Видео

After all these years, I still prefer your interpretation above all the others. Thank you !

beautiful

Oh no, I don't like manipulated note

not real is spead up with programm

Funny that's how I played it and I did the most by ear :P

Where's the sheet music? It says coming soon but this was uploaded in 2006!

Shit

now I know why Nintendo chose this song for the Tetris game: It's Russian (like the game's origin) and it is catchy.

where is the sheet ?

Is it just me, or do I hear castanets in the background?

This was so unbelievably AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!

0:45 -> Dislike, 1:33--> "WHAT HAVE I DONE!!!"

Because he's not Asian like me and you. ^_^

Not all piano players can hear by ear, can they...? Well... CAN they... ... ...?

I think you play beautifully. Credit goes to you seeing as you are the one playing....

forgot those haters man....Mike or trollz or whatever you want to call yourself do the world a favor and never stop playing. YOU ROCK!!!!

@novruz1996 no, it's a 19th century Russian folk song by Korobeiniki.

@devilasskicker ...learn piano good (or any instrument) in a short time is impossibile. U need a lot of practise xD

РОССИЯ великая страна

@tr0llz you said piano squalls fast part is very easy then are you very good at piano, i gave up piano 5 years and im thinking of learning piano back, do you have any tips to learn piano good in a short time thanks

I like how nonchalantly he gets up. This dude is a badass and he knows it.

i like the enemy at the gates theme better search it up

The best? If this is the best, then why is Kyle Landry's version is better?

@grenadezeroone So then, obviously you have more musical talent then people like Sviatoslav Richter and Arthur Rubinstein, explain to me what makes this "very different" from the Piano Squall version? Other than the minor changes I pointed out, what is the MAJOR thing that makes this one stand out? Whether I don't think it'll make sense will only be determined if you point it out, you know. ;)

@grenadezeroone If "way different" means modifying/simplifying a chord, but not changing it, or adding some minor accompaniment. to the right hand, then that would be correct, but I would like to point out how "way different" for you does not have a lot of meaning, if this comparison is an example of something that's "way different." ;) I already pointed out why it wasn't, if you can come up with something a little more insightful, then please go right ahead, otherwise don't bother.

STEVE!!!

what piano is it?

ruclips.net/video/LXkUTOeeUpA/видео.html&feature=related This speed

Way to slow. Only after it sped up some what and even then my brain was still in a slow fog.

sheet comming soon you say, well where it IS ! want it !

Spetnas lead the way!

Amazing!

@tr0llz Yeah, what I'm saying is that, like you said, it's a minor adjustment. But it's not entirely an "original" arrangement, as the basis of this is the PianoSquall arrangement. I played the PianoSquall arrangement, and added a few ornaments here and there (I'm usually against that when I'm playing Classical Music, but this isn't that), and slightly modified the chords, but I refuse to call it my "own arrangement," because it's only a slight modification of the PianoSquall version.

@mario54671 i agree with the last part of ur comment. Without technical exercises its impossible to play. But i still dont understand u. this is an arrangement of the original theme, pianosquall did the same. we both didnt change the theme but we have enriched it to make it more suitable to be played on piano. for me the version of pianosquall was a bit "poor" so I've rewritten it without changing the original theme. obviously the theme is the same, but as u said, many ppl cant play my version .

Yeah..while you added some accompanying notes to the right hand...it's still the same thing. You just made the chords less full, but they're still practically the same....hardly anything different. And yes, barely any more difficult. The only reason why people won't be able to play yours very well is because they have horrible teachers that tell them not to play their technical exercises, making this more difficult than what it really is.

@tr0llz No, I hear differences..just VERY minor ones...so it's very hard to call it "your arrangement." And are you really gonna say yours is "more difficult'? Doesn't look any harder to me. Still has simply chords and a moderately fast left hand. Sure, some chords may be in different inversions, or may be slightly altered, but they're still the same. Maybe you SHOULD send me the score, but I don't think it makes much of a difference.

@mario54671 PianoSquall's fast part is very easy to play. maybe you need a comparison of the scores because your ear does not understand the huge difference. obviously the theme is the same, or I would have written a new song and not an arrangement. :)

@rlseii as I said many times, the intro is by PianoSquall. y ppl never read the description? xD cya

I'm tired of these and not the Tetris theme... I want tetris theme not korewhatsitwhosit

Great song, but a bad camera.

War iz dat clicking? It sounds like some 1 iz plyn da solitaire theme

You should really credit pianosquall for the arrangement you are playing.

@Holbeinisscheisse Not Really D: . I can't do the right hand at 1:25 - 1:27 . But agreed that other parts aren't too hard, considering me a beginner can learn it in several days :P .

much better than piano squalls.

AWESOME !!!! WOW !!!! respect =)

this is not 'the best', it's good indeed but it's just the piano squall version which almost everybody can learn in a half evening

Sounds so dark and powerful in the beginning, it's Amazing...

@tr0llz Sounds like some sort of prince of persia music in the beginning.. :p

the first part is like a turtle..(some ppl might like this but i dont) but the second part is great!

yea i know. I made up a medley too......piano squall intro and other stuff in the middle......i wasnt trying too troll.......you play very well