Видео

I'm going to see if I can buy some land and build a track in my city I have to find out from a lawyer , if the state even allows it, if not I know what a ride you can always ride on the railroad tracks

I know nobody's going to stop, it's just going to cause them to get in accidents, why doesn't someone invest and buy some land and build a track is enough of you people out there that have money like a place that builds the bikes wake up do you want to lose your business what do you want to make it better build a track to keep them off the streets

If I was in California I will get the one that goes 75. Or 80 California should be building a track for them to ride on

I don't know how they're going to catch an 80 mi an hour bike or a 70 a mile an hour bike that doesn't make noise

I'm back because I just thought of something everyone is not going to want their bike taken or a ticket so they will run and then people will begin hurt once the cops chase them

I think throttle kids like to pop wheelies. Where as pedal assist not so easy

The whole throttle thing is so dumb. Like if you don’t want people riding “bikes” at 28mph, fine, but allowing it on pedal assist and not on throttle is just stupid. I don’t see any rational reason for that. It’s not like it’s any easier to brake or control a bike at 28mph when you are pedaling to maintain that speed. (Also there is no rule that suggests the bike has to make you pedal hard to go 28mph.). If you want people to have M2 licenses to go faster than 20mph and less than 30mph on a “bike”, I can at least understand that. But then don’t carve out a stupid exception for pedal assist, and make the M2 endorsement something you can get reasonably get using that sort of ebike/moped without having to get on a full on motorcycle. (I should note that if you have a class C drivers license, you can get an M1 by just taking and passing a CSMP course, and then just taking the completion form to the DMV… they should have offered a similar program aimed at higher powered bikes along with these changes).

New laws cost the state billions of dollars this is why it on fire that and homelessness

Is a trike a bike?

Thanks 🙏 "The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit ofhappiness. Feb 24, 2022

I saw that coming. The guys who ride this bikes maniacs.

2026 Full Cover Insurance

They just can see you win. Instead put the same energy fixing The Water Reservoir for Fires; summer around the corner which means more fire.

With so much other stuff happening in California like homeless people living on the streets, fires that took homes away and they mostly worried about people using ebikes? smh

Wonder if splicing power and adding turn signals to an Ebike is going to fall under illegal modification? ( i prefer hand signals but for those that dont..)

Thanks for the review , I like the removal battery

Go up to the court .. we have to start fighting for our rights .. we keep allowing them to get more cash and take away fun from us smh

This video tells me this is an opinion video and not one based on actual reading the law...🤷🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

1:07 wrong historical definition... It has always been ambiguous...the intent of the definition previously if read as written and interpreted as ladder between classes, then a throttle wasn't allowed... You are also misrepresenting the law's changes...it isn't about users, it's about manufacturers....

Not sure I’m sold on E bikes, they are not fast enough to operate with cars, to fast for riding the trails with people walking and biking, really comes down to, safety??, lots of selfish people out there, to much I see someone walking and the rider doesn’t slow down, seems kinda rude

E bikes are ruining some areas. Law enforcement doesn’t want to take the time to figure out what bike is banned and what’s legal so it’s easier to just close trails to bikes.

Imo, beyond 28mph, the bike should be considered an electric motorcycle. The motor power, however, is another thing. Someone who lives in a really hilly area will be overloading a 750w motor on a regular basis. My plan is for a bike that can easily pull a 100lb trailer up a 8% grade but be regulated to not assist past 20mph.

I think the claim that tickets would be given out as a means of generating revenue is a mistaken assumption. California (like many other states) prohibits enforcement agencies from receiving any portion of the fines assessed for driving offenses. This is done to reduce the corrupting effect of passing out tickets to fund the enforcing agencies operations.

All that law means is that an e-bike that goes faster than 20mph is a moped.

Lol, just wait until they make you get a vin and pay registration. That's coming very soon.

Class 3 E-Bike another name for Electric moped. If you are cruising on throttle on a bike path and not pedaling at all, you are not exercising; you are cruising and you belong on the road. You are not a cyclist, you are a moped rider/owner. You should be riding with traffic not cyclists. I am a cyclist and we often see E-bikes blasting down the bike paths weaving in and out of pedestrians and cyclists, creating a dangerous environment. This law was created because of those riders. It is a case of a few bad riders ruining things for responsible riders. But let's be real, many with class 3 modify their bikes to go even faster than 20. They should be classified as electric moped or scooter, require lights, and a plate, and a license. And they should be for on the street only, not bike paths, sidewalks or anywhere else they share a lane with pedestrians.

Sounds like California needs more revenue instead of cutting services to illegals.

California lawmakers are just doing their part to make normal everyday law-abiding citizens criminals. Because as we all know the law system loves criminals! And besides this law only affects people that are contributing to the system. You think a homeless person is going to pay a fine? Good luck with that!

The kids are the ones who made it hot for everyone. No helmets, no mirrors, no lights, they follow no rules and they wheelie all over the damn place. Now everyone else has to pay... They should have to have at least a permit and be minimally 17 to operate a class 3 ebike. If not they lose the bike..but banning a throttle for everyone is ridiculous. I use a throttle because I've got a terrible back and the Doctor says I cannot pedal at all.. I had major fusion surgery on my lower back and it's not good for me. I abide all the laws and wear all the proper gear including helmet, brake and signal lights and never ride on the sidewalks just on the right side of the road. And I stop at all red lights... But these kids all over the roads doing wheelies is ridiculous.

This law was made by people that know nothing about e-bikes and probably never even rode a ebike. Also there’s politicians probably doing this for their financial benefit and political advantage. California is the big state pushing the Green Deal bullshit and I guess they rather have gas bikes on the rode now. California has and allows driverless cars in the rode ! WTF those cars are dangerous. CA is just a F’d up state ran by F’d Up people.

Don't mind the ruling as I prefer class 2 ebikes at the moment. I think 20-25mph is plenty for most cyclist, once you get class 3 the bike gets heavy or short range. I feel for the weight and range might as well go to electric motorcycle if you don't want to pedal. Just got to be experienced to ride class 3 safely. Your baseline experience should include riding analog/class 1&2 e bike.

I have a ecells dual star generation 1.....it has a 1500 watt motor that peaks out at 2500 watts it goes 40 on throttle alone.......funk da police

ALL "e-bikes" that have a throttle SHOULD have regulations inposed. Pedal assist ONLY "e-bikes" should be the ONLY ones that are allowed for normal hiking/biking trail use.

There are steep hills in San Diego where I go 30-35 mph with no peddling, no throttle. Speed limits are 40mph. How would this play out? I'm expected to ride my brakes on the downhill? I no longer ask "what's next" in Corruptifornia.

Should be 750 nominal, not peak because of real life physics. Think of energy output from yourself when walking versus running. You need both energy levels. Unsubstantianable peak power when running and infinite nominal power when walking.

Look at that e-bike. It has a thumb throttle. Something CA doesn't want the rest of us to have. Are they going to get rid of their own bikes too?

I just read that class 2 ebikes that require helmets is only in Marin and San Diego county, so some areas might not require helmets if your over 18

But a non-motorized bicycle can pedal over 20mph all day long and teenage bicycle gangs doing wheelies on oublic roads and blocking traffic is okay. Governments can't pass ex oost facto laws. Current ebikes should be exempt. Also, the right to travel has never been overturnes bu the Supreme Court. There are no laws in any State rewuiring you to register your car with the DMV or have a "drivers" license to travel on the public higheays.

Pretty sure my state isn't going to follow California law much at all, in fact we say don't California our Texas

can you still ride a bicycle or e scooter , skateboard without a helmet if your over 18?

Good! I don't think an e-bike with a throttle should be allowed on rail trails or any bike path.

Here in California, class 3 has always been pedal assist only, no throttle. Minors under the age of 16 are not legally allowed to ride a class 3 ebike. It has been this way for over a decade. Not new law. What is new is that no child under 12yrs old is allowed to ride any class1 or class2 ebike. Any ebike that has a motor that can peak/max over 750w and/or assist assist by throttle over 20mph can no longer be sold/marketed as an ebike in California. I have ebikes the def exceed these new laws and im not happy with these new implications of the laws. Im am merely pointing out the the base of the law has been in place for over a decade. Most officers are not going to bother you unless you are blatantly doing something very stupid. I live in Sacramento, the Capital city of California. I ride a lot in our downtown area heavily trafficked by city police. I lanemsplit all the time even between police cars and they just wave or say hi. Once in awhile, they may even comment on how nice my beach cruiser looks(have a 1000w bbafang bbshd) or my E-cells 5star(1500w hentach hub motor). Im not zipping and swerving around cars or people so they dont have concern over my actions. If you dont do stupid shit, police have bigger fish to fry. Just got to know how to play the game.

If they are going to regulate e-bikes they need to regulate cars. They shouldn’t be allowed to go over 30 miles per hour. What joke. Our cops have better things to do. Our government is a joke. I’m not going to abide by these new laws for e-bikes. Newsom can kiss my ass.

The US Supreme Court has accepted a case of Ohio & many states that are suing the EPA for allowing CA to dictate regulations to car manufacturers. IMHO, this should also implicate CA trying to change the ebike classes of bicycles. In CA, I need no license, registration or insurance to ride bicycles so no papers required if pulled over. A search warrant would be required to sesrch for a throttle to see if it works or what size hub motor my e-bicycle has. It's a 750W continuous motor that peaks at 1200W on starts & steep hills but drops under 750W when cruising. That is legal & it would be theft if some cop tries to steal my bicycle.

Great now the figured out how to pull bicyclist over.

Leave it to California to come up with something Stupid..Most ebikes are limited to 20 mph with throttle..You get higher speeds with Pedal assist and pedaling..

I see this as a battle over MUP use. I am pretty much okay with a 20 mph limit on separated bike paths. IMO, PEV makers and users need to recognize that pedestrians are intimidated. Please don't turn 'car brain' into 'bike brain'. On-street bike lanes are a different animal. There are so many times you have to dive into car traffic because there is a mail carrier/cop/garbage can/garbage truck in the bike lane, that the ability to seamlessly dive into traffic at a similar speed enhances safety.

The bike is way more unstable peddling @ 28 than throttling at 28. Someone is gonna sue the shit outa there asses after a major accident.

True I ride all the time and yesterday I lane split between to Anaheim cops, they relley don't care lol 😂come know guy, thanks for the info ,but no one's cares about the laws 😉

This is why I still have a regular bike and I have an E Bike too. I dont wanna get too use to a good thing. Because Big Brother will suddenly pull the rug from under your feet. For some stupid reason