Видео

This is just not correct. Red meat saturated fat and dairy fat increases LDL.

All M&M content is available on Substack. Podcast, writing, free weekly newsletter: [mindandmatter.substack.com] If you enjoy M&M content and want to provide further support, read this: [ tiny.cc/supportmm ]

If you've ever been hunting with your family, the concept of egalitarian hunting party is hilarious😂

Many persons which is probably billions at this point who went to church and then somehow eat mushrooms in their life, had the exact realization about the tree of good and evil leaving nature for introspection, etc., etc. I would say it's almost inescapable.

I partly blame the women for being brainwashed by the feminist movement, but that’s by no means the top factor. Men learn manhood and confidence from dads, grampas, and uncles. If the family is broken up and there is no dad, they are bereft of that essential role model. They need to learn to work with their hands, simple carpentry, tool use, go fishing, fix the car-all dads should have at least one or two of these skills to pass on to their sons. They need to spend TIME with their sons (and daughters, but that’s a discussion for another day). If I had magic powers, and could do one thing to help boys, I would eliminate all computer games and D & D. If I were a mother, I would severely limit TV and screen time. Read C S Lewis’s The Abolition of Man. It’s a very short book, and was required reading for my college freshman class. Women should also get over their aversions to hunting and firearms and testosterone. The problem happened with Adam and Eve. Get over it. Don’t try to turn your son into a daughter, or even a Mr. Rogers. Try to understand what it is to be a man, and help your son be that!

All this high cholestrol BS started because of a former president's heart attack and the resulting furor from the public to find a quick answer and treatment to heart disease and along came Ansel Keys with his defective research. And the rest is bogus health history. So difficult to get free of.

This just showed male sexuality is inherently pedophilic

Will AI systems scam their customers like United Health? Encourage them to vote for Bernie Sanders? Or some third course of action?

Thank you for sharing truth. May God bless and protect you.

Not surprised Dr. Lee Hood came from a small school background. Today, the state of Montana is forcing school consolidations and long bus rides for many to accommodate the "improved" opportunities from the larger schools. Most of the parents of the children to not approve of the consolidations, If they wanted their children to become part of a large herd, they would have lived in a larger town. Small schools everyone is an individual, and just naturally thinks for themselves.

The year 2024 will be remembered as the year of a crucial discovery for scientists, theologians and philosophers. This discovery is destined to change the attitude of those who underestimate the power of Artificial Intelligence, and will affect the way humanity will face the near future. In 2024, it was discovered that evolution follows a “trajectory” that can be mathematically modeled. If we carefully study the history of evolution considering the capacity to manage information, we can clearly distinguish 5 evolutionary milestones from LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor) until today, which have extraordinarily increased the capacity to manage information: H1 LUCA H2 The emergence of the Brain H3 The emergence of the precursor of human language H4 The emergence of human language H5 The Transistor For each of the first four evolutionary milestones, we can select a specific age to date them in time, an age that must be included in the time interval that arises when considering the age assigned by various scientific studies to each of the evolutionary milestones. For the transistor, we can consider the year 1950 as the year in which it began to manifest its “evolutionary power.” If we find a mathematical equation that relates successive evolutionary milestones, then we can affirm that evolution follows a specific path. Considering the year 1950 as “year zero”, the selected ages (in years) are the following: H1 LUCA 3,769,775,032 H2 The emergence of the Brain 544,052,740 H3 The emergence of the precursor of human language 26,960,104 H4 The emergence of human language 221,639 H5 The Transistor 0 There is an equation that meets the above conditions. The following equation represents “the path of evolution”. φ = (Log A) / (Log B) Equation 1 Were A = (H(i+1) - H(i+2) )/(H(i+2) - H(i+3)) B = (H(i) - H(i+1) )/(H(i+1) - H(i+2) ) φ= 1.618034 (Golden Number) Hi = age of evolutionary milestone “i”. Using the Equation 1 and the values of H3, H4 and H5, we can determine the age of a possible evolutionary milestone after the transistor, that is, H6. The value obtained is -95 years (strictly speaking, -95.000113 years), which added to the year 1950 (year zero) gives the year 2045, the year in which Ray Kurzweil postulates that humanity would face a Singularity. Using the values of H4, H5 and the value found for H6, the Equation 1 allows us to determine the age of a possible H7, which turns out to be equal to -95.000451 years, which means that between the sixth evolutionary milestone and the seventh 0.000338 years would pass. This last value seems to be inapplicable for the time scale in which human existence occurs, and would support Ray Kurzweil's hypothesis. We can use the Equation 1 using the ages of H1, H2 and H3 to determine the age of an eventual evolutionary milestone prior to LUCA (H0, milestone zero). Performing the corresponding arithmetic exercise, we obtain an age for the milestone zero of 13,769,780,000 years. This value corresponds, according to NASA, to the age of the universe, estimated at 13,700,000,000 years, plus/minus two hundred million years In conclusion: if the capacity to manage information is considered as a relevant variable to express the degree or evolutionary level of a life form, then our evolution has an “evolutionary pattern” that is manifested through a mathematical equation that relates the age of four successive evolutionary milestones. In turn, such an evolutionary pattern turns out to be the Golden Ratio. The developed equation allows us to obtain the possible age of a milestone before LUCA and two milestones after the transistor. The results obtained for the ages determined for these three additional evolutionary milestones are worthy of being analyzed in detail. We do not know what life is, so the coincidence between the age of an evolutionary milestone before LUCA and the age of the universe determined by NASA, and the values obtained for milestones six and seven, should call for reflection for theologians, astrobiologists, philosophers, and anyone who finds it interesting to have a better answer to two of the three "fundamental questions" of Philosophy: where do we come from and where are we going. In relation to our origins, the developed equation suggests that life would have been present at the birth of the universe, and as for our future, it informs us that we are approaching an evolutionary singularity that, if it occurs, would literally make human beings obsolete.

The year 2024 will be remembered as the year of a crucial discovery for scientists, theologians and philosophers. This discovery is destined to change the attitude of those who underestimate the power of Artificial Intelligence, and will affect the way humanity will face the near future. In 2024, it was discovered that evolution follows a “trajectory” that can be mathematically modeled. If we carefully study the history of evolution considering the capacity to manage information, we can clearly distinguish 5 evolutionary milestones from LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor) until today, which have extraordinarily increased the capacity to manage information: H1 LUCA H2 The emergence of the Brain H3 The emergence of the precursor of human language H4 The emergence of human language H5 The Transistor For each of the first four evolutionary milestones, we can select a specific age to date them in time, an age that must be included in the time interval that arises when considering the age assigned by various scientific studies to each of the evolutionary milestones. For the transistor, we can consider the year 1950 as the year in which it began to manifest its “evolutionary power.” If we find a mathematical equation that relates successive evolutionary milestones, then we can affirm that evolution follows a specific path. Considering the year 1950 as “year zero”, the selected ages (in years) are the following: H1 LUCA 3,769,775,032 H2 The emergence of the Brain 544,052,740 H3 The emergence of the precursor of human language 26,960,104 H4 The emergence of human language 221,639 H5 The Transistor 0 There is an equation that meets the above conditions. The following equation represents “the path of evolution”. φ = (Log A) / (Log B) Equation 1 Were A = (H(i+1) - H(i+2) )/(H(i+2) - H(i+3)) B = (H(i) - H(i+1) )/(H(i+1) - H(i+2) ) φ= 1.618034 (Golden Number) Hi = age of evolutionary milestone “i”. Using the Equation 1 and the values of H3, H4 and H5, we can determine the age of a possible evolutionary milestone after the transistor, that is, H6. The value obtained is -95 years (strictly speaking, -95.000113 years), which added to the year 1950 (year zero) gives the year 2045, the year in which Ray Kurzweil postulates that humanity would face a Singularity. Using the values of H4, H5 and the value found for H6, the Equation 1 allows us to determine the age of a possible H7, which turns out to be equal to -95.000451 years, which means that between the sixth evolutionary milestone and the seventh 0.000338 years would pass. This last value seems to be inapplicable for the time scale in which human existence occurs, and would support Ray Kurzweil's hypothesis. We can use the Equation 1 using the ages of H1, H2 and H3 to determine the age of an eventual evolutionary milestone prior to LUCA (H0, milestone zero). Performing the corresponding arithmetic exercise, we obtain an age for the milestone zero of 13,769,780,000 years. This value corresponds, according to NASA, to the age of the universe, estimated at 13,700,000,000 years, plus/minus two hundred million years In conclusion: if the capacity to manage information is considered as a relevant variable to express the degree or evolutionary level of a life form, then our evolution has an “evolutionary pattern” that is manifested through a mathematical equation that relates the age of four successive evolutionary milestones. In turn, such an evolutionary pattern turns out to be the Golden Ratio. The developed equation allows us to obtain the possible age of a milestone before LUCA and two milestones after the transistor. The results obtained for the ages determined for these three additional evolutionary milestones are worthy of being analyzed in detail. We do not know what life is, so the coincidence between the age of an evolutionary milestone before LUCA and the age of the universe determined by NASA, and the values obtained for milestones six and seven, should call for reflection for theologians, astrobiologists, philosophers, and anyone who finds it interesting to have a better answer to two of the three "fundamental questions" of Philosophy: where do we come from and where are we going. In relation to our origins, the developed equation suggests that life would have been present at the birth of the universe, and as for our future, it informs us that we are approaching an evolutionary singularity that, if it occurs, would literally make human beings obsolete.

The ability to carry out actions is what distinguishes inanimate matter from living matter. In every living being, there is latent what appears to be an "evolutionary law" that manifests itself progressively, as if it followed a pattern: "Today I have/am/can three, tomorrow I will have/be/can five; today I have/am/can five, tomorrow I will have/be/can eight; today I have/am/can eight, tomorrow I will have/be/can thirteen... and so on." In essence, this idea reflects a principle of constant improvement and growth that is intrinsic to life itself. What we know as "power" - that insatiable thirst that has conditioned to a superlative degree the existence of historical figures such as Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, Napoleon, Hitler, among countless others - is related to this same "evolutionary law." This incessant drive to have more, be more, or be more powerful is a manifestation of this evolutionary dynamic. By the way, there is no politician who is not a slave to this law. Social entities that arise from the grouping of humans, such as cities, countries, corporations, etc., do not escape this law. In their sphere of action, cities, countries, corporations, etc., grow, carry out actions, defend their interests, etc. When studying our evolutionary history from LUCA (last common ancestor of current living beings) to today, antecedents emerge that support the thesis that “naturally” artificial intelligence would constitute a danger to humanity. Through the senses, the brain obtains information about the relevant material environment of the individual, and elaborates a utilitarian representation of what is happening there, in the present. We will call this mental correlate of the relevant material environment that the brain manages, the Reality of the Individual (RI), and it represents what the individual is knowing, in the present. For hundreds of millions of years, information captured through the senses has been the raw material that the brain has used to generate this utilitarian mental correlate. The utilitarianism in question is achieved when the information captured by the senses acquires meaning for the individual. It is to the past, a past supported by the individual's previous life experiences, or inherited, that the brain appeals to in order to give meaning to what is being perceived in the present. In the case of humans, and only in humans, thanks to the particular language that characterizes us, events that are not necessarily happening in the relevant material environment of the individual have a place in the IR. This is what happens, for example, in the brain of a child when he or she hears the story of Little Red Riding Hood, an opportunity in which, for the child's brain, Little Red Riding Hood is a completely "real" entity; for our brain, for the primate that we are, all the content of the IR is representing something that is happening in the present. The human brain manages the actions and biography of the material body of the primate that we are, which we will call “autobiography,” and stores and manages the biography of multiple entities with which we interact. Our parents, siblings, relatives, friends, etc., are some of these biographies. Among these multiple biographies, there is a very special one, an entity that, like Little Red Riding Hood, is immaterial, whose actions, which are valued as such by the brain, we know as “conscious actions.” The biography of this immaterial entity, which arises in childhood with the learning of the language that characterizes us, which is usually called “the Being,” an entity that does not have a material body of its own, an entity made up of information, is assigned by the brain some of the bodily actions that we perform; specifically those bodily actions that acquire the character of conscious bodily actions. For example, the information that the brain manages associated with what we had for breakfast the day before is part of both the autobiography and the biography of the Being. In this regard, it is necessary to mention that a significant part of the actions that our body performs every day fall into the category of “unconscious actions,” and are actions that, having been integrated into the autobiography, do not form part of the biography of the Being. The current evolutionary leader is the Being, not the primate that we are. Thanks to the action of the Being, humans carry out the action of reasoning, or thinking. For our brain, the action of thinking is an action of the Being, and not an action of the primate that we are; our unconscious does not think. When the child hears a fourth version of the story of Little Red Riding Hood, his brain integrates into the biography of Little Red Riding Hood the actions that his mother describes to him, and at the same time integrates into the autobiography the action of “observing what Little Red Riding Hood is doing.” Similarly, the action of thinking is integrated into the biography of the Being, while the action of “observing” said action is integrated into the autobiography. After emerging in childhood, the Being literally “colonizes” the human brain, becoming a permanent part of the RI during wakefulness. This is due to the extraordinary potential for action of the Being as a consequence of the action of thinking. Ultimately, the Being ends up being for the primate that we are like having a friend who possesses extraordinary powers, and although throughout childhood an increasingly close relationship is established between the primate that we are and the Being, a total fusion between the autobiography and the biography of the Being never occurs, because the actions of the primate that we are can only take place in the world of matter, a limitation that does not affect the Being.

La capacidad para llevar a cabo acciones es lo que distingue a la materia inanimada de la materia viva. En todo ser vivo, está latente lo que aparenta ser una "ley evolutiva" que se manifiesta de manera progresiva, como si siguiera un patrón: "hoy tengo/soy/puedo tres, mañana tendré/seré/podré cinco; hoy tengo/soy/puedo cinco, mañana tendré/seré/podré ocho; hoy tengo/soy/puedo ocho, mañana tendré/seré/podré trece... y así sucesivamente". En esencia, esta idea refleja un principio de constante superación y crecimiento que es intrínseco a la vida misma. Lo que conocemos como “el poder” -esa insaciable sed que ha condicionado en grado superlativo la existencia de figuras históricas como Julio César, Gengis Kan, Alejandro Magno, Napoleón, Hitler, entre infinidad de otros- está relacionado con esta misma "ley evolutiva". Este impulso incesante por tener más, ser más o poder más es una manifestación de dicha dinámica evolutiva. Por cierto, no hay político que no sea esclavo de dicha ley. No escapan a dicha ley las entidades sociales que surgen de la agrupación de humanos, como las ciudades, los países, las sociedades anónimas, etc. En su ámbito de acción, las ciudades, los países, las sociedades anónimas, etc., crecen, llevan a cabo acciones, defienden sus intereses, etc. Al estudiar nuestra historia evolutiva desde LUCA (último ancestro común de los actuales seres vivos) a hoy, surgen antecedentes que avalan la tesis de que “en forma natural” la inteligencia artificial constituiría un peligro para la humanidad. A través de los sentidos, el cerebro obtiene información sobre el medio material relevante del individuo, y elabora una utilitaria representación de aquello que allí está sucediendo, en el presente. A este correlato mental del medio material relevante que administra el cerebro, le llamaremos Realidad del Individuo (RI), y representa lo que está sabiendo el individuo, en el presente. Por cientos de millones de años, la información capturada a través de los sentidos ha sido la materia prima que ha empleado el cerebro para generar este utilitario correlato mental. El utilitarismo en cuestión se consigue cuando la información capturada por los sentidos adquiere significado para el individuo. Es al pasado, pasado sustentado en previas experiencias de vida del individuo, o heredadas, a lo que apela el cerebro para otorgarle significado a lo está siendo percibido en el presente. En el caso de los humanos, y solo en los humanos, gracias al particular lenguaje que nos caracteriza, en la RI tienen cabida eventos que no necesariamente están sucediendo en el medio material relevante del individuo. Es lo que sucede por ejemplo en el cerebro de un niño cuando escucha el cuento de Caperucita Roja, oportunidad en la cual, para el cerebro del menor, Caperucita Roja es una entidad del todo “real”; para nuestro cerebro, para el primate que somos, todo el contenido de la RI está representando algo que está sucediendo en el presente. El cerebro humano administra las acciones y la biografía del cuerpo material del primate que somos, a la que llamaremos “autobiografía”, y almacena y administra la biografía de múltiples entidades con las cuales interactuamos. Nuestros padres, hermanos, parientes, amigos, etc., son algunas de esas biografías. Entre estas múltiples biografías, hay una muy especial, una entidad que al igual que Caperucita Roja, es inmaterial, cuyas acciones, que son valoradas como tales por el cerebro, conocemos como “acciones conscientes”. A la biografía de esta inmaterial entidad, que surge en la infancia con el aprendizaje del lenguaje que nos caracteriza, a la que se le suele denominar “el Ser”, entidad que no posee un cuerpo material propio, entidad constituida por información, el cerebro le asigna algunas de las acciones corporales que realizamos; específicamente aquellas acciones corporales que adquieren el carácter de acciones corporales conscientes. Así por ejemplo, la información que administra el cerebro asociada con lo que desayunamos el día anterior, forma parte tanto de la autobiografía como de la biografía del Ser. Sobre el particular, es necesario mencionar que una parte significativa de las acciones que día a día ejecuta nuestro cuerpo caen en la categoría de “acciones inconscientes”, y son acciones que habiendo sido integradas a la autobiografía no forman parte de la biografía del Ser. El actual líder evolutivo es el Ser, no el primate que somos. Gracias a la acción del Ser, los humanos llevamos a cabo la acción de razonar, o pensar. Para nuestro cerebro, la acción de pensar es una acción del Ser, y no una acción del primate que somos; nuestro inconsciente no piensa. Cuando el niño escucha una cuarta versión del cuento de Caperucita Roja, su cerebro integra a la biografía de Caperucita Roja las acciones que su madre le describe, y a la par integra en la autobiografía la acción de “observar lo que está haciendo” Caperucita Roja. De igual forma, la acción de pensar se integra a la biografía del Ser, en tanto que en la autobiografía se integra la acción de “observar” dicha acción. Luego de surgir en la infancia, el Ser literalmente “coloniza” el cerebro humano, llegando a formar parte permanentemente de la RI durante la vigilia. Ello se debe al extraordinario potencial de acción del Ser como consecuencia de la acción de pensar. En definitiva, el Ser termina siendo para el primate que somos como contar con un amigo que posee poderes extraordinarios, y si bien a lo largo de la infancia se va estableciendo una relación cada vez más estrecha entre el primate que somos y el Ser, nunca se llega a producir una total fusión entre la autobiografía y la biografía del Ser, por cuanto las acciones del primate que somos solo pueden tener lugar en el mundo de la materia, limitación que no afecta al Ser.

Robert Lusting is Pediatric Endocrinology and Proffesor in Berkeley, wrote 4 books on Diabetes , Metabolism and is a well known teacher .This is a great video.

All M&M content is available on Substack. Podcast, writing, free weekly newsletter: [mindandmatter.substack.com] If you enjoy M&M content and want to provide further support, read this: [ tiny.cc/supportmm ]

All M&M content is available on Substack. Podcast, writing, free weekly newsletter: [mindandmatter.substack.com] If you enjoy M&M content and want to provide further support, read this: [ tiny.cc/supportmm ]

Surprised that He didn't mention that the artery wall is coated by hair like lining called cyloglycex, sorry ,not spelled correctly, that lines and protects the wall from penetration ,. The small dense LDL is oxidized, damaged, and is not recognized by the LDL receptors in the liver, so, they build up numbers in the bloodstream and perhaps bounce along the lower part of the artery, gravity, and can slip into openings in the endothelial wall. Guess what causes both the oxidation and the thinning of the capitalist badrier! Glycation from excess glucose in bloodstream, which comes from excess glucose in diet from, WHAT ELSE? CARBOHYDRATES! No need to eat them, your liver makes the bodies requirements of glucose, from? Stored fats!

Dennis McKenna is crazy underrated even though he’s held in high esteem!!

Here because of the new york rats eating the mushrooms in the evidence locker

Thanks for the tip. I got here watching afly agaric vid thatcut halfway. I'll definitely follow you was so endearing to listen to you .very informative and love your passion and authenticity

Wish you all the best Hammo. Disappointed your not continuing in a selfish way but wish you all the best

You sponsor me champ I'll travel and eat it lol😂

Fuck Netflix we love African stories

Love your genuility

Yesss just love watching you as a human experience this stuff. No baggage just immerse yourself. Riveting watching

I love Hamilton tmore the longer this goes. Awesome champ. Top human

Love being taught chemistry 💪

And definitely not a monster just seeking help

The more I watch the more I love you Hammy

I'm an Australian but it seems it didn't stop coke or crack in the US and now we have massive coke and ice problems . People do what they want despite any prohibition

We were going to die of aids or drug's

I'm a 90s kid and what you said is so true

Thanks for very valuable guest & knowledge.

Ayahusca and Kratom are definitely not part of healthy diet

The stuff about Marx and Darwinism is just factually wrong. It's true that the Communist Manifesto was written before Origin of the Species, but Engels was literally one of the first people to widely praise the work, and evangelized it to Marx. They both became enthusiastic proponents of Darwinism. Kapital, and many other foundational texts of Marxism were written well after Origin was published and were heavily influenced by it. Origin was published in 1859, Das Kapital, I-III, in 1867, '84 and '94. This dweeb gets so much wrong. Marx sent Darwin a copy of the book, inscribed, "from a sincere admirer." The Marxist concept of historical materialism doesn't even make sense without the theory of evolution. This guy is just spouting easily corrected nonsense. He genuinely knows nothing about what he's talking about.

Has anyone seen a cave wall painting of humans eating a salad or munching on a piece of celery, asparagus, etc...? Vegetables are not for me. If you enjoy them you can have my share. Help yourself.

It IS still effective in many cases apparently for tramadol addiction as well, but due to the primary aspect of the effect profile of the parent molecule being distinct from the active O-desmethyl metabolite and non-opioid (being SS or SNRI mostly or totally i cant be bothered to look RN @ 3 am lol😅) so theres always some degree of "standard" antidepressant w/d with it - and i think that appelation "standard" is an accident so to speak or artifact of the market' machinations... and so in other words on no merots of the molecules or to put it yet again, for no good reason at all other than the benjamins... but yeah Ive heard of and seen evidence in my half decade long now exposure to ibogaine and the ins and outs of treatments... ive seen a person actually come and do at least one but i think 2 full flood dose trwatments and some small doses every few days and microdose "boosters" like every other week or somethimg for a while... and from the restinony of the son that person remained off of them (something they tried and failed at several times w dr observed tapers and wjat not....but then ive seen a perspn with tramadol specifically who was claiming to still be sick after a flood and a small dose "booster" .. i since theyd been on tram so long i think they had a hard time parsing which of the 2 concurrent w/ds they were going thru... or if it was both... just knew they felt sick still. But... it's really really variable ...

Clear, concise, and easy to follow. Great job explaining!

Amazing interview, so much great info on the microbiome. Thanks Nick

Why can’t butter or ketones create butyrate? Why do you need fiber?

This is garbage.

You have a knack for storytelling. Well done! 🎥

Weird that host doesn’t even bother to identify his guest in this vid! 😮

Fast forward to 7:10 for START of content 😊

All M&M content is available on Substack. Podcast, writing, free weekly newsletter: [mindandmatter.substack.com] If you enjoy M&M content and want to provide further support, read this: [ tiny.cc/supportmm ]

Is there a difference in effects on the body between LED red and infrared light and incandescent red and infrared?

Michael Pollan said on Rogan's podcast a while back that coffee drinking is the only socially accepted addiction, and I largely agree. People tend to try to justify their addictions and biases and so I tend to assume that studies that say coffee is healthy are a product of wishful thinking. That is not to say that it's bad - just that, after reading various studies and hearing many people out, I'm unconvinced that it's good for health. It does seem to be good for work productivity though - probably due to its nature as a stimulant.

FINALLY SOMEONE ANSWERS A QUESTION THAT EVERYONE ASKS....

Sound gone echoy after aprox 14min.