Видео

How do you do the rendering?

Thank's Daniel for putting this up. One hurdle I found with this during installing it on a new server was that requiring the library via `add-deps` actually requires Java (in addition to Babashka binary), but otherwise it does the job pretty well.

This is a wonderful community of really kind and helpful people

Common Lisp is the language for legends, is the greatest hack that allows for multiple other hacks. In the Scheme world I think the closest would be Chez, Racket is wonderful but is too academic and I think it needs some stewardship towards a more industrial implementation of racket.

I'm a fan of Daniel's work and commitment with clojure.

Great explanation. Has anyone ever thought of using these ideas for a language model? It could have continuous learning built in, due to the Bayesian Approach.

Good talk! I wish Alan had shown the hyperspec page for the LOOP macro, it's pretty nuts.

Fantastic--thank you!

Thank you!

Very nice. Lovely to see Calva custom repl commands used like this. As for .gitignore, I recommend not ignoring the while `.calva` directory, because you can add custom repl commands and other similar Calva configuration via .calva/config.edn. What you want to target with the .gitignore is the repl file in there.

Excellent!

When is the next?

Racket is where it's at

for me Clojure shines for three reasons: (1) Rich Hickey; (2) it’s a Lisp; (3) it can be used for web apps

P r o m o s m 😇

great work, keep it up! looking forward to seeing more data science in clojure

Excellent, thank you!

Love this! As a Clojurists and a Prologer... love to see logic programming come into this space! I could see this useful in a data-preprocessing pipeline, btw. But so much more! Thank you Joel, Daniel, everyone in the community!

When I first saw this was happening, my heart sank and I thought "Oh, no this is terrible". But my curiosity finally rose above my disgust enough for me to at least watch this. I was immediately struck by the meme in thumbnail, of all things, which humorously draws a distinction between LLMs and "honest work". Then I was comforted in the opening words, acknowledging that this topic is "troubling". So I figure as long as you are aware of this, it is worthy of my attention. My feelings about LLMs could best be described by a quote from Commander Data in Star Trek: First Contact who exclaimed, "I hate this!". To be perfectly clear, I think we are witnessing the most destructive trend in all of computing, which embodies all of humanity's biggest shortcomings, particularly our tendency to see human qualities where they do not exist, and our obsession with automating things that should not be. On a personal level, it offends my sensibilities as a programmer because what appeals to me about programming is not so much what it makes possible, but the insights it gives us about the tasks we perform. And it seems that for the first time ever, a chasm is forming between the effects of our technology and our understanding of it. To reference Star Trek again, I cite the Prime Directive, a rule which was created out of the profound realization of the potential dangers of supplying technology to a civilization that is incapable of understanding it. I believe that the benefits of automation, as expressed in the quote from Alfred North Whitehead that "Civilization advances by increasing the tasks that can be performed without thinking about them", only applies as long as there still remains a sufficiently large group of people who understand the underlying domain and the way it is being automated. The most frightening part in my opinion is when it is used in education, because it puts an impenetrable barrier between us and the learning process. If we completely disregard the issue of correctness by assuming a model that produced 100% correct results, the problem still remains in full force, because it circumvents the most important part of the learning process which is discovering where to look for information, like documentation, which was already too difficult to get people to read. We obviously cannot put it "back in the bottle" so to speak, so we have no choice but to let it run its course until this hype bubble inevitably bursts, and have some understanding of how we got there in order to correct the damage it has caused. So thank you for presenting it in a way that is more accessible to me than anywhere else.

Introductions finish at 21:35

Great stuff!

Oh man, so cool!!! This channel desperately needs SMZeus!!

Thank you for video! It's very useful!👍

👍

Wow so many amazing people were on this call! I was there too, but it's so enlightening to watch it again after a few years of work has happened in so many areas, Clerk and Portal being a couple of great examples. I also understand it _slightly_ better now...Thanks everyone!

This is great. Simple great. Already using calva notebooks + portal views, and now I know so much more about how use the keyboard and how to save the views. It really enriched my namespaces, and the comments by rerunning and visualising, mainly query functions into a datomic db. I SEE a lot more :)

How is anyone using this (let alone being new and simply learning it) with this unreadable color scheme? It's literally 75% grey on black background for much of the text. I thought it was an aberration holding over from Halloween, however here it is in early September. I literally can't read the top menu bar on the page.

Rad!

Great session

Very nice review

pep guardiola ?

great work

9:44 START

Thank you also Kira and Sci Cloj, I briefly dabbled with R and data science with Python but would love to learn data science properly with Clojure as it's easily my favourite language. Looking forward to the course sometime and also was interesting to see what is going on with the data science community in Clojure - I had no picture of this beforehand, now I have clarity :)

Thanks for your efforts in making this very convenient update.

this came in very timely and helped to get my head around clojure.walk, thank you!

Хорошая библиотека. Но увы, наша компания приняла решение постепенно отказываться от продуктов JetBrains по политическим мотивам. В том числе требованиям гос органов ориентироваться только на отечественные разработки.

Is there a tutorial where they build a project on the same, malli schema for validation? Like a project from scratch?

When I have heard Mauricio talk about this idea before I have been thinking it is a totally crazy thing to take on. One of the blockers I've ”seen” has been how on earth you would be able to scale yourself to take care of something this big. Now I realize it is crazy in a way that accounts for that. The idea itself contains the solution! A small team _can_ probably take care of the core here. It is ”only” providing this canvas for other creators/devs to draw on. It is amazing and fantastic. To me it would fix all of what makes VS Code hard to use and hard to extend. Interactive programming could be truly supported and embraced within this canvas.

Great session! As someone who prefers to watch at 1.5x after the fact, the answer to: "should we upload this?" is always yes! Voted by those not in the room. Confusing bits can be navigated/re-watched by users, no hand-holding required. I wish that Clerk had better logging. I get "Clerk evaluated ... in ~150ms" when watching for updating files, but whether or not changes appear in the browser is anyone's guess.

Thanks for this! And for the pointer to Kalman Reti's Symbolics demo. It's mirrored on his site at MIT if you can't find it here. Loper-OS has blogged about it as well.

Really bad video. Sorry guys. Just being honest here.

Screencast starts at 5:42

Wow this so cool!

Quick question - clojure is read from the bottom up - notebooks from the top down, does this cause any issues?

Great stuff 💪

As usual with clojure library..NO documentation..generally speaking they are not well maintained...or just here to die...one shot...How to commit your organization, your customers on this kind of ground ? How to invent the wheel again and again for anything already existing in Python, C, C++, Javascript... Producing code faster is useless. 90 % of the time during the life of a software you need to read AND understand software already written by somebody else... After more than 10 years clojure has 0.3 % of the market. I know Clojure and Elixir and Erlang...I remember Eiffel and there is Ada...sorry guys..lisp priests try to sold lisp church and gospels for at least 40 years...It doesn't work.

Is there a open study group? I would like to participate in these meetings :). Gotta be the best youtube channel I encountered. Clojure + Data Science

Very good. Thank you for the content

16:00 libpython-clj spacy demo