Видео

MYLEAAA💜💜 PROUD OF YOUUUU

Look it’s me!

So proud of these two!

You are beautiful, I would like to marry you, love from USA

I disagree. Christian nationalism is anything but right wing. Christian nationalism is just a different term for christian socialism. And like all forms of socialism, laws will be enacted to punish those that don’t abide by their woke rules. True right wing politics is Laissez-faire capitalism.

I got pictures of the side of a mountain in WV were an impact debris hit the side of a vitrified rock shelf at least 2500 ft elevation. Tiny piece but big crater. Faces NW toward the proposed impact ( the main one) in correlation with Carolina bays formation.

Progressive bs

So what did he say?

Rushdoony and Christian Reconstructionism (Wikipedia)

Why does French equate lower birth rates etc with Trump’s administration? Seems foolish. COVID had a lot to do with the issues that he cited.

30:07

"Tell me, are these Christian Nationalists here in the room with us right now?"

1:20:08 just because we defeated the Soviet Union does not mean we were in a good place. Geopolitically sure. But as a culture and society we never deviated from the debauchery of the 60’s. It has only progressed. So keeping with your proposed lack of action we will continue to drift that same direction. In the 60’s if you cut your son’s junk off you would have been most likely be in prison if not worse.

1:03:34 ok. So can you name a single time people rising up against any other person or group of people would be justified with you humble love and forgiveness only philosophy? Is there any time that it is justified to use any means at all to take power or liberty from oppression? If so. What are those lines. If there are no lines that may be crossed I think you are off base.

1:03:34 ok. So can you name a single time people rising up against any other person or group of people would be justified with you humble love and forgiveness only philosophy? Is there any time that it is justified to use any means at all to take power or liberty from oppression? If so. What are those lines. If there are no lines that may be crossed I think you are off base.

54:15 I’d say that’s projecting. As far as who I’ve talked with and listened to it’s the other way around. The state of America is directly rated to the state of the church.

40:07 your high minded view of winning and losing is completely removing the consequences of either. Not loosing in a war is exponentially better than losing that war. For sure on an individual level. We’re not playing pickup basketball.

30:00 this would happen naturally with advance contraceptives. The numbers don’t matter when talking about ethics or theory. You’re a “christian”. You not seeing the moral wrong of it is damnable.

27:04 so when conservatives win. It only holds a line. It does nothing to advance anywhere. The conservatives want to conserve policy from 10 years ago. So when we win. We don’t take a step but every win of the left actually walks left. So by default our win is always a pause not an actual win.

25:11 so name one good thing about either party? There is a reason it is all but unanimous that people state it’s choosing the leader of two evils. Neither party has been virtuous or for Christian values ( deeper than lip service) for a long time.

The reason people flocked to Trump regardless of his personal flaws which are numerous. They flocked because he is the only person we have had in any sort of position, outside of Ron Paul, who actually cares about America in a historical sense. Such as the Americans and those that would be called Americans traditionally. He is garbage but even garbage that even acts like he actually cares for the real Americans is 100 times better than any option we are allowed to choose from. The rights affinity to go left is what has caused this. The rights complete abandonment of traditional conservatism has cause this.

Its just WHITE SUPREMACY..nothing less

38:00 First of all thank you for raising the question about environmental justice at the beginning. Because so often it is an afterthought. We talk about all the other issues then it becomes clear to us that none of this will be possible unless there is a habitable plante in the future and so therefore we feel obligated to talk about issues of climate change. And I think it should come first. because it is the pre-condition, it is the very condition of possibility for change in the world. So if we do believe that we need racial justice or gender justice or economic justice we absolutely have to begin with environmental justice.

You need to check the soil in the Azores Islands.

He is totally missing the effects of FOX NEWS and Rush Limbaugh in pushing the hate.

Hey there i would like to discuss water from the YDB with you. I have a vision of the SE pressurized by water. I call it the dam effect. This could in fact explain water erosion at the Pleistocene shelf going east durring and after these event. Witch would eliminate the need for the ocean erosion idea for the Carolina bays. It would put the bays back in line with these events 13kya. I’ve found evidence for pressure relief going up the coast. Chris thinks the dam effect is not possible but I think he is being bias. Being he suggests the ocean as the only culprit.

Hi Chris. Have you heard of the glacial ice impact theory that says that some of the fragments of a comet air burst 12,800 years ago over the glacial ice covering the Great lakes and Hudson Bay area? This theory says ice fragments flew hundreds of miles and created secondary impacts over much of what is now central and eastern USA, creating what are now called Carolina bays and Nebraska rainwater basins. This theory is being promoted by Antonio Zamora, a citizen scientist who has made lots of videos on it. See below: ruclips.net/video/2qnQnapmDug/видео.html&ab_channel=AntonioZamora As well as potential air burst sites near Sheboygan, Lake Michigan; Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron; and Nastapoka arc, Hudson Bay, sites at Atacama desert and Iturralde Crater in Bolivia both which have impact glass and have dates roughly concurrent.

Sorry, abortion is a big issue!

David French is a such a tool .

Don't say "Christian nationalists" - say "ChristiaNazis (1 word). Pronounced "kris chuh nat sees”

Кайф читать с бумажки

Класс

David French is trying to screw with Christians and trying to guilt you to not vote for Trump..all this Christian Nationalism, is to shame you. Out of our choices for President there is no way I would vote for Biden. He is a brainwashing fraud, funded by NGO'S for Democrats.

There will be Theocracy no matter what. Currently, the theocracy of America is orchestrated by satan. How else can you explain transgender story time and the rest of the madness? French suffers a disease widespread in professing christian circles known as libtarditis. It is a disease of the soul that causes the mind to actually think neutrality can be achieved if Christians just put down the word of God. French is a full on wolf. Between him, Russell Moore, Ed Stetzer, and Beth Moore, Christianity has no voice and Biblical Authority is forfeit. Run from these people that need to stop worshipping false idols and find the true Christ.

I was an independent until 2020. My perspective on the two parties differs greatly from David's. Reagan ushered the theocratic right into the mainstream of the Republican party. They didn't want religious freedom. They wanted US law to enforce religious views, rather than laws being about protecting individual rights. A zygote isn't an individual. The woman carrying those cells *is* an individual. My leanings have remained toward supporting individual rights, separation of church and state, civil liberties, reason, science, justice, etc. The Democratic party was perhaps weak on those things. But the Republican party was flat out against them. I had no love for the Democratic party. My opposition to the Republican party was strong, and it had zero to do with feeling being part of the democratic party. It was simple. Which party opposed separation of church and state? Which party was deeply embedded in anti-science? Anti-academia? Anti-intellectualism? Anti-reason? And then with regard to fascism and white nationalism, which party did those who were in those directions feel at home within? Dominionists and Reconstructionists... which party did they find home within? It's all about what that party represents. Where did evangelicals, up until the mid 70's, fall on the matter of women having the right to bodily autonomy? The majority were pro-choice. Even the head of the Southern Baptist Convention. It wasn't until around the late 70's that the polar shift started. And the abortion issue has little to do with abortion, and more to do with getting a foot in the door to establishing religion based law, and drive out the concept of individual rights. Appointing theocracy-friendly justices to the federal courts started, it seems to me, with the Reagan Administration. 32% of Americans believe religious views should dictate our laws, in opposition to the Constitution's separation of church and state. Which party do they gravitate toward. That percentage of theocrats isn't found in other advanced western nations. The US stands unique there. The idea that those who oppose theocracy therefore support socialism and communism is flat out false. It's a right wing lie going back decades before Trump. Which democrats support switching to a planned economy and abolishing the existence of property rights? I don't know any. That isn't something the Democratic party supports. But which party supports theocracy, fascism, and white nationalism? That's the party that actually supports authoritarianism. And this why I've voted Democratic for decades. A flawed party. But at least not a party of authoritarianism. Unlike the Republican party. Individual rights isn't that difficult a concept. One who is in office should support the Enlightenment ideas that underlie individual rights, not try to write their religious views into law. The Soviet Union didn't have separation of church and state. If the state controls religion (or religion controls state), there is no separation of church and state. What distinguished us was individual rights vs authoritarianism. Our theocratic right in no way supports individual rights. I have no problem with Christianity. Or religion. But I have major issue with theocracy. Anti-theocracy is *NOT* anti-christian. Or anti-religion. Despite the lies to the contrary. The majority of Americans are Christian. The majority of Christians aren't theocrats. But that enormous minority that is very much gravitate toward the Republican party. Those who aren't more often gravitate toward the Democratic party. In no way does the theocratic right, or the Republican party, own Christianity. Though so many right wingers falsely claim they do, implicitly. Now it seems that some pretend everything was good, from Reagan to Trump, and then suddenly all went wrong. It was Reagan who brought the theocratic right (not Christians) into the mainstream of the Republican party. Efforts to pack the federal courts with theocrats started decades before Trump. And again the issue isn't the religious, or Christians. The issue is theocrats, and their need to elevate religious views to rule of law. I could criticize the Sanders left at length. And i so often have. But where the threat to the future of freedom rests is with the Republican party. And that started decades before Trump. I'm not a centrist. And I'm not a leftist. I stand for individual rights, freedom, separation of church and state, civil liberties, reason, science, justice, decency, etc. And as such I oppose all forms of authoritarianism, be it theocracy, fascism, socialism, communism, white nationalism, or any other. And oppose bigotry, hate, anti-science, conspiracy theories, injustice, etc. So, the Republican party represents the opposite of what I support. The Democratic party may not qualify as the defenders of that list, but at least the party doesn't represent the opposite of those things.

Trump hater

This dude is such a beta male, he just plays defense. So many things I disagree with him on, but I'll take one. "Christian Nationalism can never be separated from white nationalism". This is so wrong on a realist level, this dude needs to get out of his intellectual think tanks; start fighting the evil rather than bowing to it.

A wonderful talk and discussion 👏

I wonder how the Right will justify a Trump dictatorship in light of the pursuit of life and liberty.

David French once said that poor whites deserve to die from poverty and drugs. Nation Review deleted the article. David is also a pro war advocate. I regret serving this country in Iraq. I don't care about the constitution; I care about Jesus.

Ah, yes, "Christian Nationalism", brought to us by the Marxist Nationalists. These discussions are Marxism in America in action. Be very careful not to fall for this ideology. The end goal is to remove Christianity from America. Beware.

Remember, Hillary's Gender?

'promo sm'

You mean "FAKE Christians."

What a bizarrely narcissistic and self-referential introduction by Darla Moore. Wow.

Frenchy is a bit wimpy. He gets “scared” very easily and for little or no reason. He’s fine with Globalism but Nationalism is greatly feared by this guy. Trump, who kept us at peace, is to be feared , but Biden, who is giving us wars and chaos, is not. His whole identity is to be a “conservative “ for far left organizations (New York Times) - The Times loves him because he’s really not a conservative. He’s a fraud.

ruclips.net/video/m55qFdpvBFk/видео.htmlsi=fI_HuNgGGmqhsZoy

13:01 The old right would happily allow the left to win, provided the left would not call them horrible, untrue names. ruclips.net/video/e_qcHwKXTRg/видео.html

her legs....

OK! Now I understand the appeal of Angela Davis and her revolutionary spirit! I'm glad she figured it out and is willing to explain it to the rest of us.