- Видео 2
- Просмотров 7 384
ForeverKIS
Добавлен 4 янв 2008
Mercedes S Class W222 Sun visor mirror replacement Замена зеркала козырька
A video about how a sun visor (and the mirror inside) could be replaced on a W222. Talking about my successful experience.
Видео о том, как можно заменить козырек (и зеркало в нем) на W222. Говорю о своем успешном опыте.
Видео о том, как можно заменить козырек (и зеркало в нем) на W222. Говорю о своем успешном опыте.
Просмотров: 3 527
Видео
980Ti SLI vs 1080Ti SLI and 6700K vs 9700K in 5 games
Просмотров 3,9 тыс.6 лет назад
I recently upgraded from 6700K 980Ti SLI to 9700K 1080Ti SLI (just cause I found a crazy cheap deal on two 1080Ti's) and decided to make a few videos of gaming benchmarks while testing the new hardware. Since I had to change the motherboard for the new CPU (from z170 to z390), I also had to update the video driver to allow for proper SLI scaling with the new chip. This video is NOT intended to ...
hello! how did you get the mount back in the metal clip - I can't get the mount bracket back in!!??
You still having this trouble? If so, please explain in more detail what mount, what clip. If you mean the whole sunvisor, you'll probably want to extract the metal clip, put it on the sunvisor's leg and then insert it with the clip on until it snaps.
first of all, thanks for the video. great job with the comparisons. I am commenting because of some pretty significant differences with our 6700k/980ti sli setups. I've been running alot of tests lately and your ram speed and timings were seemingly holding your 6700k and 980ti sli setup back substantially and here is why i think that: (i commented on linus' video on ram speed mattering; for more depth to detail), but i just recently upgraded from 16GB 2133 ripjaws to a 16GB 3200 trident Z rgb kit and i had exponential gains with my system. On this particular system, I am running pretty much the same exact MOBO as you with a z170X gigabyte gaming 6 1.1 with 6700k @ 4.5ghz (dynamically volted turbo per-core OC) on corsair h80i v2 with 3200mhz trident Z RGB, and 2 msi 980ti gaming 6G's on 1367 factory OC's. my main storage is a samsung 970 evo. based off of my recent experiences, 2400mhz was assuredly bottle-necking your system as much or more than the 6700k was. you were also very obviously even more bottled on the 9700k tests with 980ti sli(as you can see very clearly by the extremely similar first two results of 6700k vs 9700k both having 980ti sli). 1080ti sli and 9700k is definitely going to be alot better(insanely better with a fast RAM kit), but here are my numbers in the farcry 5 bench with your same settings (i game in 4k on a 1.1 scale, but i changed to compare with yours to the same ultra preset and 2560x1440 on a 1 scale) min: 69(66) average:87(73) max 105(85) and 5137(4225) frames rendered. In 4k on a 1.1, I am averaging 55-56fps (never seen it hit any different in multiple tests) on ultra preset and with my 2133ripjaws i was getting 44 max avg.. all 3 components need to work together because 1 bottlenecks the heck out of another if you have a weak link. 980ti sli and 6700k are way too powerful for 2133 and 2400. 9700K and 1080ti sli are way too powerful for 2133 and 2400 x100000. your RAM was choking the heck out of them. I would be curious to see how your 1080ti sli would do with the 6700k with 3200+mhz ram. i believe the gains would be huge in comparison to what your video portrays. You can also see the very obvious synthetic physics score changes with the upgraded ram also. i was hitting right at 19xxx in firestrike and just the ram change got me just over 21xxx. my timespy went from 89xx to right over 10k. If you are still using that 2400 with 9700k and 1080ti sli, i think you would definitely see some incredible gains by picking up some faster sticks with tighter timings. I've also seen large spikes in every game i've played on this system and my 7600k/1080FTW system i just upgraded to the same 3200mhz ram from 2133 also. My other system with the 7600k went from a 161xx to a 17,3xx in firestrike with the RAM change alone. The huge factor is that it boosted the minimum FPS up exponentially in all of my games in 4k. I have watched countless videos and read so many articles until i can't see anymore on RAM speed affecting gaming performance, and most info you see points to it not changing too much, but i will tell you that it makes a huge difference and i've proven that it does when you have a great CPU and a beastly graphics card setup. the change is even more apparent when gaming in resolutions below 4k and my 4k results were exponential. Thanks again for the video. good stuff.
Thanks for your comment, I may try faster RAM. I've just upgraded to a 3090, will probably do another short benchmark vs 1080 Ti SLI.
@@ForeverKIS minimum 3600mhz CL17 with a 3090 on any cpu. My comment was from a year ago, but I still have my 6700k rig with 3200mhz ram, but in my primary rig, I now run 10700K at 5.1 all turbo core with 32GB 4000mhz @ 4233mhz CL17. Ram speed still matters so much.
@@cdieseldawg5850 I have to disagree with your second comment. I have bought 32 Gb of 4000 MHz CAS 16 RAM (probably acting on your advice) and it showed zero difference in two benchmarks (Witcher 3 and SOTR) at 4K with 1080 Ti SLI comparing to my old 16 Gb of 2400 MHz CAS 14. I have researched this further and while faster RAM may increase FPS at 1080p and to a lesser degree at 1440p in games (where you are CPU bound), at 4K it just doesn't make any difference whatsoever. Literally, 1-2 FPS at best even comparing to 2133 MHz - because at 4K you are GPU rather than CPU bound so RAM speed really doesn't matter. So my conclusion is that with a 3090 (which is meant for 4K gaming - if it is meant for gaming at all) you can actually go with a slower RAM without any FPS loss in games. I hope I can still return these ridiculously expensive 32Gb of junk back to the store and find another second hand 2x8Gb 2400 MHz that I already have just to increase my RAM capacity.
@@ForeverKIS don’t look at your maxes and averages. I promise you your 1% and .1% lows are consistently higher even with 9700k depending on your board. Get into some 2020 or 2021 AAA titles in 4K and check it out. Guarantee you your low FPS is increased substantially. Faster RAM gives a much smoother experience on the low FPS-end. Also, if you are still running an 8/8 9700k, your IMC is going to be a lot weaker than an 8/16 10700k, 10850k or 10900k. Hopefully you bought some Samsung b-die also.. if not, it was pretty much a waste of money. Your board’s power output to your CPU’s IMC can also impact your RAM’s performance even if you have it “stable” at certain speeds. There are so many “cogs in the machine” if you will concerning the RAM speed actually benefitting your system. Everything else in your system must be able to fully collaborate with the RAM capacity and speed to gain its full benefit. Socket power and the specific chip’s ability to handle that power is super important in regards to pushing the IMC way beyond its stock limits. Having 4000+MHz RAM on a 9700K is definitely playing with a threshold because a 9700k imc is nowhere nearly as strong as 10th Gen.
@@cdieseldawg5850 Can you provide benchmarks to substantiate this? I'm sorry all benchmarks I've seen, including my own ones, speak otherwise. Any marginal improvement of 5-10% could be at 1080p, but at 4K there is literally no impact as you are NOT CPU bound at 4K, no matter if you are on 8700K or 10900K. Here is my bench of SoTR at 4K 16Gb 2400 MHz RAM ibb.co/vPd052b and here's 32Gb 4000MHz RAM ibb.co/N7YZD2k - no difference whatsoever in min, max or average FPS. Here's another bench of RDR2 (very demanding recent game) - at 1080p ! ruclips.net/video/gp6wSe4YPz0/видео.html - and even at 1080p the gains between 2400 and 3600 in both min, max, average FPS and frametimes are marginal at best. At 4K there would be no difference. I just don't see how faster RAM can matter in gaming at 4K where you will always be GPU bound. Maybe in the future RAM will catch up but then people will be gaming at 8K already. And given that 3600+ RAM costs over two times 2400 RAM does, I see no sense whatsoever spending hundreds of dollars on faster RAM. I'd rather put that money in a faster CPU, SSD, GPU, anything but RAM at 4K.
Sounds like when you want to duel it up you do need a better CPU. But single GPU use the 6700k works fine for the most part.
Great job done.
NICE BENCHMARK!
Thanks!
wow its 20-30fps more with the 1080ti's and the 9700k in most games...other than shadow of the tomb raider that seems to only care about GPU.. would not have expected that much of a FPS difference. Thanks for the work. Need to upgrade my cpu!
It's not only the CPU, GPUs scale differently sometimes (perhaps due to different motherboard chips or drivers) but on average in games like Witcher 3, Far Cry 5, RoTR which like to use the CPU, especially in open areas and towns, you will want at least an 8700K OC with 1080Ti SLI. Two of these cards are pretty beastly, especially when they scale in the 90% so a slower CPU like 6700K will not always catch up with them. I am overall very content with this setup which cost me half the price of a single 2080Ti and still yields better performance.
@@ForeverKIS I've been running EVGA 1080 ti SC2's in SLI on a 6700k for almost 2 years. Just ordered my parts for my new i9 setup and I'm super excited!