decide for his own self and choose his or her own lifestyle. I am not here to convince anyone. I am just sharing many years of study, practice and selfcriticism. I was a meat eater because I did not know and nobody told me. I studied, I got answers, I went back to whom we were as primitive men 100.000 years ago and asked... I got to know anthropologists and historians and slowly that huge mixed up puzzle became a very clear picture to me and as a vet I went into the biology and now I know. We are not designed to eat animal food. Period. And whatever people say just to sustain a theory because they want to be conforted in their personal choices well...it's up to them. I just do not care any further... I can share all my knowledge but I can't convince. It's not my job... Ciao.

rjhrai It has no taste at all

Without the cooking and seasoning , how does meat tastes like?

There is anecdotal evidence to support both sides. I know of people who ate pork and lard by the pound and liven well into their 90s. It seems to me that a sensible diet is to improve the nutritional quality of it, and that does not have to mean excluding healthy animal products. Of course everyone is different. Vegans are that way for moral reasons, but then try to also justify their diet by claiming that only plant foods are healthy. To this is ideology and not an open mind.

I agree.

Ya I know what you mean but I think diet does play a huge role in limiting the damages of those toxins. Toxins use up nutrients like cholesterol, fatty acids, amino acids and to prevent their introduction from foods into the blood stream it is important to have a strong gut flora to keep the gut sealed and prevent toxins from getting into the blood. For someone to get antibiotics and be exposed to toxic metals I'm almost sure they would absorb much more. Its called SIBO and gut dysbiosis. Sneaky health problems out there or should I say susceptibility to disease. I don't think vegetarian and meat eater are good enough terms to describe the range of diets. vegetarian on whole foods and that eats lots of eggs, probiotic foods, coconut oil and some fish would have a much better chance. and the meat eater who eats non antibiotic or hormone meat that is grassfed and including organ meats, fatty fish and fresh vegetables would be much better off then a meat eater who likes lean steak, burgers and of coarse the fries that come with the burgers (that's fried in vegetable oils and refined salt(toxic salt))

He isn't simply using logic. He's using research first and foremost. Comparing the pretty much the same gene pool under different circumstances.

Naomi Mordi Collin T Campbells research is not conclusive and very biased. I think his research is only to drive one point and he discards anything that contradicts his point. Most people don't know but Dr. Collin T Campbell himself eats fish. That's because he as a researcher knows the enormous benefits of DHA and vitamin D from fish how it is great for heart health brain health among other things. He is excluding the loads of research that many animal foods are good because he just wants to drive a message, eat vegan but he doesn't even eat vegan himself. The diseases he attributes to animal foods just can't be caused by animal foods when they are new diseases and animal foods are old foods. If he was based on research then why do many drs tell vegans if you don't eat meat or animal foods you got 6 months to live because your liver is going to shut down. That's the reality that's what happens to many people here in Vancouver at least. They go vegan and they have liver problems they lose their gall bladder, they get ezema or psoriasis, digestive problems ect... There is a reason why only few people mainly in warm climates can stay on a vegan or raw vegan diet. I know there are problems out there with food and in general our relationship with nature and this earth. I really believe we can fix it but to demonize animal foods or animals (we are animals) who eat animals for nutrients is just wrong and to change that is destructive because your changing nature and how a species digestive system is designed. We are omnivores

Thanks for sharing your views clearly. Wasn't sure at first you gave his a shot.

Naomi Mordi Np I love discussing diet! I just came back from my new nutritionist, I am really happy with her, teaches me a lot of new stuff and we get pretty in depth about diet and health topics.

Confirmation bias. Good job.

RIGHT!

Perhaps I misunderstood but I think he was ridiculed and his funding was cut because of the result of his research... What would happen to the market if it was indeed a fact, confirmed, proved, made public, that animal protein causes cancer? (big sarcastic hahaha here)

Come on man. So u think the goverment know the truth and try to hide it from us? U think they would choose profit above the citizens well being? Shut up. The goverment cares about us and it has always been like this since the begining until now. U better wake up and stop talking shit about the goverment. Shame on you.

***** yes yes i was being sarcastic :D hahaha no big deal. hopefully people take care of themselves by finding the truth , instead of accepting whatever they said and whatever food they throw at us. cheers.

Well there work is good in some ways but it is not all together a new idea that diet can reverse disease in fact the leading cause of disease is the diet that most of us eat now. Before there was plague, infections, lack of sanitation that is what killed people, so their bodies were resistant to disease. I just don't like how Collin T Powell talks so bad about meat it is not true and his science is deliberately misleading, like the guy himself admit to eating fish despite his studies on animal protein being of no use and always causing damage. Sure if you eat a diet of vegetables you will shake of diseases but you will eventually deplete your stores of fats and other nutrients like vitamin A and D and be in a lot of trouble specially if your thinking about having children soon because children need a lot of those nutrients and even when breast feeding, most of the nutrients in breast milk are not found outside of the animal kingdom. The person who first should get the prizes is Dr. Weston A Price. His dental research really saved my life and his diet is what is reversing my health problems. Tests have been coming back normal and my drs are puzzled they don't like me because I am surpassing their healing abilities with just prescription drugs and my information is beyond their dogma. They keep telling me you can't do it, live with this the rest of your life, you can just take this pill ect... I say Silence! I will find a way and sure enough I'm finding my way, I am on the path of HEALING!

+Marcello thank God the Nobel prize is awarded by scientist that will never give one to campbell. He put on a nice show, but his work is just way below a scientist level. Especially after the aflatoxin experiments.

They will never get a noble prize. There is a reason for this.