Видео

Thank you so much for your feedback and for enjoying the talks! We’ve double-checked the video, and the volume seems to be at the optimal level. It might be worth checking your phone’s overall sound settings or trying a pair of headphones to see if that helps. We truly appreciate you taking the time to let us know, and we’re glad you’re enjoying the content!

Thanks for that - hopefully this video will help you then ruclips.net/video/61395FnxUcA/видео.htmlsi=vfN4-pL6HhFOvb2Y

Glad you like them!

Thanks for your feedback @Michailo. I'm glad you are enjoying and learning from the clause videos. Regards, Jackie

That's great to hear!

That's fantastic to hear. It's great when the lightbulb goes off and you can see it clearly! Well done.

Thanks for that. I can see that clause 9.3 is ready for filming so it should be released soon.

Thanks. Clause 8.1.1 is ready for filming so should be available soon

Thanks. Clause 7.5 is ready for filming so should be available soon

@auditortrainingonline Thank you so much for your training videos. It's highly good and easy to understand. Good effort by the team. Congratulations and keep rocking. Thank

Thanks so much - we're glad you found it helpful!

Thank you so much for watching/listening. Kelly and I really appreciate your support.

We're glad you're on the journey towards practical knowledge - we hope our videos help!

Thanks for the question. I do not audit against ISO 13485 and do not have a copy myself to check. However I suggest looking at clause 4.3 in ISO 13485 to see whether this is a statement similar to that in ISO 9001 where it talks about determining what is not applicable to the scope. If this wording isn't in there, then it would appear that there are no areas that can be stated as not applicable (old wording - excluded).

we will let Jackie answer that question! thank you for watching our videos

Thank you so much for pointing out that error @jerinthomas6788. This is greatly appreciated. I will add this to our 'rework' list, after prioritising the videos that I am yet to record for some clauses. I'm glad you are learning from the videos.

Thank you so much for pointing that out - We will definitely make sure we are spot on for the next video!

I've just taken a look and clause 8.5 is in the 'ready to be filmed' list. We haven't confirmed a filming schedule for 2025 yet, but it is definitely on the list! Thanks for asking.

I will check with Jackie's filming schedule to see when 8.5 is ready to go!

🤣 thank you. This made me laugh! Yes, some auditors are 'interesting' aren't they? What 'sucky' behaviours are the auditors your company hires displaying? This is a great topic to break down and discuss! Thanks for sharing.

@@jackiestapleton7304 Thanks for answerting Jackie!! I believe the worst behaviors revolve around focusing on formal requirements: naming documents, signing procedures, version control (what a headache) instead on looking at the bigger picture: the things that allow the Co. to deliver consistently customer requirements. Like analyzing process output, critical to quality, controling suppliers... etc.

@@cesarb2679 interesting. It appears as though the focus is on the 'easy stuff' and this may reflect a lack of understanding of the entire business context or industry. This is only a guess, of course. If an auditor is sticking to this basic stuff, then it may mean they are struggling with understanding the bigger picture. If this is an external or certification auditor, you can request another auditor and check their credentials for industry experience, which may help you to find one that is better suited.

Thanks for the great and honest comment :)

That's a simple one to comprehend I guess!

great to hear. Thanks for your comment.

No problem at all! Thanks for watching!

Thank you, we're glad you find the videos helpful!

Thank you so much for sharing your perspective. You’ve raised some really important points about fair compensation, recognition, and the need for organizations to genuinely value and invest in their people. We completely agree that paying people what they’re worth and offering official titles and competitive wages is essential for fostering both respect and long-term leadership. The intention behind our video was to highlight that leadership is often about mindset and influence rather than titles alone. However, we recognize that this should never be an excuse for companies to exploit employees or undervalue their contributions. We also want to acknowledge that your comment likely reflects experiences in organizations that haven’t created the supportive culture people need to thrive. We understand how frustrating that can be and want to assure you that there are organizations out there that value fairness, growth, and respect. We hope this conversation helps encourage more businesses to step up and create those environments. Thank you again for taking the time to share your thoughts and adding depth to this discussion!

We understand your frustrations, it's important for leaders to acknowledge the value of their staff.

oh that is so great to hear. Thank you for your kind feedback. I'm so glad you find the videos helpful.

Thanks for the feedback @cesarb2679. That is great to hear

yes, there are a lot of similarities across all ISO standards when it comes to clause 7.5 and it's subclauses. Great point and thanks for sharing.

Thanks for your question - have you had a look at our Auditing ISO Management Systems playlist? You may find something in there? ruclips.net/p/PLixALmch2V_G1FdnTj7VA9Uhq5smXcVHr

Thanks for the feedback, however we don't have any information that could help you with your Industrial And Technology Management exam. Best of luck though and we hope you find a suitable resource.

Glad you think so!

Glad it was helpful!

We're glad you found it helpful, we'll add that to the list of topics!

We're glad you found it helpful, we'll add that to the list of topics!

Thanks for watching! Regards, Jackie

Would that be something like ISO 26000 Social Responsiblity?

I'm glad you found it useful. Regards, Jackie

We're glad you liked it!

You are very welcome!

Have you seen our ISO 9001 playlist? Check it out here: ruclips.net/p/PLixALmch2V_HUb5WPa-zmpgTkgW3TCtn5

We're glad you liked it!

We're glad you liked it!

sorry I am not sure I understand what your question is. Can you explain this a bit further? Thanks, Jackie

thank you so much! Regards, Jackie

I'm glad you liked it! Regards, Jackie

Thanks for your question. This content is covered in our Lead Auditor Management Systems course/s. Regards, Jackie

no worries at all. This is our Internal Auditor course auditortrainingonline.com/home/course/iso19011internalaudit You can also add on any of the specialist courses for ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 too if you need.

I'm glad you liked it

Thank you so much!

You will be able to find 8.3 on this link ruclips.net/video/JZgQ6UCe3IE/видео.html

@@auditortrainingonline Thank you so much

Thanks, that's great to hear!

That is great to hear. Glad you are enjoying the videos.

You are very welcome! Regards, Jackie

I'm glad you are finding the content valuable!

thanks for your kind words. Regards, Jackie

yes, if you complete Lead Auditor Integrated Management Systems with ATOL (I can't speak for other training providers) then this includes competencies for Lead Auditor, (AUTL), QM, EM and OH45001. There is a bonus module covering the correspondence between the integration of those 3 Standards also. I hope that helps.

@@auditortrainingonline thanks for your kind reply Jackie.

Wow! this is an interesting scenario! While the breakout box may not directly perform the measurement itself, it seems to be acting as an intermediary between the test equipment and the device being measured (that is my understanding so far). Based on this understanding, the breakout box could potentially affect the test results if there is interference with the signals or voltages measured. The options in continuing the use of the breakout box could be: 1. Perform a risk assessment to ensure that using the breakout box does not introduce significant risk into the testing process. This will analyze the potential for errors and how these may be able to be controlled. This could also mean that components of the breakout box are scheduled for inspection and replacement if they have the potential to impact the results. Control measures to consider could be: 1. If the breakout box is part of the process but not directly verified or calibrated, you would need to demonstrate that the final validation or verification checks are sufficient and conducted by calibrated equipment. This will ensure that any discrepancies during the earlier process using the break out box are identified. I hope this gives you something to think about :) all the best, Jackie

thanks! Regards, Jackie

We're glad you liked it!