Видео

Mashallah teach those unbelievers the truth about islam

Islam is the truth,the glorious Quran is learn by heart by millions millions people,we have the birmingham manuscript and the sanaa manuscript,we have a solid chain of narration

I like this logic nothing can not make something

So adam said shahaada?

Exactly bro. Basically redherring arguments and nonsense...and then resorting to mockery and insults...aduiii...LOL

Jake literally ran last min!! There’s no reason for him not being able to make it on the big stage debate on fresh and fit. He a coward!! How you say you was gonna debate and then not show up on a huge RUclips channel with millions of subscribers!!

Jayyid jamil akhoya ❤

Debate Sam Shamoun, if you dare, if you “Smeet” should be truthful 💩.

U should delete ur channel “Smeet” 💩

U r a dumbass "Smeet."

Oh and I forgot another thing to add Smeet, I have a good business proposition for you. Why not you sell camel milk mixed with camel urine in Malaysia, similiar to Tongkat Ali. It's Halal as per Sahih Al Bukhari 5686, and is endorsed by the greatest example in Humanity, Muhammad. Note that Bukhari is a Sahih Hadith that all Sunni Muslims (Malaysia only recognizes Sunni) must follow. I am sure this form of pissy medicine for your fellow Sunni Muslims in Malaysia, will overjoy them?! Also don't forget your Halal Certification from JAKIM

Again smeet you disappoint with childish rhetorics, and display such low level thinking skills that you are unable to reply to my comment wholistically. Now, let me help you understand better so that you may upgrade your thinking skills. First, there are laws of nature that are inherently programmed within us, that helps guide us from what is beneficial and harmful for us. This design is necessary for the the two aspects of creation, sustenance and death. As you started to grow up you knew what to avoid for your well being and how to do certain things, despite never being taught by another human being. So in accordance to this you avoid eating dangerous or harmful foods. As such, no rational being will be eating excrement, since its something that we are biologically programmed to avoid. It does not attract our senses as a food source, just as a stone does not excite our appetite since its not beneficial to our bodies. That's how humans are programmed. But I guess, you are incapable of understanding this basic natural law, which is why you have responded the way you have in this video. So no, based on my biological programming, I am not inclined to consume excrement the way you have suggested. That's just you being incapable of understanding and processing what I have commented, and hence responding in this video stupidly. Just goes to show the level of your intellect. All human waste or excrement, originates from your body, and when it is in the body, your wudu and salah is accepted. However, this same excrement when comes outside your body has the power to invalidate your prayer. See the duality here? My foundational question here then becomes, why is the body then not considered najis, since its the source of najis (impurity). Why should then the prayer of a human be accepted if he/she is the source of impurity. This ridiculousness in some Islamic schools of thought (not all) has extended to say that it is Haram for menstruating women to pray. Why would such a wonderous act that emancipates us be denied on the basis of impurity. Is not the Salah greater than all forms of impurity? You mention many times in your video, that Islam is logical. Where's the logic in this? This is the duality that I speak about that comes from the mind of men, and not from God and its creation. The Sikh viewpoint is simple, every biological process in its natural state, exists to perform a certain function. That function is neither good nor bad, clean or unclean, pure or impure. This is the existential reality, and not what you have stated above. What you have stated, pure impure, clean unclean, etc. is a creation of human intellect and hence a duality imposed on the world. Anyone who adopts the Sikh Viewpoint understands, that nature just is, it's neither good nor bad, nor clean and unclean, pure and impure. It is precisely because of this that I am unafraid to say tht God is everything. The truest place where impurity exists is in the minds of human beings. This is what Guru Nanak teaches us in Asa Di Vaar, which I am sure you used to read and listen to as a Sikh previously. We have in our state of human duality classified some things as bad and some things as good. To say that the natural world can invalidate my remembrance, prayer and love for God (as I have said above), is an oxymoron. The truest place where impurity exists is in the minds of human beings. We have perverted our state of virtue and union with God to such an extent, that we are out of balance, which is why religions were needed. Hope you learned something from this Smeet. Do try to think deeply about my comments in the future before you respond.

You are so stupid Hasmeet “Smeet” Chaal.

c,mon you aren't fooling anyone. Without lies islam dies

Show us one ayeaat for whole mankind for humanity even Single one Saal allah hu 😂

😆😆😆😆😆come on sikh guys, you can do better than this....

Continue the good work brother! may Allah bless and protect you. Aameen!

I am an ex muslim too I challenge you for a debate if you like

Now on the message of Islam, my Sikh brother is right in highlighting the five pillars as the core message of Islamic faith. You say that the message of Islam is that there is only One God and that there is non equal to Allah and all those other wonderful things that you said about our Allah. We Sikhs are in full agreement in this and are hardcore believers of this. However, if I already know this message as a Sikh, is it enough for me to just believe in this message to be saved (by Islam’s definition)? Definitely not! I have to acknowledge that I can only get to Allah through Muhammad which is why the core message of Islam is “la ilaha illallah muhammadur rasulullah". Again note, the message is not “la ilaha illallah”, it is “la ilaha illallah muhammadur rasulullah", i.e. Muhammad is part of this message. So please Smeet, be very careful that you are not misrepresenting Islam. Again my Sikh brother is right that the message of Islam is Indeed the 5 pillars In contrast in Sikhi the highest form of faith and deed is the constant remembrance of Allah, Ram, Waheguru. On Page 895, my spiritual master SGGS Ji says, “Meditating in remembrance on the Lord, you shall be saved. This is the most exalted deed. Of all faiths, this is the most sublime and excellent faith.” The Guru is already saying there is no need to a middle man such as Muhammad or Jesus. The Shabad (Word) Guru is here to teach and upon understanding this message, there is no intercession necessary between humankind and Allah / Ram / Waheguru, which is against the core Islamic teaching. Muslims need Muhammad as a middle-man but for the rest of the world that remembers Allah / Ram / Waheguru sincerely, the Grace of Allah / Ram / Waheguru is directly bestowed upon us.

As usual Smeet you do not think through before creating these so-called rebuttal videos. Let us now address the issue of “racism’ in Islam. My Sikh brother in the video is saying that Muslims “**see the world as Muslims and the other half as Kafirs**”. What’s wrong in this statement? It is the truth The word “Kafir" essentially means anyone who is unwilling to say “la ilaha illallah muhammadur rasulullah". This is not racism. It's a clear cut pillar of your Islamic faith. In my case I say, “la ilaha illallah Guru Nanak Kun Allah”, which means that ‘There is no God other than Allah, and Allah through his creative power manifested Guru Nanak’. Hence, I am a Kafir. Kafir in Malay means ‘Orang yang tidak percaya kepada Allah Dan Muhammad sebagai Rasulnya’. Sometimes I really wonder if you know Islam or not. Now, let's discuss the implications of this divisive viewpoint (Muslims and Kafirs) on Muslims. In Quran 3:28, there is specific prohibitions of taking non-believers as friends, allies and supporters except in special circumstances (i.e. when the Muslims are weak). This means a Muslim cannot establish genuine relationships with a Kafir. Now, addressing the Hadith you put forth. If we were to interpret this Hadith the way you have explained, then it contradicts the Quran. However, when taken into context, this Hadith is in relation to the treatment of the different tribes, clans and races of Muslims in the Islamic Ummah delivered by Muhammad as part of his final Khutbah. It does not paint this rosy picture that Muslims are all-loving and compassionate as you have painted. I can find many Hadiths and Quranic verses that elucidate this point, but I think I am clear enough here. As for Sikhs, my master SGGS Ji says “I am a friend to all; I am everyone's friend. When the sense of separation (from others) was removed from my mind, then I was united with the Lord, my King.” on Page 671. Hence, we as Sikhs are indeed everyone's friends. Let me address the next point that you have raised in the next comment

The fact that all the things he spoke against Islam now he is actually following those narratives for example He said Muslim think they are superior, what he is doing now doesn't he think that Sikhs are superior than muslims?His another statement:"One cannot bring non muslims to their parties and functions 😂 I mean from where does this people even come.

MrAkTaraSarNecheJhukaSaFadHatSaBadAnalChaloKarDakhAndarJa

No.. muslims dont struggle.. the knowledge to know the Creator is there if people seek it. Anyway, you dont need to make a video questioning muslims to prove a point about another religion. Just as with every other religions, there will always be a lot of people who dont really practise or fully understand their faith. It would have been better to make videos for sikhs to understand their own faith better.

“Islam” = 💩 , and “Hasmeet Chaal (aka Smeet)” = 💩 , too.

“Muhammad” was an illiterate lunatic who lied because he was raped in a cave by a demon disguised as an angel sent by Satan.

MasahAllah ❤

Smeet, you need ti stop shaking your head too much. You look like the Pondans in Malaysia doing that. And the hairstyle does not help as well

Oh and Smeet, also you seem to always favour disputed sources outside the authentic SGGS. Since you were a Sikh previously, you should know there is no higher authority than SGGS. Any Sikh literature that is against SGGS is rejected. Think of this as similiar to the different Hadith gradings such as Sahih, Daif etc. I have provided the reference above from SGGS that God is everything. Now for Guru Nanak being God himself coming to earth to teach humanity, read Guru Arjan on Page 864 of SGGS. What my Sikh brothers say here on Sikhi is 100% backed by SGGS. As usual Smeet, I am disappointed in you. You claim to know more about Sikhi, but always make sloppy easily rebutted videos. you need to up your game bro.

How does SGGS not agree with what they said that God is everything? Just go read Bhagat Naamdev on Page 485 on SGGS, and what they say is consistent with SGGS Ji. Also how is the Sikh concept of God sitting in his creation yet unaffected by it, and also being beyond his creation is a limited concept. Clearly in this context, God is able to do anything that he wishes. Capable of extending his nature beyond on multidimensional fronts. Seems like Islam is using human limitations (i.e. we humans cannot create something and then be within our creation) as a limiter on Allah's capabilities. Anyone with half a brain is able to see that the limiting condition is set by Islam, since Allah is no longer all capable. It seems Allah is incapable of many things and is bounded by this "human like nature" as defined by Islam. Is the Islamic Allah an all powerful God or not?

Oh and Smeet, also you seem to always favour disputed sources outside the authentic SGGS. Since you were a Sikh previously, you should know there is no higher authority than SGGS. Any Sikh literature that is against SGGS is rejected. Think of this as similiar to the different Hadith gradings such as Sahih, Daif etc. I have provided the reference above from SGGS that God is everything. Now for Guru Nanak being God himself coming to earth to teach humanity, read Guru Arjan on Page 864 of SGGS. What my Sikh brothers say here on Sikhi is 100% backed by SGGS. As usual Smeet, I am disappointed in you. You claim to know more about Sikhi, but always make sloppy easily rebutted videos. you need to up your game bro.

This Try to Defame Sikhi was Pathetic. Ever seen a Sikh finding Errors of Islam unless they are Challenged?

Based on what I see Smeet, you live in this state of constant duality, this eternal struggle of clean and dirty, good and bad, pure and impure etc. unable to rise above duality. The problem seems to be exacerbated with the individuality (ego) within you, causing you being unable to see the light of God in all. You see excrement as something dirty, but a truly enlightened mind sees it as the creation of God that helps sustain the ecosystem of the world. Let us not forget that this same excrement is what goes to the earth to give nutrients to plants and the very food that you eat. Heck even human excrement is a great source of fertilization used in vegetables grown in China, which Malaysians eat (since they export a lot of veges from China). Hence, we are all full of shit 😂😂. In your worldview, Allah is capable of creating imperfections which is what you associate as impure beings and products, such as excrement, dogs and pigs. But the Sikh viewpointbis that there is nothing wrong with the world. The natural world, and it's functioning is perfect, because the creator is perfect. This distinction of good and bad in the natural world is the product of the duality of the mind. Also, I understand that God is Islam needs to be limited, otherwise he would not fit into the finite rulesets that Islam imposes. An infinite, unbounded God becomes very difficult for simple minded Muslims (that prefer not to think, but to follow rules) to comprehend. So if that suits the Muslims, then that is OK. Concepts such as God creating creation, and then sitting in his creation, but remains unaffected by his creation are advanced attributes of God that Islam is unable to comprehend due to its simplistic nature. This is fine if it suits you Smeet, but for those of us that choose to be unbounded in our thinking, we prefer the Guru Granth Sahib as the master of our minds.

السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ ASSALAMU’ALAIKUM WARAHMATULLAHI WABARAKATUHU AKHI I love you soo much! Keep doing this!!!!!

Eslom is from time of Adam ﷺ ❤

Dude said Islam came from Adam and even 😂😂😂. What a joke that you believe in Adam and Eve which is scientifically impossible. There’s something called evolution my friend which has solid evidence not like made up stories of Adam and Eve

Yet also the Guru Granth Sahib scripture is the only first hand source written and composed and signed while the gurus were alive. All these other books like Quran Bible were composed after their deaths. And people corrupted the messages as well

Actually he is right, guru Gobind singh his also stated that Mohamed did not instill the true name of the lord or truth in annoying yet his ego made him preach himself. If you read the Quran there are so many disgusting horrible verses telling Muslims to kill and fight the nonbelievers and only Muslims will get into heaven and everyone else hell fire. Most of these Muslims don’t even read their whole Quran or understand it. Guru Gobind singh Ji brought the ultimate Devine truth to mankind. Also so much in the Quran Mohammad just giving himself certain rights cus he tells everyone he’s the prophet and allah says it’s okay for him to do it. Dude had sex with a 9 year old child

Haqq! It’s clear Wallahi, islam is the truth.

Sempoi bro 👍. Masya Allah

Dr Yaseer Qadhi admitted that the traditional islamic narratives has holes in it. He admitted the Qur'an has not been preserved during his talk with Muhammad Hijab. Even dr Shabbir ally has admitted, the narrative of a single preserved Qur'an no longer holds.

The great thing is that sikhs still have handwritten, Guru Granth Sahib old saroops, thw bokk mundavani ithihaas guru granth sahib containing photos from 1945 an be seen as well as original ones from years 1682, 1688, 1733, many date back to time of tenth guru gobind singh jee. Since 1952, prevalent printed Guru Granth Sahib saroops have been printed in errors and mistakes. All we sikhs need to do is go back to the handwritten ones which are found in majha and malwa regions going back to 1600s and even early 1700s. The case with Qur'an is that, no Qur'an exists from time of Muhammad, according to muslim hadiths, uthman burnt thousands of Qur'an as they were different. But if you search in muslim world, muslims only have Qur'an handwrittan manuscripts dating back to abbasid period, nothing from 610-700. Qur'an Muslims have dont match other old Quran's, for example, topkapi quran contradicts sana'a quran and ghe samarkand Quran is totally full of errors. Topkapi Qur'an from 750 has over 2,000 mistakes and errors and sana'a Quran has been completely changed erased and rewritten. Search Pfander films, Cira international and Dr Dan Brubaker on Variant Quran.

The great thing is that sikhs still have handwritten, Guru Granth Sahib old saroops, thw bokk mundavani ithihaas guru granth sahib containing photos from 1945 an be seen as well as original ones from years 1682, 1688, 1733, many date back to time of tenth guru gobind singh jee. Since 1952, prevalent printed Guru Granth Sahib saroops have been printed in errors and mistakes. All we sikhs need to do is go back to the handwritten ones which are found in majha and malwa regions going back to 1600s and even early 1700s. The case with Qur'an is that, no Qur'an exists from time of Muhammad, according to muslim hadiths, uthman burnt thousands of Qur'an as they were different. But if you search in muslim world, muslims only have Qur'an handwrittan manuscripts dating back to abbasid period, nothing from 610-700. Qur'an Muslims have dont match other old Quran's, for example, topkapi quran contradicts sana'a quran and ghe samarkand Quran is totally full of errors. Topkapi Qur'an from 750 has over 2,000 mistakes and errors and sana'a Quran has been completely changed erased and rewritten. Search, Pfander films, Cira international and Dr Dan Brubaker on Variant Quran.

Why did you delete my comments? What do you have against sikhs? Are you a Pakistani muslim clown?

Hey, Dude Are you a girl? you behave like them. Then Guru Arjan Dev Ji is our 5 th Guru, speak respectfully. How will you feel if we call your prophet Mohammed a pedophile? And secondly I want to remind you that a muslim Sai Mian Mir laid the foundation of the Sikh shrine Harmandir Sahib (Golden Temple), at the request of Guru Arjan Dev Ji, for a sign of peace between the communities.

Did Adam write Quran?😂

Thank you so much respected brother. Proud to be a Muslim.

60 seconds in, and you've already made two fatal mistakes. Ugh. If you'd like to have an honest discussion and start using words correctly, hit me up. (And yes, I respect that English is likely your second language, so no criticism there)

Bro this is so pathetic. You disprove nothigg in each video you post. You don’t even react to the video where they take down all your false claims. Like what? Please stop posting hate if you can’t back it up